Welcome to Thursday’s live blog, with Jack Sexty, Alex Bowden and the rest of the team.

Counting up London’s ‘no cycling’ signs; Dirty Sanchez star completes 10 Ironman triathlons in ten days; Dylan Teuns suffers bizarre gardening accident; Cyclists burn 40 Cream Eggs a day at the Tour de France + more in today’s Live Blog
SUMMARY

Idiot calls for cyclist's road tax, idiot gets lots of funny replies
We don’t want to give this cretin any more publicity than is necessary, but here’s a selection of the best replies…
Hey, Bob. Sign this ya massive nugget. https://t.co/kuvSELoKLp pic.twitter.com/edgor5JwCh
— Martin Porter (@TheCyclingScot) 31 July 2019
1) Road tax no longer exists. 2) Vehicle Excise Duty goes into general gov. money pot – not towards road maintenance. 3) Drivers of electric/low emission cars are exempt from VED like cyclists – should they be subjected to your tax? I look forward to your response.
— Phil Bovey (@PhillyBillyB) 31 July 2019
Electric cars are not “exempt” from VED, they are subject but pay £0. Important distinction as admin of VED costs £3.75 per vehicle per year. So if cyclists did become subject like electric cars it would cost an additional £150m per year for the Government to collect the extra £0
— ReCycledParent (@re_parent) 31 July 2019
I’m fine with paying £20 if drivers pay for road wear proportionally. Road wear is a function of the 4th power of mass. For a 1.7 ton car, that’s £1.6 million if me + bike+ luggage is 100kg
— Nick Cumming (@nickcumming) 31 July 2019
So you propose cyclists, who already pay for the roads through income and council tax, who don’t pollute, don’t kill hundreds of people per year and don’t cause potholes, pay extra on top of their current contributions, in order to fix potholes that motor vehicles create?
— Aleks Ivanov (@Dehibernate) July 31, 2019
Will my 4yr old daughter need one for her bike? Ps how do I claim back 20 yrs of taxes paid? Seeing as I don’t pay them, I’d quite like £000’s back. I’d love a new bike.
— Howard Crompton (@CromptonHoward) July 31, 2019
19 vegan sausage rolls, 40 cream eggs or 132 Jaffa Cakes: calories burned per day at the Tour de France
On average, Tour de France cyclists burn 6071 calories a day. To compensate for that energy loss, they could eat 19 Greggs vegan sausage rolls, 32 jam donuts, 40 Cadbury Creme Eggs, 132 Jaffa Cakes, 243 carrots or 759 Brussels sprouts.
— Quite Interesting (@qikipedia) 31 July 2019
Alex Dowsett calls for a revamp of his team’s nutritional strategy based of these calculations…
Yet none of this was on the menu, 40 Cadbury Creme eggs, https://t.co/oh6d21R6XL
— Alex Dowsett (@alexdowsett) July 31, 2019
Dylan Teuns won't be racing in San Sebastien due to a bizarre gardening accident involving a lawn tractor


In a development straight out of a certain spoof music-themed movie from the 80’s (although thankfully this one wasn’t fatal), the Bahrain-Merida rider is unable to race the San Sebastien Clasica due to a “minor home accident” caused by a lawn tractor. In a statement, Bahrain-Merida said: “The unfortunate event happened to the Team Bahrain Merida rider while gardening with his garden tractor this morning at his house in Halen.
Dylan suffered a facial wound, that required 15 stitches in his forehead. Due to this and a bashed up face, unfortunately, he will miss the upcoming ‘Clasica San Sebastian’. All of us at Team Bahrain Merida wish him a speedy recovery!”
Let’s hope none of the other members of the team spontaneously combust, choke on someone else’s vomit or are eaten by a pet python during the rest of their race preparations…
Government stats show more cycle investment is needed says road safety charity
Yesterday we reported on government figures that reveal there has been no growth in the number of trips being made by bicycle. In fact, since 2002, the number of trips being made has fallen by five per cent.
Joshua Harris director of Road safety charity Brake told the London Evening Standard that the results indicate more funding is needed.
“These findings reveal that most adults just don’t think it’s safe to cycle on our roads and more is clearly needed to be done to convince them otherwise.
“Whilst the Government’s actions to encourage more people to cycle and keep them safe are welcome, they must go further.
“We need slower, safer speed limits, greater investment in segregated cycle lanes and drivers who behave dangerously removed from our roads.”
Campaigners call for new commissioner to tackle 'woefully underfunded' active travel in North of Tyne region
North of Tyne mayor Jamie Driscoll has told Chronicle Live that he’s working to create a post of walking and cycling commissioner.
Driscoll has no transport powers, but campaigners say a commissioner could lobby for new, high-quality transport options to help people switch from cars.
“Sustainable transport is key priority for me and we’re already working on it,” said Driscoll. “I have met with Chris Boardman and looked at the work they’re doing in Manchester. I’m working with Sustrans, the sustainable travel organisation based in Newcastle, and with colleagues across the region to help us develop a really effective policy that is sustainable for the North of Tyne.
“An Active Travel Commissioner is one of the areas we will be exploring. The benefits of walking and cycling are obvious in terms of climate change, tackling obesity, general health and quality of life. As a keen cyclist myself, I am always happy to meet directly with groups to discuss ways we can work at a community level as well as supporting high profile events such as the Tour of Britain to promote healthy travel.”
Lyft halting San Francisco e-bike scheme after two bikes caught fire
Last week we reported how a dockless Lime e-bike caught fire while someone was riding it in New York. The firm claimed that the incident came about because someone had tried to tamper with the lock.
It’s now being reported that Lyft is to halt its e-bike hire scheme in San Francisco after two of its bikes caught ablaze.
“Out of an abundance of caution, we are temporarily making the ebike fleet unavailable to riders while we investigate and update our battery technology,” said a spokesperson. Full story over on eBikeTips.
BREAKING: @LYFT e-bike battery catches fire in #SanFrancisco
Reported first by @SFExaminer. https://t.co/Zk5T0mCD9q pic.twitter.com/3SBj19qk2X
— Joe Fitz Rodriguez (@FitzTheReporter) July 31, 2019
The new Cervelo Aspero rolls in for testing


Unfortunately for road.cc staffers the off.road.cc gang have bagsied this one, and you can read all about the juicy tech details over on off.road.cc right now.
Deceuninck Quick-Step release epic video recapping their hugely successful 2019 Tour de France
Three stage wins, and a certain Frenchman keeping hold of the yellow jersey for 14 days in total and subsequently making the entire Tour equals a very memorable three weeks for Quick-Step, and now they’ve packaged it all in video form for your enjoyment.
Remember Pritchard off of Dirty Sanchez? He's just completed a continuous Deca triathlon, or ten Ironmans in ten days...
For those who don’t recall, Dirty Sanchez was a mid-2000’s ‘stunt show’ set in the valleys in which the subjects harm themselves in various ways and film the evidence – a Welsh Jackass, if you will.
About five years ago, one of the stars of the show Matthew Pritchard had an epiphany after struggling with alcohol addiction and mental health issues, subsequently going vegan and even bagging his own vegan cooking show on the BBC. He also got well into fitness, and started doing ultra-endurance triathlon and cycling events.
His gluttony for punishment ramped up to another level recently as he lined up for Deca UK, competing in the continuous event where participants have to complete ten Ironmans, with the clock running continuously. Pritchard finished in 248 hours, 42 minutes and 30 seconds yesterday evening, swimming 24 miles, cycling 1,120 miles and rounding off with a 262 mile run.
The event was won by Mark Dodgson, who finished in a mere 235 hours, 20 minutes and 12 seconds.
Comedy Central commissions "non-scripted entertainment series" hosted by Bradley Wiggins
Gods of the Game will see contestants up against well-known British athletes in various sporting challenges.
Bob's 'road tax for cyclists' petition's being checked to see if it meets standards
Looks like Bob’s petition has been pulled by https://t.co/eQE2QZy6o2. It was going so well too! Had over 4 signatures! https://t.co/T27Qvp3b4A
— Elisabeth Anderson (@velobetty) August 1, 2019
There’ll be five angry signatories if they do decide to pull it…
"We're going to have some questions about leadership" says Geraint Thomas about prospect of lining up at next year’s Tour alongside Chris Froome and Egan Bernal
Ineos could field three different Tour-winners at next year’s race.
A fine use of resources
“NO CYCLING” Signs.
There are 12,240 across London – over half of them thanks to Wandsworth Council @wandbc which has them on every ***king lampost. pic.twitter.com/oyTUnFN1kM— always last (@lastnotlost) August 1, 2019
Apparently Wandsworth Council lead the way with erecting ‘no cycling’ signs, with an astonishing 6,996 across the borough. Are there any bare lamposts left?
Today's #ImOldEnoughToRememberWhen hashtag - a great excuse to post random vintage bikes
#ImOldEnoughToRememberWhen banana seats ruled. pic.twitter.com/f0JmNOIZdw
— T-Dub (@Norseman86) August 1, 2019
What’s your fondest bike-related memory of yesteryear?
Hereford council to remove unauthorised 30mph road markings because they might distract drivers
Whitecross Road is notorious for speeding.
Driver who filmed crash acquitted because he wasn’t 'using' mobile as an 'interactive communication device'
In August 2017, Ramsey Barreto filmed the aftermath of a road traffic collision on his phone as he drove past. A police officer spotted him and pulled him over.
The BBC reports that he was charged with ‘driving a motor vehicle while using a hand-held mobile telephone.’ This seems fair enough – except that Barreto then successfully appealed, arguing that “he wasn’t using it to communicate”.
The regulations refer to using, ‘a hand-held mobile telephone or other hand-held interactive communication device,’ and the judges decided that the inclusion of the word ‘other’ works to confine the meaning of ‘using’ to phones being used ‘for an interactive communication’ function.
This is clearly a massive nonsense. Not only is using a mobile phone to film something while driving incredibly dangerous, it also creates a host of other bizarre distinctions.
Writing in The Spectator, Matthew Scott points out that it means that operating a phone to play recorded music is not ‘using’ a phone, whereas doing so to stream music probably is.
Emma Patterson, whose law firm took up Barreto’s case, points out that a driver filming using their phone could still be prosecuted for driving without due care or dangerous driving.
“We think the law will change very quickly,” she said. “In the meantime it’s very likely that police officers that pull you over for fiddling with mobiles are more likely to charge you for driving without due care.”
Help us to bring you the best cycling content
If you’ve enjoyed this article, then please consider subscribing to road.cc from as little as £2.49. Our mission is to bring you all the news that’s relevant to you as a cyclist, independent reviews, impartial buying advice and more. Your subscription will help us to do more.
7 Comments
Read more...
Read more...
Read more...
Latest Comments
As I have commented a number of times on the frankly pointless but constant "discussion" around doping, its not "sure, sure, they're just eating better, wink wink, nudge nudge" that the brightest and best who claim they are all doped up to the gills like to rely on for their argument. Everything has improved since the dark days of doping. Literally everything. Faster bikes, more comfortable bikes (less fatigue), more aero kit, better training, better nutrition, better recovery, eating up to 150g/hr of carbs (and potentially even more in future) vs 60g/hr, no long training break, everything being optimised from a much younger age. Its frankly a testament to the powers of doping that we are only just seeing these records being beaten. The idea that all the top guys are doped up to the gills along with all these improvements to every single area of cycling performance and are only just beating these old records occasionally is absurd. Its the worst part of the TdF. That you have to deal with the wall of "yeah, but they're all doping" whenever anything is talked about.
@mctrials23 You'd hope that there's a record of warnings. But my point is, how are they implementing this new policy - are they even checking their records to see if someone has already had a warning letter - or do they look at the report, and say "ah, this is a [zig-zag line] offence - normally that would just get a warning letter, so new policy says I should NFA it." Of course the result is that most people just stop reporting them, giving a false impression of incident rates. I wouldn't be at all surprised to see them hail the success of OpSnap because it was getting so many reports they couldn't cope, and then also champion their success when the crime report rates go down...
I spoke to a TVP prosecutor many years ago. He said, he played my footage to the court and heard a gasp from those present. He knew then that he had won.
@quiff Surely their system will have any action that has been taken against them with regards to the law.
@the little onion I saw that today too, and came here looking for reaction - it got a little bit of attention on the live blog a couple of days ago. I also don't have a problem with the police looking at a submitted clip in its totality, and if you've done something you shouldn't have, don't expect to get away with it. (Am I right in thinking they also looked at other, totally separate clips you had submitted too over the offensive language thing?) But I'm in two minds about the actual cycling that got the fine. Yes, it's uncomfortably tight, and if I'd done that I'd have a had a word with myself afterwards about self-preservation, but I'm not convinced they posed any danger to the driver of that tank, at the speeds involved and going uphill. However, sounds like the charge was careless cycling, so danger not required.
@mctrials23 totally agree, I think the problem is perhaps finding a police officer these days with a basic grasp of maths - or at least the authority to deploy it without being bestowed with the title of "trained forensic specialist".
"The net result of this confusion was police forces in Wales no longer issuing warning letters to drivers who dangerously overtake cyclists, pedestrians and horse riders, despite there being no formal policy change." That is one result, but my understanding is that it's wider than this - they were getting so many submissions that they are no longer taking action on *any* offence where the action would be a warning letter. So, for example, zig-zag line offences, where South Wales Police previously acted on OpSnap reports, are now NFAd. That begs a further question though - if you've already had a warning letter for an offence, a repeat offence should potentially result in a fine or prosecution. Are they checking each report to see if the reported driver has previously had a warning, or just NFA-ing all offences of a particular type? Any thoughts, wjts?!
The leader's team would get on the front and block the roads through Montmartre and completely kill the spectacle. Let's face it, the last stage has always been meaningless apart from the sprint, now it's meaningless apart from a superb and thrilling triple lap of Montmartre followed by a sprint. Neutralising GC helped that spectacle - imagine if Tadej had needed to go back and help bring Del Toro up. The roads are too narrow to allow for really fair racing, if we want the wonder of the Montmartre loop then GC neutralisation is the price we have to pay, and one well worth paying in my view.
The big thing that the technical analysis missed out is positioning on the bike. Modern riders do aero work on their road bike and have much better discipline on holding position than even riders 10 years ago. I think Dan Bingham summed it up, his team rode with an old POC helmet with a massive peak whereas Sky had a little stub tail Cask helmet the idea being that it was less sensitive to head position. Bingham said that the long tail helmet was about 15W faster. “How hard would you train to get 15w more power, is it harder than training yourself to live with that helmet?” Pantani is standing up on the pedals, bare head, shirt open, rocking and rolling everywhere with his position, vs someone who is sat on the seat in a quasi time trial position. The 90’s riders were rank amateurs compared with those today, so it’s not a massive surprise that 30 years of progress can beat EPO.
7 thoughts on “Counting up London’s ‘no cycling’ signs; Dirty Sanchez star completes 10 Ironman triathlons in ten days; Dylan Teuns suffers bizarre gardening accident; Cyclists burn 40 Cream Eggs a day at the Tour de France + more in today’s Live Blog”
Top tip – do not try cycling
Top tip – do not try cycling behind someone that’s just eaten 759 Brussels sprouts.
hawkinspeter wrote:
Would inhaling the gas be classified as doping or can riders get a TUE for it?
“…….behind someone that’s
“…….behind someone that’s just eaten 759 Brussels sprouts.”
Hopefully there’d be a passing James Burke to capture the moment with some impeccable timing.
HowardR wrote:
.
Well, that Bob didn’t do his
Well, that Bob didn’t do his research properly, did he?
brooksby wrote:
I feel rather sorry for old Bob. In a time that will live in our collective memory as an Age of Considerable Stupidity he has just outed himself as The Stupidest Man in Britain.
if, that is, he is indeed a man.
“Joshua Harris director of
“Joshua Harris director of Road safety charity Brake told the London Evening Standard (link is external) that the results indicate more funding is needed.
“These findings reveal that most adults just don’t think it’s safe to cycle on our roads and more is clearly needed to be done to convince them otherwise.”
Oh the irony! Brake, the very organisation which has spent thirty years lying about the risks of cycling to convince everyone that it is incredibly dangerous so that they could promote helmets. At least they didn’t mention them this time, but then, they do have thirty years of disinformation to make up for. Perhaps if they apologised and issued a statement saying that they were wrong I might have the tiniest shred of respect for them.
http://www.brake.org.uk/news/711-310811