David Gaudu (Groupama-FDJ) took his third professional victory on the Alto de la Farrapona on Stage 11 of the Vuelta a Espana, having spent the day in the break. The day was also notable for Chris Froome leading a rider protest over time bonuses before the stage start.
Gaudu was one of two riders in with a chance of victory on the first of two summit finishes this weekend, and edged out fellow breakaway rider Marc Soler (Movistar) in the final few hundred metres.
Soler could at least comfort himself with having moved up four places to sixth overall.
There were no other significant changes in the top ten, although young British rider Hugh Carthy (EF Pro Cycling) – who is fourth overall – was gapped at the finish and lost seven seconds to those ahead of him.
Primoz Roglic (Jumbo-Visma) retains the race lead.
Earlier in the day, Chris Froome (Ineos Grenadiers) had led a rider protest over changes to the rules on time gaps at the end of the previous day’s stage.
Stage 10 winner Roglic had gone into the race lead on the same time as Richard Carapaz (Ineos Grenadiers) that day following a split in the bunch.
Race judges had used a one-second rule to identify the time gaps. However, Eurosport reports that riders had been told at the start of the stage that a three-second gap would be needed to qualify as a split – a rule that is applied on stages where a sprint finish is expected.
Because times are taken from the first rider in each group, a one-second split from the back of one group to the front of the next can in some cases mean riders in the following group losing 10 seconds or more.
"It was a mistake on the UCI’s part and the commissaires part," said EF Pro Cycling’s Michael Woods. "They initially said at the start of the stage it was going to be a three-second gap instead of a one-second gap.
“Looking at the finish it should have been a one-second gap, but that’s what they said at the start. But at the finish they changed their mind.”
Woods said that several riders would have approached the finish differently had they known how the rules be applied. He also said that Jumbo-Visma were “on board” with the protest even though they had benefited.
Froome took it upon himself to lead the protest and spoke to race organisers about the riders’ concerns.
It has since been reported that EF Pro Cycling have lodged EF an official complaint.
its the kind of thing I normally think about 10mins later after theyve barged me out of their way would have been a great thing to do instead, but...
what do you mean by misuse of chains though ? other than cross gearing and its arguable how bad that is, what else can you do to chain to misuse it...
if insurers are inclined to take cycling incidents into account, will they be offering no claims discout for years of cycling insirance with no...
I've had one of these for a while now. I don't use the big chamber much - if you're just doing a top up, even of a big MTB tyre, it's overkill and...
H The OCG
We don't seem to have heard anything bad about Staffs. Police. Maybe they're just getting on with the job and prosecuting people. I wonder if we...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xMHo5CicN4
Tubeless tyres that aren't compatible would normally have 'use on hooked rims only' on the sidewall, or words to that effect. It'd normally be...
"People said we couldn't play, they called us loud mouthed yobs . . . . . . . ' It's a swindle, it's a swindle.
Why would you make an assumption that a helmet would have made a difference to the poor fella - or that he wasn't wearing one - without any...