A van driver who chased a cyclist before knocking him unconscious in a vicious road rage attack was handed a suspended prison sentence yesterday.
30-year-old Jack Rawlins, who had a previous caution for a similar attack on a cyclist, turned his vehicle around and followed the victim after the cyclist – who had been indicating to the approaching van driver to give him more space on a narrow residential road – was clipped by his van’s wing mirror during a head-on close pass in Bedminster, Bristol in February.
A clip of the incident, captured on the cyclist’s helmet camera and shared online by BBC West, shows Rawlins deliberately driving towards the cyclist on the nearby Weymouth Road a few minutes later, knocking him from his bike.
The painter and decorator, along with a passenger, then got out of the van and punched the victim in the face, knocking him unconscious, before driving off.
The cyclist was left with concussion and severe bruising to his ribs in the assault, and has suffered headaches and breathing problems in the months since the attack.
Rawlins was tracked down through his employer, whose contact details were printed on the van used in the attack, and later admitted to dangerous driving and assault in Bristol Crown Court.
The 30-year-old, who received anger management training as a teenager, told police that he chased the victim to “teach him a lesson” for “punching” his wing mirror.
Yesterday in court, Rawlins was handed a two-year prison sentence, suspended for two years, and was ordered to complete 150 hours of unpaid work, pay £920 in costs and compensation, and undertake an anger management course.
“This is your opportunity to address your anger and find different ways of dealing with it,” Judge Moira Macmillan told him.
Speaking after the sentencing, the victim told the BBC that he continues to cycle, but said that he is now more anxious on the roads and that his wife suffers panic attacks if he returns home late.
The 56-year-old business analyst also noted the dangers of motorists “othering” and dehumanising cyclists on the roads.
“There is a big problem of ‘othering’ of cyclists, they are seen as less than human,” he said.
“If something happens to someone’s car or something, it is seen as more important than the health and wellbeing of the cyclist, which I think is really worrying.
“Any kind of infraction of the Highway Code from cyclists is met with rage from people who may do plenty of things outside the Highway Code as well, but because it’s a cyclist they see that differently.”
> Road rage driver assaults teenage cyclist after clipping him with wing mirror
Two weeks ago, road.cc reported on a similar incident which saw a teenage cyclist allegedly assaulted by a motorist after clipping his wing mirror on a narrow country road.
After hitting the cyclist, the driver – a man reported to be in his 50s – turned his Mercedes around and confronted the youngster.
The motorist then dragged him from his bike and threw him to the ground, before tossing the bike into a nearby ditch and driving away. The teenager allegedly suffered bruising in the apparent road rage-induced assault.

51 thoughts on “Road rage van driver who assaulted cyclist, knocking him unconscious, handed suspended sentence”
That man needs to be in
That man needs to be in prison.
On the plus side, he seems
On the plus side, he seems like the sort of person who will not be able to behave himself for the two years of the suspended sentance.
Indeed. Whether he gets
Indeed. Whether he gets caught misbehaving is another matter. And given Avon and Somerset’s diligence in this area, I don’t expect he’ll get caught.
Donaldp wrote:
Not really much of a plus if his next victim dies.
“Jack Rawlins, who had a
“Jack Rawlins, who had a previous caution for a similar attack on a cyclist”
Is this normal? Two instances of unprovoked violence, at least one of which leaves the victim unconscious, and doesn’t get locked up?
We dont know when the other
We dont know when the other instance(s) were, or have the judges full summing up comments, it may have been presented as a last chance to turn their life around,or as sole wage earner if he had family to support does it impact them more by punishing him with a jail term etc etc.
I’m not trying to justify it, I think he’s fortunate not to have ended up in jail for that with a record of similar aggression, but I know jail is considered the very last resort in cases like this and a suspended sentence is considered a custodial sentence, just one that doesnt involve time behind bars, it’s still meant to control your behaviour to rehabilitation.
He does have to comply with the court orders on anger management and not come up again in court for 2 years or he will be yanked inside for a spell at His Majestys pleasure.
Is there an argument for a
Is there an argument for a bit of vigilante action here?
I’m not saying we duff anyone up, cancel them, discredit the business, no I’m thinking, is there a way to support this chap in falling on his own sword?
Could local cyclists make a point of riding near this guys commuting routes, maybe near his employers location and bascially give him the opportunity to repeat offend?
Maybe only big, burly cyclists should apply?
We know he will reoffend (anger managment course didn’t work last time), is there an argument to encoruage him to do so in a controlled environment?
I think that if anyone was to
I think that if anyone was to consider such an action, it would be wise to do it old school via voice telecoms and not be any form of written media (including SMS).
We can but hope that one day, this cocksocket will do something to the wrong person, and will then spend a while in ICU, and then the rest of his unnatural life in a wheelchair
I am a fairly large guy, well
I am a fairly large guy, well over 6 feet tall. I find I get the most aggressive driver behaviour when I am wearing a leather jacket, with a buzz cut, looking like someone I would probably cross the street to avoid. Its like agro drivers decide to behave worse towards those who look somewhat scary, either conciously or subconciously.
Nothing is more stark than the difference between riding a brompton and a full size bike though. Riding the brommie on my normal semi rural commute roads is taking your life into your hands.
I guess what I am saying is that if you are going to be trying to get this guy to attack someone again in order to send him to prison, getting a local biker gang chapter to circle his block on circus mini bikes it probably the best way to do it based on unreasonable extrapolation of my own observations.
I would never advocate such
I would never advocate such action and would strongly advise against doing what you propose, let the law take its path, if the individual re-offends within the 2 year period, they will be dealt with.
Maybe when he kills the third
Maybe when he kills the third cyclist he’ll get a prison sentence. Though I wouldn’t be surprised f he got a caution.
the little onion wrote:
Only when the victim is a cyclist.
………….
………….
I presume he didn’t identify
I presume he didn’t identify the passenger who assaulted the cyclist as well.
Passenger didn’t assault
Passenger didn’t assault cyclist, driver threw one punch but i suspect passenger would have got involved if needed, and at least should have been investigated for potential incitement to commit violence.
AlsoSomniloquism wrote:
Why wasn’t he charged under the joint enterprise doctrine? In 2016 the UK Supreme Court clarified joint enterprise as a person being guilty if “if they intended to encourage or assist the person who committed the offence to do it” – quite clearly Scrote A was well up for helping out Scrote B if necessary and would have been encouraging him, he should have been up on the assault charge as well.
Rendel Harris wrote:
Wasn’t there a case recently where a whole group of teenagers got done under the joint enterprise doctrine even though none of them had been involved in or had been anywhere near the incident in question.
Of course, they were all Black, IIRC…
brooksby wrote:
Yes, it is certainly open to abuse, if you mean the Manchester case indeed some of the youths were convicted for angry text messages about taking revenge after one of their friends was killed, without any other evidence against them. Not good. However, in this case the scrote is right there on the scene and the fact that he has jumped out of the van and approached the cyclist at the same time as the assailant, coupled with the fact that he did nothing to stop the assailant nor to assist the victim, doesn’t leave much room for ambiguity in his particular defence.
Rendel Harris wrote:
Yeah, I think that was the one.
No mention of a driving ban
No mention of a driving ban in the article?
I assume as it isn’t mentioned there wasn’t one but that person clearly should never be allowed to drive again, they have proved on two separate occassions that they are not mentally fit to undertake the responsibility of driving.
Imagine that was a cyclist
Imagine that was a cyclist who turned their bike round and chased a pedestrian down, before cycling into them, and punching them unconscious.
Do you think the outcome would have been :-
I know what I think
We would have number plates
We would have number plates for bicycles back on the political agenda by the end of the day.
The business listing on
The business listing on google was getting hammered with bad reviews yesterday, it’s been removed from google today.
The perp has the same surname as the business owners and resides on the same street as the business is registered. So, it’s a fair probability that this 30 year old manchild is living with mum and dad. Whether they were just borrowing the van or they work for them is another matter, but disappointing that no driving ban has been mentioned in the reporting.
So with the possibility this individual could still be behind the wheel, this is the area you need to be vigilant around if cycling in Bristol…
https://goo.gl/maps/p8YTM36Hg3bFznjP9
Definitely not the best
Definitely not the best advert for Bristol Property Maintenance…
google reviews are dreadful
google reviews are dreadful for this company , makes you wonder how they get any buisness at all !!
They haven’t removed it from
They haven’t removed it from Yell.
[quote]Punched me for no reason!
Jack came round to quote me for some works, asked if he would like a cup of tea, he punched me in the head!! Must know I’m a cyclist!
{/quote]
AlsoSomniloquism wrote:
Wow, is it possible to fake the date of a Yell review? I’d expected a few recent poor reviews, but these two from way back are quite shocking…
Perhaps someone living in
Perhaps someone living in Bristol might be tempted to pop round with a few friends for an, ahem, ‘educational’ visit.
I also think this is a much
I also think this is a much better thumbnail for the video than the frame the BBC chose…
Did he get a driving ban?
Did he get a driving ban?
If not , why not ?
It’s a mandatory minimum 12
It’s a mandatory minimum 12 month ban with retest and min 3pts, for dangerous driving if convicted.
Cyclists should definitely
Cyclists should definitely have number plates so they can be identified!!!
At this rate I think dental
At this rate I think dental records or DNA will suffice
How the fuck is that
How the fuck is that deserving of a suspended sentence, especially when the thug has been cautioned before for a hate attack. This is why c**ts like this feel they can get away with intimidation and bullying. I sincerely hope he either meets a tree at speed, or a cyclist that also happens to be a top MMA fighter. This guy will only learn when he gets a severe beating. If I happen to be in Bristol and see his van about, I shall be giving him a free windscreen wash with my D-Lock.
Someone needs to get their
Someone needs to get their money back from his previous anger management course.
Hmmm – looks like his van is
Hmmm – looks like his van is out of MOT.
I wonder how an interested person could report an expired MOT van?
Apparently you have to report
Apparently you have to report it as a traffic offence to Avon & Somerset police. Apparently.
brooksby wrote:
I would need to see it out and about though, wouldn’t I?
I would need to see it out
I would need to see it out and about though, wouldn’t I?
More side-splitting mirth-inducing comments! You may argue that Lancashire Constabulary is a special case, and other forces cannot compete with Champion Bad Cops UK, but this was first reported over 3 months ago
Apparently it is an offence
Apparently it is an offence for it to be anywhere except on a garage forecourt awaiting an MOT test or on his private property. Allegedly.
try this https://www.gov
try this https://www.gov.uk/report-no-mot
I wonder how an interested
I wonder how an interested person could report an expired MOT van?
Report to which authority? If the local police are anything like Lancashire they’re completely uninterested in vehicles which haven’t had MOT, insurance or VED for over 2 years and which are regularly seen and reported on local roads
wtjs wrote:
You’ll be interested to know that I reported a huge SUV/pickup thing that has been parked on my street for three weeks with no MOT to Avon & Somerset police. Got an email back the next day informing me that “there was nothing of interest for them at this time” so they will be taking no further action…
Tyre Extinguishers missed
Tyre Extinguishers missed that one when they were in the area last week !
https://www.gov.uk/report-no
https://www.gov.uk/report-no-mot
https://www.gov.uk/report-no
https://www.gov.uk/report-no-mot
Not a great addition to the collective knowledge bank! It just tells you report the vehicle to the police. You can see below that Lancashire Constabulary and Avon and Somerset Police immediately consign such reports to the bin- LC is rather more efficient as they don’t even consider responding. There are dozens of these around Garstang alone, as a result of active police tolerance. I’m using KT18 ZFC (parks completely onto the pavement as part of the ‘Garstang school’s out!’ almost complete blockage of the main road) just for variety, even though the period without MOT is only 4 months (worthy of a Good Citizenship Award in Lancashire), but I have shown PJ07 NFP below and MV57 GXO is usually parked on the main road at the top of the hill behind the blue Garstang Community Academy sign, at the Old Garstang Police Station
On the whole I’m not an
On the whole I’m not an advocate of custodial sentences as I would prefer not to spend the tens of thousands of pounds per year it costs to keep someone locked up. However I do see the neccessity of custodial sentences in order to protect the public from pschos like this one. Not a one off “moment of madness”, as he had previous. He probably gave some sob story about needing to provide for his family. They would be better off without him. He needs to be behind bars.
A climate change activist who
A climate change activist who tied himself to a goalpost at a Premier League football match has been handed a six-week prison sentence.
Seems perfectly reasonable that he ends up in gaol and the oppressed motorist is free to help old ladies across the street.
there are a whole bundle of
there are a whole bundle of laws that exist around peoples behaviour near to and in football grounds brought in the 80s and since, that make them alot easier to prosecute for trivial discretions than motorists.
Not disagreeing with the
Not disagreeing with the prosecution or ease thereof, simply the disparity in sentencing.
well theyve been using
well theyve been using aggravated trespass in that case, which I dont believe can be given a suspended sentence, but remember a suspended sentence is still considered a custodial sentence equivalent to time spent in prison, its just the courts consider it a better path to rehabilitation.
aggravated trespass is normally just a fine, however the individual concerned is a repeat offender (I know what you’re going to say) but the football match wasnt their first offence I would guess within a period the court considered relevant to then impose a jail term for this latest transgression
and its not even the only case against them this year as I believe they were due back in court this week (not that would have influenced the sentencing for the football match) for aggravated trespass for the track invasion at Silverstone during the F1 British GP.