It’s a big week in the dot-watching cycling community.
We’re about halfway through the Atlas Mountain Race, one of the toughest ultra-distance races in the world, covering 1,300km over seven days across Morrocco, from Marrakesh to Essaouira.
Crossing the Moroccan Atlas, this endurance epic features some of extremely unforgiving terrain, featuring over 20,000m of elevation and following high-altitude gravel roads and long-forgotten single and double tracks, with barely any tarmac for respite.
And it’s safe to say it’s already taken its fair share of prisoners.
Our very own Matt Page – who seemed to be in good spirits yesterday after being joined by a few locals – appears to have scratched later that afternoon, his dot lingering about 30km off the route near Skoura. Matt’s not the only one to suffer a bit of bad luck, however.
Sofiane Sehili, one of the best off-road long-distance racers on the planet and the winner of the 2020 edition of the Atlas Mountain Race, felt the full force of Morrocco’s unforgiving terrain when he trashed his fancy Shimano GRX rear mech – and had to make do with an on-the-cheap replacement from a local bike shop.
Which, unfortunately for the French ultra-distance legend, means he’s now forced to ride all the way to Essaouira on single speed – putting him, obviously, out of the race.
> Bring on the Atlas Mountains: a beginner's guide to ultra-distance bike racing
Describing his DIY job in an Instagram story, while riding his newly single speed machine, Sehili, who’s also won the Tour Divide and the Silk road mountain race during his illustrious long-ride career, said: “So, I went to this little repair shop and they had chains, six or seven-speed chains, which obviously were too thick for my 12-speed cassette.
“I removed a couple of cogs from the cassette, replaced them with some spacers that were the right size.
“So now I can use one cog! And I added a derailleur, just to have the right tension on the chain. Yeah, so I’m riding single speed on tarmac.
“And if you’re wondering why I’m not back on the course, I honestly think it would be mental to do single speed on that course – though I know one guy who’s doing it!”
Yeah, that sounds fair. I doubt anyone will be shouting ‘one gear is more than enough on those mountain dirt roads!’ as he passes by on the tarmac anyway.
In a longer Instagram post, Sehili – who joked that he was “in the mood for a bike tour anyway” after being forced onto the tarmac – added: “This is how my second attempt at the Atlas Mountain Race ends. Pretty differently from the first one. It was all going well, until it wasn’t anymore. I don’t give up easily but this time there’s nothing I could do but throw in the towel.
“When it happened, I was more than gutted. Now that I have had time to get some sleep and reflect on it, I feel a bit better. Of course I’m disappointed, but if something like that has to happen, I surely prefer it happens during a race I have already finished and won.
“I also take comfort in the fact that I didn’t just come here just for the race but was, beforehand, lucky enough to ride almost a thousand kilometres in this beautiful country that is Morocco.
“It is easy to indulge in self-pity, but in the end it is truly just a bike race and I got to take part in half of it. Some of my mates weren’t as lucky, a good friend is in hospital bed awaiting surgery after a serious accident. So yeah, it’s not the end of the world…
“I’m not gonna complain. Instead, I will look at the bright side of things, which is that I was racing hard and fast in a very competitive field. I was right there in the mix. Well ahead of my 2020 times.
“It feels quite good to actually get better while getting older to be honest. There will be other races. There will be many other opportunities to sing and (hopefully) crack you up.
“Now I'm gonna try to single speed my way to Essaouira.”
I don’t know about you, but that sounds brutal, too. These ultra-distance cyclists, eh?
Add new comment
17 comments
Nothing at all to do with cycling, but just very (unintentionally) funny:
"Tory MSP says something positive/usefull for cyclists"
Either it is 1st of April or he isn't a Tory.
It'll be a bit chilly in those there Atlas Mountains too. #nutters
"covering 13,000km over seven days" - that would be QUITE a pace. It should read 1,300 km.
https://www.thamesvalley.police.uk/news/thames-valley/news/2025/february...
"Between 4pm and 4.30pm on Tuesday (4/2), the offender, who was on a push-bike, punched the wing mirrors off the victim’s car on V6 Grafton Street.
The victim, a man in his fifties, got out of his black Range Rover on the dual carriage way and the offender assaulted the victim, leaving him to fall unconscious on the floor."
Hmm, I'm willing to bet there's more than one victim involved here. Also, do Range Rovers have 'wing' mirrors?!
I'll bite. They do have wing mirrors - that's what they're called because they enable you to see down the wing of the car. They're usually attached to the door because that's the best place to put them; it's a bit like the rear view mirror (which is what you use to see what's behind you) being attached to the inside of the windscreen rather than being part of the scenery behind the car. <adjusts spectacles>
No, they were called wing mirrors because they used to be mounted on the front wings of the car. The wings being the covers over the wheel - which eventually merged with the body work. This was pretty much the norm to about the early 70s. Just google for "Morris Minor", or "Morris Marina" (earlier versions), or any 50s or 60s car.
The wing is not the side of the car - not generally anyway.
So ... hahaha ... I made that point previously (minus the Morris Minor reference) on this very forum and was told in an equally authoritative tone that the panel over the front wheel is indeed called the front wing but that wing refers to the side of the car more generally and that panel is only called the front wing to distinguish it from the door (and I guess rear wing). It made sense to me because of the more general usage of "wing" in e.g. architectural terms which would pre-date the car.
There are lots of words in common usage which derive from some former incarnation. Nobody thinks twice about referring to the thing the instrument panel is mounted on as the "dashboard", But it's hard to argue that the current dashboard's job is to stop dash from the horses' hooves getting all over everyone instead of onto the side of 1970s houses where it belongs.
Either way, they're wing mirrors because that's what they're called regardless of what they're attached to.
Binnacle, shurely?! Or console at a push (since that is now used for "electronic entertainment system" it's getting more appropriate...)
It was a tongue-in-cheek reference to the regular debates about this subject 'swldxer' used to initiate on this forum 😉!
I have to say, I've never tried to wrestle a wing mirror from a Range Rover. I can't imagine it's that easy, so to do both is quite something. Sounds like quite a serious incident for the driver to have ended up unconscious.
So the person who got out of their car to confront a cyclist is the victim. How does that work?
Because they were then punched and ended up in hospital
"The victim suffered a concussion and bruising and swelling to his face which required hospital treatment. He has since been discharged."
Although if a cyclist confronts illegal behaviour then they are causing incitement.
I think just seeing a cyclist is enough incitement for some motorists!
Getting out of you vehicle to have a confrontation is never a good idea. Possibly a case of whoever lost the fist fight is considered the victim?
We shall have to wait and see if more details emerge. But this particularly interests me, as I'm quite local to the area and have had some woeful experiences with Thames Valley Police's roads policing.
People who drive wankpanzers are usually entitled. Hard to believe the cyclist damaged the wing mirrors with no good reason.
It's hard to imagine a legally defensible reason for doing both of them though, "He's a cock, your honour" not usually being an acceptable mitigation.
Except no one really knows what happened. Perhaps the driver threw a punch and the cyclist defended themselves and connected first. Then that's more self defence.
Are we really meant to believe the cyclist punched off one wing mirror, jumped off his bike, ran around the other side to punch off the other, and then had a pop at the motorist as well - all unprovoked? Possible I guess but unlikely.
We all know the likelyhood of bellend behaviour increases from Range Rover drivers.
Jimmy Hill says you can borrow his chin to stroke.