- News
- Live blog

“Let’s have more spaces to park them and this won’t happen”: Lime bikes accused of damaging vehicles as “hundreds” dumped on street – but cyclists say there are “too many cars” + more on the live blog
SUMMARY

“Let’s have more spaces to park them and this won’t happen”: Lime users accused of damaging vehicles as “hundreds” of e-bikes dumped on residential street, blocking access to homes – but cyclists say there are “too many cars anyway”
Over the past few years, we’ve spotted a new trend emerging in London. Whenever there’s a major event on somewhere in the capital – such as boat race between posh universities, a tournament for posh tennis players, or a posh solar eclipse – it’ll almost certainly be followed by complaints about Lime bike parking.
Last April, you may remember, thousands of Boat Race spectators flocked to south-west London using the green hire e-bikes, leaving the dockless machines strewn across streets usually frequented by huge 4x4s, annoying a few SUV owners in the process:

And last month, hundreds of Wimbledon watchers were accused of causing parking chaos in SW19, prompting the local council to warn that it will confiscate bikes if they’re not parked properly (and, oddly enough, Ant of Ant and Dec to lash out and kick a few badly parked bikes over).

Now, it’s the eclipse’s turn to spark some Lime controversy, after Londoner Mia Edie woke up on Thursday morning to find her street dominated by a sea of green, white, and black – and her Volkswagen Beetle allegedly covered in scrapes.
However, Mia, taking to Instagram to post a video of the abandoned bikes (and a fair few abandoned cars), wrote: “This wasn’t eclipse chaos. This was completely preventable. Lime, how was this allowed to happen?
“Hundreds of Lime bikes were abandoned blocking residential roads and access to people’s homes. One resident undergoing cancer treatment couldn’t even access her driveway.
“Cars had to be abandoned in the road and were subsequently damaged. Your parking system is broken, facilitating anti-social behaviour.”
While most of the comments were from people up in arms at the “disgraceful” e-bike parking – with several users calling for Lime to be “banned” from the streets of London – Tim offered up another, alternative take on the issue of Lime parking.

“Let’s have more spaces to park them and this won’t happen,” he said.
“Too many cars anyway. Lime bikes have revolutionised transport and movement in London. There just isn’t enough space for them to be parked. You can fit 10-15 lime bikes in ONE car parking space.”
Meanwhile, Jonny pointed out: “The cars on that street still use more parking space.”
I’m not sure that’ll appease them, if I’m honest.
Pro-car campaigner slams “hidden agenda” to “slow down motorists, restrict parking, and deter travel” after England’s first ‘Cycle Street’ closed for works as road markings deemed sub-standard
Earlier this week, it was announced that England’s first ‘Cycle Street’, opened at the end of May in Cambridge, has already been closed for more works, due to some road markings not being up to scratch.
The upgrades to Adams Road saw the street painted red and narrowed to encourage slower driving, while pavements were widened and much of the on-road parking removed. Drivers can still access the road but are crucially no longer able to overtake cyclists or pedestrians, and must give way to them along the renovated stretch, which attracts over 3,000 cyclists at peak times.

The Cycle Street is part of the Comberton Greenway project that aims to link the city of Cambridge to surrounding villages with 150km of infrastructure suitable for walking, wheeling, and cycling.
However, the BBC reported this week that the road will be closed until next Friday, after double yellow lines were removed.
The Greater Cambridge Partnership (GCP), which was behind the scheme, said in a statement that, as it was carrying out routine checks, “it became clear some of the road markings were not up to the required standards”.
“Our contractor, M Group, takes full responsibility and is removing and replacing them at their own expense. There is no additional cost to the GCP or taxpayers.”
“We’re supporting the Greater Cambridge Partnership and carrying out the work as agreed at no cost to the taxpayer,” a spokesperson for highways firm M Group said.
“We’re sorry for any disruption caused to local residents and businesses and are working to keep this to an absolute minimum.”
That announcement, based simply on an oversight from a contractor, has sparked a completely normal reaction from the pro-motoring, anti-cycling corner of the internet. Oh, wait…

“A lot of ‘cycling infrastructure’ seems designed to slow down motorists, restrict parking, and deter travel full stop rather than to provide significant benefits for cyclists,” Richard Wellings, a former head of transport at the right-wing Institute of Economic Affairs think tank, posted on Twitter yesterday.
“I noticed that they used the lockdowns to rush build loads of cycle lanes. Research into the councils showed it was directly related to reducing car capacity,” another user commented.
“Indeed, and it made zero sense in terms of the Covid rationale. There was clearly a hidden agenda,” Richard replied.
Yes, Richard, that hidden agenda publicly and vociferously supported by the then-Prime Minister at almost every opportunity. It’s all a big conspiracy, eh?
Any bike’s a cargo bike if you try hard enough
New Merida alert (and it’s gone all gravelly)
Help us to bring you the best cycling content
If you’ve enjoyed this article, then please consider subscribing to road.cc from as little as £2.49. Our mission is to bring you all the news that’s relevant to you as a cyclist, independent reviews, impartial buying advice and more. Your subscription will help us to do more.
No Comments
Read more...
Read more...
Read more...
Latest Comments
@mctrials23 Oh I could go on for days about irresponsible dog owners! Long/extendable leads, no recall! Sorry to hear your boy was scared! I love dogs, even though i've been bitten a few times (first time was as a postman, yes, it really does happen haha!) The last time was a yappy little thing called pickles, not on the lead, snapping around my ankles, zero attempt to recall by the owners - obviously i was known as Pickles for the rest of the ride (the bite didn't break skin, so no attention needed).
@Bezzard74 Berry Yeah, I don't want a hoof to the face and I appreciate that horse riding accidents aren't entirely uncommon and the injuries from them can easily be life changing hence the reason I am very careful around them. I was stuck behind a couple of riders for a few minutes the other night and they didn't realise I was there. I eventually made myself known and they immediately moved over and we had a nice exchange of thanks and pleasantries and went on our way. I can't imagine thinking that they were slowing me down so fuck their safety which is precisely the attitude too many drivers have towards us. And yes, utterly baffling when people ride horses in public that aren't able to do it safely. Same as dogs that can't respond to commands when they are off the lead. One of my boys was scared horribly by a dog that wouldn't leave him alone. Hes three and the dog was almost the same size as him. The owners weren't apologetic. He didn't hurt my child but he scared him and he completely ignored all commands from his owner. Some people just have no self awareness and dog owners especially don't seem to be able to fathom the idea that their dog is not wonderful and well behaved and scares people.
@mctrials23 100% agree. I am always wary around Horses, they're pretty terrifying animals, so I ALWAYS make sure I call out and pedal slowly. My interactions with the riders is friendly and polite 99% of the time. We did have one horse rider who gave us grief, despite us being stationary, on a trail down to the Sussex coast. She moaned that her horse was skittish around bikes. We kept silent when that point was made, but then later discussed why the hell the horse was out on mixed trails!
They're never really hot takes, anyway - they're the same old cold takes warmed over again and again.
It's spelled "shit takes", Nigel. It's like a hot take only it's shit.
So they've trimmed the weight but you've still got to pay more thank £6k for a sub 8kg bike now. How Trek keep going mystifies me, been massively overpriced for years.
For anyone who wants a Shimano groupset, there's a big gap in the range between the 105 SL & Ultegra SLR. 105 Di2 &/or Ultegra SLs (like Madone range) are missing...at least for my wallet
I agree - it's literally free advertising for him as AFAICS this is how he likes to promote himself and get attention. Seeing how well it works, I wonder if others could make use of that tactic? What do you think?
What's the point and purpose of this bike, then?
The problem with roadcc's coverage of Nick Freeman is that it's focusing too much on his controversial hot takes, rather than the well-known work he's done road safety campaigning. For balance, Nick has been very vocal recently on the dangers posed by electric cars for cyclists and pedestrians, writing (on X): "Pedestrians, cyclists and other vulnerable road users often rely on hearing an approaching vehicle. That’s why I believe EVs should emit synthesised warning sounds at all speeds, not just low speeds. Road safety must always come first." I think we can all unite around that sentiment rather than the more divisive number plates argument which I disagree with. Nick thinks that "accountability" comes with identifiability. I agree to some extent, but you have to balance the risks posed by a form of transport with the loss of freedom and increase in state power resulting in having mandatory identity numbers. Cycling doesn't even come close.
