Dr Richard Wellings — an author with a PhD in transport policy and a Twitter audience of more than 30,000 followers — has been accused of spreading conspiracy theories after claiming Active Travel Commissioner Chris Boardman’s appointment is part of the “Great Reset agenda to force ordinary people off the roads”.
The comments came in reference to an interview Boardman did with The Telegraph newspaper this weekend, in which he said reduced car usage is required and argued cars should not be used for journeys of less than a mile.
> Chris Boardman confirmed as permanent National Active Travel Commissioner
Dr Wellings tweeted: “This appointment is further evidence that our fake-conservative government is fully behind the Great Reset agenda to force ordinary people off the roads and out of their cars. They either don’t understand or don’t care about the economic costs.”
? Cars should not be used for journeys less than a mile, Chris Boardman has said, as he takes up his post as Boris Johnson’s first National Active Travel Commissioner https://t.co/IaRTrDqiJZ
— The Telegraph (@Telegraph) July 2, 2022
The Great Reset was the name of the 50th annual meeting of the World Economic Forum, held in June 2020, as well as the title of a book co-authored by the WEF’s chairman Klaus Schwab, in which addressing global warming in the aftermath of Covid-19 is discussed.
However, as per fact checking organisation Full Fact, the term has also “spawned a number of false and unsubstantiated claims which amount to the basis of a conspiracy theory. For example, since the initiative launched, it’s been claimed that the Great Reset is something that will restrict what you can eat or own.”
During his time as head of transport at the Institute of Economic Affairs, Dr Wellings co-authored a report arguing railway lines should be replaced by buses routes — but made no mention of cycling.
In 2016, a Dr Wellings authored IEA report recommending removal of traffic lights also claimed that cycle lanes have ‘unfortunate’ effects on motorists.
His latest anti-cycling comments came in response to a Boardman interview in which the newly-appointed permanent head of Active Travel England said: “We have to drive less. A lot less.”
In contrast to Dr Wellings’ comment about the “Great Reset” agenda “forcing ordinary people out their cars”, Boardman told The Telegraph: “People shouldn’t be forced out of their cars. People should be given a viable, attractive alternative.”
“Ultimately, we have to give people the choice. We don’t want to say: ‘Don’t drive’. Cars are great [but] we are just overusing them. We have to drive less. A lot less.”
Boardman also tackled critics of Low-Traffic Neighbourhoods, asking: “Who wants a high traffic neighbourhood?”
“If you think about it, there’s no such thing as a Low-Traffic Neighbourhood. It’s either a neighbourhood or there are cars coming through. Define a neighbourhood? We’ve allowed them to fill up so in the last 10 years alone, there are 20bn more miles being driven around homes. Because we’re overusing cars.”
Main image: Allan McKenzie / SWpix.com

40 thoughts on “Prominent transport author claims appointment of Chris Boardman as Active Travel Commissioner is part of “Great Reset agenda””
Kinda hope Dicks right
Kinda hope Dicks right
Never heard of this dude
Never heard of this dude before – I guess I don’t pay enough attention to the pronouncements of the Institute of Economic Affairs. Would that be Dr. Richard Wellings [homepage], “Libertarianism and Austrian economics.”?
A quick skim suggests he’s pretty full-on “the state is the problem” and “free market” (for a particular definition of free…). Nothing (positive) about bicycles but couldn’t be bothered reading much – tell me where I’m wrong.
I’ve never worked out why such folks rarely seem keen on cycling. After all that’s inherently decentralised, involves personal private transport, low cost to any state. Some cost-benefit analysis suggests that compared with cars cycling could be a net financial positive when you sum all the externalities. Perhaps cycling’s … too free – or rather, too cheap? Maybe by being so efficient the bicycle makes it hard for a few folks to get a monopoly / make sacks of money?
Although by guilding the lily / making bikes more like the car with e-bikes and e-scooters for all I’m sure there’s some opportunity left!
Surely it couldn’t be that these folks decrying “crony capitalism” (of our “fake conservative” government) are just getting their funding from a different set of capitalists (or offering a better deal for the existing ones for support)?
Probably the best explanation
Probably the best explanation is that the IEA is part funded by oil – BP is said to be major donor. Along with other wholesome companies like the tobacco companies.
I think this quote from wikipedia sums it up:
“In or about 2019, on national radio station LBC, James O’Brien said that the IEA is a politically motivated lobbying organisation funded by “dark money”, of “questionable provenance, with dubious ideas and validity”, staffed by people who are not proper experts on their topic. The IEA complained to UK media regulator Ofcom that those remarks were inaccurate and unfair. In August 2021, Ofcom rejected the complaint.[60]”
I didnt even read that much
I didnt even read that much into it tbh. Just hope he’s right about kicking people out of their cars..
Is it the classic, ‘the
Is it the classic, ‘the cyclist is the enemy of the capatilist’ as when choosing the bike you are not buying fuel, you are fighting obesity, you are not crashing into things and causing loads of damage, you are not paying insurance, etc. etc.
To be fair, if those people holding the above beliefs were to learn the price of the new 105 groupset, their viewpoint would surely change!
Language matters to shape
Language matters to shape attitudes and behaviour on the public highway. Aside from the Great Reset to better explain the global changes occurring, the Pandemic has shown that many people do not need to travel to an office to communicate with colleagues and be effective. So less office travel is part of the new normal and is good to lower our unsustainable imp impact on the one planet that we inhabit.
https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/608904
Wellings looks like a dodgy
Wellings looks like a dodgy geezer- I remain a supporter of Boardman
Chris Boardman’s great at
Chris Boardman’s great at avoiding the bear traps laid by the motoring lobby / status quo (“but the disabled”! “how to get the kids to school!” “but ‘cyclists’ / red light jumpers!” “The road’s already congested”!) while being very clear, practical and common-sense. Not getting tangled in intricacies of counter-arguments* is definitely the way for mainstream communication. Most people are dependent on cars and have little awareness of “transport cycling”. Or even a negative view of “cyclists”. For change we have to speak to them.
This guy – although he sounds like he’s straight out of some US political “culture war” nonsense – is right in one sense. We will get some kind of “great reset” – like it or not. We’ve already had a minor one with Covid (remember that?) working changes. What’s at stake is how – and whether – we choose to direct this.
Do we try to get somewhere which will benefit more people and be more stable longer term? Or somewhere which involves less “change” to human routines and makes some people / organisations very rich – but merely defers some problems and creates others? Alternatively we can just drift with the flow of events until change is forced upon us.
* The detail is necessary. Just look at the tons of inadequate or actually dangerous “cargo cult Netherlands” – or worse – stuff we’re still building. From seeing what they’d started in Manchester I think he and his team have grasped the key points around adequate infrastructure which might actually serve mass cycling.
Dr Wellings does sound a wee
Dr Wellings does sound a wee bit unhinged, but I’m all for getting ordinary people out of cars. Brilliant idea Dr Wellings!
Yep.
Summary Table
Oil Consumption 35,442,913,090 barrels per year
97,103,871 barrels per day
Reserves/Consumption
47 (years left)
(Data shown in the table is for 2016. Counter shows current estimate.)
Now down to 41 years, and what’s left is going to get more expensive and difficult to get out of the ground. Source: https://www.worldometers.info/oil/
https://www.cambridge-news.co
https://www.cambridge-news.co.uk/news/cambridge-news/ridiculous-cambridge-bus-lane-thats-24371266
Link to story on the Cambidge News site which on the face of it* is about a resident complaining that a bus lane restriction (which has been in place for many years) is creating traffic congestion and pollution on account of their 160yd drive to work requires a 1 mile alternative route.
*Cambridge News is not renowned for quality or accurate reporting so this may well be absolute scrotum contents.
Wow! The Cambridge News item
Wow! The Cambridge News item shows that there are some dim anti-social Climate Changers active in Cambridge. Bring in Boardman to give this idler a talking-to! (if the story is true, that is)
I might be giving too much
I might be giving too much credit here, but I would guess that the journey isn’t starting on Sidgewick Avenue, they are just quoting the relevant bit of the journey. He probably lives in the brilliantly planned commuter village of Cambourne with virtually no public transport into Cambridge.
Having said that there are plenty of P&R sites around Cambridge which could be used.
FWIW I used to cycle around Cambridge in the early 90s when SIlver Street was two way for all vehicles and Fen Causeway, Queen Street and Silver Street were all congested most of the day then.
Well I should have listened
Well I should have listened to this chap before:
The first sentence is entirely correct – it is just missing “… because we’ve too many motor vehicles”. No motor vehicles and we don’t need traffic lights, pedestrian crossings, heavy crash barriers, speed bumps, speed cameras, giant road signs, roundabouts, “pedestrian safety fencing”, extra bridges and underpasses to get people out of the way!
In the second sentence he’s correct that this costs lots of money – indeed there’s evidence we’d be much better off with a lot less motor traffic.
Unfortunately he’s misunderstood or never properly observed “shared space”. (Or maybe he has and this is tongue-in-cheek?) “Shared space” can and does work only if the more dangerous / faster mode is controlled and appears as a very small minority of users of the space. Otherwise – and in the UK version – “shared space” just means “for motor vehicles”. In general it isn’t safe for other modes.
Shared pedestrian / cycle space is appropriate in some places but not a good idea in general. It’s just not very pleasant for either mode unless there aren’t many of either.
At the moment it would seem
At the moment it would seem that it’s the oil companies and the leccy suppliers doing their best to get people out of their cars, especially for short journeys.
Noticing a lot more people on bikes out there, old bikes fresh out of the shed, inexperienced riders on sparkly new bikes, notice the wide knees, and kickstands, seeing a lot of kickstands…
The kickstand is much
The kickstand is much maligned. I’m coming around to them.
Agreed. If you’re loading
Agreed. If you’re loading panniers with shoppping, or attaching a trailer, then a kickstand is invaluable.
You want a centre stand
You want a centre stand really, rather than the side-stand that is the typical kick-stand over here. Lot of dutch bikes have them (the more traditional ones back in my day anyway). Precisely cause they make loading up bikes easier. The dutch having a bit of experience in mass, utility cycling.
I tried to replace the
I tried to replace the supplied kickstand on the wifes ebike with a centre one. Unfortunately the drive side leg would have caught the chains. So had to swap it for another left side stand instead.
A kickstand was the single
A kickstand was the single best accessory that I fitted onto my daily rider hybrid (it already had a rack fitted). No more carefully lying the bike down; no more finding a convenient ‘something’ to lean it on. Bliss
A lot of kickstands are on
A lot of kickstands are on ebikes simply because of how heavy / awkward they are.
Sounds like a good
Sounds like a good application to me. Of course in an efficient world not everyone with the cash would get an e-bike. That may cause some issues longer-term (though nothing will change for roadies / off-roaders, this will still be a specialist activity). But that’s humans and the market for you.
When I get my next (non-electric) practical bike I’ll get a double-leg kickstand too. (Saves having one for each leg).
Is the good Dr. Welling’s a
Is the good Dr. Welling’s a physician? If so, how could he have missed the huge pandemic costs of the overweight and unfit, let alone the death toll? Any true conservative has to recognize the hundreds of millions if not billions of pounds government stands to save by getting people moving. It’s hard to imagine anyone but a money-doesn’t matter liberal opposing the idea.
He has a PhD in Transport
He has a PhD in Transport Policy. I doubt that he also fitted medical school in there as well.
I’d be interested to know
I’d be interested to know what the subject of his PhD was (and why his supervisor didn’t tell him he was writing a load of rubbish, by the sounds of things).
I noticed a letter in my
I noticed a letter in my local newspaper last week. It read (I paraphrase) ‘ due to the road works in Kentish Town my 1 mile journey takes me thirty minutes by car. Why does there never seem to be people working these days!’
At least cyclists weren’t (primarily) to blame – though the letter did have a dig at cycles lanes in the next paragraph.
obvioulsy my first thought was – walk! It’s Summer, enjoy the urban morning. Though their reply would be ‘I would love to walk but how would I carry this bath tub with me’
Quote:
Like causing them to lose all sense of proportion.
I live less than half a mile
I live less than half a mile from my local railway station and the town centre. Living even closer than I do is a man who drives his sports car to the station every day and, ‘cos he doesn’t want to pay for parking, parks his car a 5 minute walk from the station. I have neighbours who, in the twenty plus years I’ve lived here, I’ve never seen walking down to the town. It’s as if people’s legs don’t work properly anymore!
I think you must live in the
I think you must live in the same village as me
And don’t get me started on
And don’t get me started on the parent who drives the kids less than 300 metres to school before turning around to drive past the end of her road on the way to work. Complete madness
Personaly I am looking
Personaly I am looking forward to the Great Reset, It can’t be any worse that the corrupt capitalist system we have at present.
Bring it on………..
yupiteru wrote:
I may be way off as everything I know about the ‘great reset’ has come from Russell Brand but isn’t the point that the same politicians/media/corporations will be in charge and the rest of us will lose what little self determination we have left?
Sounds like more of the same, but worse.
Defund the rich!
Defund the rich!
I imagine most of the same types and likely some of the same individuals will stay at the top in any upheaval. What is this self-determination you speak of? We already swapped gold and silver for numbers, happily gave “them” all our data and voluntarily carry around pocket spy devices which also feed us our opinions, remember? Unless you think we’re headed after China / Russia / insert your dystopian favourite here?
More of the same, but with fewer vehicles and more cycling? I’d take that.
chrisonatrike wrote:
Only the poor ever get defunded and ‘more of the same’ sounds terrible.
i’d like to see normal people realise that whether they are left/right, black/white, gay/straight, religious/athiest or any of the other artificial reasons the powerful convince us to hate each other with, we all want the same freedom, health and happiness. Maybe then we might elect some decent leaders.
Of course hating other people just like me is easier than holding the powerful to account so sadly I think we’re destined for more of the same. ?
NOtotheEU wrote:
Indeed – but it seems that the powerful are always the ones with the power. Aren’t you worried it’s a case of voting for a lizard so the wrong lizard doesn’t get in?
chrisonatrike wrote:
Indeed – but it seems that the powerful are always the ones with the power. Aren’t you worried it’s a case of voting for a lizard so the wrong lizard doesn’t get in?— NOtotheEU
I think you hit the nail on the head.
I’m voting for my lying crook because I hate you and your crooked liar.
chrisonatrike wrote:
Indeed – but it seems that the powerful are always the ones with the power. Aren’t you worried it’s a case of voting for a lizard so the wrong lizard doesn’t get in?— NOtotheEU
Yup – the only people who should be allowed to be politicians, are people who really don’t want to be politicians (Douglas Adams misquote).
Oh, wait, but that’s what we’ve already got: Johnson liked the idea of power but not the responsibility of actually being PM. He is already no doubt working out who can ghost write his biography and all his after dinner speeches (and possibnly that biography of Shakespeare he was supposed to be writing?) once he’s no longer PM and has marketable memories and connections.
Having just won a 4 year
Having just won a 4 year battle for compensation after being knocked off my bike and left with life changing injuries … Would you mind clarifying “rich”, please?
Glad you got the compensation
Glad you got the compensation. The definition’s easy – the person who has one more superyacht than you. Or the person who has one more house than you. Or one more car, or bike, or potato.
The trick is the honest selection of those categories. And not being the person with the car calling for the other to give up their extra potato.
Thank you ?
Thank you ?
yupiteru wrote:
Eat The Rich!