Forum Replies Created
-
Replies
-
“Despite road closures being
“Despite road closures being announced a head of time, I witnessed today marshalls being shouted at, one Marshall be hit by a car, and a car driving into runners”
Outrageous! Can’t those runners just learn to get along with hard-working drivers?
we do have lawyers involved
we do have lawyers involved in this who think our chances are pretty good
There are always lawyers involved on both sides who think the chances are pretty good, especially on the side with the most money
Excellent, just the job!
Excellent, just the job! ThanksWhat about children / people
What about children / people with disabilities …
You thoughtless, heartless *!&^%£! What about their fridge-freezers?
I hope this outcome brings
I hope this outcome brings some form of closure for Roseanne’s wider family and my thoughts very much remain with them today
What fiendish gene-bending technology has enabled them to breed police officers with so little insight that they don’t realise how ‘thoughts and prayers’, closure and all the other tripe instantly signals insincerity
He said there was a kerb,
He said there was a kerb, footpath and fence between the car park and the playing area and “you wouldn’t anticipate any car could gain enough speed to land as it did on the pitch”
I would- I watched it happen when Garstang public toilets were demolished by a tyre-screeching car tearing across the car park into them. It’s a black BMW i40- that’s pretty much all we need to know. Notwithstanding the inevitable ‘we mustn’t speculate before all the facts are known’, the facts are very likely known already- it’s just the excuses we’re waiting for. If it was a dead cyclist he’d mostly get away with it- not so easy to get him off when it’s a 10 year old
Oh dear! Even I can’t blame
Oh dear! Even I can’t blame this on Lancashire! Neither is Kendal in Cumbria, which no longer exists.
Cumbria Police arrested a 40
Cumbria Police arrested a 40-year-old man from Lancaster on suspicion of causing death by dangerous driving but said there was “no indication to suggest that this incident was a deliberate act”
Ah! The ‘he didn’t mean to do it’ dodge. The police/ CPS should be able to get it down to ‘careless’ at worst, and possibly even less if the driver comes up with ‘a medical incident and I have no recollection, but I’m fine now’
Can you let me know if the
Can you let me know if the links work and if these are useful to you
Excellent. Thanks. It may be that I have mentioned on here my degree of dissatisfaction with Lancashire Constabulary? What I’m really after at the moment is your video link and a copy (you could delete any names, a screenshot would do- showing the reference number and the police logo) of the communication from GloucsRozz which informed you about the points/ fine. I definitely have mentioned not more than 10^6 times this case
https://upride.cc/incident/4148vz_travellerschoicecoach_closepass/
and LancsFilth’s extraordinary efforts to conceal what their promised ‘action’ actually was- they claim it’s illegal to tell me, which is obviously untrue. I’m going to repeat the FoI request 2 years on and they’ll probably try the same thing again. Rendel’s item about the Met’s new ‘find out what we did’ scheme would have been a help, but has been delayed indefinitely, probably because they suspect that people will use it to find out what they didn’t do.
PS I have noted the topic address so I can find your latest information
We get these ‘high action
We get these ‘high action rate’ claims all the time, with little or no evidence of what the action was. People are, of course, entitled to consider that ‘a call from a copper’ is suitable action, just as I am entitled to consider it as worthless box-ticking which deters nobody from repeating the offence. I am even doubtful that these calls are even recorded on the ‘driver’s record’, and that police officers are willing and able to check up on non-conviction incidents in a driver’s career. People may assume this is just cynicism from someone in Lancashire, but my repeated efforts to establish actual action taken by other forces in specific cases with video have met with no success. The Met’s wonderful ‘find out what happened to your offender’ facility seems to be on permanent hold, and Northamptonshire’s apparently genuine equivalent scheme has not enabled anybody to provide a specific example on hereWhereas I would be surprised
Whereas I would be surprised if the police ever took any action over a road traffic offence- except those they punish because they don’t like the offender and/or for PR purposes
Isn’t this degree of
Isn’t this degree of obstruction of view through the rear window subject to action by the police because it’s permanent? Rhetorical question only – we all know they won’tYou’ve missed the bit where
You’ve missed the bit where it’s going to court
And yet, not a peep from The Filth about this
https://upride.cc/incident/ku71cuk_montgomery44tonner_closepass/
Good to see they’re concentrating their resources on the most important threats to Society. The police truly are hopeless, useless, ineffectual b******s!
Ashford only needs something
Ashford only needs something to break down or a slight accident and you might as well forget it as it’s gridlocked
And, yet, the b*****d cyclists still get through owing to the outrageous anti-motorist policies of this communist government, avoiding the consequences of the traffic chaos they cause!*!!
Pfff! Garstang was way ahead
Pfff! Garstang was way ahead with this radical new redevelopment technique. Last April, car and Gents totalled- now re-opened
