Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

news

Shell UK chairman David Bunch joins Active Travel England board

“I’m delighted to have David on my team to help us deliver a step change in active travel,” National Active Travel Commissioner Chris Boardman said of the non-executive director’s appointment

Shell UK’s chairman David Bunch, who is tasked with delivering the oil and gas giant’s net zero strategy in the UK, has been appointed as a non-executive board member of Active Travel England.

Bunch joined Shell in 1997 and, prior to his current role, was the multinational’s senior vice president for retail mobility in Europe and South Africa, helping launch the electric charging service Shell Recharge.

As chairman of Shell UK, the London Business School graduate has corporate responsibilities for the company’s activities across the UK, and has recently led the establishment of the country’s largest electric charging network while aiming to implement a “just and orderly” energy transition from oil and gas.

Bunch’s new non-executive director role at Active Travel England will see him provide the governmental body – which was formed last year to implement the Gear Change strategy and transform the nation’s “travel culture” – with “strategic advice, support, and challenge”.

> Sir Chris Whitty appointed to Active Travel England Advisory Panel

He will attend Active Travel England board meetings and meet with the management team, which includes former world and Olympic champion cyclist turned cycling and walking campaigner Chris Boardman, permanently installed as the agency’s head last June, Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Danny Williams, and Chief Operating Officer (COO) Louise Wilkinson.

Bunch, who says he enjoys cycling and hiking with his family in his spare time, will be joined at Active Travel England by the Office of Rail and Road’s chair Declan Collier. Collier, who was previously CEO of London City Airport and Dublin Airport Authority’s chief, has been appointed as one of the body’s expert advisors, providing guidance on how to make cycling, walking, and wheeling the first choice for everyday trips.

> Chris Boardman confirmed as permanent National Active Travel Commissioner

The appointment of Shell UK’s chairman to the Active Travel England board may raise some eyebrows within the cycling community, especially following the controversy surrounding the oil and gas giant’s sponsorship of British Cycling, a move described as “greenwashing, pure and simple” by members of the national governing body last year.

However, Active Travel England – which is responsible for driving up the standards of cycling and walking infrastructure and managing the national active travel budget – has said that Bunch will enable the agency to garner expertise from beyond the walking, wheeling, and cycling world.

“Our Non-Executive Directors, like all government appointments, were recruited as a result of a fair and open process,” a spokesperson for Active Travel England told road.cc.

“David Bunch has significant board level experience and has a wide perspective on projects across future transport integration and decarbonisation.”

> Active Travel England rates councils' capability to deliver infrastructure — 94% fall in lowest three categories

The agency’s head, Chris Boardman, also emphasised the need to “think bigger” and compared Bunch’s appointment to British Cycling’s recruitment of experts from outside cycling as part of its drive for Olympic success during the past three decades.

“If we want to give an entire country access to active travel as part of a genuinely sustainable transport system, we need to think bigger than we ever have before which is why Active Travel England’s board is purposefully made up of more than just experts in this one area,” Boardman told road.cc.

“I want our work to be guided by people who have delivered national scale infrastructure, are comfortable speaking to power, and are used to working on a massive scale.

“Anyone who knows me can vouch for the fact I’m all about the outcome and I’m delighted to have David on my team to help us deliver a step change in active travel.

“This is the same approach I took when leading the R&D program for the Olympic Cycling Team. The Secret Squirrel Club was made up of people who were experts in their field but knew nothing of cycling. Without fail they were the catalyst for the game-changing tech and we all now know the impact they had on making us the most successful Olympic Team of all time.”

> British Cycling and Shell: THAT very controversial deal discussed

Bunch’s appointment comes less than six months since British Cycling was accused of facilitating ‘greenwashing’ after announcing Shell as a new partner in a deal which runs until 2030.

The widespread outrage which followed the partnership’s announcement saw many now-former members tell us they would not continue to financially support the governing body because of Shell’s sponsorship.

One British Cycling member, a trained ride leader for the organisation’s Breeze women-only rides, said that the energy company “stands for everything we everyday cyclists don’t”, while another who has belonged to the organisation for more than a quarter of a century said that the sponsorship was “greenwashing for them [Shell UK], plain and simple”.

> British Cycling and Shell: How HSBC pulling plug and COVID-19 hit governing body’s finances

At the time then-CEO Brian Facer, who has since stepped away from his role “by mutual agreement”, said the deal would help “widen access to the sport, support our elite riders, and help our organisation and sport take important steps towards net zero”.

Great Britain's Sophie Capewell at 2022 UCI Track Worlds (copyright Alex Broadway, SWpix.com).JPG

 Alex Broadway, SWpix.com

At October’s world track championships Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, where Team GB’s riders raced with Shell branding for the first time, Sir Chris Hoy also argued that the controversial partnership could help inform and influence the oil giant’s environmental policies.

The six-time Olympic champion claimed during the track worlds that many of British Cycling’s staff and riders believe that the deal provides the governing body with the opportunity to “put cycling on the agenda” and give it “a voice” within the fossil fuels industry.

However, many remained unconvinced and highlighted the fact oil and gas still accounts for the vast majority of Shell’s profits, with ‘renewables and energy solutions’ making up just 6.3 percent of the company’s earnings for the second quarter of 2022, as it announced record $11.5bn (£9.4bn) profits.

> Extinction Rebellion protest British Cycling's Shell deal at National Cycling Centre

Just this week, a group of high-profile British runners, including Jasmin Paris and Damian Hall, called on European Athletics to drop Shell as a sponsor after the multinational’s branding played a prominent role at the European Indoor Championships.

“We were both surprised and disappointed to see the very high-profile sponsorship by Shell, the biggest European oil and gas producer and one of the ten most climate-polluting companies in the world, of the recent European Indoor Athletics Championships in Istanbul,” a letter to European Athletics, penned by the New Weather Institute, Green Runners, and Champions for Earth, stated.

“We are asking you to discontinue any commercial relationship with Shell, whether through advertising or sponsorship.

“Allowing athletes to be used as a billboard to promote a company like Shell, normalises a major polluter and gives them a social licence to operate.”

After obtaining a PhD, lecturing, and hosting a history podcast at Queen’s University Belfast, Ryan joined road.cc in December 2021 and since then has kept the site’s readers and listeners informed and enthralled (well at least occasionally) on news, the live blog, and the road.cc Podcast. After boarding a wrong bus at the world championships and ruining a good pair of jeans at the cyclocross, he now serves as road.cc’s senior news writer. Before his foray into cycling journalism, he wallowed in the equally pitiless world of academia, where he wrote a book about Victorian politics and droned on about cycling and bikes to classes of bored students (while taking every chance he could get to talk about cycling in print or on the radio). He can be found riding his bike very slowly around the narrow, scenic country lanes of Co. Down.

Add new comment

19 comments

Avatar
Mungecrundle | 1 year ago
2 likes

Ideas flow both ways.

Companies such as Shell, hate them or loathe them, are the forces to drive a change from fossil fuels to renewables on the grounds that they have to embrace the commercially lucrative opportunities as providers of energy, not simply the dead end business model of being providers of fossil fuel derived energy.

Avatar
Claire87 replied to Mungecrundle | 1 year ago
2 likes

Agree.  I know some Shell and BP people - much more carbon conscious than most and point out that we all still use fuel, chain oil, rubber tyres, plastics.  Bigger issue for me is the funding support.  If they want to bring their money to the sport- fantastic- it's a crisis out here.   And I really get pretty upset when people criticise Chris B or Sir Chris H - these appointments aren't made without a big screening process.  This is a government appointment - paid a stipend.  It's not a Shell appointment- its the person -  and I back Chris to get what he needs.

Avatar
Muddy Ford | 1 year ago
3 likes

He may like cycling and walking, in his spare time. And he might think cycling and walking are for spare time activities only rather than legitimate ways of travelling for work. Unless Shell forecast they are going to use their oil to make billions of bike tyres and other components, I fail to see why this appointment is necessary unless it's to ensure that increase in active travel doesn't harm Shell through a decrease in fossil fuel demand. They will almost certainly only be interested in slowing the pace. 

Avatar
Car Delenda Est | 1 year ago
3 likes
Quote:

aiming to implement a “just and orderly” energy transition from oil and gas.

Read as: profitable and delayed.

Hopefully he's just there to give insight into everything they shouldn't do.

In other news: Cressida Dick appointed head of anti-corruption and discrimination taskforce

Avatar
treadtyred | 1 year ago
0 likes
Avatar
ubercurmudgeon | 1 year ago
11 likes

People like that hold several similar positions on boards of charities and public organisations. Sometimes they're paid for their day or two of work per year, sometimes not. There are probably about a million people in the world better qualified, but they get offered them because other rich people are more likely to donate, or politicians to direct public funds, if they see one of their kind has a hand in directing the money. Sometimes the money goes where is should, sometimes not. I doubt the fact that his main job is with Shell, as opposed to a bank or a tech company, say, will have a direct effect on policies. Although, you have to question the integrity of anyone employed by a company that (a) knew about the effects of carbon dioxide emissions decades ago and funded astroturfing efforts to delay having to do anything about it, and (b) also hired Liz Truss.

Avatar
eburtthebike | 1 year ago
5 likes

Normally, I would say if St Chris of Boardman is for it, then it must be good, but I'm wondering about these appointments.  OK, those people may have experience at board level delivering projects, but will their hearts be in it?  Or are they there to further sabotage Active Travel, after the government's crass, imbecilic cutting of funding (nothing from St CofB on that?).

Maybe Shell could demonstrate its new-found enthusiasm for AT by not only making up the government cuts but doubling them: then I might start believing that they've really changed.  Until then, they remain a highly suspect, fossil fuel company desperate for green publicity.  So show us some genuine AT investment Shell, not more green-washing and e-car stuff.

Avatar
Stevearafprice | 1 year ago
8 likes

Early April fool joke. Ffs, more greenwashing . Pretty shameful stuff. Shell puts the minimum amount of funding into green stuff as its not profitable for them .
If they closed their forecourts 2 days a week and used half of their massive profits to pay for cycling projects I might have more faith.

Avatar
brooksby replied to Stevearafprice | 1 year ago
6 likes

Maybe Mikey should be appointed to the board of Shell? Quid pro quo and all that...

Avatar
AidanR replied to Stevearafprice | 1 year ago
0 likes

He's not on the board as a representative of Shell.

Avatar
belugabob replied to AidanR | 1 year ago
5 likes
AidanR wrote:

He's not on the board as a representative of Shell.

Not officially, maybe, but...

Avatar
brooksby replied to AidanR | 1 year ago
7 likes

AidanR wrote:

He's not on the board as a representative of Shell.

No, but he has a chuffing great conflict of interest...

 

Avatar
AidanR replied to brooksby | 1 year ago
1 like
brooksby wrote:

AidanR wrote:

He's not on the board as a representative of Shell.

No, but he has a chuffing great conflict of interest...

 

Does he? He leads the net zero strategy at Shell, and he's a hiker and cyclist. He's even trekked to the South Pole, relying on renewables. I get the scepticism, but he might be one of the good ones.

Avatar
Awavey replied to AidanR | 1 year ago
4 likes

arguably he is though, thats the skillset he brings to them, Shell Chairman, and is specifically highlighted in the press release as bringing those skills of the boardroom to ATE. Will he be able to leave his Shell Chairman hat at the door ?

if you look at the 3 other non exec directors, theyve all got strong cycling, active travel or local transport planning experience, which seems far more relevant.

out of all of UK plc are you telling me he was the only one choice available ? the guy who must have been personally involved in the Shell decision to sponsor British Cycling.

they can dress it up how they like, but I think its a bad appointment that creates unnecessary distraction for ATE, maybe they arent as bothered as theyll never have to deal with anyone other than councils/local government who wont care either.

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to Awavey | 1 year ago
4 likes

Awavey wrote:

arguably he is though, thats the skillset he brings to them, Shell Chairman, and is specifically highlighted in the press release as bringing those skills of the boardroom to ATE. Will he be able to leave his Shell Chairman hat at the door ?

if you look at the 3 other non exec directors, theyve all got strong cycling, active travel or local transport planning experience, which seems far more relevant.

out of all of UK plc are you telling me he was the only one choice available ? the guy who must have been personally involved in the Shell decision to sponsor British Cycling.

they can dress it up how they like, but I think its a bad appointment that creates unnecessary distraction for ATE, maybe they arent as bothered as theyll never have to deal with anyone other than councils/local government who wont care either.

Completely agree.

Shell (and other oil companies) have a history of acting in bad faith with regards to climate change and efforts to reduce humanity's fossil fuel usage. What concerns me most is that they act in a very underhanded way, and I fully expect a Shell Chairman to be subverting the ATE as his main mission.

However, Saint Chris is no fool, so I hope that he has a strategy for not letting Shell's money and influence act against our best interests (again).

Avatar
AidanR replied to hawkinspeter | 1 year ago
1 like

Are you so blinded by ideology and cynicism that you think he's been snuck into the board of ATE to actively undermine it? That sounds an awful lot like a conspiracy theory to me.

The whole point of non-exec directors is that they can advise boards from a different angle, because diversity of thought and ideas strengthens organisations, not weakens them.

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to AidanR | 1 year ago
3 likes

AidanR wrote:

Are you so blinded by ideology and cynicism that you think he's been snuck into the board of ATE to actively undermine it? That sounds an awful lot like a conspiracy theory to me. The whole point of non-exec directors is that they can advise boards from a different angle, because diversity of thought and ideas strengthens organisations, not weakens them.

There's extremely good reasons to be suspicious of oil company execs. Oil companies have been fighting against active travel and environmental issues for decades and now that they've been caught out, they're now going for greenwashing themselves whilst continuing to grab as much money as they can from oil whilst there's still enough people to buy it.

In terms of conspiracy theory,  there's evidence that oil companies have conspired together and with political parties to push their agenda. There's even this court case about it: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/dec/20/big-oil-is-behind-conspiracy-to-deceive-public-first-climate-racketeering-lawsuit-says

He may indeed be "one of the good ones", but the nature of his employment does compromise his authenticity.

Some more information about Shell and Exxon conspiring together: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/shell-grappled-with-climate-change-20-years-ago-documents-show/

Quote:

Like other energy companies, Shell also has been a member of lobbying and trade groups that promote climate skepticism and oppose climate policy, including in recent years. The company was part of the American Legislative Exchange Council, a group that raised doubt about mainstream climate science, until 2015. Shell rescinded its membership because of the organization’s position on climate science. In the 1990s, as world leaders were crafting some of the first international climate agreements, Shell joined the Global Climate Coalition, an industry group that battled against climate policy. Shell also backed the American Petroleum Institute, which had a coordinated campaign in the 1990s to sow public doubt about climate change.

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to hawkinspeter | 1 year ago
1 like

Also found this about Shell directors being personally sued for dragging their feet about adapting Shell towards climate risk and zero-carbon technologies: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/feb/09/shell-directors-personally-sued-over-flawed-climate-strategy

Also, here's some evidence that Shell does attempt to abuse its influence: https://www.theguardian.com/business/2015/may/31/shell-sought-influence-direction-science-museum-climate-programme

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to hawkinspeter | 1 year ago
1 like

Here's a fun little piece: https://www.foei.org/eight-shell-scandals/

Latest Comments