Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Driver assaulted cyclist for questioning mobile phone use

UPDATED: After two missed court appearances Akil James eventually pleaded guilty and was fined £2,000 and ordered to pay compensation, which still has not been received, of £500 and £820 costs

UPDATE 31/01/2023 

Following the publication of this story our reader finally received a response from ERS, in which the driver's insurance provider confirmed "enquiries into the matter are ongoing at this point".

ERS apologised for the "delay" in getting back to the cyclist and acknowledged the documents submitted relate to criminal charges and may differ from any civil claim made via an insurer.

"Our enquiries into the matter are ongoing at this point but we hope to be able to conclude these swiftly and we will then confirm how we can progress matters for you," ERS said.

ERS has not responded to a request for comment from road.cc.

Original story below... 

A cyclist has recalled the shocking road rage incident which saw him assaulted after questioning a driver's mobile phone use behind the wheel.

The rider, who will remain anonymous throughout this article, told road.cc they are still yet to receive the £500 compensation a judge at Westminster Magistrate's Court ordered Akil James to pay along with a £2,000 fine and £820 costs on top of five penalty points on his driving licence.

"What concerns me most is that this dangerous driver remains a threat to other road users," the rider, whose bike suffered £450 worth of damage in the incident on the King's Road, Chelsea, on Christmas Eve 2021 told us.

The cyclist was returning from volunteering for disadvantaged youths in west London when James pulled out in front of him, blocking the road. 

> Here's what to do if you capture a near miss, close pass or collision on camera while cycling

"I could see the driver had a phone held up to his left ear and was talking into it and was not wearing his seat belt," the rider explained. "I asked the driver 'what are you on the phone for?'. The phone screen was clearly lit up in an active call.

"I said 'you shouldn't be on the phone while driving'. He responded 'you shouldn't be talking while riding'. When he said the word 'riding' he lunged at me with his right hand and struck me on the left side of my head. He then accelerated off as I said 'don't hit me — that's an assault — I'll be reporting you, you'll be reported, sir'.

"He told me to 'f*** off' and I respond with a 'thank you' and started to cycle away. I could see the driver turn his steering wheel to the right as I cycled away.

"I could sense what was about to happen and prepared to take evasive action. A second or two later he accelerated hard, whilst shouting 'get out of the road'. The vehicle then collided with my leg and bike.

"I said to him 'that's the second assault, I'll be calling the police, you've just hit me' as I picked my bike up off the floor. He responded 'shut up you f****** mug' and accelerated away.

"The vehicle was held up at a zebra crossing with pedestrians crossing. I limped my damaged bike to the pavement and approached the BMW on the passenger side to tell the driver I'd be reporting him.

> Best cycling cameras — capture your ride and relive it later

"He continued to hold his phone in his left hand in a phone call as a female pedestrian walked across the zebra crossing. Obviously angry, he failed to give way and narrowly missed her, accelerating off at speed." 

The rider told us he was "blown away with the kindness" of those passing who checked he was okay and provided witness statements.

"As I said, this happened on Christmas Eve. This incident very much destroyed my family Christmas as I was in a very stressed state and couldn't stop replaying in my head what happened," they continued.

"I was lucky the bruising to my leg was minimal as I'd managed to leap off my bike as the collision happened. Damage to my bike caused by the collision included popping out many spokes, bending my rear wheel/cassette/gear assembly/brakes, totalling £450 in repairs.

"A damage report by the amazing guys at CycleWorks Kennington was submitted to the police but not submitted in court. I had to report this myself in court to the magistrate in order to get compensation."

Having provided an online statement to the Metropolitan Police the cyclist was later asked to provide an in-person statement at Hammersmith police station and in April 2022 received a "generic letter" informing "after careful review it has been decided that no further action will be taken".

> Furious road rage motorist goes viral for confronting cyclist — as car rolls away because he forgot to apply handbrake

"I couldn't believe this decision had been made. I contacted the investigating officer who stated that this letter was from the Met Police Traffic Unit but he was still being prosecuted by a different department for common assault, and driving without due care and consideration," our reader explained.

"I thought the video evidence I provided was compelling: offences I can see include using a phone whilst driving, failing to wear a seatbelt, dangerous driving, failing to stop after an accident and failing to give way on a zebra crossing. I have no idea why they decided these offences were not worthy of further action.

"I wanted to claim against his insurance to repair my bike, but had to take legal advice to compel the police to release the driver's insurance details as the vehicle was a company car and had multiple policies against it. I finally found out that the driver was insured with ERS and have sent various emails to them but have not had any response [a silence repeated to road.cc's request for comment]."

In the meantime our reader twice attended Westminster Magistrate's Court, once in July and then again in September 2022, but both times James failed to show up.

"To save wasting everyone's time again, the magistrate gave instructions that I should give evidence without the driver being present," he continued. "The driver's hearing finally took place in November where he plead guilty to the charges [below]."

  • Common assault
  • Use of threatening/abusive/insulting words/behaviour with intent to cause fear of/provoke unlawful violence
  • Criminal damage to property valued under £5,000
  • Driving a mechanically propelled vehicle on a road/in a public place without due care and attention
  • Assault by beating

James was sentenced, with the judge taking the guilty plea into account, and received five penalty points on his driving licence, a £2,000 fine, £620 costs to the Crown Prosecution Service (collection order made), £200 victim surcharge and £500 compensation to the cyclist (still unreceived).

"The driver has still not paid a penny in compensation," our reader told us. "I have again sent another email to his insurance in the vague hope of getting paid for repairs.

"What concerns me most is that this dangerous driver remains a threat to other road users. I don't post on social media, but hope this story shows how inadequate some of our legal processes are and that the rights of car drivers are put above the safety of cyclists."

Dan is the road.cc news editor and joined in 2020 having previously written about nearly every other sport under the sun for the Express, and the weird and wonderful world of non-league football for The Non-League Paper. Dan has been at road.cc for four years and mainly writes news and tech articles as well as the occasional feature. He has hopefully kept you entertained on the live blog too.

Never fast enough to take things on the bike too seriously, when he's not working you'll find him exploring the south of England by two wheels at a leisurely weekend pace, or enjoying his favourite Scottish roads when visiting family. Sometimes he'll even load up the bags and ride up the whole way, he's a bit strange like that.

Add new comment

31 comments

Avatar
zero_trooper replied to mike the bike | 1 year ago
5 likes

It doesn't work like that.

There will be will be a 'fines and enforcement unit' which will cover a number of courts in the area. The defendant will have an account with them, as will the victim. The defendant pays the unit and the unit divvies up the monies (as there may be more than one victim) and pays direct into the victims' bank accounts. The victim should have a letter explaining how it works. If there's a problem the victim contacts the unit direct.

I know because in the last 12 months I have only received 20% of the compensation due from being the victim of a crime (not cycling related). Coincidentally I rang them today as I haven't had a payment in a couple of months. I've a note in my diary to ring back in March. 
 

It would be much easier for the victim if the courts paid them direct in one go and the defendant then owed the courts. Something tells me that it wouldn't drag out so long.

Pages

Latest Comments