Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Councillor campaigning against CS9 schooled on cycling by police

Why isn’t filtering considered close passing?

A Chiswick councillor campaigning against CS9 has been given an education by police via Twitter after taking issue with cyclists “whizzing” past cars in moving traffic.

Conservative councillor Joanna Biddolph, who represents Turnham Green ward, spoke to 10 traders running shops alongside Enfield’s Mini Holland scheme in a bid to establish that “badly thought-out dogma-driven cycle schemes on shopping streets are bad for business.”

Based on this, her fear is that CS9 will lead to Chiswick becoming “a ghost town.”

The report’s a fun read. She says that one cyclist who went the wrong way down a cycle lane “provided more evidence that cyclists will do whatever they wish even when they have what they say they want.”

She also says that what cyclists want in Chiswick, “is any cycling infrastructure for the sake of the free money that will pay for it, not cycling infrastructure that would work for local residents.”

When she tweeted a link to the report, a number of other users took issue with her conclusions, including Jeremy Vine.

Responding to one cyclist’s account of a recent close pass, Biddolph responded: “What's it called when someone on a bicycle whizzes past moving cars in moving traffic on a busy road, squeezing between the car and the pavement or the car and parked cars, almost touching the cars it was whizzing beside?”

Surrey Police responded:

 

 

But Biddolph continued, asking why this ‘undertaking’ wasn’t considered close passing: “How does it differ from close passing – other than that it's the person on the bicycle doing the close passing?

At this point, West Midlands Police took up the educational challenge.

Alex has written for more cricket publications than the rest of the road.cc team combined. Despite the apparent evidence of this picture, he doesn't especially like cake.

Add new comment

34 comments

Avatar
hawkinspeter | 5 years ago
23 likes

Nice schooling by the WMP.

Another way to explain it to non-thinking drivers is that they'd be quite happy to walk within inches of a stationary car in a car park, but would be less happy to have the same car pass them within inches at 30mph.

Avatar
brooksby replied to hawkinspeter | 5 years ago
4 likes
HawkinsPeter wrote:

Nice schooling by the WMP.

Another way to explain it to non-thinking drivers is that they'd be quite happy to walk within inches of a stationary car in a car park, but would be less happy to have the same car pass them within inches at 30mph.

Excellent analogy: completely agree!laugh

 

Avatar
pockstone | 5 years ago
4 likes

Have the 'let's prosecute cyclists for legally using a shared path' Met weighed in yet?

Avatar
Legs_Eleven_Wor... | 5 years ago
15 likes

Another retard who needs a quick primer on force and kinetic energy. 

Pages

Latest Comments