…………………………………. Put it on your head!
Flo K
…………………………………. Put it on your head!
Flo K
If you’ve enjoyed this article, then please consider subscribing to road.cc from as little as £1.99. Our mission is to bring you all the news that’s relevant to you as a cyclist, independent reviews, impartial buying advice and more. Your subscription will help us to do more.
Bicycles can't pedal themselves so they can't break the limit and it doesn't apply to cyclists do they can't break it either so where exactly were these 220 occurrences of the law being broken?
His standard of living would drop massively...
And his wonderfully slow paced reassembler introduced me to the JIS Japanese Industry Standard type crosshead screwdriver. There is a reason why your standard Phillips type crosshead will destroy your Shimano adjustment bolts.
Regardless of the merits of the argument, anyone who ties their jumper over their shoulders like that is automatically wrong.
Reply to hawkinspeter Can you give it a more descriptive url so I can imagine it better?
Thanks for raising this. I'm assuming they had a serious talk about visiting Saudi Arabia and went anyway. GCN wants to be respected, but this is the definition of sportswashing.
Regarding "[helmets are] good insurance if you topple over... and so are not without merit": Even that protection is exaggerated. In 50+ years of avid cycling, club membership, etc. I've had exactly one friend die from a bike crash. He was riding at slow speed when he came to a stop. He apparently failed to unclip, toppled sideways, hit his helmeted head and died of TBI. And let's keep in mind that far more pedestrians than cyclists die of TBI. And even more motorists, despite the "protection" afforded by a car's interior. So why is it that cyclists are the ones persecuted by helmet nannies?
Spot on with the explanation but hey Snooks doesn’t want facts to get in the way (I don’t ride hookless for the avoidance of doubt).
It does look deliberate, but also weirdly efficient, as though the rider was practiced at that particular move. Which make me believe it might have been unintentional after all. He still should have stopped, of course.
7 thoughts on “Commuter diaries – riding along carrying a helmet on your bag…………….?!”
might be someone else’s
might be someone else’s helmet
still put it on, I never
still put it on, I never understood the point of carrying helmets and not wearing them. It’s not like he was climbing an Alpine Col on a scorching day, with helmet on the handlebar ready to pop it on again for hurtling down into the valley once more. He was riding a Brompton on the flat, either have a helmet and wear it or do not! Unless he is running a helmet courier service, seems unlikely. Am I getting a wiff of you helmet politics Tony?
Flo K
Flo K wrote:… climbing an
you have that round the wrong way
helmets are only effective at low speeds
may as well have on for the ascent where it will work and take it off for the descent where it won’t
wrong and quite mad.
Flo K
wrong and quite mad.
Flo K
Could we have a helmet free
Could we have a helmet free section please?
antonio wrote:Could we have a
No. It’s dangerous.
😀
Ooh, I ride a Brompton, and
Ooh, I ride a Brompton, and sometimes leave my helmet strapped on the bag – wonder if it was me?