Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Controversial wiggly cycle lane with "Mickey Mouse" layout recommended to be ripped out following independent review

Anti-cycle lane campaigners said the cycling infrastructure made the seaside town the "laughing stock of the nation", the council's leader now saying "big mistakes" were made and "we got it wrong"...

A council leader has apologised for a £1.3 million seafront redesign which saw a cycle lane and wiggly markings installed and attracted criticism from a campaign group who said the "Mickey Mouse" road layout had made them the "laughing stock of the nation", an independent review now recommending major changes to the design.

North Somerset Council's changes to Clevedon seafront caused uproar from some sections of the town, campaigners holding multiple headline-grabbing protests over the new road layout, which they said made the seaside town like "Balamory from hell". In January, the 'Save Our Seafront' campaign organised a conga line protest demanding action, while in April a "flash mob" to block the bike lane with cars followed.

Clevedon cycle lane protest (Image credit: Justine Willington/Twitter)

The scheme's eye-catching design caused national media coverage, with the RAC describing it as one of the "most bizarre new road schemes", and to a backdrop of complaints about the "crazy" design, wavy lines, two-way cycle lane, and loss of parking, the council agreed to an independent review into the scheme which ITV reports was £1.1 million overbudget.

> Seafront cycle scheme with "Mickey Mouse" layout that made council into a "laughing stock of the nation" to be reviewed

The council had originally suggested the scheme would improve safety, encourage active travel and reduce unwanted parking, however the local authority's leader Mike Bell has now apologised and said it was a "big mistake".

During the review, infrastructure consulting firm AECOM heard the views of thousands of people, concluding in its recommendations that the two-way cycle lane should be removed and replaced with a contraflow lane on the eastern side of The Beach, the town's seafront road.

It also recommended restoring the sea-facing parking, creating a pedestrian crossing, changing the mini roundabout, introducing a coach pick-up and drop-off bay, as well as retaining the one-way system and 20mph speed limit.

"We got it wrong"

Speaking following the review, council leader Bell said the council had "got it wrong" and the scheme, which will cost an estimated further £375,000 to fix, was a "big mistake".

"We'll have to try to find the money — it's not going to be easy, but we will try to do that," he said. "The big mistake was that we implemented a scheme that wasn't supported by the community and I'm really sorry that happened.

"We didn't get the consultation and engagement right, it took place during the Covid pandemic and, as a result, we've delivered a scheme that didn't work for people. We're under immense financial pressure, as are all councils. I would not wish to be in this position if we could have avoided it.

"But the right thing to do is to try to deliver some changes and deliver a scheme that works for the people of Clevedon and that's what we're going to try to do."

The comments mark the end of an 11-month period of protests and campaigning following the unveiling of the new layout in January, pictures of the "wiggly line" design appearing across the media and social media.

While a public consultation found that 50 per cent of locals supported the plans, compared to 42 per cent who opposed the scheme, since the initiative was announced 'Save Our Seafront' has led a high-profile campaign against the redevelopment and penned a petition to the council which attracted over 6,000 signatures.

The Conservative MP for North Somerset and former cabinet minister Liam Fox was among the locals opposed to the measures, and in early 2023 tweeted that "huge numbers" joined a protest "on a cold and windy January day against North Somerset Council's plans to destroy our seafront with a cycle lane that is neither needed, wanted, nor a good use of scarce resources."

Weeks after its unveiling, campaigners formed a conga line to protest the scheme before, in April, they formed a parking "flash mob" to block the cycle lane and park vehicles in the old layout, facing out to sea.

> Anti-cycle lane campaigners conga along seafront to protest new "Mickey Mouse" road layout

Campaign group member Chris Berry said dozens of drivers had parked in the cycle lane in protest at the "monstrosity" as a "peaceful parking flash mob".

"I can see about 40 cars all enjoying the view of the sea," he said. "These aren't people who are accustomed to civil disobedience; these are people who feel incredibly strongly about what's happened to their sea front. If you reduce the number of cars, you reduce the number of visitors and reduce the amount of money coming into the town.

"Businesses unfortunately are struggling — the reduction in parking is going to have a significant impact on them."

Clevedon seafront proposals (N Somerset Council)

Speaking at the time, one local cyclist explained how the row had seen the town to become "very anti-cyclist", while another said the campaigners were "disproportionately vocal" and the protest is "completely misplaced because people can't see what the future could be".

"It's the car lobby that is ruling the roost and I think that's wrong," Howard Parker said. "[The campaigners] have to recognise that if they want parking they're going to have to park round the corner and that's not such a big imposition."

Ultimately that does not seem as though it will be the case, the council expected to follow the recommendations of the review. That despite previously stating that it wants to reduce driving visits and "encourage more walking and cycling in the town" as part of a "commitment to promoting healthier lifestyles and tackling the climate emergency".

Just three months later, in July, the independent review was announced as the council pledged to review the scheme and arrange "a number of pieces of work as part of the process".

Dan is the road.cc news editor and joined in 2020 having previously written about nearly every other sport under the sun for the Express, and the weird and wonderful world of non-league football for The Non-League Paper. Dan has been at road.cc for four years and mainly writes news and tech articles as well as the occasional feature. He has hopefully kept you entertained on the live blog too.

Never fast enough to take things on the bike too seriously, when he's not working you'll find him exploring the south of England by two wheels at a leisurely weekend pace, or enjoying his favourite Scottish roads when visiting family. Sometimes he'll even load up the bags and ride up the whole way, he's a bit strange like that.

Add new comment

16 comments

Avatar
brooksby | 1 week ago
2 likes

Looks like they're finally making a start on undoing it all…

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c4g3eq0xdx8o

Quote:

The work would begin in mid-February and was expected to be completed within 12 weeks, the council said.

It will include the reintroduction of sea-facing parking, removal of the two-way cycle path and the unusual wavy road markings.

Loading bays and a coach drop-off point will be installed and the introduction of vehicle access to the promenade for boats and food vans.

In addition, the council said pedestrian crossing points would be improved and planters would be repositioned.

However, the seafront will remain a one-way system and the double cycle lane will now by a contra-flow lane for bikes.

Avatar
wtjs replied to brooksby | 1 week ago
3 likes

It will include the reintroduction of sea-facing parking

All this expense to facilitate a load of idle old (and young) knackers sitting in their cars looking at the sea while reading the hyper-junk press and eating. Active Travel is just a slogan in the UK- not intended to be taken seriously. I hope some local Active Traveller can provide us with a photo of lines of these stationary deadbeats when the de-improvement is completed!

Avatar
Bungle_52 replied to brooksby | 1 week ago
2 likes

This is the staggering bit for me.

Quote:

It originally cost about £1m and a further £425,000 is being spent on the reversal, but the council said the move was "in line with feedback".

The council said the cost of the changes was being covered via a number of sources, including council reserves and funding for the local transport plan.

Further cash is coming from Section 106 money from developers - a sum negotiated during the planning application process to contribute towards community spaces - as well as £21,000 that was unallocated from the Great Lakes project.

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to Bungle_52 | 1 week ago
3 likes

While its own mess, perhaps the recent US fandango should remind us of the limits to foresight in people's "enlightened self-interest" *.  We have limited discipline, limited appetite for changes we're not very interested in.  Changes which increase the cost / decrease the ease of our daily lives are going to face noisy opposition.  Even where what we're doing now is - with a little consideration - unsustainable.

I guess the positive from this is that the council actually tried - and indeed did make some changes.  Even if this may have been "too soon".  And in fact the changes weren't brilliant for active travel - building "where we can" not "where most needed".

Chris Boardman talks about ensuring that local authorities start by succeeding with any changes.  Even if this is means starting with really minor improvements e.g. safer crossings near schools.  Success is built on success, failure will sometimes stall any further attempts at changes for many years.  And in this case - essentially throw away a substantial chunk of monies for improvements.

I'm not sure if I like the implications of that (e.g. unlikely to see any substantial change in most places in my lifetime at this rate).  It's may be reality though, barring some kind of revolution.

* e.g. if it's a case of "but our cities are catching fire" vs. "it feels really expensive to drive to work and I feel poorer overall" the result is quite likely to be widespread support for "drill, baby, drill".  The future is uncertain, causes of things are often obscure at a personal / local level.  So be for yourselves and get as much jam as you can today.  (Perhaps even favour choosing a noisy strongman you find personally boorish as leader - to keep everyone else's strongmen guessing).

Avatar
brooksby replied to Bungle_52 | 1 week ago
1 like

Bungle_52 wrote:

This is the staggering bit for me.

Quote:

It originally cost about £1m and a further £425,000 is being spent on the reversal, but the council said the move was "in line with feedback".

The council said the cost of the changes was being covered via a number of sources, including council reserves and funding for the local transport plan.

Further cash is coming from Section 106 money from developers - a sum negotiated during the planning application process to contribute towards community spaces - as well as £21,000 that was unallocated from the Great Lakes project.

North Somerset council has introduced paid parking in various car parks around the region which were formerly free.  Cue howls of outrage from the motorists.

Fun fact: the amount likely to be raised by the car parks will pay for the reversal of Clevedon seafront… 

Avatar
Bungle_52 | 10 months ago
0 likes

Just read that Clevedon is now one of the best places to live in the SW. I wonder if there is any connection.

https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/bristol-news/best-places-live-south-w...

Avatar
mattw | 1 year ago
0 likes

Do we have any indication as to how well the changes - ignoring the stupidly artistic elements such as the wiggly lines and the weird roundabout - have worked?

The new ideas seem like populist pandering.

Avatar
chaos | 1 year ago
8 likes

And again we have 'car people' talking about  "vandalising our lovely Victorian seafront". I was never that good at history, but cars in Victorian times! Did I miss something?

Avatar
NOtotheEU | 1 year ago
1 like

"It also recommended restoring the sea-facing parking"

It's not the sea, it's the Bristol Channel/Severn Estuary (not sure where one ends and the other begins).

Avatar
Born_peddling | 1 year ago
1 like

Lot of cash spent....still this road looks more fun to swerve down 😁

Avatar
scousegreg | 1 year ago
6 likes

Another Wiggle gone bust.

Avatar
IanMK | 1 year ago
8 likes

I visited earlier this year, the sea front is lovely. I thought they'd done a fantastic job. If I had an observation it just didn't seem to be very well connected to other cycling facilities.

Also the cafes along there were buzzing - dog walkers, park runners and cyclists.  I know we weren't there peak season but there seemed to be plenty of street parking towards Walton Park, so just a short walk to the beach. There did seem to be more problems with parking near the marine lake but as I'm not a local I didn't have anything to compare.

Avatar
bobbinogs | 1 year ago
11 likes

I demand the right to sit in my car to look at the sea whilst eating my sandwiches.  It's what active travel and sustainable tourism is all about, possibly.

Avatar
Veloism | 1 year ago
4 likes

Apparently to work for a council in the UK, your IQ must be no greter than 70.

Avatar
chrisonabike | 1 year ago
1 like

Never mind magic - this must now be some of the most expensive paint outside of an art gallery.

Avatar
Car Delenda Est | 1 year ago
1 like

All this over a wiggly line..

Latest Comments