Like this site? Help us to make it better.


SKS Commuter Hybrid Mudguard



Solidly made budget guards that offer excellent performance

At every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works. Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.

What the scores mean

Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.

  • Exceptional
  • Excellent
  • Very Good
  • Good
  • Quite good
  • Average
  • Not so good
  • Poor
  • Bad
  • Appalling

The commuter guards are among my favourite designs: simple, high quality PET construction and stainless fittings are just what you need from day to day mudguards. The 38-45mm hybrid width might seem a little broad for close clearance training frames but they were just slender enough to accommodate short reach callipers.

Mudguards should be function over form in my opinion. It’s fine for the stays to wear some salt and over-spray but there shouldn’t be a layering on top this to me means they're not doing their job and it's all too common on very minimalist models. I'm happy to report I had no such problems here.

Attaching to bikes with recessed brake fittings demanded judicious filing of the mudguard bridge bolts but once completed the three millimetre thick pre-assembled twin parallel stays make very secure mounting points and the secu-clip system means the stays gently break away should a twig lodge itself between guard and front tyre. As a precaution, I lightly greased the mounting bolts, adding a shoulder of loctite to prevent them vibrating loose but I’m pleased to report there’s been no infuriating rattling.

As you’d expect, being a budget guard there are some omissions- you get no reflector or rear dynamo fitting, although there’s ample room for applying reflective decals or even mounting an LED. Similarly, the plastic construction takes most everyday abuse in its stride, but lacks the outright indestructibility of chromo plastic and although not immediately obvious, our black test pair seems prone to collecting scratches.


Minor niggles aside the commuter guards make an excellent cost conscious option for anyone seeking a solid set of guards but happy to forgo some of the finer, cosmetic detailing.

If you're thinking of buying this product using a cashback deal why not use the Top Cashback page and get some top cashback while helping to support your favourite independent cycling website test report

Make and model: SKS Commuter Hybrid Mudguard

Price: 20.00

Weight: 456g

Size tested: 45mm

Tell us what the product is for, and who it's aimed at. What do the manufacturers say about it? How does that compare to your own feelings about it?

The Commuter are good quality budget mudguards aimed at commuters, available in a choice two colours and with pre-assembled stays for easy fitting. I would largely agree with this, although sells the guards a little short-they make great companions for winter trainers and others wanting the protection of a full guard that is much quicker to fit.

Tell us some more about the techincal aspects of the product?

PET guards offer good compliance, 3mm stainless steel pre-fitted stays with secu-clips will resist the ravages of daily riding and are a great safety feature- releasing effortlessly in the event of obstruction.

Rate the product for quality of construction:

Good, comprehensive fitting kit including a pop-up stay bridge safely accomodates framesets without traditional mudguard attachments.

Rate the product for performance:
Rate the product for durability:

Finish on test pair marked easier than I expected.

Rate the product for weight, if applicable:

Might not suit those whose priority is keeping weight to a minimum but 456g(Pair) isn't outlandish.

Rate the product for comfort, if applicable:

Despite enjoying a slightly shorter profile, offer comparable protection to more traditional designs

Tell us how the product performed overall when used for its designed purpose

Offer excellent weather protection for both rider and machine-especially in the wider profiles.

Tell us what you particularly liked about the product

Speed of fitment and quality of materials used.

Tell us what you particularly disliked about the product

Rear mudguard bridge was a little chunky, making attachment a litle tricky.

Did you enjoy using the product? Yes

Would you consider buying the product? Yes

Would you recommend the product to a friend? Yes

Overall rating: 8/10

About the tester

Age: 35  Height: 1m 81  Weight: 70 kilos

I usually ride: Rough Stuff Tourer Based around 4130 Univega mtb Frameset  My best bike is: 1955 Holdsworth Road Path and several others including cross & traditional road

I've been riding for: Over 20 years  I ride: Most days  I would class myself as: Experienced

I regularly do the following types of riding: cyclo cross, commuting, touring, fixed/singlespeed, mtb,

Shaun Audane is a freelance writer/product tester with over twenty-eight years riding experience, the last twelve (120,000 miles) spent putting bikes and kit through their paces for a variety of publications. Previous generations of his family worked at manufacturing's sharp end, thus Shaun can weld, has a sound understanding of frame building practice and a preference for steel or titanium framesets.
Citing Richard Ballantine and an Au pair as his earliest cycling influences, he is presently writing a cycling book with particular focus upon women, families and disabled audiences (Having been a registered care manager and coached children at Herne Hill Velodrome in earlier careers)

Latest Comments