Local road race crammed into a weekend vibes at the Tour de France Femmes today, a morning road race followed by an afternoon TT. The AM action is well underway, 40km to go there, then the riders will take to the streets of Rotterdam again this afternoon for a six-kilometre-long individual time trial, two stages that I reckon even I could get through. Don't get me wrong, I wouldn't be in the time limit, but still a flat 70km in the sun sounds quite pleasant.
Stage two:
Stage three:
Some more reaction to yesterday before today explodes into life, yellow jersey Charlotte Kool unsurprisingly called it the "best day of my life" after winning the opening sprint. For compatriot Lorena Wiebes it certainly was not, the pre-stage favourite explaining later that the mechanical, which was in fact not a dropped chain but her derailleur "breaking off in a race incident", gave her no chance.
"This is a disappointment. I am not looking for excuses. I had been looking forward to this for a long time, but knew bad luck," she said. "You work very hard for months and then you miss out."
The Tashkent team was also a popular interview last night, four of their seven riders abandoning on stage one, the team getting a place at the race by virtue of a top-18 ranking earned through points gained in races in its home Central Asia region, rather than at more competitive European events. When the team's riders were chucked in at the calendar's biggest event, several of those riders being young, inexperienced and clearly not yet at the level for such an intense WorldTour race, more than half couldn't make it to the finish on day one.
However, the team's sports director Volodymyr Starchyk hit back at criticism of the team's performance, telling Cyclingnews their presence at the race is a "victory" for the sport.
"People can think everything they want. Everybody is able to think about what they want but we are here, it's something big for the nation," he said. "The first time in history an Uzbek team with all Uzbek riders so I think also for cycling it's a victory because a country completely outside of races in Europe, an Asian team coming here to Tour de France, it's never happened in history. So it's sad for results because we lose some riders today but at the same time, Tour de France Femmes avec Zwift shows people that cycling is open for the whole world."
Add new comment
49 comments
I cut the drops off my bike for hill climbs - very happy with it. The only problem is the added weight of the spare bike for the downhill bits.
RE: Transport Secretary Louise Haigh joins Chris Boardman and Laura Laker on Trans-Pennine Trail (N62) bike ride
This is all nice stuff, start 'em gently etc. And she makes mention of the "variable" NCN...
... except I think much of the NCN is "recreational" - in fact the whole thing is has an "adventure" rating I'd say.
No-one got time for it but for full understanding people should have to cycle to the airport / train / ferry from where they are in the UK, be transported to NL, have a couple of days of cycling / walking / taking public transport around with people explaining both the finer details and the overall philosophies. Then should be directed to ride back to their transport, returned to the UK and finally have to ride back home again there.
Or is that just cruel?
Still, I'd trust CB to get the message across.
First cut the drops off 25 years ago ... always have since , how much you cut depends on your hand size though ...
I'm down there 80% of my riding time. Would be quite difficult if nowhere to put your hands, eh?
Yet another really stupid hack.
Genuinely curious, do you spend most of your time racing crits? I find it hard to imagine any other riding situation in which it would be necessary to spend 80% of your time on the drops, I think even pros would, unless it was a day with particularly strong and consistent headwinds, spend below 50% of their time on the drops. Each to their own of course but I would be interested to know why you spend so much time down there.
My bikes have two things in common: (1) they all have drops (2) I almost never use the drops.
Perhaps a bike fit is in order.
I mean.. if that's a gravel bike with no drops.. they may was well have either brought a XC bike.. or convert it to a flat bar.. at least that way they'd be able to pull the brakes properly.
Pretty sure you can pull the brakes properly with your hands on the hoods, I've done it loads of times.
All jokes aside the cut off drops chat has made me seriously consider buying an old used light carbon bike and rebuilding it for hill climbs, however such thought bubbles are punctured by the fact that I already have an incomplete new acquisition (a vintage 1949 Claud Butler Allrounder) and I don't have the space or the money for another project. And I don't want to go N-1 right now either as I don't have a bike that doesn't get used.
That was my thought process a couple of winters ago, a hillclimber sub 6kg for sub £1500, to take on my local hillclimb competition one year. The starting point was a Boardman SLR (mine was acquired from eBay for £230, when ONE Pro cycling folded, the bikes & parts were sold off by Boardman, mine is ex Kamil Gradek), it was fun sourcing and weighing the parts before assembling it.
"Public outrage prompts Melbourne e-scooter ban
The Australian city of Melbourne has banned rental electronic scooters with officials saying they posed unacceptable safety risks."
I wonder what criteria they used to decide the risks were unacceptable.
Would those same risks be applicable to motor vehicles/drivers?
If it is based on the injuries (and deaths) caused by users, and the associated costs etc... could they be compared against the damage/injuries-deaths and other costs caused by motorists?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c3w68ywqv2go
It's Australia, so the main criterion was probably whether or not the rental scooter was a car. If not, then ban it!
What news of the Bristol scooter trial? I've passed through the place at the beginning of the year and the apocalypse didn't seem to be occurring. Actually didn't see that many being used.
(I'm mostly "e-scooters not the answer to any of the questions we should be asking" but I also don't think they're the end of the world. And for a few people having a tiny-folding "last mile" transporter could obviously be very *convenient*).
I see lots of them around and they seem to be very popular for people to commute on. Mrs HawkinsPeter enjoys using them to get to her work and she also uses the e-bikes when she can find one available.
E-scooters are definitely useful for short journeys and the "casual" nature of them appeals to a lot of people. They're also incredibly nimble and so great for winding through queues of slow moving traffic.
(Maybe too popular if the crime reports are anything to go by: https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/bristol-news/e-scooters-bikes-being-set-9478089)
I believe the main issue is users dumping errr "parking" the scooters in all manner of places after using then causing trip/crash hazards for pedestrians and cyclists.
And also injuries and the occasional death sustained by riders when they hit a rock or stick or other obstacle at speed and come off. Some of these incidents would be from riders using the scooters not as they were intended to be used ie carrying passengers and not wearing a helmet.
Nothing to do with cars at all.
I mean ... "some people were riding them on the pavements"?
What did they think would happen?
16mph limits? You're on a pogo stick on wheels, what could go wrong?
While much of this issue is give the general public new toys, expect 'creative' use" it may also be that Melbourne - while maybe changing - doesn't seem to have protected infra which goes where people want to go (rather than a nice rambling shared-use trail).
Drop bars. My guess is maybe 95% of road cyclists never use the drops. They are there offering an alternative hand position, but I've rarely found them useful. Some might say the rider is more aerodynamic if on the drops, but this has been disproved. It's more aerodynamic to be on the hoods with horizontal forearms. I wouldn't cut my bars down though 'cos they look fugly (and I might want to sell them one day).
To enforce my use of the drops, I'm going to remove the tops from my handlebar
I removed the wheels to get below the wind. Seem to work pretty well as I can't feel a breeze no matter how hard I pedal.
I followed advice and cut off the drops. Much more convenient for commuting, lighter, takes up less space etc.
In fact I can fit them in a rucksack if I want. Not sure what to do with the rest of the bike though?
I wonder how many people would change their answer to the poll when they hear they don't qualify for australian citizenship and that breakdancing won't be in the next olmpics...
6% of Brits surveyed are idiots.
You're statistically incorrect. You're assuming that there's a lot of overlap and that the 6% of idiots that believe they could compete in road race are the same 6% that think they could qualify for the 100m. The qualifying time being 10 seconds for men and just over 11 seconds for women. Also the survey revealed that 15% of over 65s thought they could compete at Olympic level in 4 years time. There are a lot more than 6% of idiots.
Yes, nore like out of the 27% who thought they could qualify for one or more sport approximately 26.99% are idiots.
In the Olympic men's road race they barely averaged 25 mph, with the best possible equipment, training and support.
A lycra-clad (from head to toe) commuter will typically do 50 mph, with no special preparation or backup.
Methinks you're being too judgemental.
You never know. In amongst that 6% could be a few folk who have the right stuff in terms of genetics and physicality who with the right support, training and nutrition could get there.
I cut off a set of drops years ago. It was a great set up for commuting.
Isn't that just a set of bullhorn bars?
Nope, they're wider.
Cutting off the drops will have been a great idea right up until the point when you're going down a really fast descent and you reach for the drops...
Pages