Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

"Ridiculous" bike hangar "will cause more accidents" on street where "there have been more than five car crashes", resident claims — but council defends "popular" bicycle storage

The local authority emphasised that there were "no objections" prior to its installation and there had been "hundreds of requests from across the city" asking for more secure on-street bike storage...

A council has defended one of its bike hangars from criticism after residents claimed it would "cause more accidents" and is a "health and safety nightmare" — the local authority pointing out there were no objections to the on-street bicycle storage during a period of planning and consultation with the local community, and stating that there have been "hundreds of requests from across the city" for more bike hangars.

The BBC has published the views of a Tokar Street resident and her grandson, the pair objecting to Portsmouth City Council installing a bike hangar on the street near a junction, the bicycle storage unit taking the place of a former car parking space.

Housing between four to six bikes depending on the design, spaces in the hangars that have been installed across the city can be rented for £30 per year (a charge the council says is to cover the cost of cleaning and maintenance) and offer residents a secure place to keep their bike if they do not have space at their property.

As has been seen in numerous other cities across the country, demand has been high and the council said it had received "hundreds of requests from across the city" for more units to be offered. However, as has also been seen across the country, it is the complaints of a few residents that have made headlines, similar objections having been heard in Brighton and Bath in recent times.

> Council "investigating" after driver outrage at cycle hangar "deliberately" blocking car parking spaces

One Tokar Street resident objected to the bike hangar being placed "directly outside my property" and told the BBC that it "needs to be removed" as it is "ridiculous" and would "cause more accidents". Veloris Ballingall, 75, said she had lived in the street for 40 years and had seen "more than five car crashes on the corner of the street".

She claimed the council had "given no warning about this" and her grandson Owen also took to social media to complain that the council was "refusing to remove it".

"My grandmother doesn't ride a bike, so she won't use it," he said. "It should be put somewhere where it is accessible properly and not on a junction. It's too bulky and a health and safety nightmare."

Portsmouth City Council refutes the claim residents were not warned and said the "usual process to advertise the plans received no objections".

A spokesperson added: "Bike hangars offer safe, secure, bike storage for Portsmouth residents who don't have that space in their home. We have had hundreds of requests from across the city and these dictate where we develop plans and consult with the local area. With Tokar Street we carried out our usual process to advertise the plans which received no objections.

> Bike hangars are "woke" (apparently) as car parking row rumbles on

"It has proven a popular location and like most hangars in the city we've received far more applications to use it than there are spaces."

Elsewhere in the city, the council began a bike hangar pilot in 2021, eight roads getting a storage unit between March and September. The Liberal Democrat-run council said the trial prompted "requests for more cycle storage" and a second phase of installations came in February 2023.

"If the scheme continues to be popular we will seek further funding to further expand bike hangars to other roads in the city. If you would like to rent a space in a bike hangar but don't live near the roads selected for the pilot you can nominate your road for a hangar in the future," the council's website states.

The outspoken complaints mirror what has been aired elsewhere in the country. Along the coast, Brighton & Hove City Council has heard criticism from residents and a councillor over the city's bike hangars, the local politician branding a bike storage facility a "monstrosity".

The council also said it would investigate the placement of a cycle hangar causing outrage with parking permit holders who said it was "deliberately" blocking car spaces, that coming as another resident took to the local press to say she does not want one of the "giant ugly objects" outside her house.

Cycle hangar in Norfolk Square, Brighton (credit - Laura King, Facebook)

In Bath, a resident called the newly installed bike hangars "green measles" and claimed they would "make Unesco's decision [about the city's World Heritage status] so much simpler".

That despite Unesco noting on its website that Bath "remains vulnerable to transport pressures", with "improved transport" based around public transport and pedestrianisation part of the management plan to protect the city's integrity and authenticity as a World Heritage site.

And while cycling is not mentioned explicitly, the advised shift to walking and a "bus-based network" implies the "need for improved transport" will not be answered by overdependence on car use.

Dan is the road.cc news editor and has spent the past four years writing stories and features, as well as (hopefully) keeping you entertained on the live blog. Having previously written about nearly every other sport under the sun for the Express, and the weird and wonderful world of non-league football for the Non-League Paper, Dan joined road.cc in 2020. Come the weekend you'll find him labouring up a hill, probably with a mouth full of jelly babies, or making a bonk-induced trip to a south of England petrol station... in search of more jelly babies.

Add new comment

39 comments

Avatar
giff77 replied to mark1a | 4 days ago
4 likes

A lot of cagers struggle with stuff like spacial awareness, depth of field etc. That's why we need lines and what not to help them. Even with these aids they struggle. Had a discussion with somebody about this and they said there was no yellows to show the 10 metre. I pointed out the central white and where it stopped was a good guideline. And if the struggled with that, then to imagine two car lengths. Still didn't sink in. They still park up and to pot with everyone else. 

Avatar
ActiveTravelEngineer replied to mark1a | 3 days ago
0 likes

I hate to break it to you but the police won't enforce based on the highway code. If there were double yellow lines on the corner it would be another matter.

Avatar
mdavidford replied to ActiveTravelEngineer | 3 days ago
5 likes

ActiveTravelEngineer wrote:

I hate to break it to you but the police won't enforce based on the highway code. If there were double yellow lines on the corner it would be another matter.

FTFY

Avatar
ubercurmudgeon | 4 days ago
9 likes

From the BBC article...

Quote:

The more-than-2m (6.5ft) wide container

Imagine, something parked there, taking up two metres of the width of the public highway...

https://www.google.com/search?q=how+wide+is+the+fifth+generation+range+r...

Avatar
Mr Hoopdriver replied to ubercurmudgeon | 4 days ago
1 like

I think I see what the problem is :-

https://maps.app.goo.gl/Y8pJLRKuHxUssckj9

The chain ring is a bit rusty too.  Definitely needs storage to save it from the elements.

Avatar
Secret_squirrel replied to ubercurmudgeon | 4 days ago
1 like

It does pose an interesting question though.  What width is that parking space and did cars regularly "overflow it" width ways just like the hanger does.

I would hope those hangers are designed to be no wider than a regulation parking space?

Definately pro-hanger but mounting them partially on the pavement isnt a good look unless the space is smaller than standard....

Avatar
Moist von Lipwig replied to Secret_squirrel | 4 days ago
1 like

I think this was mentioned during the Brighton hangers articles - the kerb can act as a lip to stop it opening if not mounted above it.

Avatar
wycombewheeler | 4 days ago
5 likes

"Veloris Ballingall, 75, said she had lived in the street for 40 years and had seen "more than five car crashes on the corner of the street"."

 

good to have that baseline information, so that if there is a crash next month, it will not be a new thing caused by the bike hanger. I bet Mrs Ballinghall's real objection is that she can no longer park directly outside her house.

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to wycombewheeler | 4 days ago
5 likes

Correct - "My grandmother doesn't ride a bike, so she won't use it,".  Because the space outside your house is actually yours.  Apparently that's how "road tax" really works.

I think what troubles me is "neither one way or the other" motornormativity fudge.  I can imagine people WILL drive into this (like everything else near roads) - especially for a year or so.  But that's not new...

However given what happens perhaps we should keep "making it safer because fallible, lazy, entitled humans" - "safe system".  BUT in that case shurely "safer for EVERYONE" which means quite a lot of people need removing from the driving pool.  For the benfit of other drivers / pedestrians if nothing else.

No?  Not the kind of "safety" you were looking for, local folks?

Pages

Latest Comments