Gkam84

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 replies - 2,236 through 2,250 (of 7,101 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • in reply to: Giro stage 3 #643513
    0
    Gkam84

    Because everyone seems to be
    Because everyone seems to be having a little challenge at “I posted first” so going to give it another try.

    Look at the Stage 3’s just from today….

    in reply to: Giro stage 3 #643507
    0
    Gkam84

    And again??
    And again?? :B :B

    in reply to: Giro Stage 3 #678141
    0
    Gkam84

    Go on, admit it, you thought
    Go on, admit it, you thought this was ANOTHER thread for the 2013 stage 👿 👿

    in reply to: Giro stage 3 #732507
    0
    Gkam84

    Stage 1: 152
    Stage 2:

    Stage 1: 152
    Stage 2: 3548

    Overall 3451

    But my purist team went up 1209 places today :B

    Gkam84

    That one doesn’t count,
    That one doesn’t count, because he races steel aswell 😉

    in reply to: Road etiquette #732447
    0
    Gkam84

    If I am catching a group of
    If I am catching a group of riders, I go out of my way to power through, up into the 52/9 and power up. Then I get some funny looks as my trike goes flying past, only for them to catch my up when I’m spinning 30/34 on a little uphill 👿

    in reply to: Giro – Stage 2 (TTT) #732383
    0
    Gkam84

    1 Salvatore
    1 Salvatore PUCCIO Italy 24 3:20:43
    2 Bradley WIGGINS Great Britain 33 +0
    3 Sergio Luis HENAO MONTOYA Colombia 26 +0
    4 Dario CATALDO Italy 28 +0
    5 Rigoberto URAN URAN Colombia 26 +0
    6 Benat INTXAUSTI ELORRIAGA Spain 27 +9
    7 Giovanni VISCONTI Italy 30 +9
    8 José HERRADA LOPEZ Spain 28 +9
    9 Alex DOWSETT Great Britain 25 +9
    10 Eros CAPECCHI Italy 27 +9

    in reply to: Giro – Stage 2 (TTT) #732379
    0
    Gkam84

    Sky
    Movistar
    Astana
    Katusha
    V

    Sky
    Movistar
    Astana
    Katusha
    Vini Fantini
    Lampre
    Garmin
    Blanco
    Vancansoleil
    Cannondale

    That’s your top 10

    in reply to: Giro – Stage 2 (TTT) #732373
    0
    Gkam84

    I haven’t changed my team
    I haven’t changed my team from yesterday at all, saving transfers for the next couple of days.

    Much the same as I might do towards the end to annoy someone 👿 👿

    in reply to: Road etiquette #732437
    0
    Gkam84

    Seems good enough, If you
    Seems good enough, If you wanted to be a knob, power up the climb to the top, then stand there shouting….come on, nearly there 👿

    But yeah, just a hi, nice bike, you been out far. Something like that

    in reply to: Most Combative Rider Award #732283
    0
    Gkam84

    I read this on twitter last
    I read this on twitter last night….. 👿 👿

    Given up answering his question’s, complaints, comments….etc. Someone go tell him to shut up ITS A GAME http://road.cc/82480 via @roadcc

    Gkam84

    bashthebox wrote:There’s a

    bashthebox wrote:
    There’s a reason pros use Carbon.
    carbon is better because the pros use it.

    WRONG, The pro’s have no choice as to what they are riding, the team are told their bike with be…. X and then they can fit whatever to it within the sponsor agreement.

    The reason they ride carbon in most races is because they are told to ride it.

    Look at pro’s OUT of the race, alot of them are NOT using carbon frames 😉 😉

    in reply to: Paul Kimmage Defense Fund #701761
    0
    Gkam84

    I beat _SiD_ to it…..
    I beat _SiD_ to it….. :B

    Lesli has released her court papers http://www.scribd.com/doc/139460677/Complaint-Cohen-v-Aaron-Brown-and-Siroque-Holdings-Inc-A2280371

    in reply to: Kimmage Defense Fund #731389
    0
    Gkam84

    Some legal documents on the
    Some legal documents on the issue

    Gkam84

    Aluminium over carbon every
    Aluminium over carbon every time.

    NO, if Aluminium was as expensive as Titanium it wouldn’t be a “premium” frame, because Titanium is difficult to work with and is mainly used for custom bikes, although it is filtering down.

    If Aluminium did reach that price, everyone would be flying around on cheap carbon and Aluminium would be the “new” carbon.

    I do not consider carbon to be a premium material at the moment, they would just change about, Titanium would stay up there.

    As steel is making quite a big come back, I expect to see more people going steel over carbon in the next few years aswell.

    To me, unless something improves in carbon frame’s. They are on the edge of “having their day” the reason I say this. Look at pro teams, almost every rider needs a different bike set up. Steel, Aluminium and even Titanium as all easier to build a custom frame to each riders need vs Carbon, where they get a “general” frame size given to them and have to muck about with stems and saddle height, handle bar width.

    So to sum up. NO it wouldn’t be classed as premium like Titanium is at the moment, in MY eyes :B

Viewing 15 replies - 2,236 through 2,250 (of 7,101 total)