At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
Just this week I'd wondered where this was going and had intended to ask if anyone had seen anything pop up about it, but forgot. Hoping the...
Slightly off topic, but $1,161 and $619? WTF? Does anybody know why Australia's fines are not "round" numbers like they are in the rest of the...
it used to be, obviously opinions differ. But the stuff they sold a decade ago, absolutely was very good quality stuff, it felt quality too,and...
That's connected via OBD-II so can't access GPS data, therefore won't help with navigation.
The SsangYong Rexton is 1.995m wide. Looking at the video, it looks to me as if the driver was intending to give Richard at least the recommend 1...
Ahh; the usual issue....
Yeah; read Tom Allen's blog for his thoughts on the difference between Touring & Bikepacking......
Qidi ... was it just me, or did the guys with the system come over as right cocksockets?...
You can see the effect of a 'way too late' opening of this comp, with my dismal results! Wrecked a good start to my season.
It was off my list of helmets worth buying as soon as I saw someone had named it "Game Changer".