A school’s soon-to-be-completed mountain bike trail has already attracted fierce criticism from neighbours, who claim the track, which they say is being used by local children without permission, has “ruined” their lives and “massively” devalued their houses – because kids have been “peering” into their homes and “waving and smiling” at them.
Residents who live near Folkestone Academy have also called for better security, due to youngsters accessing the site before it has officially opened, while raising concerns that the bike track will “attract the wrong type of people”.
In April, we reported that plans to build a new cycling track at Folkestone Academy were approved by Folkestone and Hythe District Council, following the creation of the UK’s first purpose-built skate spark at the Kent school.
The £150,000 facility is currently being built on an underutilised part of the school’s campus, backing onto homes in Grasmere Gardens. It will consist of a 480-metre trail split into two loops, with a free-flowing area including jumps and obstacles, with teachers saying it will provide an alternative to riding on “busy roads” or on pavements.
The planning application was met with vocal criticism from Grasmere Gardens residents, who claimed the creation of the track would place their “peace and privacy” under threat, comparing the potential noise to “living next to a motorway”. 23 letters were also submitted to the local authority’s planning portal opposing the proposals.
Amid this criticism, the plans for the track were originally submitted in January 2024 and rejected last year, but were eventually granted in April following revisions and an “acoustic assessment” submitted to the council, which failed to show a drastic impact in noise levels on neighbouring properties.
However, with the track now nearing completion, these criticisms have reemerged this week, as locals claim the facility has caused privacy and safeguarding concerns.
Speaking to KentOnline, Grasmere Gardens resident Ian Price, whose sons’ bedrooms overlook the track, criticised the location of the mountain bike and BMX trail and said his family have already seen young cyclists looking into their home.
“We never had an issue with them having the cycle track,” he said. “But they’ve got a massive playing field area, and they chose to put it right against all the back fences of the residents.
“The other day, there were some kids at the top of the track who saw us and started waving and smiling.”
As well as being used by students during school hours, the track will also be open outside term time, from 8am to 8pm on weekdays and 9am to 2pm on weekends and bank holidays.
And Price argues that, due to this range of opening hours, the school needs to install an opaque barrier around the track, instead of the standard chain link fencing currently in place.
“If they’re going to have it there, I’d rather they had a screen around it – maybe a solid wall – and then they could put a gate on it and lock it up,” he said.
“That way, when it’s in use, they’ll be confined within that area and not looking out on us.”
Price also told the website that children are currently ignoring the ‘do not use’ signs on display at the track, and have been using it to ride their bikes over the past few weeks.
Meanwhile, another neighbour has even claimed that the track’s installation has “ruined” their quality of life, while fearing that it will “attract the wrong type of people”.
“I’m worried about where they are going to sit and drink alcohol at night,” they said. “It’s ruined living here and devalued our houses massively.”
In response to these concerns from residents, a spokesperson for Folkestone Academy pointed out that the fence separating the trail from the houses in Grasmere Gardens is of sufficient height and has been used by neighbours to install bushes and plants, blocking their view of the school grounds.
“We have been through the formal planning process for this track and our plans have been approved by Folkestone and Hythe District Council,” the spokesperson told road.cc on Friday.
“The site is well secured to deter unauthorised access out of hours. The fencing between the school’s land and the adjacent housing is over two metres high, with many houses using our fencing as a trellis for plants and bushes in their gardens.
“We believe that this bike track will offer our students and local young people an exciting space where they can enjoy physical activity and develop new skills.
“For many of our children their only alternative is to cycle on busy roads or along pavements and this facility is unique in Folkestone in offering a specialist mountain bike trail.”
Of course, the residents of Grasmere Gardens aren’t alone when it comes to opposing cycling facilities used by children.
Earlier this year, we reported that a group of conservation volunteers in Sheffield were accused of leaving a wooded area “in a mess” after a popular children’s mountain bike trail was dug up and destroyed in what locals have described as a “malicious and vindictive” act targeting young cyclists.
In June, a park ranger and 15 volunteers from the Friends of the Porter Valley (FOPV) conservation group dug up and removed an “unapproved” bike track on a steep slope in Trippet Wood, in Sheffield’s Bingham Park nature reserve.

According to the park’s Ranger Service, the track was “much larger in scale” than similar trails in the valley, containing a series of jumps, bankings, and ramps, “causing a significant amount of damage due to excavation (at depth) of the ground”.
But after the move was criticised by locals as “spiteful” and an indication that “bikes and kids aren’t welcome in the woods”, a local councillor who took part in the “unsanctioned” track’s destruction insisted that the work was necessary to repair the damage allegedly caused by the trail, while arguing that it will “remove the danger speeding cyclists pose to other woods users”.

In May, police in Shropshire were criticised by local cyclists for taping off a grass area in the grounds of a village hall, which was reportedly used by schoolchildren on mountain bikes as a ramp, sparking concerns about potential collisions with passing motorists.
And in July 2024, a group of young cyclists in Lancashire were criticised by conservationists for allegedly causing “serious” damage to a nature reserve by digging up parts of the earth to create mountain bike jumps.
That criticism came around the same time children in South Wales were threatened by residents and stopped from entering a woodland which they had cleared of litter to use as a cycle track, which the local housing association claimed was anti-social behaviour that was causing “severe damage” to the area.

Throughout June 2024, the group of local kids, all around primary school age, spent their weekends clearing rubbish from Garw Wood, which runs between houses in Croesyceiliog, a suburb of Cwmbran, to create a makeshift bike park.
However, at the end of the month, the Bron Afon community housing association fenced off the entrances to the ancient woodland, a decision it claimed was due to “anti-social behaviour in the area which has caused damage” – but which local parents have claimed was due to pressure from residents who had threatened and swore at the children.

20 thoughts on ““They started waving and smiling”: Fuming residents claim children’s bike track has “ruined living here” and devalued houses – due to kids “peering” into their homes”
Ian Price wrote:
I know, right! They could have put it on the centreline of the playing pitch (about which Sport England would have had nothing to say), but instead they chose to put it out of the way, so now you can see all the way across the pitch during a game!
Elsewhere, on the irrational
Elsewhere, on the irrational/clueless front…
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx2lmg070n7o.amp
Council bans 2 things that
Council bans 2 things that are already illegal.
Does the PSPO also ban defecating in public ?
I might be wrong, but I’d
I might be wrong, but I’d speculate this move means the council can now take enforcement action against those activities with their own enforcement officers, rather than having to hope the police are there to do something about it.
So long as staff are adequately trained, and encouraged to take a proportionate approach (encouraging compliance rather than hiding in the bushes, hoping for an opportunity to ticket someone who is not at risk of bothering anyone).
FionaJJ wrote:
If that is, indeed, the case, then they’d have been better off acknowledging that the police have failed to enforce the illegal scooters/bikes and that they are taking responsibility for it – they’d still acquire the positive views of the general public, whilst not alienating cyclists
belugabob wrote:
Why would making it possible for council officers to take enforcement action against those on illegal use of e-scooters and electric motorbikes alienate cyclists?
The obvious answer for the council passing an order that allows them to take action on a problem without having to make a song and dance about how the police should be doing it is presumably because they aren’t completely stupid. That’s the kind of thing that doesn’t just piss off the people they will already be working with on a multitude of things (including this), but is also a guaranteed way to get the idiots frothing in the comments section of the local paper about how the council want to distract the police for solving murders.
FionaJJ wrote:
I didn’t say that
Isn’t that what I said?
Hirsute wrote:
…and also, bizarrely, seems to accept illegal behaviour outside the PSPO: “The report said people would be able to push or walk alongside their e-scooters or non-compliant e-bikes through the exclusion zone” – tacit acknowledgement that they will be riding them before and after.
No, for that you need a POPE (Prevention of Papal Excretion) Order.
“Papal Excretion” – Is this
“Papal Excretion” – Is this the opposite of “are the bears Catholics”?
chrisonabike wrote:
Rem acu tetigisti.
“attract the wrong type of
“attract the wrong type of people”.
Cyclists.
“The other day, there were some kids at the top of the track who saw us and started waving and smiling.”
OMG! How rude! How offensive! I hope they called the police. We can’t have people smiling and waving in this country. If that isn’t a crime it should be.
Folkestone: newly crowned NIMBY capital of the UK.
The wrong type of people eh !
The wrong type of people eh ! Do a crime map search for CT19 or CT18 and you’ll see that these NIMBY’s live in a very low crime area. Haha I don’t (Bradford Met) and wouldn’t know a PCSO if I fell over one. Privileged fers are getting no sympathy from me.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-57284953
This is a classic .. Revenge can be creative : )
The graphic of what they
The graphic of what they might get looks fantastic.
Good luck to them.
The now completed skate/bike
The now completed skate/bike park is full of folk enjoying themselves whenever I go past.
I was looking to see how the
I was looking to see how the skatepark could have an impact on a used car dealership – it turns out that the nearest branch of that business (yes it’s a chain) is the other side of Swansea
From that, I’m guessing that the business owner lives in one of the substantial houses along the seafront – none of which are actually next to the skatepark.
I don’t suppose the traffic along the main coast road bothers him, though.. ?
Of course none of the people
Of course none of the people complaining have kids who ride bikes. Their kids are also transported safely by SUV.
“It’s ruined living here and
“It’s ruined living here and devalued our houses massively”
Has it? Have you sold your house and found out? You probably should if things have been, as you say, “ruined”
Isn’t the all weather pitch
Isn’t the all weather pitch at the same height as the top of the track.
Track looks like fun.
It looks a bit basic. That’s
It looks a bit basic. That’s a long straight with just a few small jumps. But it’s certainly better than nothing.