Met Police - learning results of submissions

We're approaching half way through December 24 now- any progress on the Met's hopefully will be live in December 2024, where you will be able to view the results of Public Reporting traffic offences?

I'm compiling my evidence to APPGCW, and pointing out the great lengths the police go to in covering-up that they didn't do anything about offences against cyclists. Lancashire refused to tell me, citing the usual GDPR distortion, while Northampton puts out huge lists of what happened in all their cases- you just have to know the reference number to find the relevant case on the published spreadsheet. So is the Carrick-Couzens Memorial Police Force going to come up with the promised counterpart to the Northampton scheme?

I'm pleased to say I didn't 'do' Latin, but I was also pleased to learn the origin of 'laconic'

Gloucestershire have told me the outcomes to nearly all my reports. I have to wait 12 months to find out now whereas I got them immediately before 2023. They are rarely the outcomes I want but it just highlights the inconsistency between forces. Gloucestershire will now only send an advisory letter for a close pass no matter how close (used to be NFA until recently) but will tell you the outcome where as other forces are the exact opposite.

Semper ubi sub ubi (nisi sub lycra?)

after I said that if they wouldn't tell me the outcome of a submission I would have to make an FOI request for it

This has been discussed at length before, but it's a lot to read. I don't think the police are worried by threats to make FoI requests because they will simply refuse them. Here is the Information Commissioner's Decision Notice on my attempt to expose the police lying about taking action over this case. They did essentially nothing- most likely a joke advice letter

https://upride.cc/incident/4148vz_travellerschoicecoach_closepass/

This proposed Met scheme to reveal all follows the Northamptonshire Police equivalent, which I was informed about by HoarseMann last year. There's a mass of information in there, but without the reference you won't find out much- nearly all of the offences against cyclists will be shown at the top end of the spreadsheet if it's sorted 'Ascending' on the Offence Description column, but they'll be hidden under the great mass of 'Driving without due care and attention' and you won't be able to find ones involving cyclists. I haven't spent much time on this because what I want is information on Lancashire Constabulary- and they're prepared to spend an almost infinite amount of time and money on making sure I don't get it.

Romanes eunt domus

Just remember the LancsFilth Dodge! They refused to tell me what they actually DID when they claimed they would take action after a gross offence by a bus driver. FoI, ICO, Information Tribunal procedure terminated by the Upper Tier Tribunal when I was refused leave to appeal there. That takes ages so I'm going to repeat the FoI request soon. They're prepared to spend all that time and effort refusing - obviously because what they did was send the joke advice letter or did nothing at all. They don't like lying in print!

I'm reminded of King Leonidas's comment at Thermopylae "...if".