Colombian cyclist Jarlinson Pantano, who won a Tour de France stage in 2016 when he was with the IAM Cycling team, has tested positive for EPO, the UCI has confirmed.
World cycling’s governing body said that the rider was targeted for testing by the Cycling Anti-Doping Foundation.
It added: “The rider has the right to request and attend the analysis of the B sample.
“In accordance with UCI Anti-Doping Rules, the rider has been provisionally suspended until the adjudication of the affair.
“At this stage of the procedure, the UCI will not comment any further on this matter.”
The 30-year-old’s current team, Trek Segafredo, said: “It is with deep disappointment that we have just learned that our rider, Jarlinson Pantano, has been notified of an adverse analytical finding in a sample collected during an out of competition control carried out by the Cycling Antidoping Foundation.
“In accordance with our zero-tolerance policy, he has been suspended immediately.
“We hold our riders and staff to the highest ethical standards and will act and communicate accordingly as more details become available,” it added.
Personally, when crossing the road, going up the stairs or getting out of the bath I'm not going 30 mph and will hit tarmac with my head at that...
Especially because of the lack of any rise in fuel duty, 10th year, I believe.
* [Citation required]
I'm sorry but more than half of these aren't close passes. Ride in the middle of the road. Problem solved.
Ouch! Those are actually painfully similar!
Merino is the answer, especially for the winter Agreed! Especially for skull caps and reduced smell bottom layer. If you see any in Aldi, get them!
Traffic islands are hands down the most dangerous thing for cyclists IMO....
He's just saying what he see's: a disproportionate amount of bad driving from a particular ethnic group. Applying the stereotype that the majority...
I wish I knew, but I appealed immediately two months ago, and I've sent them an enquiry a few weeks ago, but they will neither explain why I was...
Sorry, my comment wasn't clear. I meant that existing methods can do 0.01 m^2, because that's not particularly hard. Some existing methods can do...