Alright, LeMond, Fignon, aero bars, the Champs-Élysées, 1989, eight seconds, and all that. It was a good run, but your time at the top is finally over.
Because yesterday afternoon, on the 21 hairpins that make up cycling’s most legendary climb, Alpe d’Huez, we witnessed the most tense, exciting, unpredictable, and closely fought Tour de France finale in the sport’s history.
Four seconds. That was all that separated a fighting, battling, desperate Kasia Niewiadoma from a career-defining triumph and devastating defeat.
The 61 seconds that ticked by between stage winner and defending champion Demi Vollering crossing the line and the yellow jersey’s final, long agonising sprint felt like an eternity – the handful of seconds after Évita Muzic had passed Niewiadoma, taking away those potentially vital bonus seconds, even more so.
The realisation on the face of Niewiadoma – who admitted afterwards that she had a horrible time on both the Alpe and the preceding Col du Glandon, convinced another breakthrough victory was falling through her fingertips – when she learnt that the yellow jersey was hers to keep will surely go down as one of the Tour de France’s most iconic images.
(A.S.O./Charly Lopez)
As the old saying goes, the Tour is won on the Alpe. Never was that adage, one applied to race-winning moments by the likes of Lance Armstrong and Carlos Sastre, truer than it was yesterday evening.
Of course, the drama of the final stage of the 2024 Tour de France Femmes wasn’t confined to that deceptively long finishing straight, or even Alpe d’Huez for that matter.
When Demi Vollering – who started the day 1.15 behind on GC – accelerated through the fog on the steepest section of the Col du Glandon with 53 kilometres remaining, in the company of Pauliena Rooijakkers, yellow jersey Niewiadoma dispatched quickly, the gap increasing with every pedal stroke, the stage was set.
And the actors knew their roles perfectly.
(A.S.O./Thomas Maheux)
Vollering: the consummate, imperious stage racer, the finest of her generation, seeking to simply ride away from the rest and regain what she believed was rightfully hers.
Niewiadoma: the impetuous, popular attacker, the fighter, and nearly woman of the peloton, suddenly vaulted into a desperate defending job.
And Rooijakkers: the wildcard, the pure climber, sitting two seconds ahead of Vollering on GC, waiting to pounce to shock us all.
After a breakneck descent, the gap stabilises at 1.15 – at one point Vollering, Rooijakkers, and Niewiadoma are all basically level on the virtual GC – then falls (thanks to Lidl-Trek’s Lucinda Brand pulling for Gaia Realini in the valley), then stabilises again.
(A.S.O./Thomas Maheux)
Meanwhile, the long road to Alpe d’Huez was characterised by tension in both groups, as Vollering became visibly frustrated at both Rooijakkers’ sometimes reluctant assistance and that her own usual dominance in the mountains was being curtailed by the dogged determination of Kasia Niewiadoma.
That dynamic continued on the Alpe: Vollering, a picture of concentration through her clear lenses, ploughing on, Rooijakkers a constant, dangerous presence on her wheel. Niewiadoma in time trial mode, showcasing all the stubborn resilience she’s become famous for.
By the final, shallower kilometre of the Alpe, the pendulum had swung back in the yellow jersey’s favour. At the top, it was just, just enough. After eight stages through the Netherlands, Belgium, and France, the top two of the Tour de France were separated by just four seconds, the final podium of Niewiadoma, a devastated Vollering, and Rooijakkers by just ten.
(A.S.O./Thomas Maheux)
“When Demi attacked it was terrible because the climb was so hard and I could feel like I was losing my legs then,” an emotional Niewiadoma said at the finish.
“I had to stay patient and keep my pace on descent. And got my power back and I knew that I just had to push my best on my final ascent. I believe you always have to keep pushing and trying hard, even if things don't go your way.
“There are weeks when things are perfect. Besides putting in a lot of hard work, the stars have to align. We wrote history this week and I am so proud to be on the top step.”
“It was nail biting. We thought we lost it, then we thought we had it, then we lost it then we thought we had it,” Niewiadoma’s Canyon-Sram boss Ronny Lauke said.
“Oh, my goodness, that was unbelievable. I think in any sport, I’ve never been through such an emotional rollercoaster.”
(A.S.O./Thomas Maheux)
Of course, the major plot device of this year’s Tour de France Femmes, which acted as Chekhov's Gun for the drama that unfolded in the Alps yesterday, was Demi Vollering’s crash in the final six kilometres of stage five.
Vollering, then in a yellow jersey ripped and tattered by her high-speed fall, was left almost completely isolated by her SD Worx teammates as Niewiadoma pressed on ahead, the Dutch star extracting a brief turn from Mischa Bredewold, as Blanka Vas won the stage, her team leader losing 1.47 to new race leader Niewiadoma.
The debate around SD Worx’s curious tactics during Vollering’s lonely chase was exacerbated further when Lorena Wiebes, who sprinted for eighth place despite knowing her team’s yellow jersey hope had hit the deck, nonchalantly claimed that Vollering would easily claw back the time lost once the race reached the high mountains – a prediction cast asunder by Niewiadoma’s dogged brilliance.
Did SD Worx’s failure to rally around Vollering – who’s set to depart the team for FDJ Suez next year – cost them a second Tour de France title in a row?
(A.S.O./Thomas Maheux)
For many cycling fans, it didn’t matter.
“If, if, if… Let’s just celebrate one of the most thrilling days the sport has seen in a long while,” cycling writer Peter Cossins tweeted yesterday.
“The best finish in the history of Grand Tour racing without a doubt. Absolutely phenomenal.”
Amen to that. Sorry Greg…
Add new comment
32 comments
Ah, that would be me, I believe...I didn't quite say that, I said I didn't think he would exceed his achievements of last year, given that to do so he would have to win the flat stage and all three hilly stages that don't have altitude finishes. Given that he didn't take yesterday's hilly stage, there's one hilly stage and the flat stage left for realistic chances, so...both the "hilly with altitude finish" stages end on Cat 1s so can't see him in with much of a shout there. Stage 11 may be an outside chance, "medium mountains" but Cat 3-2-2-3 with a downhill to the finish, but on the whole I'll stick with my prediction that he won't better last year's haul. Time will tell!
Once again, it's got to directly affect a plod before they'll do anything about it.
Rest of us ... well, we don't matter.
dunno, got close passed by a car tonight probably not much different from that vans gap, with a police car coming the other way. they didnt do a thing, probably close to their shift ending.
“Sorry to hear that,” the unit responded. “We will always prosecute poor driving such as this if we see it.”
Ah! The police standard dodge is back! 'The offence has to be witnessed by a traffic officer' fib, which we know to be untrue after the Rishi Sunak 'not wearing seatbelt' incident when even Lancashire Constabulary (leading contender for the UK's Most Idle and Inept Police Force Award) managed to prosecute. The subtext for this comment is 'so if you annoying little b******s think anything other than the bin is reserved for all your HD videos, you've got another think coming'
Looking after someone's dog for a week.
Why do drivers slow down and give me more space when walking the dog than I get riding a bike ?
Why do drivers slow down and give me more space when walking the dog than I get riding a bike ?
It's another version of the exaggerated courtesy shown to riders on horseback by BMW and Audi drivers- the ones who cheer the Telegraph 'writers' advocating routinely killing cyclists
Because you'd probably get a heavier sentence for killing a dog than you'd get for a cyclist?
They like dogs.
You've just sent me down a "What the hell is O'Tacos?" rabbit hole, and now I really want some 'French tacos' - chips, kebab, and tacos all in one meal - sounds like genius!
I have only caught highlight clips of the TdF Femmes battle on the Alpe and my word was that insane. A brilliant race as a neutral and the tension for that minute-and-a-second was nail-biting. An excellent finish to showcase the pinnacle of the Women's elite sport.
You have to feel for Vollering, for if it wasn't for her team's actions the day she crashed, she would have won the jersey by a couple of minutes. Absolutely feels like SD Worx hanging her out to dry because she is due to leave.
And a huge cheer for Yalina Kuskova. A very strong finish for a lone rider, and no doubt on the World Tour teams' radars. I do think that her team's entry to the TdF was questionable, and calls in to question the fairness and viability of the current points system, but there's no doubt that Kuskova is a rider to watch.
I wonder if the BBC "had a word" with Mr Hoy. By my read of those rules he must have at least been skating on paper thin ice as a part owner of an aero sensor company talking about how (amongst other things in fairness) aero sensors are allowing riders to optimize in real world velodrome conditions...
There's huge inconsistency in the rules anyway. For example TV chefs are on television to tempt people to then go and buy their books, but this is seen as OK
In most instances, the BBC will have some financial involvement with the publication of the book - acting as co-producer or distributor on behalf of the publisher and the author, thus taking a cut of the money and the book is a BBC affiliated product. The BBC logo will be printed on the cover or in the foreword. And as the book is a BBC product, it can "advertise" the book at the end of the relevant cooking programme it comes from.
I don't get how the BBC think they can dictate what Laura puts on her personal Instagram page? I fully appreciate have strict guidelines on what gets broadcast through their media channels, but AFAIK it wasn't posted on a BBC account, or live in camera?
Very simply. If she were to continue to breach their expectations they won't ask her to do more punditry. She won't be an employee like Gary Lineker where guidelines are enforcable, but if they are unhappy she won't be doing anymore work for them.
I'd be surprised if there weren't clauses in their contract that would allow them to withhold fees if she refused to remove posts that breached the guidelines.
They're not doing that at all, what they are saying is you can promote what you like on your own channels but if you're sponsored to wear something you can't then wear that when you're appearing on our channel, so Ms.K is sponsored to wear Breitling watches, no problem, but she can't wear them when appearing on the BBC because that would amount to Breitling getting their product advertised on the BBC. Their statement made it pretty clear:
"Nor should they appear on air wearing clothes or using products, goods or services which they have agreed, or been contracted, to promote or in which they have any financial interest.”
No problem with you having the promo deal but you can't use our airtime as part of it.
Well, complaints that James Cracknell was paid to publicise the helmet that he claimed saved his life, and according to BBC rules they either shouldn't have interviewed him or made it very clear that he was paid, fell on stoney ground. They also had a helmet expert for balance, and promised him that they would broadcast his statement that helmets didn't save lives, but then cut it.
The article about cutting off the drops had me paying more attention to where I had my hands on the commute this morning. My conclusion, probably about 75% on the hoods, the other 25% on the drops. Does this mean I can cut out the tops of my bars?
Good one
I've just taken my vintage Claud Butler project bike out for its first (albeit very short and flat) ride since reassembly and I was almost exclusively in the drops - Bars and brake levers from that era are not easy to hold on in a "hoods" position and I wasn't climbing enough to need the tops. Admittedly just under 2 miles around a quiet housing estate is not enough to test out a proper riding position, but bike fit will come once the bike is mechanically sound.
Nah, just get an old Grail
Brilliant race, must admit I was hollering for Vollering, as it were, but Niewiadoma showed amazing guts to hang on. Might have helped at the finish if the Eurosport commentator had actually told us after Vollering had finished exactly what time Niewiadoma had to finish in to hold the jersey rather than leaving viewers to try and figure it for themselves...
A real shame it wasn't broadcast on free-to-air UK television
Exactly. Although, assuming we'd only have got Eurosport's highlights on Quest, there's no guarantee they'd actually have aired when advertised anyway.
Yet again yesterday, the Vuelta highlights didn't air in the 7pm slot, with the usual apology banner but no explanation or alternative time slot advertised. And, again as usual, they finally showed it at midnight, without updating the EPG, so those unaware of Quest's MO would think it was still going to be NASA's unexplained UFO Files (or whatever it was). Pathetic. 😡
Very happy for Kasia though, great to see her win such a big race.
I was frantically hitting refresh on the browser every 30 seconds.
Was willing Demi to suceed despite her teams malice and/or incompetence. I know she has a prickly reputation but I cant believe how poorly served she was by SDWorx in the last 4 stages. With the exception of the excellent Niamh Fisher-Black
Seems like they're the only police force which is actually following up on illegal e-bikes/e-scooters, then…
And although they are at least doing something, they are not doing it terribly efficiently; I can guarantee that if I stood at a busy junction in the City during a working day I would see a number of illegal electric motorcycles and scooters equivalent to those the CoLP have seized in a year pass by within a couple of hours at most.
And at what rate are new ones being added to London's roads? I'd wager somewhat more than one a day.
Apologies if this has been picked up before, but a bit of political news. The Department for Transport has finally confirmed its Ministerial portfolios. Active travel is under the Minister for Local Transport, Simon Lightwood - https://www.gov.uk/government/people/simon-lightwood
Also e-scooters, modal shift & integrated transport strategy so hopefully he can join up lots of the dots.
Although he'll need Treasury support, hopefully they stop pinching from small budgets to address big funding gaps?
Pages