- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
Add new comment
6 comments
JessieRae,
The swimming pool comment is reductio ad absurdum. You're not proving the case the for this facility with it.
The existence of a nearby MTB centre doesn't strengthen the case either. Maybe it even weakens it.
YMMV but my experience of Sustrans routes is that unpaved sections are generally not suitable for road bikes, particularly in bad weather.
I know its curmudgeonly to criticise this type of thing, but I think it's a mistake to assume all cycling money is money well spent.
You can say, 'we're doing something for cycling', without actually addressing the bigger problem of everyday opportunity for cycling and this is an example of that. This type of 'leisure cycling' focus appeals to councillors because they get no backlash from motorists.
Hi JessieRae
You are quite right; it's not intended to.
My point is that if I was spending a million quid on cycling infrastructure in a region with 0.5% mode share, it wouldn't be on a closed circuit in a field. Why not build opportunities for cycling into peoples actual everyday lives if, as the councillor says, this is about "making it easier for all Fifers to be fitter and healthier"
And if I was putting a leisure or sports type circuit in a field, I'd make a bmx or mtb track. You mention that the connecting NCN1 route isn't paved - so that rules out riding a road bike to this facility. I can see hardcore roadies training in the winter maybe, but then again if they have to share it with runners, that's ruled out as well.
What's the council really saying with this? 'We've given up on even pretending that cycling to school or the shops is appealing, so why not drive out to this field and cycle round in circles instead'?
> You mention that the connecting NCN1 route isn't paved - so that rules out riding a road bike to this facility.
Um, really?
>And if I was putting a leisure or sports type circuit in a field, I'd make a bmx or mtb track.
You mean like the one that's next door to this proposed facility? http://www.dmbins.com/developing/case-studies--3/lochore-meadows-country...
>What's the council really saying with this? 'We've given up on even pretending that cycling to school or the shops is appealing, so why not drive out to this field and cycle round in circles instead'?
I hear they build swimming pools that you can't even swim to...
Presumably folk still encouraged to travel by car to this facility.
Does nothing to improve the dire situation for everyday utility cycling.
>Presumably folk still encouraged to travel by car to this facility.
From NCN1 there's a cycle route link in through Blairadam Forest (not paved) and through Lochore Meadows (paved IIRC) - then just over 1 mile from there to the school on a B road (may even be a link to the school from the park). The school is 0.2 miles from Lochgelly station. I suspect some people will drive there [shakes fist at sky, etc].
>Does nothing to improve the dire situation for everyday utility cycling.
Is it intended to? Does it need to?
Hang on, Am I the only one who noticed the headline, then read the article and they don't add up....
DEDICATED cycling circuit.
Then "Hood anticipates that the circuit – which will also be suitable for running"
So not a dedicated cycling circuit then.
In that case, many venues throughout Scotland can claim to be dedicated cycling circuits, but are used by other sports