The images that came out of yesterday’s crash were chilling to the bone, but wasn’t showing them live on the broadcast a step too far? At least Ryan and I thought so, and perhaps so did a couple of broadcasters who cut the footage at the time of the crash.
And while updates on injured riders is paramount, for fans yes, but most importantly for the families and loved ones of the cyclists, the lingering camera on Roglič, Cras and Vingegaard as they lay in the concrete gutter wasn’t just horrifying, some might say it felt wrong too.
Adam Hansen, President of the riders’ union CPA, raised this issue on Twitter last evening, writing: “Out of respect of riders that have fallen in a crash and their families at home. The CPA does not support TV coverage to continue to film them while they are down. Riders have reached out to me asking if we can make this a rule and we support that. Please be mindful.”
Meanwhile, Mark Cavendish’s wife Peta also shared her thoughts on social media. She said: “There is a lot of conversation around the lingering camera shots of motionless riders and endless repeats of the crashes.
“I know that some families of riders have shared that they find it helpful as it's the only updates they receive. I hear that. The wait for information seems an eternity. However, I for one would rather not play voyeur to the fragility of a human life. A spectator to a families pain and anguish.
“I don't believe ‘it’s just part of the sport.’ It's something I have said many times before. It is not the same in all sports. It’s not just the distress it can cause as it's watched in real time. But also the weight it can hold in the future.
“Remember, these are not actors. There are no retakes. No scripted happy ending... yet still the cameras roll. Uncertain as to what title time will give the sequence. I have been the wife with children in arms watching, flinching at every repeat.
“I don't no speak for everyone. But… Let's remember, this footage is not for information, for facts or vital sporting updates. It’s for ratings. For clicks, for views.”
Responding to someone who argued that they would have liked close-up footage or commentary “to know that they are alive”, Peta replied: “With the greatest of respect and I truly hope my sentiment doesn’t get lost in written word…It’s not about what you would have liked. It’s about respect for the ‘lifeless rider’ and their family.”
Add new comment
15 comments
The worst thing by far I've ever seen in cycling coverage was when poor Wouter Weylandt was killed in the Giro in 2011; the camera zoomed in on him as he lay on the road and for a moment he looked just stunned, then blood started welling out from under his helmet and in that instant one knew he was dead. I'd definitely support cameras/directors instantly cutting away from crashes rather than ever see that again, it was the stuff of nightmares.
We watched the MotoGP when Simoncelli crashed, foolishly watched the crash in slow mo on the sky box, wish we hadn't.
Did you see Jeremy McWilliams MotoGP crash back in the late 90s when another rider moved over and hit his front brake lever while going flat out down the straight and he went over the bars? If i remember correctly he slid the rest of the way down the straight but amazingly got up and walked away.
Once again cycling lagging behind other sports, particularly motorsport which tends to move coverage away, and not show endless replays until the condition of drivers is known.
Saying that, I recall a journalist saying that the latin media have no issues showing grizzly scenes......Which explains why Spanish owned (until recently) MotoGP/WSBK will often show endless replays of accidents, despite protestations from many in the media.
And remembering the crash of Ayrton Senna at Imola in May 1994; the Italian broadcaster hovered over him whilst he received treatment - fortunately, the BBC decided to cut away as they had their own team there.
Given Peta's own observation "that some families of riders have shared that they find it helpful as it's the only updates they receive" is there any logical solution to coverage of crashes other than that people who don't want to watch turn it off? Or is there some way to provide a private video feed so only friends and family can see how bad (or hopefully not) the injuries after a crash?
Why not just every rider has an emergency contact number and the DS/soigneur/mechanic/commisaire makes a call to give them news if they go down? Obviously they have other jobs to do but in a WT race there are enough staff around to make that doable.
Sadly,the coverage of injured riders is nothing new.
It has been part of the tv coverage for years, so don't quite understand the uproar regarding yesterday's crash. Unless, only those at the top of the sport matter in these incidents but those at the back aren't worthy of the same outcry.
Well worth a read and a listeb:
https://canvas-story.bbcrewind.co.uk/chasingspeed/
Chasing Speed
Jamie Morris' younger brother Sammy was killed in a car crash with his friend Lewis, who was driving at speeds that have been described as insane.
This is Jamie's story.
"You should talk to drivers about their behaviour instead of reporting them"
https://www.phtm.co.uk/news/6604/phtm-news/speeding-gloucester-cabbie-ki...
Judge Lowe said he would get 'significant' credit and a shorter sentence for pleading guilty rather than having a trial
Oh dear! I feel something bad is about to happen
Still no rerun or highlights of stage 4 on Discovery. I missed yesterday's action and still have no idea who won the stage
No one won the stage as there was no contest after the accident.
Meintjes won after they let the break contest the final kilometres. I think Discovery made the right decision to pull the episode, given the distateful camera coverage
I saw Eurosport had a 7 minutes highlights package on You tube. Coverage was only of the last 3km (ish) and only made verbal reference to the fact there had been a crash because of the neutralised stage.
I agree, but today they started the coverage with "here's what happened yesterday" showing some fairly graphic footage of the crash and the aftermath. I guess they thought it was OK because by that time knew that nobody was killed or atrociously injured, but it still felt pretty voyeuristic and unnecessary.