Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

news

Highways England decides against banning cyclists from UK’s fastest time trial course

Cycling UK welcomes a ‘victory for common sense’

Highways England has withdrawn a proposed ban on cycling on the A63 near Hull after Cycling UK delivered nearly 10,000 letters protesting the plan.

The A63 Trunk Road forms part of the V718 course on which Marcin Bialoblocki set the 10-mile time trial record of 16m35s in 2016, but earlier this year Highways England was proposed a Traffic Regulation Order to ban cyclists.

A ‘statement of reasons’ cited the high speed of vehicular traffic as well as six collisions involving cyclists, including one fatality.

In 2013, Christopher Auker, riding in a time trial, died following a collision with a stationary caravan. A coroner’s court returned a finding of accidental death.

His widow Elizabeth said: “Neither Chris nor I had any worries about this course – we both felt time-trials were safer on a dual carriageway where there is room for traffic to overtake. This was a freak accident that could not have been foreseen and nothing to do with the time-trial course.”

Cycling UK were concerned that a ban would set a dangerous precedent and delivered 9,500 letters of protest to Highways England’s headquarters in Leeds (by cargo bike).

The charity’s head of campaigns, Duncan Dollimore said: “We have been fighting for 140 years for the rights of cyclists, and we couldn’t let Highways England impose a ban when there was no real basis or justification.

“One of the arguments put forward was that cyclists couldn’t keep up with traffic, but on that basis they would have been banning cyclists on every A-road and many sections of B-road across the country.

“I’m delighted that common sense has prevailed and pleased that Highways England listened to our arguments.

“I’d like to thank all our supporters who took time to take part in the campaign and respond during the consultation period.”

A spokesperson for Highways England said it was now developing cycling and safety improvements for the road.

“We want people using our roads to be safe and alongside Humberside Police were particularly concerned about how safe cyclists would be with increasing volumes of fast moving traffic on the A63 between North Cave and Hull.

“We’re really grateful to everyone who commented on our proposed ban, especially from cyclists themselves.

“We are already developing more cycling and safety improvements for the A63 and in the meantime we urge all road users to use this route safely.”

Alex has written for more cricket publications than the rest of the road.cc team combined. Despite the apparent evidence of this picture, he doesn't especially like cake.

Add new comment

23 comments

Avatar
Woldsman | 5 years ago
1 like

For those not familiar with the A63 and its surroundings, yes there are far more pleasurable roads to cycle along for those not interested in timetrialling.  But that's not the point, is it? 

Since this story broke earlier in the year the local TT folk have voluntarily switched to a section of the 'old A63' between Howden and Selby for their events. The problem is that this is not a dual carriageway, so when cyclists are riding on an out-and-back-course there is limited opportunity for bigger vehicles to pass safely, potentially as cyclists are passing each other in the opposite direction, as opposed to the A63 proper - a dual carriageway with the width to support relatively safer overtakes on those quieter times that CTT events are typically run. 

The downside to this story, which on the face of it has given a welcome outcome, is that recently imposed additional safety requirements - having professional, ie costly, sign erectors put up warnings and, oddly, the doing away with marshals - has meant that TT events have been priced out of taking place and may even be less safe. 

It is good news that the Cyclists' Touring Club/Cycling UK has mobilised to put an end to this dangerous precedent, but given how the whole affair has impacted upon the V718 this would appear to be somehing of a Pyrrhic victory. 

Avatar
burtthebike replied to Woldsman | 5 years ago
0 likes

Woldsman wrote:

For those not familiar with the A63 and its surroundings, yes there are far more pleasurable roads to cycle along for those not interested in timetrialling.  But that's not the point, is it? 

Since this story broke earlier in the year the local TT folk have voluntarily switched to a section of the 'old A63' between Howden and Selby for their events. The problem is that this is not a dual carriageway, so when cyclists are riding on an out-and-back-course there is limited opportunity for bigger vehicles to pass safely, potentially as cyclists are passing each other in the opposite direction, as opposed to the A63 proper - a dual carriageway with the width to support relatively safer overtakes on those quieter times that CTT events are typically run. 

The downside to this story, which on the face of it has given a welcome outcome, is that recently imposed additional safety requirements - having professional, ie costly, sign erectors put up warnings and, oddly, the doing away with marshals - has meant that TT events have been priced out of taking place and may even be less safe. 

It is good news that the Cyclists' Touring Club/Cycling UK has mobilised to put an end to this dangerous precedent, but given how the whole affair has impacted upon the V718 this would appear to be somehing of a Pyrrhic victory. 

That's tragic and appalling.  So they've allowed time trialing and effectively banned it.  Who imposed the additional requirements? I'm sure a lot of people might be persuaded to sign another petition or write to some beaurocrat.

Avatar
Woldsman replied to burtthebike | 5 years ago
0 likes

burtthebike wrote:

Woldsman wrote:

... The downside to this story, which on the face of it has given a welcome outcome, is that recently imposed additional safety requirements - having professional, ie costly, sign erectors put up warnings and, oddly, the doing away with marshals - has meant that TT events have been priced out of taking place and may even be less safe. 

It is good news that the Cyclists' Touring Club/Cycling UK has mobilised to put an end to this dangerous precedent, but given how the whole affair has impacted upon the V718 this would appear to be somehing of a Pyrrhic victory. 

That's tragic and appalling.  So they've allowed time trialing and effectively banned it.  Who imposed the additional requirements? I'm sure a lot of people might be persuaded to sign another petition or write to some beaurocrat.

This is the gist of an interview during yesterday's Radio Humberside 'Drivetime' programme given by Ed Nielson of Vive le Velo, a local bike shop.  Ed has ridden the V718 and supported such events.  He was saying that these impositions (and, I'm sorry, I didn't follow who or what organisation had brought about these restrictions) meant that even he would be unwilling to ride the course again. 

 

Avatar
alansmurphy | 5 years ago
3 likes

Can HE not simply change the speed limit to 30mph?

 

Avatar
Woldsman replied to alansmurphy | 5 years ago
1 like

alansmurphy wrote:

Can HE not simply change the speed limit to 30mph?

Wot, and not go under 20 mins for 10?  3

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to alansmurphy | 5 years ago
1 like

alansmurphy wrote:

Can HE not simply change the speed limit to 30mph?

I don't think it's fair to slow everyone down just to save some lives. Wouldn't it be better to install airbags and crash protection in all the cars and just ban anyone not in a car?

Avatar
Master Bean | 5 years ago
0 likes

I wouldn't cycle between Swindon and Cirencester on the A419 so why would you want to use the main road into Hull. Fast TT course and all that but I'm sure there are more enjoyable quiet roads to cycle along.

Avatar
burtthebike replied to Master Bean | 5 years ago
1 like

Master Bean wrote:

I wouldn't cycle between Swindon and Cirencester on the A419 so why would you want to use the main road into Hull. Fast TT course and all that but I'm sure there are more enjoyable quiet roads to cycle along.

Which bit of "time trial" did you not understand?  Or you could be a troll I suppose.

Avatar
Master Bean replied to burtthebike | 5 years ago
0 likes
burtthebike wrote:

Master Bean wrote:

I wouldn't cycle between Swindon and Cirencester on the A419 so why would you want to use the main road into Hull. Fast TT course and all that but I'm sure there are more enjoyable quiet roads to cycle along.

Which bit of "time trial" did you not understand?  Or you could be a troll I suppose.

There used to be a time trial run on the A419 but the road became too busy and somebody died I think so it was stopped.

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to Master Bean | 5 years ago
2 likes

Master Bean wrote:

I wouldn't cycle between Swindon and Cirencester on the A419 so why would you want to use the main road into Hull. Fast TT course and all that but I'm sure there are more enjoyable quiet roads to cycle along.

I wouldn't want to be trapped in a vehicle stuck in long queues of traffic, belching out damaging air pollution - I'm sure there are more enjoyable ways of spending your time.

Avatar
MikeKay | 5 years ago
1 like

This is a good disision as bans are never a good thing, but the road is unsafe for cyclists as it's a 70mph stretch of duel carageway ( the main road in to hull and it's docks) there is and has always been a good cycle path and alternative routes to avoid using it. Lets just hope the clubs that run the TT's see sense and stop using it to race on.

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to MikeKay | 5 years ago
6 likes

MikeKay wrote:

This is a good disision as bans are never a good thing, but the road is unsafe for cyclists as it's a 70mph stretch of duel carageway ( the main road in to hull and it's docks) there is and has always been a good cycle path and alternative routes to avoid using it. Lets just hope the clubs that run the TT's see sense and stop using it to race on.

I fail to see how the "road" is unsafe. Does it have pit-traps (apart from the usual pot-holes) or did they use exploding tarmac to cover part of it?

I would be willing to bet that the road is perfectly safe, but that there's lots of dangerous drivers using it. Dangerous driving can be tackled with appropriate policing/traffic calming/speed cameras etc., but to just accept it seems like a foolish and short-sighted decision.

Let's apportion blame where it belongs - the road is innocent and it's the inconsiderate/uncaring/thoughtless drivers that are making it unsafe.

Avatar
ChrisB200SX replied to MikeKay | 5 years ago
5 likes

MikeKay wrote:

This is a good disision as bans are never a good thing, but the road is unsafe for cyclists as it's a 70mph stretch of duel carageway

I think you'll find that the dual carriageway moves at 0mph, relatively speaking of course.
FYI, the speed limit on the stretch of road has nothing to do with cycling.

Avatar
CygnusX1 replied to ChrisB200SX | 5 years ago
1 like

ChrisB200SX wrote:

MikeKay wrote:

This is a good disision as bans are never a good thing, but the road is unsafe for cyclists as it's a 70mph stretch of duel carageway

I think you'll find that the dual carriageway moves at 0mph, relatively speaking of course.
FYI, the speed limit on the stretch of road has nothing to do with cycling.

Hmm... if we are strictly  relatively speaking, if a cyclist (lets assume a time triallist) is doing an average speed of just under 30mph eastbound along the A63, then relative to the reference point of the cyclist, the A63 is moving at 30mph west.

Physics is great.

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to CygnusX1 | 5 years ago
1 like

CygnusX1 wrote:

ChrisB200SX wrote:

MikeKay wrote:

This is a good disision as bans are never a good thing, but the road is unsafe for cyclists as it's a 70mph stretch of duel carageway

I think you'll find that the dual carriageway moves at 0mph, relatively speaking of course.
FYI, the speed limit on the stretch of road has nothing to do with cycling.

Hmm... if we are strictly  relatively speaking, if a cyclist (lets assume a time triallist) is doing an average speed of just under 30mph eastbound along the A63, then relative to the reference point of the cyclist, the A63 is moving at 30mph west.

Physics is great.

From Voyager 1's frame of reference, they'd both be travelling at around 38000mph. Just slow down!

Avatar
rkemb | 5 years ago
3 likes

Seems to me that HE are admitting to failing in whatever duty or responsibility they havd to provide and maintain a safe road system. Surely once you start banning classes of users as your facility is now "too dangerous" for them it's time for some serious questions to be asked about what your priorities (and statutary duties?) actually are.

Avatar
rkemb | 5 years ago
2 likes

Quote:

A spokesperson for Highways England said it was now developing cycling and safety improvements for the road

Which is obviously what they should have done in the first place, at the design stage, to ensure that the road was fit to be used by all classes of users who have a right to use it. Have they learned any lessons from this?

Avatar
brooksby replied to rkemb | 5 years ago
2 likes

rkemb wrote:

Quote:

A spokesperson for Highways England said it was now developing cycling and safety improvements for the road

Which is obviously what they should have done in the first place, at the design stage, to ensure that the road was fit to be used by all classes of users who have a right to use it. Have they learned any lessons from this?

The original road.cc story on this quoted HE as saying

"Concerns have been raised for the safety of cyclists using the A63 Trunk Road between North Cave Interchange and Daltry Street Interchange. Cyclists are travelling on a carriageway that carries average speeds of 65mph for traffic, at a rate of over 2,500 vehicles per hour. In the last 5 years there have been six accidents involving cyclists, including a fatality in 2013."

It doesn't, nor does HE, say how many accidents involving motor vehicles there've been on that road over the same period, but I'd guess its a greater number.

When was the road actually constructed or dualled?  Was it during the Cycling Dark Ages when everyone was expected to drive a car everywhere no matter what?

Seems to me, HE has already put forward a cast-iron case for why they need to build an off road, segregated cycle way or, (given the likely numbers of pedestrians there) even a shared-use facility...

Avatar
longassballs | 5 years ago
1 like

I was in Connecticut recently at my great Aunts house mowing the lawn when I happened upon what looked like a bucket load of builders hardcore dumped in the middle. I told her and carried on mowing. A couple of minutes later (at max 5) I turned around and saw a cop standing over the rubble taking notes. Due to the noise of the mower I can neither confirm nor deny whether he used his siren to get there

Avatar
ChrisB200SX | 5 years ago
3 likes

I wonder what the council are now doing about the quite obvious huge danger to cyclists that they tried to use as the reason to ban cycling on this road?
Oh, just "encouraging" everyone to use the road safely.

Avatar
Woldsman replied to ChrisB200SX | 5 years ago
1 like

ChrisB200SX wrote:

I wonder what the council are now doing about the quite obvious huge danger to cyclists that they tried to use as the reason to ban cycling on this road?
Oh, just "encouraging" everyone to use the road safely.

Neither Hull City Council nor the East Riding of Yorkshire Council had anything to do with this nonsense. The request to Highways England came from Humberside Police. 

Avatar
Jetmans Dad replied to Woldsman | 5 years ago
4 likes

Woldsman wrote:

The request to Highways England came from Humberside Police. 

Humberside Police have a dismissive attitude towards both cycling events and cycling generally. A friend of mine is chair of one of the local clubs and was told in no uncertain terms that HP would refuse to allow a particular event to take place unless the club had applied for road closures when the event didn't need them (and had run for a number of years very safely and successfully without them) and would almost certainly not be granted them. 

This year I have suffered very two close passes on my commute into work by police cars, one of which took place on a section of solid double white lines which they happily straddled ... and on neither occasion were they running with sirens or flashing lights as I would happily have got out of their way if they had been. 

I have also had "discussions" with two separate police drivers in Hull city centre about the bad example they were setting by illegally pulling into the ASZ beside me while the lights were red. The first ignored me, the second told me I should probably "mind my own business".

But then, considering their response to our last burglary was to give me a crime number so I could claim on my insurance but add that there was unlikely to be any investigation because it was low priority, I guess it should be expected. 

Avatar
burtthebike | 5 years ago
8 likes

Well done Cycling UK and everyone who took the time to write in and comment.

Just goes to show what can happen when enough cyclists work together, even when most of them won't ever ride that course, a lesson for all the other times the authorities come up with some diabolical anti-cycling scheme and the people opposing need help.  You help them, and next time, they help you, and together we can start turning this gigantic supertanker of motor vehicle domination around.

Latest Comments