Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Shocking footage of road rage driver repeatedly trying to ram cyclist off bike

Police claim insufficient evidence to press for more serious prosecution — driver admits driving without due care, fined £100 and given three points

On December 15th last year, road.cc reader Kionne Potter went on his usual one-hour lunchtime training loop, the footage he sent us today shows the shocking road rage attack that followed from a driver who repeatedly tried to ram the West Midlands cyclist from his bike.

The motorist involved admitted driving without due care and received three penalty points and a £100 fine after West Mercia Police downgraded the report from assault to dangerous driving, and then once more to driving without due care, saying there was insufficient evidence for a more severe prosecution.

In his own words, Kionne reacted to the unnecessary dangerous close pass on the A491 Kidderminster Road in Hagley, instinctively throwing an arm up in frustration.

"The motorist then slowed down and as I approached him he wound down his window and shouted abuse at me and instructed me to ‘get off my f***ing bike now’.

"He continued this abuse throughout the incident but you cannot hear most of it. He then deliberately prevented me from getting back into the lane I needed to be in, if I increased my speed so did he and if I slowed down he did also. He made four or five attempts to hit me which I had to avoid and then he tried to pin me into the gutter whilst still shouting ‘get off your f***ing bike now’.

> What to do if you capture a near miss or close pass (or worse) on camera while cycling

"When I got in front of him he then tried to hit me from behind, you can hear the car rev hard and hear wheelspin from the hard acceleration, he then made one last swipe to the left before driving off.

"I tried really hard to get away from him but he did everything he could to prevent me escaping. Although the camera got some decent footage it still missed a lot that happened, and because the GoPro Hero 8 is so good at image stabilisation it smooths out a lot of my evasive manoeuvres so it looks a lot less dramatic than it was."

The driver was apologetic once the police were involved, citing relationship problems for his uncharacteristic behaviour, and after the report was twice downgraded by West Mercia Police, he was fined and given penalty points.

road.cc has contacted West Mercia Police for a further comment on the footage.

Dan is the road.cc news editor and has spent the past four years writing stories and features, as well as (hopefully) keeping you entertained on the live blog. Having previously written about nearly every other sport under the sun for the Express, and the weird and wonderful world of non-league football for the Non-League Paper, Dan joined road.cc in 2020. Come the weekend you'll find him labouring up a hill, probably with a mouth full of jelly babies, or making a bonk-induced trip to a south of England petrol station... in search of more jelly babies.

Add new comment

95 comments

Avatar
VIPcyclist replied to Bungle_52 | 2 years ago
0 likes

Well I'm sorry to tell you that bullies do win and quite often. Since you brought up Ukraine the UK government has sanctioned a few Russians, but only after giving them 30 days notice - so the bullies win. At the other end of the scale the DWP has sanctioned 50000 universal credit claimants - so again bullies win. Here's a thought experiment, imagine standing up to a bully in a small car, you rant rave etc and then the bully in the small car knocks you off, because they're a bully - you loose. Bullies by definition always pick fights they can win. So my opinion hasn't changed stop and let them sod off.
Of course I agree in principle with what you say but unfortunately it doesn't survive contact with reality.

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to VIPcyclist | 2 years ago
1 like

VIPcyclist wrote:

Well I'm sorry to tell you that bullies do win and quite often. Since you brought up Ukraine the UK government has sanctioned a few Russians, but only after giving them 30 days notice - so the bullies win. At the other end of the scale the DWP has sanctioned 50000 universal credit claimants - so again bullies win. Here's a thought experiment, imagine standing up to a bully in a small car, you rant rave etc and then the bully in the small car knocks you off, because they're a bully - you loose. Bullies by definition always pick fights they can win. So my opinion hasn't changed stop and let them sod off. Of course I agree in principle with what you say but unfortunately it doesn't survive contact with reality.

Sort of.  In my experience "Bullies by definition always pick fights they think they can win - or more often where they don't think there will be any resistance".  Or more succinctly: "They don't want a fight - they want a win".

The problem is deciding whether it's a) the kind that is "trying it on" and will back down if the threat doesn't work or b) the kind that won't.  You also need to be very sure that you can handle any resulting conflict.  That means a brutally honest look at yourself and your abilities, and continual practice.  If you're on a bike and they're in a car in one sense it doesn't matter.  Escalating confrontation will always be a high-risk strategy because of the power inbalance.  If it goes badly your grieving relatives will also have a hard time getting any conviction and even if that happens the sentence is unlikely to feel like justice.

Quite agree in the case of Putin and cronies this isn't a good analogy.  They possess the resources to beat almost anyone.  I've heard analysts say that the regime has painted itself into a corner / burnt their own boats in this case.  So no backing down, it's deliver some kind of conquest or fall from power.

Avatar
Bungle_52 replied to VIPcyclist | 2 years ago
4 likes

Since you bring up Ukraine. What do you think would have happened if sanctions had been used after Crimea? Letting bullies get away with it encourages them to continue.

Avatar
Fignon's ghost replied to VIPcyclist | 2 years ago
0 likes

Caltrops are an effective means of mediation too. Especially at low speed. The springs from old clothes pegs can be a useful tool. Doubles up as a cycle tool and can be used to pick out crud from those hard to reach places.

Avatar
Car Delenda Est replied to VIPcyclist | 2 years ago
0 likes

I don't think stopping to have that fight they're trying to force would be good advice for everyone.
I'd say get off the road, cycle away on the pavement and get as far away from the road and them as possible.

Avatar
numbersnerdmatthew | 2 years ago
5 likes

Road CC - you should collate all these incidents and send them to Dominic Raab - Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice for judicial review

https://www.gov.uk/government/ministers/secretary-of-state-for-justice

 

Avatar
Rome73 replied to numbersnerdmatthew | 2 years ago
10 likes

Raab? isn't he still trying to figure out where Dover is and what Dover does? 

Avatar
grOg | 2 years ago
5 likes

Driving without due care? that was dangerous driving all day long; having said that, I would never try to pass someone that is brake checking.. just dangerous and certain to elevate the road rage.

Avatar
Touring Philph MSC | 2 years ago
13 likes

That's nothing! A couple of years ago I was rammed from behind for arguing about a close pass in front of 20+ witnesses. I had no video camera. The police lost my statement and then three months later when they took another, decided the best policy was to get him to write me a letter of apology and buy me a new coat. Here's a picture of him stood over me screaming abuse after he had hit me. The Audi is his, the ladies are protecting me. 

Avatar
cyclingequity | 2 years ago
3 likes

its quite simple at this point if the police won't do anything there are other people that will, the police are corrupt here in Canada as well, i've stopped waiting for them and decided to "figure things out myself"

don't interact with them then, you have their license plate,  pretty easy to figure out where they live and work...

Avatar
formerLondon | 2 years ago
8 likes

The UK "justice" system is a complete and utter joke.

Custoldial sentence and a lengthy ban should be minimum for this.

That driver will 100% do this again, until someone is seriously injured or killed.

Avatar
the infamous grouse | 2 years ago
0 likes

how to prove deliberate proximity intent; apply contents of water bottle through open drivers-side window.

Avatar
Rik Mayals unde... | 2 years ago
14 likes

Should have been a section 59 all day long. Unbelievable, the Police ar shambolic. He must be a mate of a copper.

Avatar
chrisonabike | 2 years ago
14 likes

1) What's the relationship of this guy to the police / CPS?  I think we should be told...

2) What additional evidence would be required for "sufficient evidence"?  (Presumably a dead cyclist with car-sized tyre tracks across them - although on thinking that doesn't always do it either).

Avatar
Dingaling | 2 years ago
16 likes

There is something seriously wrong in the UK justice system. In todays Newark Advertiser

A man has been found guilty on two counts of fishing illegally, including netting two critically endangered species.

Graca, 50, was proved guilty in his absence and ordered to pay a total penalty of £861 ­— a fine of £660, costs of £135 and a victim surcharge of £66.

 

 

 

Avatar
Username replied to Dingaling | 2 years ago
23 likes

It's the feudal contruct dating back to the Normans.

Illegal fishing is an attack on the landed gentry's wealth - so attracts a serious punishment.

Hurting a cylist (read serf) is not seen as a serious crime - so attracts a derisory punishment.

Avatar
Awavey | 2 years ago
13 likes

its certainly a frustrating outcome, as you are left to feel someones actually tried several times to use their car to injure you, for no reason other than you ride a bike and raised an arm to them, and theyve got a punishment nothing more serious than someone who had maybe a momentary minor lapse of concentration and went slightly over the speed limit.

but I dont see a jury convicting the driver for dangerous driving for that footage alone, and careless driving does account for aggressive driving as a factor, so dont get too hung up on the name of the resultant charge making it sound less than it is, its easily capable of handing out lots of points and large fines if necessary, and thats the letdown really it should have been in the 4-6 points with a bigger fine at the very least IMO.

the thing that strikes me most about encounters like this though, is the driver close passes you, you react understandably by raising an arm or hand it doesnt matter which as it in no way gives license for what happens next. But that triggers the driver in to his anger outburst, which means they were looking in their rear mirror waiting for your reaction, which means the close pass was a deliberate act to try and start a confrontation with you, basically the guy is looking for a fight and using a car to fight you with.

But that part never gets tackled by the police, or the prosecution, or society as a whole, even though its clearly not normal behaviour.

Avatar
Gareth79 replied to Awavey | 2 years ago
9 likes

3 points and £100 fine means it was dealt with as a fixed penalty.  It should have been sent to court to be dealt with where a the points/fine could have been higher (although that is by no means certain of course!).

Avatar
a1white replied to Awavey | 2 years ago
9 likes

Awavey wrote:

the thing that strikes me most about encounters like this though, is the driver close passes you, you react understandably by raising an arm or hand it doesnt matter which as it in no way gives license for what happens next. But that triggers the driver in to his anger outburst, which means they were looking in their rear mirror waiting for your reaction, which means the close pass was a deliberate act to try and start a confrontation with you, basically the guy is looking for a fight and using a car to fight you with.

But that part never gets tackled by the police, or the prosecution, or society as a whole, even though its clearly not normal behaviour.

Excatly this. This has happened to me a few times. Car aggressivly passes you, usually with excessive revving then cutting in early, then you can clearly see them looking in the mirror for a reaction. That is pre-meditated so should be classed as an assualt. Probably difficult to prove though.

Avatar
Gareth79 replied to Lance ꜱtrongarm | 2 years ago
12 likes

It mentioned that the cyclist raised their arm after the pass, and the driver had stopped to argue/abuse them.  Ideally you'd not ever want to be in front of a driver who is annoyed, but then again you just want to get away...

Avatar
mdavidford replied to Lance ꜱtrongarm | 2 years ago
10 likes

Lance Strongarm wrote:

Got it. Not excusing tThe driving which deserved to be prosecuted as dangerous driving., but if By the time the cyclist hadn't gesticulated, the incident wouldn't have happened had already begun with a (likely deliberate) close pass. Might be a moral to that story somewhere. Maybe that some people shouldn't be behind the wheel of a car.

Avatar
Eton Rifle replied to Lance ꜱtrongarm | 2 years ago
5 likes
Lance Strongarm wrote:

Got it. Not excusing the driving which deserved to be prosecuted as dangerous driving, but if the cyclist hadn't gesticulated, the incident wouldn't have happened.

Might be a moral to that story somewhere.

"Shut up and get to the back of the bus, Rosa. You'll only make the white folks hate us even more."

Give your fucking head a wobble.

Avatar
Rendel Harris replied to Lance ꜱtrongarm | 2 years ago
7 likes

Lance Strongarm wrote:

Has any group in the history of humanity ever wallowed in more self-pity with less justification?

Yes, actually, you wouldn't remember, being a new name hereabouts, but there used to be this complete arsehole calling himself Nigel Garage on this forum who would whine like a baby about how poor little Tories were the only group it was acceptable to attack and how they were "the most unfairly and viciously vilified group in the country." God he was a whingy little git, glad he's not around any more.

Avatar
TheBillder replied to Rendel Harris | 2 years ago
2 likes
Rendel Harris wrote:

Yes, actually, you wouldn't remember, being a new name hereabouts, but there used to be this complete arsehole

I think incomplete back then, given their subsequent development of the role.

Avatar
Rendel Harris replied to TheBillder | 2 years ago
3 likes

TheBillder wrote:
Rendel Harris wrote:

Yes, actually, you wouldn't remember, being a new name hereabouts, but there used to be this complete arsehole

I think incomplete back then, given their subsequent development of the role.

When Boris's new press officer said of him "He's not a complete clown" I sent a polite query asking if that meant he'd had his appendix out. No answer as yet...

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to Rendel Harris | 2 years ago
3 likes

Rendel Harris wrote:

Lance Strongarm wrote:

Has any group in the history of humanity ever wallowed in more self-pity with less justification?

Yes, actually, you wouldn't remember, being a new name hereabouts, but there used to be this complete arsehole calling himself Nigel Garage on this forum who would whine like a baby about how poor little Tories were the only group it was acceptable to attack and how they were "the most unfairly and viciously vilified group in the country." God he was a whingy little git, glad he's not around any more.

Not sure about that but wasn't there some chap who was sanctioned for something (racist / anti-semitic if I recall rightly) who then popped back up with a name like "YouAreAllCyberBullies"?

Still, all for robust good humour!

EDIT: or at least that's the story this website tells - there may be something darker afoot though.  I better check for the real truth (alternative facts) on Infowars / RT International etc.

Avatar
Muddy Ford replied to Lance ꜱtrongarm | 2 years ago
3 likes

Lance Strongarm wrote:

Got it. Not excusing the driving which deserved to be prosecuted as dangerous driving, but if the cyclist hadn't gesticulated, the incident wouldn't have happened. Might be a moral to that story somewhere.

Good grief Loophole, you still here? I expect you have friends that constantly look at their watches when you visit.  

Avatar
Sriracha | 2 years ago
14 likes
Quote:

citing relationship problems for his uncharacteristic behaviour

pretty sure he's got cause and effect back to front. "Uncharacteristic" is probably also a bit of a lie.

Avatar
Fignon's ghost | 2 years ago
2 likes

Kionne, I feel your frustration. It's happened to me. These people don't care. This could've gone badly. He needs to pull over and calm down.
That's why I have a bottle of pepperspray in my handlebar bag. Spray him and brakes on. Take another route.
Change your route for a couple of weeks too (after the event).

Avatar
brooksby replied to Fignon's ghost | 2 years ago
6 likes

What country are you writing from, Fignion, because in the UK that would be treated as assault and you'd be the one getting arrested...

Pages

Latest Comments