Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

"The defect remained in the road and dangerous": Cyclist's death prompts coroner to question water company's 'reliance on third parties to report issues', after crash caused by sunken fire hydrant

Coroner to write to United Utilities and raise "concerns" about how long it took for the defect to be repaired and whether water provider is too reliant on the public reporting issues...

An inquest has heard concerns from a coroner who questioned water company United Utilities in relation to the death of a cyclist following a crash caused by a sunken fire hydrant.

A Lancashire Post reporter was at Preston Coroner's Court to hear Kate Bissett's questions to the water company, the coroner now to put her concerns in writing and question United Utlities' reliance on third parties to alert them of defects and problems, as well as the fact it took "weeks" after the crash for the sunken fire hydrant to be repaired.

"The defect remained in the road and remained dangerous to road users and cyclists," she said. "I will put in writing the concerns that I have."

The coroner concluded that it was likely Robert Ingram's crash was caused by the defect, the 75-year-old, a "fit and keen cyclist", suffered a broken hip in the incident and died in hospital two weeks later having suffered a stroke and multiple pulmonary embolisms.

While coroner Ms Bissett decided there was insufficient evidence to reach a conclusion on a link between the crash and the stroke (which she said she felt was suffered some hours after the fall), she did suggest the incident and Mr Ingram's previous health issues may have "drained his physical reserves".

The cyclist hit the sunken fire hydrant on Cowling Brow in Chorley on 14 August 2024. The hydrant in question is pictured in the Google Maps image illustrating this article from September 2022, and the Lancashire Post photographed it after the incident, with tarmac now smoothing out the sunken defect.

Riders using the route in the direction Mr Ingram did would approach the hydrant off a descent, the now-repaired defect close to the edge of the road.

Cowling Brow, Chorley: fire hydrant from coroner's inquiry pictured (Google Maps)

[The fire hydrant pictured on the right side of this image in September 2022, two years prior to Mr Ingram's crash] 

After the crash the cyclist was taken to Royal Preston Hospital, but was able to tell passers-by and paramedics that he had fallen off his bike after he hit the fire hydrant. Apart from a hip injury, later diagnosed as a break, his condition seemed coherent and fine.

It was the next day that staff began to have concerns that Mr Ingram's speech was slurred and his condition deteriorated. He was treated in the intensive care unit and tests showed he had suffered a stroke and multiple pulmonary embolisms. He died on August 30, a little over two weeks after the crash.

His bike was found free from defects and a witness who was around 50 yards behind Mr Ingram reported seeing him wobble and fall off, the cyclist then telling her he had hit a pothole.

Police investigators came to the opinion that the sunken fire hydrant would have been enough to cause a cyclist to lose balance if they hit it, although the inquest also heard that the council inspected the route every three months (including a walking inspection by two inspectors on July 12, one month before the incident) and no concerns were raised.

Robert Wilson, Lancashire County Council highways manager, suggested that the route's high HGV traffic may have meant the defect was caused in the weeks after inspection. However, when they were notified of it the day after the crash, it was not classed as a serious defect as it had not sunk more than 100mm.

United Utilities' head of operational services, Andrew Cunliffe, told the inquest there was no defect reported prior to the crash and that the hydrants, of which there are more than 100,000 in the North West, are inspected by the fire brigade and the company is also notified of issues by the county council and the public.

The coroner said she would be writing to the company to raise concerns about how issues are managed and to question its reliance on third parties to report issues.

Ms Bissett also questioned why it took "weeks" for the defect to be repaired while, in the meantime, it "remained in the road and remained dangerous to road users and cyclists".

Mr Cunliffe told the inquest the repair work was carried out on September 15, one month after the crash, but would have been deemed more urgent if United Utilities had been aware a fatality occurred.

He also confirmed the water company was made aware of the issue the day after the crash, a temporary repair made on September 9. The full repair was due to be made on September 10, however parked cars prevented the team from carrying out the works.

In October 2023, Ms Bissett presided over a similar inquest at Preston Coroner's Court, the coroner criticising Lancashire County Council after a massive pothole that killed an 84-year-old cyclist was missed because the "primary focus" was to identify "dangers to cars", not bikes.

Crack on Island Lane, Winmarleigh (Lancashire Coroner)

Ms Bissett accused the local authority of "defying logic" by claiming that the giant crack – visible on Google Maps since 2009 – must have closed "on its own" prior to an inspection months before Harry Colledge's death.

A council officer conceded the enormous crack was missed during their inspection as "dangers to cars" was the "primary focus".

At the time of Mr Colledge's death, Cycling UK's Keir Gallagher said that the tragic incident highlighted the serious threat posed by potholes and road defects to cyclists, arguing that "our crumbling roads… are deterring many from taking up cycling".

"Popping out for some exercise in the countryside shouldn't be a high-risk activity: it's time for the government to get serious about the risk potholes pose, and to ensure local authorities have long-term funding to properly fix and maintain the local roads," he said.

Dan is the road.cc news editor and joined in 2020 having previously written about nearly every other sport under the sun for the Express, and the weird and wonderful world of non-league football for The Non-League Paper. Dan has been at road.cc for four years and mainly writes news and tech articles as well as the occasional feature. He has hopefully kept you entertained on the live blog too.

Never fast enough to take things on the bike too seriously, when he's not working you'll find him exploring the south of England by two wheels at a leisurely weekend pace, or enjoying his favourite Scottish roads when visiting family. Sometimes he'll even load up the bags and ride up the whole way, he's a bit strange like that.

Add new comment

14 comments

Avatar
Geoff H | 12 hours ago
1 like

Any chance of (voluntarily or involuntarily) taking some of these inspectors on a bike ride where they have declared it safe?

Avatar
Hirsute | 20 hours ago
5 likes

I reported this recently but Essex highways say no.
It's a 60 and no street lights. This is also the third repair!

Avatar
brooksby replied to Hirsute | 20 hours ago
0 likes

That's nasty! 

Avatar
wtjs replied to Hirsute | 19 hours ago
1 like

Hate to say it, but the main northbound road through Garstang is like that in many places. I hope to remember to get a photo tomorrow, but it's only a 30 limit, of course.

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to Hirsute | 18 hours ago
2 likes

I don't know if I'd be cycling at 60mph along there.  

Of course, some papers would have me doing north of 50mph, and "way too fast" at that...

That's bad, only saved by "taking the lane" but of course on a NSL road "good luck with that".

OTOH (and I don't want this to become a "Yorkshireman sketch") there are certainly streets in Edinburgh with limits up to 30mph where the entire road is that quality for sections...

Avatar
Hirsute replied to chrisonabike | 17 hours ago
2 likes

In my submission I mentioned 2 wheelers users of all types. Seems dangerous for motorbikes too.

Avatar
wtjs replied to Hirsute | 23 sec ago
0 likes

As promised, Park Hill Road, Garstang today- one of many. I'm not trying to incite a competition- around the country there will be many busy roads worse than this. I'm not even blaming the county council- except for the obviously lying employee who claimed that the big crack in the road which killed Harry Colledge must have closed up spontaneously at the time of his inspection, then opened up again afterwards- they're nothing like as bad as the police

Avatar
brooksby | 21 hours ago
6 likes

Quote:

the council inspected the route every three months (including a walking inspection by two inspectors on July 12, one month before the incident) and no concerns were raised.

No concerns were raised because it would likely cause no problems if a motor vehicle drove over it surprise

Avatar
panda replied to brooksby | 20 hours ago
2 likes

If someone were to do a meaningful analysis to derive some better criteria for "dangerous - repair immediately" taking into account all road users and their relative likelihood of sustaining injury and then apply it to a council's roads then the conclusion would be financially ... inconvenient.  It's cheaper to self-insure; accept you need to pay out the occasional claim but trust people on two wheels to keep themselves rubber-side down or stop cycling altogether.

I'm not defending it - like any cyclist (and I imagine, council employee) I'd love smooth tarmac everywhere.

Add it to the very long list of problems Rachel Reeves needs to deal with ...

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to panda | 20 hours ago
0 likes

And Heidi Alexander?  Perhaps if we could only divert a small fraction of the motoring monies to alternatives to driving we would end up levelling out or hopefully decreasing the amount of driving.  Which should mean not having to pour money into holes in the ground or pay compensation so often (by reducing the road space we "need" / allocate to driving - I bet cycle paths and footways last longer)?  (The wrinkle there is that if it's "buses" they may be doing a lot more road damage stopping and starting than having all the passengers driving their own cars... oh and the UK's "just have at it" approach to utilities works / inability to figure out tree roots and paved surfaces).

Avatar
Secret_squirrel | 1 day ago
2 likes

Hmmm.  Odd one this.  The hydrant cover in the picture doesnt look that bad at all even if you hit it at speed.  There are worse than that one on nearly everyone of my regular roads.

Article needs a bit more context....

Avatar
panda replied to Secret_squirrel | 21 hours ago
0 likes

I was thinking the same thing.  The article describes the bike as being "free from defects", but I'm wondering whether there was a pinch-flat in the front causing a loss of control?  The witness said he wobbled and fell, rather than going over the top of the handlebars.

Out of interest, who does the examining of bicycle wreckage after serious incidents?  The same people who examine cars, or would a qualified (is there even a qualification?) bicycle mechanic have a look?  

Avatar
brooksby replied to panda | 20 hours ago
2 likes

panda wrote:

a qualified (is there even a qualification?) bicycle mechanic have a look?  

Cytech? https://www.cytech.training/

Avatar
LeadenSkies replied to Secret_squirrel | 14 hours ago
0 likes

Certainly one of the pictures in the article is not contemporaneous to the accident- captioned "The fire hydrant pictured on the right side of this image in September 2022, two years prior to Mr Ingram's crash".  The other picture looks to have been taken from the same Google Maps? source so I suspect that's also from two years before.

Latest Comments