Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Southwark Council warned TfL that longer route will make riders avoid Cycle Superhighway

Works progressing on originally planned route despite council's belief people will use direct route instead...

Southwark Council warned Transport for London that cyclists will not use a section of the forthcoming North-South Cycle Superhighway because it makes a detour that will add 350 metres to their journeys, it has emerged.

According to the news website London SE1, Mark Williams, the council’s cabinet member for regeneration, planning and transport, wrote to TfL in December to outline his concerns, with the letter only recently being made public.

He said that cyclists would be likely to ride the short distance from St George’s Circus to Elephant & Castle, the southern end of the £17.5 million route, via London Road, rather than following the Cycle Superhighway along Lambeth Road and St George’s Road.

"Whilst we understand the reasons for doing this, due to the road widths, and the inability to deliver segregated facilities on London Road, the council considers that London Road is the desire line and most direct route which will be used by most cycle commuters," he wrote.

Councillor Williams added: "We have agreed with TfL to a plan and a set of measures to improve the public realm and cycling facilities along London Road and our support for the implementation of the north-south route is contingent on these measures being delivered at the same time."

Nigel Hardy, head of road space management at TfL, wrote to Councillor Williams in February, telling him: "We are investigating proposals for improvements to London Road and hope to consult on the scheme in the near future."

By then, however, TfL’s board had already approved plans for the North-South Cycle Superhighway from King’s Cross to the Elephant & Castle following a consultation exercise conducted late last year.

Construction began in March on the part of the route in question, with Mayor of London Boris Johnson visiting St George’s Circus to help get the works under way.

In its Response to Consultation published in January, TfL highlighted that a number of respondents including Sustrans, the Cycling Embassy of Great Britain and the inclusive cycling charity Wheels for Wellbeing, “would prefer the proposed route to use a more direct link between Elephant & Castle and St George’s Circus.”

TfL says the responses saw most of them “specifying a preference for London Road and the remainder concerned about the indirect routing, but without stating a preferred road.”

Addressing those issues in its report, TfL said:

Some respondents asked why the North-South route doesn’t use London Road rather than St George’s Road and Lambeth Road. We recognise that London Road is a more direct route for cyclists between Elephant & Castle and St George’s Circus, however, because of width constraints on London Road, it is not possible to provide a segregated cycle track along here. London Road is a very busy bus corridor with 223 buses in the morning peak hour. To provide good quality segregation on London Road would require removing either two general traffic lanes or two bus lanes.

Removal of bus lanes would significantly impact bus journey times. The removal of general traffic lanes would require need an additional junction. This would require a new design and prevent delivery of the Elephant & Castle scheme by 2016.

The alignment along St George’s Road and Lambeth Road is 245m longer but equates to only an additional 15 seconds northbound and 2 seconds southbound.

St George’s Road/Lambeth Road will also be a much more pleasant environment to cycle in because of the urban realm improvements proposed and a new pedestrian crossing. In addition, the St George’s Road alignment benefits the many cyclists that pass through the Lambeth Road/St George’s Road junction who would otherwise not be catered for.

We are proposing to make some further improvements to London Road as part of a separate scheme which is due to be consulted upon in 2015.

We will ensure that these proposals tie in with both the North-South and Elephant & Castle roundabout schemes.

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

12 comments

Avatar
Roger Geffen | 8 years ago
0 likes

Despite generally supporting the proposals, CTC voiced concerns not only over the detour between St George's Circus and the Elephant & Castle, but also the decision to use a single two-way cycle track for this route. We fear this is likely to worsen safety for south-bound cyclists at junctions, and will probably also result in greater delays at junctions.

These factors are also likely to deter some (by no means all) southbound cyclists from using the superhighway - especially if their journey both starts and ends to the east of the superhighway (e.g. from Clerkenwell to Borough) or continues beyond the Elephant & Castle (where use of the superhighway involves BOTH of these disadvantages).

Having said this, we're still glad the scheme is going ahead, despite attempts by opponents to derail it. Here's what we said in response to the consultation: http://www.ctc.org.uk/blog/roger-geffen/thumbs-boriss-crossrail-bikes

Roger Geffen
Campaigns & Policy Director, CTC

P.S. The use of a single two-way cycle track on the East-West superhighway is far less problematic than on the North-South superhighway, given the way that the Thames limits the number of potentially problematic junctions.

Avatar
pmanc | 8 years ago
0 likes

Some cycle superhighways (including east-west and north-south) I put on a Google map in case it's of interest. There might be better maps around but it's very poor that TfL can't provide an official version of something like this.

https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer?mid=z8X9aFfV8hBI.kM_LtWjTn4PY

The bit specified is right at the bottom of the north-south CSH.

Avatar
bdsl replied to pmanc | 8 years ago
0 likes
pmanc wrote:

Some cycle superhighways (including east-west and north-south) I put on a Google map in case it's of interest. There might be better maps around but it's very poor that TfL can't provide an official version of something like this.

https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer?mid=z8X9aFfV8hBI.kM_LtWjTn4PY

The bit specified is right at the bottom of the north-south CSH.

Thanks, that's an informative map. But I think you've made the N-S CSH a bit too long. The current building works are only going as far north as Stonecutter Street, near Holborn Viaduct.

Avatar
pmanc replied to bdsl | 8 years ago
0 likes
bdsl wrote:

The current building works are only going as far north as Stonecutter Street, near Holborn Viaduct.

Thanks for the comment. The proposal maps here:
https://consultations.tfl.gov.uk/cycling/8806f3e1

and the map on page 11 (3?) of the response to consultation linked here:
https://consultations.tfl.gov.uk/cycling/northsouth

...both show the plans going up to Greville Street. Further north than that is the proposed section as indicated on my map and the response to consultation.

The web page says

Quote:

TfL is continuing to explore options for the route north of Stonecutter Street, taking into account the presence of developments such as Crossrail on this section of the route and will consult on the details in the near future. The developments will not hold up construction of the route between Elephant & Castle and Stonecutter Street although with some changes to the proposals set-out for consultation.

so maybe it's just a delay on section due to crossrail etc?

Avatar
darrenleroy | 8 years ago
0 likes

The East West Superhighway is going to fail to attract cyclists who live along the east-west access west of Hyde Park. We'll still continue to take our lives in our hands through Notting Hill Gate, Shepherd's Bush, Acton and Ealing rather than cycle miles out of our way along the A40.

Avatar
Dnnnnnn | 8 years ago
0 likes

Northbound on London road (assuming the bus lane remains) is fine for me, thanks.

Avatar
jacknorell | 8 years ago
0 likes
Quote:

To provide good quality segregation on London Road would require removing either two general traffic lanes or two bus lanes.

So take away a lane north-bound and make it two-way for bicycles, with protection.

Makes it less appealing to drive into Central.

However, TfL has good points about the overall amenity on the longer route.

It's not just about distance, but in city traffic, lights (i.e. stop and start) suck a lot of energy as a cyclist, I'd rather ride (somewhat) further and not stop so much.

Avatar
paulrbarnard | 8 years ago
0 likes

Why not just make cars go the longer route? Just have London road for busses and cycles. Planners always forget that people invest their own energy into cycling where as those driving only have to sit there. Cycles should always have the shorter route with cars being diverted to longer routes if both can not be accommodated.

Avatar
mad_scot_rider replied to paulrbarnard | 8 years ago
0 likes
paulrbarnard wrote:

Why not just make cars go the longer route? Just have London road for busses and cycles. Planners always forget that people invest their own energy into cycling where as those driving only have to sit there. Cycles should always have the shorter route with cars being diverted to longer routes if both can not be accommodated.

TfL and BoJo have both confirmed in the past that travel times and commercial considerations trump protecting the lives of cyclists

This should be no surprise

Avatar
jasecd replied to mad_scot_rider | 8 years ago
0 likes
mad_scot_rider wrote:
paulrbarnard wrote:

Why not just make cars go the longer route? Just have London road for busses and cycles. Planners always forget that people invest their own energy into cycling where as those driving only have to sit there. Cycles should always have the shorter route with cars being diverted to longer routes if both can not be accommodated.

TfL and BoJo have both confirmed in the past that travel times and commercial considerations trump protecting the lives of cyclists

This should be no surprise

Exactly - cycling is a priority, it's just that it is behind many other larger priorities.

Avatar
bamboo replied to jasecd | 8 years ago
0 likes

Well, not quite - London Road already is for buses and bikes only coming from Elephant and Castle. It is a great way to get from E&C to Blackfriars. Southwark Council got it spot on in saying that cyclists are likely to continue to use that bit instead of the St George's Road aligned cycle way.

It is great that the North-South and East-West cycle ways are coming - it'll be a great step forward for cycling infrastructure in London despite details like the routing in this area.

Avatar
OldRidgeback | 8 years ago
0 likes

Southwark Council is actually more bicycle aware than most in London.

Latest Comments