Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

French railway calls for prosecutions of Paris-Roubaix crossing-dodgers (+video)

"Extremely serious and irresponsible action" says company...

Although race officials decided to take no action against the cyclists who rode through a closed level crossing in yesterday's Paris-Roubaix, French rail company SNCF says riders should be prosecuted for acting "against all safety rules".

The barriers at a crossing in Northern France came down as riders approached, but a large number went round or even under them. One rider from the Lotto team was even clipped by the barrier as it dropped.

Seconds later a TGV hurtled through the crossing.

SNCF is, unsurprisingly, not impressed.

"Millions of television viewers saw live this extremely serious and irresponsible action which could have been tragic," the rail company said in a statement.

"A few seconds later, a TGV ran on this line and could have hit the peloton.

"SNCF has decided to lodge a legal complaint and will leave it up to the investigation to determine who was responsible. We regret that such foolhardiness took place."

While the lead riders in the group might be able to claim they were too close to stop safely as the barriers, video of the incident clearly shows some riders ignoring a motorcycle policeman's instructions to wait.

Guy Dobbelaere, president of the race jury, said: "It wasn't possible for the leading riders to stop sufficiently safely.

"By neutralising the race for a few moments to not penalise those who stopped, we respected the spirit of the rule."

The rule in question reads "It shall be strictly forbidden to cross level crossings when the barrier is down.

"Apart from risking the penalty for such an offence as provided by law, offending riders shall be eliminated from the competition by the commissaires."

However, Dobbelaere said some of the riders could not be identified during the race.

"In theory, those who pass when the barrier is down are thrown out of the race.

"This time, that would have been unjust in respect of those riders who weren't identified."

Paris-Roubaix crosses railways multiple times, making the prospect of interactions with trains an ongoing headache for race organisers.

In 2006 the race's lead riders, Lief Hoste, Vladimir Gusev and Peter Van Petegem were disqualified for ducking under the barriers at a level crossing. The race was running ahead of schedule that year too, leading to what organisers called "an unpredictable accident de la course."

According to the Express there were 29 deaths at French level crossings in 2014. British level crossings have a rather better record, with 44 deaths over the last five years and just four in 2014.

French TGVs travel so fast that a driver may not even notice the train has hit someone. When a train hit a cyclist last year, the unfortunate rider's body was not found until it stopped at Mulhouse, close to the Swiss border, 40km away.

Network Rail's advice in its Level crossings for cyclists leaflet is:

• Consider dismounting – especially when you’re about to cross the tracks diagonally

• Follow signs and instructions

• Check both ways before crossing – if there is a train coming, don’t cross

• Remain stationary until all the warnings stop

• Check that your exit is clear before crossing

John has been writing about bikes and cycling for over 30 years since discovering that people were mug enough to pay him for it rather than expecting him to do an honest day's work.

He was heavily involved in the mountain bike boom of the late 1980s as a racer, team manager and race promoter, and that led to writing for Mountain Biking UK magazine shortly after its inception. He got the gig by phoning up the editor and telling him the magazine was rubbish and he could do better. Rather than telling him to get lost, MBUK editor Tym Manley called John’s bluff and the rest is history.

Since then he has worked on MTB Pro magazine and was editor of Maximum Mountain Bike and Australian Mountain Bike magazines, before switching to the web in 2000 to work for CyclingNews.com. Along with road.cc founder Tony Farrelly, John was on the launch team for BikeRadar.com and subsequently became editor in chief of Future Publishing’s group of cycling magazines and websites, including Cycling Plus, MBUK, What Mountain Bike and Procycling.

John has also written for Cyclist magazine, edited the BikeMagic website and was founding editor of TotalWomensCycling.com before handing over to someone far more representative of the site's main audience.

He joined road.cc in 2013. He lives in Cambridge where the lack of hills is more than made up for by the headwinds.

Add new comment

67 comments

Avatar
jmaccelari | 9 years ago
0 likes

Stop the train for a bike race? Crazy! Imagine the knock on effects to other services and trains. You can't just 'stop' a train and not cause major havoc on the lines.

The riders were just plain stupid. It's been know for over a 100 years there are train lines that the race crosses. It's written into the rules that they have to stop. No surprises. If you get caught out, then bad luck.

They should have been disqualified (as were some a few years ago - whatever happened to consistency?) and if prosecution is in order, then so be it.

Avatar
Simon E replied to jmaccelari | 9 years ago
0 likes
jmaccelari wrote:

Stop the train for a bike race? Crazy! Imagine the knock on effects to other services and trains. You can't just 'stop' a train and not cause major havoc on the lines.

The riders were just plain stupid. It's been know for over a 100 years there are train lines that the race crosses. It's written into the rules that they have to stop. No surprises. If you get caught out, then bad luck.

They should have been disqualified (as were some a few years ago - whatever happened to consistency?) and if prosecution is in order, then so be it.

Agree with all this.

The rules are very clear, this has happened repeatedly and it's no good having rules if they aren't enforced. Bloody cyclists!

Perhaps the UCI commissaires were too busy inspecting frames for 5w electronic motors.

Avatar
Threeh | 9 years ago
0 likes

^ Trains have schedules to adhere to, surely? Not like rolling road blocks. I wouldn't be very happy if the train had to be stopped while a bike race went through.

While this isn't the near miss the media are making out, the level (ha) of stupidity of some of the riders is unreal.

Avatar
roadie.ronan | 9 years ago
0 likes

One of the biggest races in France, and the SNCF refuse to slow the train in the first place. What do they expect. They should of stopped the train for 4-5 mins and everyone would be happy.

Avatar
vonhelmet replied to roadie.ronan | 9 years ago
0 likes
roadie.ronan wrote:

One of the biggest races in France, and the SNCF refuse to slow the train in the first place. What do they expect. They should of stopped the train for 4-5 mins and everyone would be happy.

I'm sure stopping a train for 4-5 minutes to let a race through would mean more like stopping the train for an hour, once you factor in the uncertainty of when and where it would have to stop, how long for, etc, etc.

Avatar
DaveL75 replied to roadie.ronan | 9 years ago
0 likes

Have a look at the video - that doesn't look like a train travelling at 200mph. The TGV can travel at those sort of speeds but that looked to me more like 50-70mph... so they did slow down.

Media hype at the expense of accurate reporting again imho.

Avatar
STiG911 replied to roadie.ronan | 9 years ago
0 likes
roadie.ronan wrote:

One of the biggest races in France, and the SNCF refuse to slow the train in the first place. What do they expect. They should of stopped the train for 4-5 mins and everyone would be happy.

Because of the tailwind the race was actually quite a way ahead of schedule, so even if they planned to stop the train that would have been due to cross at the originally projected time, the train which did arrive would still have been there. It's one thing to close a road for a given time, but to expect a major train route to succeed to the race is extremely unrealistic.
As others have stated, the focus should really be on the professional riders who risked their lives, and flouted the rules in order to save a bit of time, knowing that the race would be slowed to allow them to catch up. It's not the first time the race has been run on this route, so riders should know to expect potential delays and not display that kind of reckless behaviour to the world.
And another thing - at least two riders got smacked on the head by the barrier, so what if they'd actually fallen? You're back to a previous comment about running in cycling shoes...
Shocking.

Pages

Latest Comments