Il Lombardia winner Paul Seixas forced to pose with “idiot” mayor who banned all cyclists from city centre and called for bike licence plates; Lachlan Morton breaks Pony Express record; Healy on Pogačar-less racing; Safety protest + more on the live blog
SUMMARY
“He has a face like a…”: Il Lombardia winner Paul Seixas forced to pose with “idiot” mayor two months after he banned all cyclists from city centre and called for bike licence plates and insurance
If you hadn’t realised by now, Paul Seixas is the real deal.
On Saturday, the 20-year-old Frenchman became the youngest ever winner of the Tour of Lombardy (or Il Lombardia, if you must), clinching his maiden monument victory with a devastating long-range solo attack along the shores of Lake Como.
In the absence of five-time Lombardy winner Tadej Pogačar, Seixas put on his own Pogi-esque display, casually burning everyone off his wheel on the Civiglio, before building a commanding advantage over the final 19km. By the finish line in Como, in-form Vuelta winner Enric Mas was the only rider within a minute of the flying French wonderkid.
The Decathlon star’s triumph at the Race of the Falling Leaves makes him the fourth youngest winner of any of cycling’s five most prestigious one-day classics, just two weeks on from his 20th birthday.
It’s also his eighth victory of a season that also saw him win atop the Mur de Huy at Flèche Wallonne, clinch the overall at the Tour of the Basque Country, finish second to Pogačar at both Strade Bianche and Liège-Bastogne-Liège, and finish fourth overall at his debut Tour de France. The future is here.
But if Seixas is to continue his precocious, mind-bending run of success in 2027, he’s going to have to get used to all the obligations that come with it. Like posing with local, publicity-hungry politicians.
Around three hours after he raised his arms in triumph at Il Lombardia, Seixas was still fulfilling his post-race duties, which included a photograph with Como mayor Alessandro Rapinese, as captured here by Domestique’s Barry Ryan:
If you’re wondering why Rapinese’s name rings a bell, he’s the mayor who just two months ago announced a ban on all bicycles in the historic centre of Como, after he was hit by the rider of an ‘electric bike’ earlier this summer.
“People act based on their own experiences and I know what it’s like to be hit by one of these beasts,” the independent politician said back in August.
According to Rapinese, the ban applies to all cyclists because the Highway Code won’t let him differentiate between electric and non-electric bikes. Nevertheless, he also hinted at the possibility of bringing in mandatory licence plates and insurance for bikes in the northern Italian city.
“I think it’s madness to have required scooter owners to insure their vehicle and equip it with a licence plate, but not to have done it for bicycles which are perhaps even more dangerous,” he said.
The irony of Rapinese posing proudly alongside Seixas (and his bike) a matter of weeks after he banned cyclists from the centre of Como hasn’t been lost on some online observers.
“That guy just banned bikes from the centre of his city because he was hit by one. Rapinese is an idiot,” Magolly wrote on X.
“He has a face like a…,” Gianluca added, leaving you to fill in the blanks.
“Imagine winning a race, then you’ve got some political obligation. Must be pretty corny,” noted Omar.
He’ll have to get used to it, however, if he keeps riding like that.
SD Worx rider Valentina Cavallar hits out at “disrespectful” anti-doping test carried out in room next to deceased mother, hours after her death
Austrian rider Valentina Cavallar has criticised what she describes as the “disrespectful” conduct of anti-doping officials, claiming she was forced to carry out a drug test at her family home just hours after her mother’s death.
In an emotional Instagram post, SD Worx-Protime rider Cavallar, who finished ninth overall at this year’s Giro d’Italia before her season was abruptly ended in a crash at the Tour de France, revealed that her mother passed away in September.
“Losing my mum in September has changed the way I see life forever,” the 25-year-old wrote.
“You can spend so much of your life chasing goals, pushing your limits, measuring success in results, victories and achievements. But losing someone you love makes you realise how little of that truly matters in the end.”
View this post on Instagram
She continued: “What made this experience even harder was that just a few hours after my mum had passed away, I had to undergo a doping control at home, in the room next to where she lay.
“I understand the importance of clean sport, and I have always respected the responsibility that comes with being a professional athlete. But in that moment, I was clearly not thinking about cycling, competition or my responsibilities as an athlete. I was a daughter who had just lost her mum.
“Having to navigate a doping control in those circumstances felt deeply painful, profoundly out of place and disrespectful towards my family. It was a moment that made me reflect on how easily we can forget that behind every athlete, there is a human being with a life, a family and emotions that do not simply disappear when the responsibilities of professional sport begin.
“I believe in clean sport. But I also believe that humanity, compassion and respect should never be forgotten.”
We have approached the ITA and the UCI for comment.
“I wasn’t desperate for it to end, which was odd”: Lachlan Morton officially faster than horses as Australian breaks Pony Express record, covering 3,217km route in six days, 21 hours, and 15 minutes
A few hours ago in California, Lachlan Morton completed his latest long-range exploit, breaking the record for the Pony Express – proving once and for all that he is, in fact, faster than a horse.
In what may well be his final cycling adventure in the pink of EF, as he leaves the team at the end of the year, Morton decided to pay homage to the riders who carried post on horseback from St Joseph, Missouri, to Sacramento, California back in the nineteenth century.
After riding for 3,217km riding on the trail, which included some stiff headwind sections, mud in the Nevada mountains, and a tough, cold slog across the Sierra Nevada, Morton reached Sacramento at 11.19pm last night.
His time of six days, 21 hours, and 15 minutes meant he covered the distance 19 hours and 45 minutes faster than the previous record, apparently set by the horse riders who delivered Abraham Lincoln’s inaugural address on the Pony Express in 1861.
Which isn’t the kind of sentence you write every day on the live blog. But I suppose that’s kind of the point for Morton and EF, who peppered their press release with somewhat overblown references to the American west and its constant state of becoming (or something like that). There aren’t many Morton pressers to come, they need to strike while the iron’s hot.
“I had an amazing time,” Morton said in his statement. “I wasn’t desperate for it to end, which was odd. I was really just having a great time.
“It was something I’d been dreaming about for years, so it’s great to be here. It’s great to have the community out here, too. It’s such a big route that it’s always hard to know what to expect.
“You look at a map, but you just see a line. You don’t really see what that line is going to mean. There was a lot that was intimidating, but I felt like I was able to enjoy it a lot more than I expected, even though it was really hard. There was so much riding that I loved, and it was a combination of the kinds of riding I really enjoy doing.
“On top of just being hard, it was really satisfying. I didn’t think I’d be able to enjoy the route as much as I did, given how challenging it was. It’s very satisfying.”
If you love 31-inch wheels and delayed gratification, Newmen have just the release for you…
Help us to bring you the best cycling content
If you’ve enjoyed this article, then please consider subscribing to road.cc from as little as £2.49. Our mission is to bring you all the news that’s relevant to you as a cyclist, independent reviews, impartial buying advice and more. Your subscription will help us to do more.
1 Comments
Read more...
Read more...
Read more...
Latest Comments
@markvr It is pearl clutching to want to try and ban something because of a danger that only exists in your imagination. Cargo bike stopping distances are not actually much higher, because most of them have 203 mm discs with four pot callipers, so although they are heavier they have much more stopping power. Additionally, a cargo bike carrying 100 kg of bricks is not going to be ridden fast and so the rider will often have a better chance of seeing, anticipating and stopping than a solo cyclist. You're just making up a danger that simply doesn't exist, where are your examples of people being put in danger or hit by cargo bikes?
"AI spots nearly 19,000 'shocking' road offences" But cyclists. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c39wzpegqgd9o As I've said previously, when it comes to road safety enforcement... "We have the technology. We just don't have the political will to make it happen."
@EK Spinner My guess would be because it means you can have a normal length chain. If the rear wheel was 1m further back from the normal position, it would require a chain 2m longer.
@Rendel Harris I'm surprised that they still have site access privileges given the racist comments about an MP the other day
@Rendel Harris what an absurd response. Of course I think of my children's safety. It's not pearl clutching to do that. They are much more vulnerable and less predictable than someone who is experienced at commuting every day. And whataboutery is not a valid argument. Just because something else is also dangerous doesn't negate my point. Your stopping distance is much higher on a heavy cargo bike, you are much less agile. At some point you shouldn't be mixing with vulnerable cyclists and should use the roads. Bike paths are for cyclist, not carrying heavy cargo around. At 15mph 100kg of bricks hitting you is going to do far more damage than a person would. At some point you should be on the roads, not weaving in and around pedestrians and other cyclists.
@markvr Won't somebody please think of the children! If you think about it without pearl clutching histrionics, you are much more likely to be crashed into by someone on a standard bike riding irresponsibly fast or weaving in and out on a cycle path. Because of the nature of cargo bikes and their loads they will be ridden slowly and will not be zipping in and out of the other traffic on a path. My area of London is cargo bike central both for people carrying kids et cetera and for delivery riders and I've yet to have a single incident with a cargo bike, whereas it's an unusual 25 km commute where I won't have to take evasive action against somebody riding a standard bike foolishly or inappropriately for the conditions or cirumstances. I've never even heard of somebody being hit by a cargo bike, I'm sure it must've happened somewhere but seems to be a very rare event. Your kids are far more likely to be in danger from cars and other motor vehicles, even when they are pedestrians on the pavement, than they are from cargo bikes, sensible concern is one thing but baseless paranoia is another.
@EK Spinner they are often used to carry children, which is easier when they are in front.
I don't want people carrying heavy cargo on bikes around me and my kids when we are on cycle paths! There should be a maximum weight allowed for an ebike. All these photos of people showing off about how much they can carry on a cargo bike scare me. What happens if they crash into me or my kids with hundreds of kilos of paint or whatever? At some point it's safer for everyone else for you to be on the roads in an electric van. Bikes are bikes. They shouldn't be used to carry heavy equipment around other cyclists. Your ability to steer and stop is massively reduced when carrying heavy loads and at the point you should be on the roads, not on bike paths.
Moving away from the politics of this, I have asked a question a few times about cargo bikes and never really had an answer. I should highlight I have never used a cargo bike and I am unlikely to ever have a need to either. My question is this, Why do so many cargo bikes but the cargo at the front and the rider at the back, the riders view can be restricted by the load and the long front introduces avoidable visibility restrictions when emerging from junctions. Is there another advantage to this layout that I am not seeing other than being able to see the cargo load.
I don't know what others think but I thought it was a mistake to cancel the event. I live in one of the areas they cycle though and it didn't seem to bad. Even the few accounts I have watched didn't show cancelling weather, waiting under a tree maybe.
1 thought on “Il Lombardia winner Paul Seixas forced to pose with “idiot” mayor who banned all cyclists from city centre and called for bike licence plates; Lachlan Morton breaks Pony Express record; Healy on Pogačar-less racing; Safety protest + more on the live blog”
“AI spots nearly 19,000 ‘shocking’ road offences”
But cyclists.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c39wzpegqgd9o
As I’ve said previously, when it comes to road safety enforcement…
“We have the technology.
We just don’t have the political will to make it happen.”