Wandsworth Borough Council’s recent clampdown on ‘speeding’ cyclists in Tooting Bec Common has been praised by some local residents, who claim the park’s shared paths have been turned into a “motorway”, with some even calling for a ban on cyclists in the park altogether.
However, other park users have pointed out that the 12mph speed limit being enforced by the council’s parks police is not clearly signposted, and that most of the tensions between pedestrians and cyclists stem from illegal e-motorbike users “going really fast”.
Last week, it was reported that Wandsworth’s in-house parks police force has been using speed guns to catch cyclists travelling at over 12mph in Tooting Bec Common and issue them with £50 fines, following “complaints from dog walkers that people had been going too quickly”.
According to London Centric, resident Ed Owen was riding to work on his Brompton earlier this month when he was pulled over by the park’s police, who told him that their speed camera had clocked him cycling at 16mph.
Owen was handed a £50 fine, which was later rescinded after he raised concerns with the local authority over the relatively low limit, which can also to apply to other areas such as Finsbury Park and Wandsworth Common, and the fact that, unlike motorists, not all cyclists are equipped with speedometers.
“It struck me that this was a very confrontational way to do this. Maybe they should cycle around and show people what 12mph looks like,” he told the London Centric.
> Speed gun deployed to fine cyclists riding faster than 12mph in London park
This apparent crackdown on ‘speeding’ cyclists, which comes after London’s Royal Parks launched its own campaign urging people on bikes to adhere to the parks’ speed limit, follows an open letter by the Friends of Tooting Common group, calling for both “increased police enforcement” and the imposition of “physical barriers or other effective constraints”.
The group told the council’s cabinet member for the environment Paul White that residents had reported a “particular problem with delivery riders” and warned the local authority that unless increased speed checks were carried out barriers built to slow down cyclists, a “serious accident or fatality is waiting to happen”.
“We are, of course, not anti-cycling. There are strong environmental and health reasons to encourage cycling, and many of our members are cyclists,” the group said.
“Among other things we are concerned that a cyclist could well be seriously injured in a collision with a speeding cyclist. Traffic calming measures do not deter considerate cyclists – on the contrary.”

That warning was echoed this morning in the Daily Mail, who have spoken to some of the park’s users about the perceived ‘threat’ posed by people on bikes.
“You can honestly think you’re going to be killed when cyclists come past you at high speed with no warning,” one pedestrian told the Mail.
“About 20 delivery drivers passed in the space of ten minutes earlier, they’re going really fast and not looking where they’re going. They’ll ring their bells if you’re lucky, but it’s clear they expect you to get out of the way.
“It’s not a shared path, it’s more like a motorway. There’s nowhere that the cyclists won’t go and I try to avoid them because my dog is terrified of bikes.
“They’ve even screamed at me things like ‘f*** off you c***’. To me – an old lady! It’s foul. Their rudeness is extraordinary. The whole situation is increasingly terrifying.”
Meanwhile, another walker claimed that she had seen toddlers knocked by cyclists on “racing bikes” over the summer, when the park was at its busiest.
“Oh, God, it’s awful. They just get so close whizzing past you and they are such big vehicles swinging between people,” she said.
“I think we’ve got to stop the bikes coming down here. As much as it’s a shame, maybe only kids should be allowed to use it, because the adults are using it as a cut through. There’s now a petition which aims to stop them going down here.”
Others pointed out that only some of the park’s paths are earmarked to be shared by pedestrians and cyclists, something they claim is often ignored by people on bikes.
“The thing that bothers me is that this is meant to be the only path that cyclists are allowed on but they go everywhere,” dogwalker Sarah Pyper said.
“Either police the fact that you get fast cyclists on all the other paths or just allow cyclops to go on all of them and get them to look out for pedestrians. The thing is bikes don’t have speedometers so how are they going to know?”
However, one local, Alistair Macintosh, told the Mail that the “problem doesn’t tend to cyclists on normal push bikes”.
“It’s more the delivery drivers on the e-bikes going really fast,” he said. “The big, fat-tyred things that look like mini motorbikes – they’re the ones that zoom along.
“There are also regular problems with kids on Lime bikes. But, you know, they’re young and fearless and they think they’re going to live forever.”
Macintosh also argued that, instead of an increased police presence in the park, the signage should simply be clearer.
“I hadn’t realised that there is actually a speed limit on this path for bikes until all the local residents got up in arms, but there’s nothing you can see here in this spot that shows it’s 12mph,” he said.
“The commuters just seem to regard it as a cycle track rather than shared use space,” David Thomas added. “They get really close to you and it can be scary, you hear about collisions. I knew someone who broke something after being hit by an e-bike.
“I’m a cyclist too and it’s a tricky one, because I think cyclists should be able to use them through routes, because it’s a green space, and it’s lovely to cycle through. But then, it’s a shared path, people shouldn’t feel unsafe.”
When approached by road.cc, a spokesperson for Wandsworth Borough Council told road.cc that “too many park users told us they feel unsafe around speeding delivery riders, illegally modified e-bikes, and dangerous or inconsiderate cyclists”, adding that the clampdown “is about responding to residents’ concerns and keeping our parks, commons and open spaces safe for everyone”.
“Our Parks Police are taking action to protect many people, including considerate cyclists, who use our parks responsibly,” the spokesperson said.
“Officers follow an educational-first approach, offering information and advice about the importance of slowing down and using designated cycling routes, and only as a last resort will they issue Fixed Penalty Notices for dangerous speeding and unauthorised cycling.”

17 thoughts on ““It’s not a shared path, it’s more like a motorway”: Walkers call for bike ban and hit out at “terrifying” and “rude” cyclists ‘speeding’ through park – after rider’s £50 fine for breaking 12mph limit rescinded”
Ridiculous. This doesn’t even
Ridiculous. This doesn’t even look like a shared path – there looks to be separate sides for walking and cycling.
It’s equivalent to pedestrians just ambling off the pavement without looking into a 20mph limit road and complaining that the cars are going ‘too fast’. Then drivers are fined £50 if caught doing more than 12mph – even though that limit isn’t signposted!
The path as it is looks like a good width for a bi-directional cycle path, but a bit narrow with the section for pedestrians. Pehaps another path could be created for the sole use of pedestrians, with a bit of separation, maybe even a low hedge, to keep the wandering peds safe from themselves?
I agree that its fucking
I agree that its fucking annoying when pedestrians don’t adhere to the side they are assigned and in many cases just take up the whole width but fundamentally its a shared use path through a park. You have to ride to the conditions and the conditions are “there might be pedestrians in your way so slow down”. The local park near me has a path like this with hills and blind corners on it. I could fly down them on my bike and blame whoever I hit but I understand that people are idiots and its dangerous to do that therefore I don’t.
Shared path usually means that there is a cycling side and a walking side. It also always means that you will encounter cyclists and pedestrians on the wrong side of the path for their method of transport.
I’m not advocating riding
I’m not advocating riding fast and loose around wandering pedestrians – just pointing out that such behaviour would not be tolerated if it were encroaching on the domain of the motorist.
What is unfair here, is a blanket speed restriction, that is poorly advertised and difficult for many cyclists to adhere to. I don’t have a speedometer on my town bike – why would I need one? If there are no pedestrians around, then why is riding at 16mph a problem on that path? It seems a draconian measure IMO.
Round my way, a shared path is just that – one where there are no sides. In this case, there’s a clear side for cycling and a clear side for walking. Pedestrians are not permitted to use the cycle track and cycles are not permitted to use the pedestrian side (but yes, heeded only by a few unfortunately):
For some unknown reason dog
For some unknown reason dog walkers always prefer to walk on the cycle side.
This used to be divided into
This used to be divided into 2 sections for cyclists and pedestrians like the one in London Fields. It’s now a shared path where pedestrians have priority.
Technically it still is
Technically it still is because the pedestrians can wander on the clearly marked cycling side and complain bitterly about not being able to stare at their phones whilst going for a dog walk
It’s not great but it is
It’s not great but it is marked. I go there regularly, sometimes walking my dog and sometimes cycling. It’s not nearly as bad as the people complaining seem to suggest. If pedestrians would be more aware of the cycle provision it’d help. I always poodle slowly along their on my bike. And I always keep my dog on a short lead if I’m on the pedestrian path.
A quick fix would be for the
A quick fix would be for the council to change the park bylaws to ban all commercial vehicles (e-bikes and illegal motorbikes) and eHire bikes from entering the park. This would ease enforcement by avoiding the need to enforce a contested speed limit.
The pattern of behaviour reported in the article is the same as our local parks – it’s not cyclists on normal bikes causing problems it’s the door delivery / drug delivery drivers on illegal eBikes – they don’t slow down, go way too close to walkers, young kids on bikes and people walking dogs and generally don’t give a flying F about anyone else.
i think this is more just
i think this is more just symptomatic of the culture around the area. once you reach a critical level of people on bikes, things like this kind of sort themselves out.
for example, in london fields, there’s a similarly janky setup that’s nearly identical to this, just slightly wider. it’s stupid busy with pedestrians and people on bikes pretty much permanently, yet everyone handles it mostly fine. people walking don’t stray into the bike area, and people cycling slow down and pass pedestrians wide because it’s busy and there’s a really dumb pinch-point at the entrance and exit. there is the odd uber eats muppet on an illegal motorbike, but by and large it works fine enough and i see every kind of person imaginable on a bike here.
they’ve used “traffic calming” features like a bunch of yellow signs saying to slow down, gentle bumps where paths meet (not the boneshaking stuff the royal parks use that guarantee youll be infertile after a week), and a radar sign that gives you a sad face if you’re going too quickly, but i suspect it’s secondary to it being “normal” for bikes to exist here.
it’s not ideal to have such a busy cycleway routed right next to such a busy pedestrian path, but it seems to work fine. i guess i naively think that Most People Are Generally Fine. it’s more just that without cycling being safe enough for primary school kids, you’re kind of inherently self-selecting people with (on average) a more questionable risk tolerance that will (on average) tend to behave a little more recklessly.
“speeding bikes” will largely sort itself out once there are enough “normal people” on bikes.
Agree – I suspect part of
Agree – I suspect part of “how” it “works” in NL is just that kind of social adjustment. However they have helped that “natural” process by making it easy for people to do the “right” thing. That is: they’ve provided adequate separate space for *both* cycling and walking in busy places and made it very clear who goes where / what behaviour is expected in different environments.
Little point banning bikes
Little point banning bikes along there,that would just penalise decent,law abiding cyclists,those riding illegal bikes,well they will continue to ride illegally
Remarkable how relatively
Remarkable how relatively rarely any of these conflicts seem to occur outside London.
Because there are very few
Because there are very few cyclists compared to (parts of) London anywhere else in the country?
IDK – but I’d guess it was to do with “a high density of people, with lots of people walking (because parts of the city are somewhat walkable, given public transport there is better than much of the country). Then add cycle infra that is now just good enough to tempt people to make maybe 6+% of journeys in places * and conflict will result”.
But maybe it just makes news because London?
* Compared to the national average of about 1-2%, but of course cycling is very unevenly distributed.
Spangly Shiny wrote:
Road.cc is full of stories about people trying to get cycling banned from shared spaces in other parts of the country – Grimsby most notoriously but I doubt a week went by in 2025 that road.cc didn’t report some pedestrian/cyclist conflict over shared spaces in other areas. London is in fact remarkable for its high number of shared spaces and how well they work. When implying that there’s more conflict here than elsewhere you need to take into account our size both geographically and demographically; Greater London is bigger than quite a number of England’s other counties and holds nearly 20% of England’s population, so its apparent over-representation in such stories is not indicative of there being more cyclist/pedestrian conflict than elsewhere.
Hmm, I walk my dog there
Hmm, I walk my dog there regularly and I cycle through there pretty often as well. I’ve missed seeing any cyclists hitting motorway speeds when I’ve been there.
I wonder how many of the
I wonder how many of the complainers are guilty of wandering across the centre line whilst staring at their phones? Or how many are oblivious to the centre line as they wander along with noise cancelling earbuds in? Or how many of the dog walkers dogs were running off the lead out of control?
There’s two sides to this story.
Huh? How do earbuds affect
Huh? How do earbuds affect their awareness of where the centre line is?