- News
- Live blog

“It’s unfortunate Tadej and Jonas have to atone for the sh*t we did”: EF boss Jonathan Vaughters says 2am Tour de France drugs tests during Armstrong era would have “saved the sport 25 years of drama”; Tour TT behind the scenes + more on the live blog
SUMMARY

“It’s unfortunate Tadej and Jonas have to atone for the sh*t we did”: EF boss Jonathan Vaughters says 2am Tour de France drugs tests during Armstrong era would have “saved the sport 25 years of drama”
I have a feeling we might be hearing about Tadej Pogačar and Jonas Vingegaard’s Sunday morning drug test wake-up calls for a while to come yet.
Yesterday saw a series of new developments to the Tour de France’s latest doping-related controversy, including the revelation that a judge in Paris signed off on the tests prior to the race, after determining that there was enough suspicion to warrant an out-of-hours knock on the door for the Tour’s then-top two.
In a curious intervention, the CPA riders’ union chose to criticise the nocturnal tests, calling on the UCI to “invest more in scientific research and detection technologies, rather than increasing the number of particularly intrusive unannounced tests”.
Meanwhile, there have been mixed messages concerning how common nighttime tests are at the Tour. One source within a team informed me that their riders have been subject to controls between 11pm and 6am over the past two weeks, while a member of another team told me their doctors can never remember any of the riders ever being asked to take a nocturnal drugs test at any race.
And now, EF Education-EasyPost manager Jonathan Vaughters has chipped in, arguing that nighttime testing could have saved professional cycling a lot of grief a quarter of a century ago, while apologising to the sport’s modern stars who he claims are still “atoning” for his generation’s sins.

Vaughters, a former US Postal rider who once held the climbing record for Mont Ventoux, admitted doping throughout his career. In the late 2000s, he set up the Slipstream squad (now EF), heralding the American team as a bastion of ethics and clean sport.
“I don’t post here much,” Vaughters wrote on Twitter last night. “But I’ll roll this grenade down the aisle: 2am testing is one of the very effective ways to prevent peptide (EPO, hGH) and testosterone micro dosing.
“If the UCI had tested us in 2001 at 2am? We’d all have been suspended and saved the sport 25 years of drama.
“It’s unfortunate that Tadej and Jonas have to atone for the sh*t we did. However, I’d take some lost sleep for some gained credibility. I should apologise to both of them, honestly.”
Interestingly, Vaughters’ post has acted as something of a Rorschach test for cycling fans’ opinions on doping.
While some were up in arms at his ‘apology’ to the Tour’s big two, others were fuming that the EF boss defended the nocturnal testing, telling him that he should test his own team at 2am if he’s such a fan of out-of-hours controls.
Which says it all, really.
Four AirPods Jeremy? That’s insane
At the start, I spotted Luke Durbridge rocking the latest warm-up marginal gain: the earphone in the nose strategy:
Or maybe he’s simply aiming for perfect surround sound…
Out on the course!
Sorry for the delay, if you’re wondering where we’ve been this morning, the answer is out on today’s TT course…
A relatively long but straightforward climb kicks things off. But at the top of the hill things get technical through the village before a rapid, twisty descent. A long false flat downhill section then leads into another technical descent and run-in to the finish on tight roads with lots of pinch points and sharp corners. The riders will need their wits about them…
And here’s the descent…
Incidentally, Josh Tarling is currently in the hotseat having beaten teammate Filippo Ganna by 5 seconds. However, with that long, steady climb the expectation is it will be a stage for the more GC focused specialists against the clock…
We’ve had a faller… (and it’s me)
Apologies once again for the delays to today’s live blog coverage, a result of the lack of signal among the team buses at the start.
It also wasn’t helped by the fact I suffered my own fall, tripping on the legs of a race barrier (like an idiot, or Abdoujaparov) and hitting the road hard, knee first, in front of a large crowd of spectators. The bag of Haribo I was holding in my hand thankfully survived unscathed, unlike my dignity.
My knee was still bleeding pretty badly by the time we reached the press room, so I paid a visit to the Tour’s medical truck (Jonas Vingegaard wasn’t there, surprisingly), where I was patched up and deemed fit enough to return to live blog action.
Let’s hope the long-term effects of my injuries aren’t so bad and I can still make it to Paris…
“Why would he want to go through that again? Why would he consider even buying a legal e-bike, when he could just buy a cheap £500 illegal e-motorbike and be at the same level of risk?”
Quite a lot of work went into this rather bizarre, sometimes infuriating story, so go on, give it a read while you’re having your mid-morning coffee:

Help us to bring you the best cycling content
If you’ve enjoyed this article, then please consider subscribing to road.cc from as little as £2.49. Our mission is to bring you all the news that’s relevant to you as a cyclist, independent reviews, impartial buying advice and more. Your subscription will help us to do more.
2 Comments
Read more...
Read more...
Read more...
Latest Comments
@jackcycles I don't see any evidence in your comment that you're not a paid lobbyist posting anti-e-bike comments on behalf of the motor and oil industries. As far as the bike in the article goes, though, there is pretty strong evidence that it was road legal, in that it was hired from a reputable scheme.
Or just buy direct from Waltly & save a few quid!!
We regularly hear of a traffic police officer giving confident opinions in court cases regarding such things as 'speed at the time of collision', and their opinions seem to be taken seriously. We also know of a police officer's opinion, when being told by a dying man that he has been stabbed, saying 'I don't think you have, mate'. Why are people still surprised that stupid, ill-educated but very self-confident police officers are as thick as two short planks, as well as being criminal (think Couzens, Carrick and many of the officers at Charing Cross Police Station) and/ or as bent as a £9 note- this method of assessing whether a bike is a legal EAPC is so stupid as to beyond belief, unless you have personal experience of the UK police, that is. Many of them really are malevolent, cyclist-hostile thick, out-of-control b******s
@Rendel Harris my "lived experience" is of delivery drivers riding around on illegal modified motorbikes. In fact, I don't think I've ever seen anyone riding around with a silly blue delivery bag riding a road-legal bike, let alone having insurance. I don't see any evidence in the article to support the idea that the seized bike was unmodified and road legal. These e-motorbikes are a menace to the road. Just yesterday I went to my local bike shop and the poor owner nearly killed himself when some fat bloke riding what can only be described as a motorbike drove to the door asking for help with his brakes. Bike shop owner went to have a look and inadvertently turned a throttle, causing the machine to roar into life and drag him along the pavement in an undignified manner.
There wouldn't have been a peloton in that era (aside from Christophe Bassons) if they had instigated night-time testing.
The article states that: "The term E-bike refers to an electrically assisted pedal cycle (EAPC)" YES & NO. It can refer to any electrically powered cycle or motorbike. That would include EAPCs. An "E-bike" is not a legally defined thing.
It occurred to me that this could be fitted to an older rim brake bike as well but it would involve for example building a new rear wheel with a disc hub and rim brake rim.
@Paul J Please show me any reliable evidence. EPO tests already detect levels far below the minimum effective dose. With the recent state of the art, microdosing simply does not make any sense.
@tomlew microdosing EPO most definitely does "work" in terms of stimulating RBC production.
This is what the media frenzy about the "dangers of e-bikes" led us to. Meanwhile, drivers kill one pedestrian a day in general indifference.
2 thoughts on ““It’s unfortunate Tadej and Jonas have to atone for the sh*t we did”: EF boss Jonathan Vaughters says 2am Tour de France drugs tests during Armstrong era would have “saved the sport 25 years of drama”; Tour TT behind the scenes + more on the live blog”
If the judge was woken up at 2am to approve the doping tests then it’s fair enough, he made the right decision.
There wouldn’t have been a peloton in that era (aside from Christophe Bassons) if they had instigated night-time testing.