Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Cyclist who football manager forced off road reveals full story

Matthew Lupton was victim of incident in which witnesses said Mike Cook used his vehicle as a weapon

A cyclist who was the victim of a road rage incident in which a football manager was described by witnesses as having used his car as a weapon to force the rider off the road has contacted road.cc to give a full account of what happened.

As we reported yesterday, Chippenham Town caretaker manager Mike Cook was fined £500 and banned for driving for six months under the totting-up process in connection with the incident in Stroud, Gloucestershire.

> Football manager fined for forcing cyclist off road

After seeing our article, which was based on a report in the Stroud News & Journal, road.cc reader Matthew Lupton got in touch to tell us that the newspaper’s article was “slightly confused” and to clarify exactly how the incident unfolded.

He said: “I was cycling through the one way system in Stroud, a car pulled out in front of me and drove slowly through the one way system (20mph zone).

“Mike Cook caught up with me while I was behind that car and was driving very close revving his engine. Once the slow car was out of the way, Mike Cook then overtook me where the road is too narrow for a safe overtake.

“The pass was very close and only just missed me so I shouted 'Oi!'. Mike Cook then stopped his car. I overtook the stationary vehicle and he set off again.

“Once again he drove very close behind me and was revving the engine. I had to stop at a mini roundabout, he overtook me while I was waiting and drove so close that his tyre brushed my ankle.”

At his trial where he pleaded guilty to careless driving after earlier denying the more serious charge of dangerous driving, Cook’s defence barrister said that he had been frustrated by the cyclist because he was in a rush to get home, having spent three hours on a train.

According to Matthew, though, it does not seem that he was in that much of a hurry. He said: “He then drove very slowly in front of me (a bit odd considering he was in a rush!).

“At the next two roundabouts he kept to the right, leaving a big gap in the left and drove very slowly, I remained behind him. He then stopped in the middle of the road, again leaving a big gap on the left.

“This time I decided to get past him (having no idea what his intention was), but as I was passing him he set off and deliberately drove towards the edge of the road. My wheel hit the kerb and I went over the handlebars.

“He then drove off at speed. Fortunately I only suffered minor bruising and minor damage to the bike (derailleur and wheel). The car behind me when this occurred was driven by an off-duty PCSO who witnessed everything after the first roundabout (ie didn't see the initial close pass).”

Matthew added: “The case was treated seriously by the police, but it took a long time for Mr Cook to be interviewed. The CPS then took a very long time to make a charging decision. 

“As liability was in dispute the insurance company refused to consider my claim until they got the police file.”

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

19 comments

Avatar
Philh68 | 4 years ago
3 likes

And this is why having front and rear cameras is basically mandatory. Pictures prove it did happen.

Avatar
Mlupton replied to Philh68 | 4 years ago
2 likes
Philh68 wrote:

And this is why having front and rear cameras is basically mandatory. Pictures prove it did happen.

I now have a camera!

Avatar
Mlupton | 4 years ago
0 likes

As
If you would like to provide feedback on the CPS decision not to pursue the dangerous driving charge you can do so by using the form here https://www.cps.gov.uk/form/feedback the CPS area is South West and county is Gloucestershire. The case ref is 53CH0065019/TP/HP

Avatar
TriTaxMan | 4 years ago
8 likes

Interesting, how for someone in a rush he deliberately drove very slowly, leaving obvious gaps for the cyclist to filter, and when the cyclist took the opportunity to filter he deliberately forced him off his bike.  It is complete and utter BS that the court accepted his "I was in a rush" defense when it was clear that he was deliberately intimidating the cyclist, and purposely not in a rush so he could extract his planned revenge on the cyclist.

There are times I wish that the victim in such cases had the opportunity to veto a plea to a lesser charge so that the assailant has to face the prospect of a much higher sentence.

Why do I get the feeling that if this had been a car driver, who had done the same thing to another car driver the "carless driving" charge wouldn't have been on the table. 

And why was there no mention of failing to stop at the scene of an accident?  That in its own right is a minimum penalty of 5 points on his licence.

Avatar
Mlupton replied to TriTaxMan | 4 years ago
3 likes
craigstitt wrote:

Interesting, how for someone in a rush he deliberately drove very slowly, leaving obvious gaps for the cyclist to filter, and when the cyclist took the opportunity to filter he deliberately forced him off his bike.  It is complete and utter BS that the court accepted his "I was in a rush" defense when it was clear that he was deliberately intimidating the cyclist, and purposely not in a rush so he could extract his planned revenge on the cyclist.

There are times I wish that the victim in such cases had the opportunity to veto a plea to a lesser charge so that the assailant has to face the prospect of a much higher sentence.

I was asked for my opinion, but the CPS still decided to accept the plea. I have complained, not least because the witness was an off duty PCSO. However it won't change the outcome in this case. Anyone can contact the CPS with feedback: You can do so by using the form here https://www.cps.gov.uk/form/feedback the CPS area is South West and county is Gloucestershire. The case ref is 53CH0065019/TP/HP

Avatar
bike_food | 4 years ago
6 likes

Cheers for the info Matthew, glad you're okay, shame you came across this massive bellend, least he got some comeuppance.

Avatar
AlsoSomniloquism | 4 years ago
3 likes

This is atrocious from the CPS based on the description and credible witnesses. I know there can be legal challenges on sentence lengths but can there be one on accepting such a lesser charge based on obvious evidence?

No wonder the defence jumped at the offer. I suspect they didn't realise the witness had such standing in the law or was hoping witnesses wouldn't turn up.

Avatar
hawkinspeter | 4 years ago
5 likes

Sounds like an entitled, aggressive, egotistical motorist who couldn't stand have his driving ability commented on and preferred to cause some injury and damage instead. I don't know how he got away with such a lenient verdict. Maybe the review into road traffic offences will sort these kinds of shenanigans out.

Avatar
eburtthebike replied to hawkinspeter | 4 years ago
3 likes

hawkinspeter wrote:

Maybe the review into road traffic offences will sort these kinds of shenanigans out.

Any day now; only been about 2,500 so far.

Avatar
EK Spinner | 4 years ago
9 likes

A cumulation of Careless incidents, sounds like cut n dried dangerous to me, it certainly isn't a momentary lapse, they really should have persued the more hefty charge, it is defo in the public interest to maximise the time he is removed from the roads

Avatar
Simon E | 4 years ago
11 likes

"he had been frustrated by the cyclist because he was in a rush to get home"

But was he not frustrated behind the slow car? And he managed to not assault a member of staff while on the train. And what has a 3 hour train journey got to do with how he threatens someone with a lethal weapon?

It seems he was only banned because he already had 6 points on his driving license (which suggests that he is an incompetent driver as well as an aggressive bully).

What a complete and utter twat. Perhaps there are a couple of cyclists among the Chippenham Town supporters that could take him to one side in the changing rooms and have a quiet word.

Avatar
Rod Marton | 4 years ago
9 likes

Thank you, Matthew, that now makes a lot more sense. Unfortunately. It beggars belief how something like that could be considered merely careless. At least he will be off the road for a little while (though nowhere near long enough) and I shall feel a little safer cycling through Stroud for the next few months.

Avatar
EddyBerckx | 4 years ago
1 like

New day...new injustice on the roads...

Avatar
eburtthebike | 4 years ago
7 likes

Utterly appalling, which makes the CPS decision to accept the plea to careless driving inexplicable.  With a witness like a PCSO giving evidence and the evidence from Matthew himself, surely they should have refused to accept that plea and pressed on with the dangerous driving charge?

Next time the twat will kill someone and there won't be any witnesses when he gets his licence back in six months.  Should be banned for life, he's clearly not mature enough to have charge of a lethal weapon in a public place.

Avatar
CStar replied to eburtthebike | 4 years ago
3 likes

Every day I read these stories and cycle in London. The more I read and see, the more I think F*** it, if anything happens to me I'm not going to waste time relying on Police /CPS, I shall simply take direct action vs the vehicle concerned (not the driver) with my D -Lock.

Avatar
eburtthebike replied to CStar | 4 years ago
5 likes

Understandable, but you do realise you'll get a heavier sentence for damaging the car than the driver would for trying to kill you?

Avatar
kt26 replied to CStar | 4 years ago
3 likes

I understand your sentiment, but a word of warning. Hitting a vehicle doesn't stop the driver trying to hit you, and usually escalates the situation - which remember is a confrontation with someone in possession of a deadly weapon.

That has been my experience at least. Still doesn't stop me in the heat of the moment though...

Avatar
Derk Davies replied to CStar | 4 years ago
4 likes

When I still rode BMX someone pulled out on me. They ended up with a nice chainring shaped dent in their wing/bonnet. I dont think the road bike would appretiate being hopped onto a car though. Another time also on a BMX a nice shiney range rover half overtook me then went to drive through me into a parking space (that was too small for it), as I had no bar ends he ended up with a good scrape down the side of his car. I saw him a few minuts later parking in the supermarket car park. He came over to me and surprisingly apologized. Don't take no sh*t from these idiots.

I try to be curtious to drivers and hope to get the same back.

Avatar
kt26 replied to eburtthebike | 4 years ago
1 like

Should be banned from life - FTFY

Latest Comments