- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Tubeless valves
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
Add new comment
3 comments
A long-tailed helmet will generally have less drag (assuming lots of conditions are adhered to) and as you can see from the results yesterday, small things can have dramatic consequences at the front of the peloton.
As for Utrecht, I should imagine they were either asked to wear them by Giro for publicity.
Looks very similar to the casco speedtime...well the visor at least.
Does anyone have any idea why BMC used the new helmet in Utrecht but the older selector in the TTT?
Giro has previous form for "releasing" new helmets that subsequently never go on to general sale. A couple of years ago, a lot of Giro sponsored teams were sporting a stubby Giro Selector in TT stages, but as far as I'm aware, it's never been available to the public.
Not only is it against UCI rules, it's very frustrating as a consumer, I've been waiting over two years for that helmet! Perhaps their tunnel testing found out that its drag was *even* worse than the Air Attack?! Nah, only joking, I'm not sure that possible...