Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

news

Cycling likely to suffer in government spending review

Major roads and rail are likely to be given priority

The Times reports that cycling is likely to lose out to road building and rail upgrade projects when five-year budgets for government departments are set out next month. A source close to the spending review told the newspaper that cycling was “off the agenda” with government departments seeking £20 billion of savings by 2020.

The government has pledged to create a Cycling and Walking Investment Strategy which should entail a five-year funding and investment plan, including a legal commitment to report on the achievement of specific aims. However, it seems unlikely that budgets will exceed those previously set.

There were already concerns over an approaching cliff edge for cycle funding when Local Sustainable Transport Funding runs out in April with CTC’s Sam Jones suggesting it could take more than 18 months for the Cycling and Walking Investment Strategy to be drawn up. That would leave the eight cities receiving Cycle City Ambition funding, plus London, as the only places with cycling investment.

The situation is compounded by the fact that ministers are under pressure to protect a £15.2bn programme to upgrade a hundred A-roads and motorways as well as Network Rail’s £38.5bn upgrade plan. Cycling is therefore likely to feel the squeeze, with minor council-managed roads and grants for bus services also likely to be affected.

A spokesman for the Department for Transport said: “The government wants to double the number of journeys made by bicycle. We want to create a cycling nation. We will be setting out the timescales and wider aims for the cycling and walking investment strategy shortly.”

New budgets are to be announced on November 25.

Last week the chairman of UK Anti-Doping (UKAD) claimed that the ‘integrity of UK sport is at risk’ after being warned to expect a huge budget cut. David Kenworthy is braced for his organisation to receive a 25 per cent reduction in budget which he says would leave it ‘almost dead in the water’.

A government spokesperson said that decisions on future funding would be made at the November 25 spending review, but that it had been made clear that all parts of the public sector would be required to find savings through efficiencies and reforming the way things are done in a bid to ‘deliver more with less’.

Alex has written for more cricket publications than the rest of the road.cc team combined. Despite the apparent evidence of this picture, he doesn't especially like cake.

Add new comment

17 comments

Avatar
grayvelo | 8 years ago
0 likes

I'm sure we could have a whip-round and help replace the tenner budget they've spent over the last couple of years. 

Avatar
Awavey | 8 years ago
0 likes

clearly the cycling funding provided under previous flavours of goverment was such a nirvana of free money,Id clear completely forgotten all about it ever happening.

look the government spends next to the square root of nothing on cycling, you could take away the whole budget and it wouldnt even begin to dent the 20billion they need to find, and actually not increasing spending but maintaining the existing low levels isnt a cut !!!

so that isnt really the message the DfT spokesperson is attempting to get out, the message is the road/rail infrastructure building,which alot of MPs had put in their election literature because building roads/railways actually wins more votes than building cycling lanes, is likely to be safe.

and building roads/railways,however annoyingly expensive it is isnt anti environment, its not done because goverments hate the countryside, or have been brainwashed and want to concrete it all over, it provides a measurable economic boost,because you employ hundreds of thousands of people across thousands of companies in the whole delivery chain of the construction, all of who get paid so have money to spend in hundreds of thousands of other places and it becomes a virtuos circle.

think how much money has literally been poured into Crossrail, and how many people work on it, and thats just 1 project.

Avatar
Must be Mad | 8 years ago
1 like

I have my "not surprised" face on.

The people are getting what they voted for.

I am surprised by just how extreamly right wing this Tory govement are being -  there is no pretense at fair govenment of the country, just wall to wall  greed, blantant short term thinking and openly lining their own pockets as fast as they can. But what I really don't understand is why people voted for this (???) Yes, I know Labour are crap, but at least they are not evil.

Avatar
barbarus | 8 years ago
0 likes

To be fair I'm as left wing as they come but underfunding cycling infrastructure is not exclusively a Tory trait. Sadly we are just low down the pecking order.

Avatar
Airzound | 8 years ago
1 like

As a cyclist you can actually ride on these new roads as well ........... unless they are motorways.

Avatar
Jonny_Trousers replied to Airzound | 8 years ago
0 likes

Airzound wrote:

As a cyclist you can actually ride on these new roads as well ........... unless they are motorways.

Ah, Airzound! You were an end of the bell variety at bikeradar and I see you are here, too. In a strange way I've missed you. 

Avatar
brooksby replied to Airzound | 8 years ago
0 likes

Airzound wrote:

As a cyclist you can actually ride on these new roads as well ........... unless they are motorways.

 

yes, and most of the protected road schemes *are* motorways and turning-roads-into-virtual-motorways schemes. And it's the primary road network- again motorways- which will be funded by the VED ring fencing.

Avatar
ChairRDRF | 8 years ago
0 likes

If this and he previous Government had not dropped the fuel tax accelerator there would be plenty of money for cycling, not to mention the lots for the NHS etc. Also, why should the road "upgrading" be protected? It is there to accomodate - or to be more precise, actually generate - additional motor traffic.

Avatar
Colin Peyresourde replied to ChairRDRF | 8 years ago
0 likes

ChairRDRF wrote:

If this and he previous Government had not dropped the fuel tax accelerator there would be plenty of money for cycling, not to mention the lots for the NHS etc. Also, why should the road "upgrading" be protected? It is there to accomodate - or to be more precise, actually generate - additional motor traffic.

what is the fuel tax accelerator?

they may be protecting the roads because actually the motor vehicle is still an important device for business and industry. Just a thought....the bicycle still isn't the answer to everything.

Avatar
Jonny_Trousers | 8 years ago
1 like

Shower of cnuts!

Avatar
HarrogateSpa | 8 years ago
1 like

I hope this isn't true, but it seems likely given what else we know about this government.

I tended to think that cycling was the one policy area where the Conservatives were capable of enlightened and progressive policy. They're busy destroying the renewable energy sector, lobbying against more stringent emissions tests for vehicles, and damaging or destroying the BBC. If they remove cycling funding as well, I will despair.

I tend to think that road.cc is not the right place for political comment, but on this occasion I'll make an exception. Osborne and rest are Barbarians.

Avatar
LeighNichol | 8 years ago
4 likes

I actually hate the Tories. Its one thing after another with these smug arrogant twats. Just give us a few crumbs eh Dave and George, instead of taking all the time, what with stealth taxes, benefits cuts, selling everything off, why not give a little something back? Self serving arseholes.

It might seem that as a cyclist I would expect more, but so many people are doing it now, and so many want to but won't because they're scared of the roads. Just help us out a little bit eh and the savings regarding money, health, the environment are quite obviously huge.

Avatar
brooksby replied to LeighNichol | 8 years ago
6 likes

LeighNichol wrote:

I actually hate the Tories. Its one thing after another with these smug arrogant twats. Just give us a few crumbs eh Dave and George, instead of taking all the time, what with stealth taxes, benefits cuts, selling everything off, why not give a little something back? Self serving arseholes.

It might seem that as a cyclist I would expect more, but so many people are doing it now, and so many want to but won't because they're scared of the roads. Just help us out a little bit eh and the savings regarding money, health, the environment are quite obviously huge.

 

in  all fairness they're not Entirely self serving. A lot of people they help are their very good friends, who went to the same schools and are members of the same clubs. 

 

 

Avatar
brooksby | 8 years ago
3 likes

Government wants to double the number of people cycling by waving a magic wand and scattering pixie dust, not by actually- err - spending money. Meanwhile, road schemes for roads dedicated to motor traffic continue to have money thrown at them. Why am I not surprised...

Avatar
jasecd | 8 years ago
1 like

Just pathetic.

Avatar
Critchio | 8 years ago
3 likes

Not surprised really. It's always too little too late with every government we've had regardless of alignment. This is nothing more than lip service, always will be. Has any government ever truly delivered on their promises and intentions? No. They are all a bunch of corrupt parasites in it for themselves and their own fat pockets who play the game of politics but don't actually achieve anything for those they represent. Rant over. Ride time.

Avatar
mrmo | 8 years ago
5 likes

is this a surprise, another case of talk the talk and fail to follow through. The car is still king, that the UK government was lobbying against the tightening of emissions says a lot. 

Latest Comments