

Cycling app of the week: Sweatcoin
Add as a preferred source on Google

Help us to bring you the best cycling content
If you’ve enjoyed this article, then please consider subscribing to road.cc from as little as £2.49. Our mission is to bring you all the news that’s relevant to you as a cyclist, independent reviews, impartial buying advice and more. Your subscription will help us to do more.
8 Comments
Read more...
Read more...
Read more...
Latest Comments
I’ve got a G-Line. I quite like the look of some of that bling. I can’t imagine any of it will be cheap though. :( It’s already quite an expensive bike.
@SVXY It does not say you can't ride three or more abreast. It does not say that to do so would be inconsiderate. I'm afraid your opinion that it would be has no particular legal status.
@SVXY Rule 66 of the highway code says you can ride two abreast but to also 'be considerate of the needs of other road users when riding in groups.' It does not say you can ride three or four abreast which would not be considerate of the needs of other road users. As the highway code is used by prosecution lawyers as evidence to convict in Road Traffic Act offences cases you certainly could therefore be prosecuted and convicted for careless cycling if cycling three or four abreast
@SVXY This is a curious tactic - rebutting your own argument with your very next sentence.
Affordable? Starting at £6K? You 'having a larf?
@SVXY Ah, so it *is* the "flood the zone with shit" argumentation technique then? Or perhaps ... you are genuinely unclear about the difference between the Highway code and the law (and perhaps the difference between cyclists, drivers and indeed horse riders? And rusty on safe practice? As mdavidford notes you appear to be confusing rule with Rule 66 (for cyclists, which doesn't say anything about not riding x abreast) with Rule 53 (for horse riders which gives guidance not to more than double up - I don't think this is a direct summary of any law since "should" not "must"). Charitably I'm going with "*i* know what it says!" which as I noted many of people feel they do. Anyway away with you, I feel you've had your fill of attention for today.
Road tax was abolished in 1937 by Winston Churchill because, as he said, "road tax makes motorists believe they are the moral owners of our roads." He got that right.
@SVXY None of the magistrates who sentenced him said the CPS should have charged him with dangerous driving. Why should they? He was not speeding, he was not on his phone and he was not drunk or under the influence of drugs either
@SVXY The court does not decide on whether someone was driving carelessly or dangerously, they can only decide on the guilt or otherwise of the defendant on the charge the CPS decides to lay against them. The CPS is notorious for preferring to charge careless rather than dangerous because it's an easier win; this results in entirely unjust sentences such as this one.
@Rendel Harris Wearing sandals may be fine if cycling on tracks over fields or in a quiet residential street with a 20 or 30mph limit. It is not sensible cycling on a 60mph main road
8 thoughts on “Cycling app of the week: Sweatcoin”
Not compatable with IPhone 5C
Not compatable with IPhone 5C…
Sevenfold wrote:
Better get used to that! Won’t be long before most apps are incompatible with 5C and earlier thanks to apple dropping 32 bit support.
Not wishing to be too cynical
Not wishing to be too cynical, but… What’s the business model here? Are they selling on contact details? (Haven’t read T&Cs or privacy policy, admittedly).
Not sure it would work for me in any case, as I prefer to keep my phone in my saddle bag (gut feeling is it’s safer there).
ricardito wrote:
They don’t sell contact details, but I do believe they profit from passing on search data and user profiles (things like your age, exercise habits etc) as info like this is useful to big retailers regarding what kind of ads they should serve to you – it’s no more intrusive than most social media platforms really. They will also take a fee from the brands/companies running promotions on Sweatcoin.
I downloaded the app to give
I downloaded the app to give it a try and walked approx 3,000 steps according to the app, however it converted only 722 into Sweatcoin steps and you need 1000 sweatcoin steps for each Sweatcoin. The app info says that it converts on average 65% of recorded steps into Sweatcoin steps so you’ll have to do a lot of walking to earn the daily max of 5 Sweatcoins(on the free version) which equates to 5000 converted steps.
I think I’ll leave it on my phone as it’s not taking up any real space (58mb) and it works in the background.
To good to be true ?
Let me get this straight. I let a private corporation access my location and whereabouts at anytime (app always running in the background) for profits and I get in return access to a little “sweat deal”.
Thanks but no thanks.
When it looks to good to be true, it probably is !
Krazyfrenchkanuck wrote:
The cynic in me suggests you already do. Unless you’re Edward Snowden. Or my Dad, and he’s dead. Are you Edward Snowden?
Not sure it’s for cycling.
Not sure it’s for cycling. Think it’s just steps so walking and running.
I tried it this morning on my walk and logged 9,366 steps and 6.53 coins so will take a while to build up. Will persevere for a while unless the battery drain looks like being too much.