Sajid Javid has become the latest Conservative politician to weigh in on the viral video – discussed during Tuesday’s episode of Jeremy Vine’s Channel 5 show and viewed almost 2.5 million times on Twitter – which shows a motorist failing to stop before narrowly passing a five-year-old cyclist.
The former Chancellor of the Exchequer, who has also served as the Home Secretary and Secretary of State for Health and Social Care during his time in government, joined Tory peer Baroness Foster and Conservative London Assembly leader Susan Hall in pointing the finger at the child’s father for letting him cycle on the road in the first place.
Responding to a tweet from the Jeremy Vine on 5 Twitter account, which asked viewers who they thought was “in the wrong”, Bromsgrove MP Javid – who unsuccessfully stood to replace Boris Johnson in the first of this year’s Conservative leadership contests, before later endorsing Liz Truss – replied: “The 5-year-old’s father”.
Javid (whose driver, incidentally, was filmed stopped in a bike box outside Westminster earlier this year) has been heavily criticised for his comments by other Twitter users, who ridiculed the MP’s apparent ‘car is king’ attitude and advised him to review the Highway Code:
Nevertheless, the MP’s comments echoed those made earlier this week by some of his Tory colleagues, including Susan Hall, the chair of the Police and Crime Committee in the London Assembly.
Replying to a tweet – this time from Vine himself – which suggested that anyone who does not think “the driver must go dead slow, or stop” should “cut up their driving licence and send the pieces back to the DVLA”, Hall argued: “Surely the issue here is that a 5-year-old should not be on the public highway riding a bike!”
Hall then claimed that the child should only cycle “slowly on the footway, or preferably in the park” and that she was “amazed that given road behaviour by all that you find it acceptable for a five-year-old to be on a bike in the road.”
> "Should not be on the public highway riding a bike": Conservative politician weighs in on viral clip of driver refusing to stop for child
Conservative peer Baroness Foster – appointed to the House of Lords by then-Prime Minister Boris Johnson in December 2020 – also took to Twitter to castigate the child’s father, writing: “A child that small should not be cycling on a road! A completely irresponsible decision along with your comments that put the entire onus on the car drivers if/when something goes horribly wrong!”
The widespread argument shared by the Conservative politicians, that the five-year-old should have been cycling on the footpath instead of the road, was today countered by his father, who posted the below video of his school run:
On Tuesday, after the contentious video went viral, the child’s father Ashley also appeared on Vine’s Channel 5 show, where the noted cycling advocate criticised the driving on display.
> Viral video of driver refusing to stop for five-year-old cyclist debated on Jeremy Vine's Channel 5 show
Ashley told the show that “the facts are clear on this one: the driver was wrong and my son has every right to ride on the road.”
Panel guest and journalist Mike Parry agreed, dismissing the debate about whether the child should have been cycling on the road as “utterly irrelevant”.
“Surely human compassion, surely human nature says that if you’re driving a car at speed and there’s a little child coming the other way your instinct should be the protective nature of an adult in a car over a child,” he told Vine.
> Driver – in untaxed car with expired MOT – mounts pavement on wrong side of the road… then chastises six-year-old for cycling on same footpath
Meanwhile, on the same day that the video was discussed on Channel 5, road safety expert Tim Shallcross of IAM Roadsmart told the Sunday Times Driving: “There is no minimum age limit for cycling on a road; the lad is a little younger than most cycling organisations recommend to be on a road, but he’s certainly riding competently and with confidence and under supervision, so no problem there.”
Shallcross also pointed to Rule H3 of the Highway Code, referencing the ‘hierarchy of road users’, which tells drivers to “stop and wait for a safe gap in the flow of cyclists if necessary”.
“Highway Code guidance is for cars to give 1.5m clearance to cyclists in 30mph limit, and since the cyclist was already passing parked vehicles and there was clearly not room for 1.5m clearance, the car should have waited until the cyclist was clear before carrying on,” he concluded.
Add new comment
93 comments
The problem is that twitter is just hot takes and not a proper discussion. The father shouldn't be taking his kid on the roads at 5 when they are clearly a bit wobbly. Thats simply the reality of our roads at the moment. That is 100% on the dad. This is like the argument against helmets that some have. That they shouldn't be necessary and wearing them just makes people think cycling is dangerous which it shouldn't be....and yet it is. For whatever reasons, cycling on our roads is bloody dangerous and not the place for 5 year olds
Now, the separate point of is the driver in the wrong is indisputable. Of course they are. They usually are. I wouldn't put a childs life on the line and rely on the UKs drivers not to kill them. They are fucking awful in general. As a 6'2" man with lights and bright clothing on I still get people nearly hitting me because they haven't seen me or they think that they can get away with a manouvre. Being half my height and a bit wobbly is just making that far worse.
Some people are utter ***** on twitter (and in real life) and other people are just arguing different points not necessarily disagreeing.
Flintshire Lad incoming with "A Conservative politician! Can you believe it?!" in ... er... never.
As others have pointed out neither main party is short of people who could have come out with this. I'm not entirely sure the SNP is much different although in Scotland we've managed to get a slightly more sensible share for active travel compared to the overal "transport budget". (No idea about other regions).
Motorist to bloke on bike: "You idiot, I could have killed that kid."
Bloke on bike: "Yeah, I saw that, I was right behind and you nearly hit me too. Guess you didn't see either of us, huh."
Motorist: " 'course I saw. Whatever. How about you keep your kid off the road?"
Bloke on bike: "That's not my kid."
Motorist: "But... so where is the person responsible for me driving so close to that kid?!"
Pages