Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

“Expert” driver who does “stunts for Channel 4” banned from driving for a year and fined £300 for causing serious injuries to cyclist

The driver denied any collision with the cyclist who had his shoulder blade broken and sustained irreparable damages to his £6000 bike, but a witness claimed otherwise, saying that the driver kept saying “I did not see him” after the collision

A stunt driver for Channel 4 TV who described his driving proficiency as “advanced” was found guilty of causing serious injuries to a cyclist by careless driving, fined £300 and banned from driving for year, after he repeatedly denied his involvement in the collision despite a witness claiming otherwise.

61-year-old Stuart Penman was riding his custom-built carbon Look bike which cost over £6,000 and was a retirement present, as he approached a mini-roundabout from from Oakfield Street, Kelty in Scotland on 13 October 2022 at around 2pm, when he was hit by a Luton van driven by 56-year-old James Cunningham of Edinburgh.

Penman said that he was riding between speeds of 5 and 10mph while wearing a hi-vis helmet with an LED flasher on at the front, and described the conditions as “dry and fair”.

He said: “As I proceeded across the roundabout I thought, ‘he has not seen me’. I just knew he had not seen me, so it was a case of do I stop and he is over the top of me or do I accelerate?

“He caught me at the back of the bike, spun me round and I was lying outside The Kings (pub), facing the direction I came from. It spun me round, flew me up into the air and I came down heavily on the right shoulder.”

> Delivery driver who hit cyclist and blamed low sun found not guilty of causing death by careless driving

Penman, a retired project manager, was taken to hospital with a broken shoulder blade, road rash and bruising to his hips. He added that the bike wasn’t insured and was no longer in a reparable condition, but a new one wa paid for after he contacted a “no win, no fee” company.

The Courier reports that Ellie Garvie, an events manager, who was driving behind Mr Penman, said that after he slowed naturally at the roundabout, the van came from the left and she thought “he has not seen the cyclist”.

She said: “The van [driver] just continued over the roundabout. There was a collision with the cyclist.”

Mrs Garvie recalled Cunningham being shaken and upset afterwards and him saying “I did not see him, I did not see him.” She said she stayed with Mr Penman and other members of the public phoned for an ambulance.

However, Cunningham told the court that there had been no collision, and that he saw nothing coming when he looked right at the mini-roundabout.

He said he stopped the van on the roundabout about halfway across as a cyclist came “flying” down at speed before trying to correct the bicycle but ended up falling as his bike slid along the ground.

A police officer who attended the scene of the collision was questioned by the defence lawyer about why she did not inspect the accused’s van for damage. Cunningham also repeatedly voiced concerns about police not inspecting his van for damage at the time.

The officer said she did not know why she didn’t inspect the van, and agreed that it would have been a good idea.

Sheriff Krista Johnston convicted Cunningham of causing serious injury by careless driving by failing to take proper heed of his surroundings and failing to slow down for a cyclist travelling ahead of him.

The sheriff said she found the prosecution witnesses to be credible and reliable and rejected Cunningham’s evidence where it differed. However, Cunningham interrupted to say this was “impossible” and “crazy” and was warned about potentially being in contempt of court.

In mitigation, defence lawyer Mr Winning argued the conviction was at the “lower end” of the careless driving scale, suggesting a “momentary lapse”.

He stressed there was no question of excessive speed on Cunningham’s part and stressed his client responded in the way most people would by being shaken and upset.

Sheriff Johnston banned Cunningham from driving for a year and fined him £300.

> "Road safety remains the biggest barrier to more people cycling": Research suggests more than two thirds of Scots think not feeling safe is main barrier to cycling

Earlier this week, two of Shetland’s most renowned and successful cyclists claimed that there is “definitely less tolerance” shown by drivers towards cyclists on the Scottish archipelago in recent years, putting people on bikes in increasing danger, just weeks after an MSP raised “concerns” in the Scottish Parliament over e-bike tours in the Northern Isles, arguing that cyclists are “more focused on the scenery than the road and other traffic”.

In May, a survey done by Cycling Scotland found that over a quarter of motorists in the country didn't know driving dangerously around cyclists could lead to driving ban or prison sentence.

Meanwhile, 58 per cent of drivers said that knowing they were being filmed would change their behaviour around people cycling, while 62 per cent said the risk of killing someone would make them drive more safely.

According to new Police Scotland data, on average four people a week in Scotland suffer serious, potentially life-changing injuries in collisions involving motorists while cycling.

Adwitiya joined road.cc in 2023 as a news writer after graduating with a masters in journalism from Cardiff University. His dissertation focused on active travel, which soon threw him into the deep end of covering everything related to the two-wheeled tool, and now cycling is as big a part of his life as guitars and football. He has previously covered local and national politics for Voice Wales, and also likes to writes about science, tech and the environment, if he can find the time. Living right next to the Taff trail in the Welsh capital, you can find him trying to tackle the brutal climbs in the valleys.

Add new comment

36 comments

Avatar
anotherflat replied to john_smith | 1 month ago
2 likes

That would seem to cover a wide range of normalised driving behaviour, aggressive tailgating, exiting the motorway from the fast lane cutting across 2-3 lanes of traffic, undertaking, leaving insufficient space for vulnerable road users.

Avatar
john_smith replied to anotherflat | 1 month ago
2 likes

Maybe, though I suspect many, if not most, of the drivers who do those kinds of things believe the risk of something going wrong is negligible.

Avatar
Surreyrider | 1 month ago
20 likes

So he saw nothing, yet he saw the cyclist coming at speed. Which is it?

Very simialr thing happened to me a few years ago. A driver joined the roundabout when I was on it and hit me in the left leg, sending me flying. The impact left me with a broken left leg and plenty of road rash.

She admitted fault at the scene, only to tell her insurance company I just fell off (this was a mini-ish roundabout and I was travelling at maybe 5mph). Luckily, I had witnesses who provided statements (although 1 refused apparently because he felt it was wrong). 

Drivers will do or say anything to get out of admitting any responsibility.

Avatar
didsthewinegeek replied to Surreyrider | 1 month ago
4 likes

Bizarre isn't it? When telling the truth is considered the wrong thing to do. 

 

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to didsthewinegeek | 1 month ago
6 likes

Guess we should be grateful it's not "if you think no-one else witnessed it but you and the victim, go back and finish the job so you're the only witness..."

Avatar
anotherflat replied to Surreyrider | 1 month ago
5 likes

Had same comment from some idiot who pulled out in front of me, luckily the road was wide enough that having braked and swerved but contacted the door pillar and been knocked off that I was in the central hatching not the opposite lane.
He hadn't seen me but what did I expect riding at that speed... he stopped about 150 metres down the road, I suspect because his wife told him to, and was very angry at the prospect that his vauxhall sh*tbox might have been damaged. 

Pages

Latest Comments