Emergency cycle lanes on London’s Kensington High Street will be removed this week, with the Tory-controlled council claiming that the scheme is “not working” – although the decision seems to be one that is based on feelings rather than hard data.
The Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea (RBKC), which even before the COVID-19 pandemic strongly resisted any attempts by Transport for London (TfL) for segregated cycle lanes to be routed along its streets, introduced the lanes on either side of the road, marked off from the main carriageway by plastic wands, in September.
They run, with some gaps, from near Olympia at the western end of the High Street to just past the Royal Albert Hall in the east, from where riders can enter Hyde Park and continue along Cycleway 3.
But confirming their removal this weekend, councillor Johnny Thalassites, RBKC’s lead member for transport, said: “The cycle lane was a trial scheme to help those hopping on bikes during lockdowns and encourage shoppers to the High Street. Businesses and residents have told us loud and clear that they believe the experiment has not worked. We are listening.
“By removing the temporary lanes as lockdown lifts, we hope to help get the High Street moving again and give our local economy the best possible chance of a good December.”
News of their impending removal – the works will take place over five nights from Wednesday 2 December – has been described as a “backwards step” by nearby Fox Primary School, which is calling on West Londoners to show their support for the cycle lanes by riding along them (alone or with others as permitted by current restrictions) from 8am tomorrow.
Imperial College, whose main site lies close to the Royal Albert Hall and which also has a campus at White City, said that the cycle lanes were being used as a safe route by staff and students travelling between the two locations.
Opposition to the lanes has intensified over the past week, with local MP Felicity Buchan and fellow Conservative Tony Devenish, Member of the London Assembly for the area, writing to the council calling for the lanes to be removed.
They claimed that “it is apparent to most people who use the High Street to travel, whether on a bike or other form of transport, that Kensington High Street is not an appropriate location for a cycle lane, either for cyclists or all other road users.”
Meanwhile, last weekend, the actor Nigel Havers complained they were “causing gridlock every day” in a column for the Mail on Sunday – the newspaper’s offices, coincidentally, are just off Kensington High Street.
> ‘Scenes of utter havoc’: Nigel Havers rants about cycle lanes ‘causing gridlock every day’ in front of empty Kensington High Street
CCTV footage from Transport for London (TfL), however, portrays a very different picture – here’s the “havoc” on Kensington High Street at around half past nine this morning, and cyclist numbers on the road have doubled since the lanes were installed.
Removal of the cycle lanes does seem to be more of a knee-jerk reaction to calls for them to be scrapped than anything backed up by data, however, with figures from TfL showing that people walking, cycling and using public transport to get to local shops spend the most there – 40 per cent more each month than car drivers.
> More shoppers, more shops: TfL stats show benefits of designing streets around cyclists and pedestrians
And as Hackney councillor Jon Bourke, who has faced vocal opposition and even received death threats over his championing of cycle lanes and low traffic neighbourhoods in his borough, in RKBC less than half of households have access to a car.
A petition cited by RBKC as demonstrating local residents’ opposition to the cycle lane turns out, on closer analysis, to have been signed by people living elsewhere in the UK as well as further afield, for example Egypt, Nigeria and the United States.
Meanwhile, here’s the reaction of one local cyclist about having safe space to ride with her children – space that will be taking away in the coming days.
In June last year, RBKC withdrew its support for a planned segregated cycleway running from Holland Park Avenue to Notting Hill Gate and which would have formed part of a longer route from Acton to close to where Cycleway 3 begins at Lancaster Gate.
The temporary cycle lane on Kensington High Street itself surprised many active travel campaigners when it was unveiled, not least because the planned Cycleway 9 from Brentford will stop at Olympia on RBKC’s western boundary rather than continuing along the road, due to the council’s opposition to segregated cycle lanes on major routes.
Probably some time after everyone happily swallowed up £300+ pairs of shoes
This particular rider wasn't mountainbiking, and didn't fall off. They were hit and knocked off by an inattentive driver. This could also happen to...
It is not the law which is vague it's the guidance. Local can mean anything and just makes any guidance meaningless. If you define local as local...
I honestly don't know how you can come to this conclusion, at no stage was the cyclist 4 seconds behind the tractor, so there was no gap for the...
It's hardly unique when you compare it to top end Fizik, Bontrager, Suplest etc shoes.
The Sunlit Uplands of Brexit - World Beating Trade Deal - World Beatingly bad that is!
Amen
Would be useful to see the trousers photographed with boots....
Really sad that you did not notice the 1%. Like come on.
rather worrying, I thought they were supposed to have a better understanding of the law than the standard person, if they can't see an offence here...