Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

“Cyclists dismount” sign put up as roadworks begin on “ham-fisted” bike lane repeatedly targeted by “brazen” cone-stealing vandals, despite road being open to motor traffic

Thieves had stolen over 600 cones from the cycle lane earlier to turn it into a third motor lane, with a Conservative councillor claiming that the bike lane had been done in “ham-fisted way” 

Cyclists have slammed Trafford Council for putting up an advisory “Cyclists dismount” sign as roadworks have begun to replace the cones on the “ham-fisted” cycle lane repeatedly targeted by vandals, despite the road still being open to motor traffic.

The cycle lane on A56 in Stretford, Greater Manchester first came under scrutiny last year when it was targeted by vandals who removed the segregation cones to turn the bike lane into a third motor vehicle lane, with vehicles soon queueing up to fill the road and the removed cones stacked at the side of the road.

The news came in the same week that Manchester was ranked as the 'worst in Europe for clean and green transport' in a Clean Cities Campaign report. And then just days later, the vandals were at it again, this time removing the cones along the entire stretch of infrastructure, resulting in exasperated local cyclists calling for more effective segregation.

Now a year later, Trafford Council announced a £2 million investment dedicated at removing the “ham-fisted” cones and replacing it with better infrastructure to improve the segregation between the A-road and the cycle lane.

Local politicians and residents rejoiced at the decision, the relief running so high that a Labour councillor for Trafford, Aidan Williams, told the BBC he was “going to resist the urge to individually remove each traffic cone by drop-kicking it”.

However, just days after the announcement, as inroads have started to appear into the three-and-half month project, starting with the removal of barriers between the pavement and the cycle lane, one cyclist has shared an image of a Cyclists dismount sign that has been put up next to the bike lane on the pavement.

> "Ham-fisted" cycle lane cones to be replaced with protected cycling infrastructure — as councillor resists urge to "individually remove each traffic cone by drop-kicking"

However, the road is still functional and open to motor traffic, leaving cyclists confused and disappointed.

“There's a Cyclist Dismount appeared on the A56! This sign should not be used, and is itself obstructing the pavement. Cycles are allowed on the road, and the signage should be saying "Do not overtake  cyclists". Please sort this @TraffordCouncil,” wrote Katcycle on Twitter.

She added: “It’s not possible for all cyclists to dismount and walk so arrangements should be made to allow cyclists to proceed without dismounting. I suspect temporary signage during work is not part of the planning.”

Another person wrote: “Its blocking the footway pavement, when it should be on the Carriageway pavement. It is totally non compliant per TSRGD [Traffic Signs Regulations and General Directions] Chapter 8 for road works which MUST provide a MINIMUM of 1.5m width.”

Meanwhile Tom said: “Fine, I'll dismount, but it'll take a lot longer to get through the lights,” while Melanie also echoed similar sentiment, writing: “I find myself very tempted with those signs to dismount and walk my bike through on the road very slowly…”

The temporary cycle lane on Chester Road was installed at the start of the Covid19 pandemic in an effort to ‘promote walking, wheeling and cycling choices for shorter journeys’, according to Trafford Council. But, the scheme proved unpopular with some — with a petition to scrap it receiving nearly 3,000 signatures in 2021.

Last year, Conservative Councillor Nathan Evans said the cycle lanes had been done in a 'ham-fisted' way, adding: “There's clearly a problem but the way they are treating cyclists, it's totally ridiculous. Maybe we can't afford [proper cycle lanes] but if we are going to do it, let's do it properly.”

Trafford Council has outlined the improvement plans, with protected cycle lanes featuring heavily throughout the proposals for the one-mile stretch of the A56 Chester Road in Stretford.

Images of the potential upgrades show cycle lanes segregated with wand-style bollards from the Talbot Road junction to "a point just north of the M60 Junction 7". This will also be accompanied by a "buffer strip" to increase the distance between the cycle lane and the multiple lanes for motorists.

There will be improved crossings to benefits cyclists and pedestrians, while new vehicle loading restrictions will be introduced on the route to prevent "loading or unloading at any time”.

A56 cycle lane (@jbizzleymcbizzl/Twitter)

> Cyclists call out latest bike lane vandalism as city named 'worst in Europe for green transport'

Last summer, the police were involved after over 600 cones were stolen from the A56 in a "systematic theft" that prompted cyclists to urge the council to bypass the conflict and make the roads safer by installing a proper protected cycle lane.

Following the announcement of the plans, Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham defended the idea for a new segregated cycle path. “The world where drivers dominate and cars have got all the road – we just can't be in that world anymore because life is changing,” he said.

Adwitiya joined road.cc in 2023 as a news writer after completing his masters in journalism from Cardiff University. His dissertation focused on active travel, which soon threw him into the deep end of covering everything related to the two-wheeled tool, and now cycling is as big a part of his life as guitars and football. He has previously covered local and national politics for Voice Cymru, and also likes to write about science, tech and the environment, if he can find the time. Living right next to the Taff trail in the Welsh capital, you can find him trying to tackle the brutal climbs in the valleys.

Add new comment

19 comments

Avatar
bensynnock | 4 months ago
1 like

I will always ignore these signs.

Also, there are a few cycle paths on roads where I cycle which have permanent cyclists dismount signs. So I use the road for their entire length. It isn't cycle infrastructure if I can't cycle on it.

Avatar
Andrewbanshee | 5 months ago
2 likes

I accidently lay them face down.

Avatar
Benthic | 5 months ago
3 likes

A mandatory 'no overtaking' sign would be better for cyclists' safety.

Avatar
wtjs replied to Benthic | 5 months ago
1 like

A mandatory 'no overtaking' sign would be better for cyclists' safety

Except the police would pay no attention to it and would  refuse to enforce it, just as they ignore the 'mandatory' rules about not passing traffic lights at red, not crossing single or double unbroken white lines, not using handheld mobile phones while driving etc. etc. Therefore, the worst kind of driver would flaunt their disobedience of this rule, like they do for all the others.

Avatar
open_roads | 5 months ago
6 likes

We need a new offence by which any motorist removes bike lane infrastructure automatically losss their right to drive.

Avatar
Pub bike | 5 months ago
11 likes

Definitely considering getting off my bike and walking in the middle of the road next time I see a "cyclist dismount" sign.  On the other hand where is the cyclist mount sign at the other end?

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to Pub bike | 5 months ago
8 likes
Pub bike wrote:

Definitely considering getting off my bike and walking in the middle of the road next time I see a "cyclist dismount" sign.  On the other hand where is the cyclist mount sign at the other end?

Careful - planning on holding up traffic can land you five years in prison

Avatar
Săndel replied to hawkinspeter | 5 months ago
3 likes

Only the planning, right?

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to Săndel | 5 months ago
3 likes

That would seem to make the difference - if you crashed through "careless driving" which e.g. caused everyone to be held up on a motorway for hours that's clearly not as bad as deliberately planning to cause disruption according to recent cases?

(Yeah apples and oranges but clearly the thought is "those in automobiles must be facilitated make progress.  Even if we facilitate (or tacitly ignore) some of them making progress in a way which is likely to slow everyone's progress and perhaps stop a few peoples', permanently).

Avatar
eburtthebike replied to chrisonabike | 5 months ago
1 like
chrisonabike wrote:

That would seem to make the difference - if you crashed through "careless driving" which e.g. caused everyone to be held up on a motorway for hours that's clearly not as bad as deliberately planning to cause disruption according to recent cases?

I wonder if anyone from JSO reads road.cc and is planning a few "accidents".

Avatar
brooksby replied to hawkinspeter | 5 months ago
6 likes
hawkinspeter wrote:
Pub bike wrote:

Definitely considering getting off my bike and walking in the middle of the road next time I see a "cyclist dismount" sign.  On the other hand where is the cyclist mount sign at the other end?

Careful - planning on holding up traffic can land you five years in prison

But they'd just be following the instructions on the signage : it says cycle lane closed and it says to dismount.

It doesn't say dismount and push your bike along the narrow footway where you'll be blocking oncoming pedestrians, prams, wheelchairs etc...

Avatar
Pub bike replied to brooksby | 5 months ago
4 likes

Maybe the signage is telling me I should dismount and then just stand there in the middle of the road and await further instructions.  How long will it be before the authorities tell me what to do next I wonder?

Avatar
brooksby replied to Pub bike | 5 months ago
3 likes
Pub bike wrote:

Maybe the signage is telling me I should dismount and then just stand there in the middle of the road and await further instructions.  How long will it be before the authorities tell me what to do next I wonder?

Well, gosh, you'll just have to wait and find out  4

Avatar
Pub bike replied to brooksby | 5 months ago
3 likes

Dismount can also mean "remove (something) from its support.".

Is the sign telling me to remove the "cyclist dismount" sign from its support?

I think that is the better solution whether it is the intended meaning or not.  I usually carry tools so this shouldn't be too difficult.  When challenged I can just say I was following the instructions on the sign.  

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to Pub bike | 5 months ago
3 likes

Or is it missing a space and an "s"? Perhaps it's trying to sow discord between riders by encouraging criticism of our rides?

"Cyclists diss mount"

Avatar
check12 | 5 months ago
0 likes

one of Eminem's new album tracks should have been about click bait / anger engagement advertiser impression news.

 

Avatar
Homebaker | 5 months ago
9 likes

It's simple. Close the road to motor vehicles whilst the road works for the vandalising of the cycle infrastructure takes place. Every time it happens, close the road.

Avatar
Spangly Shiny replied to Homebaker | 5 months ago
2 likes

These are motorists you're talking about. They are generally too self absorbed to recognise a hint if it attacked them with a belay pin. (Was going to say baseball bat but I thought to keep it non septic.)

Avatar
bensynnock replied to Homebaker | 4 months ago
0 likes

They would drive on the pavement to get round the closure.

Latest Comments