At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
Irrespective of the fact that bikes don't have licence plates or other means of identification, your approach won't work. Richmond Park isn't flat...
Arrest now made. As a (very) local, my feeling is that may be a drugs turf war of some sort.
My turn to have a go at this...
Yes! Nineteen Eighty-Four is where the police learn to construct their publicity releases and other statements: our thoughts and prayers are with.....
That could be hundreds of addresses, though? In the linked story, Jim Waterson said he spent hours staking out one block......
Go up or down hill.
Personally, I thought that the Astana Willier was the best looking bike in the peleton for the past couple of years.
Looking forward to picking the shoes up on Sports Pursuit soon.
Judging by the DC Rainmaker review, and looking at the many basic features that are missing and scheduled for H1 next year, I would say that a...