- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
news
broken bike.jpg"Oblivious" speeding driver handed five and a half year jail term for killing six-year-old boy riding home from football practice
A Luton motorist who killed a six-year-old boy cycling home from football training has been jailed for five and a half years. Michael Raffermati had a clear view for 132 metres before he hit Zi Singh, who was catapulted 100 feet along the road.
The BBC reports that on Saturday October 20 2018, Singh went to cross Whitehorse Vale in Luton with his adoptive father, Dr Tekki Rao, a consultant paediatrician.
Rao checked both ways to ensure it was safe, but then heard a car.
Prosecutor Peter Shaw said: "Dr Rao was a little ahead of Zi, when he heard the roaring sound of a car engine of what he later described as a fast-approaching car.
"He tried to shout to Zi to stop him, but realised Zi was already crossing the road behind him. Dr Rao witnessed Zi being struck by a car and catapulted on the road about 100ft (30.48m)."
In a victim impact statement, Rao said: "Zi was lifeless, pale eyes deviated to either side. At that very moment I felt he was no more. My experience in paediatric medicine and neurology told me his life has ended."
Rao tried to resuscitate his adopted son, but the boy was pronounced dead in hospital.
The speed limit of the road is 30mph. Police estimated Raffermati – who had his three children in the car – was travelling at between 50mph and 61mph at the time of impact if there had been braking before.
Rao told police he heard Zi being hit and the sound of something being dragged, but no braking.
A witness said Raffermati had been doing at least 60mph on the single carriageway road. Another said they hadn’t seen brake lights at the time of the collision.
Shaw said: "The defendant was travelling at well over the 30mph speed limit and such driving was inappropriate for the prevailing road conditions. It was a residential area with multiple crossing points.
"The nature of the road is such that extra care is required. It is residential, near a corner shop, there are multiple designated crossing points, multiple bus stops and multiple side roads from which vehicles may be emerging.
"There are multiple vulnerable road users and hazard points. There is clear witness evidence that the defendant was not driving in a manner even approaching appropriate for the road.
"Having proved Zi and Dr Rao were there to be seen, at or near a designated crossing point, the defendant did not react in any way to account for their presence on or near to the crossing point. “Given the 132-metre view he should have seen Dr Rao crossing and Zi behind him and slowed down accordingly.
"There is witness evidence that no braking was seen or heard on the car's approach to the crossing and, to the contrary, that he accelerated in the lead up to it.
"The defendant was driving so fast he was oblivious to other vulnerable road users and either failed to see Zi or Dr Rao until it is too late, or does see them and carries on regardless."
Raffermati, from Leighton Buzzard, had three previous convictions: one of damaging property and two of threatening behaviour, one of which was a road rage offence from 2015 when he threatened another driver with a hammer.
Shaw also said the MOT on the car had expired 11 days before the collision.
Raffermati admitted causing death by dangerous driving.
Defending, Neil Jarvis said: "He wishes he could put himself in the place of the child. He accepts his speeds was excessive. He can't clearly say what happened. He wishes he could go back and do something completely different."
Alex has written for more cricket publications than the rest of the road.cc team combined. Despite the apparent evidence of this picture, he doesn't especially like cake.
Latest Comments
- Hirsute 1 min 18 sec ago
Too late for the victim. Whether Ruth Green can take action I don't know.
- Tom_77 12 min 22 sec ago
Had a Kona Blast sometime around the turn of the century, that was a pretty decent mountain bike for not much money....
- OldRidgeback 13 min 46 sec ago
Right whingers moaning about 20mph limits, cyclists and 'woke' are numbskull snowflakes IMHO.
- beanpole 17 min 31 sec ago
I'm a HUGE fan of my Garmin rear light and radar. It took me ages to decide to get one, now I won't ride without it.
- chrisonabike 47 min 44 sec ago
David9694 - you were right! These new autonomous vehicles really are conspiring to run out of control!...
- Bigtwin 55 min 48 sec ago
That clamp is clearly not suitable for a carbon post. Many aren't - the ones on some Whytes for example - because they concentrate the pressure on...
- HoarseMann 1 hour 19 min ago
Decathlon have the Garmin Varia RTL515 on offer at the moment for £129.99: https://www.decathlon.co.uk/p/rearview-radar-varia-rtl515-65-lumens/_/R-...
- Rendel Harris 2 hours 29 min ago
So when you said "all Jews" you didn't actually mean all Jews, just religious ones. However even that distinction is erroneous, as you must surely...
- Dnnnnnn 3 hours 23 min ago
Almost - but apparently not quite. There are in Northern Ireland.
Add new comment
22 comments
I think the legal argument against lifetime driving bans is something along the lines of 'just can't expect that to work', because the perp still needs to be economically active etc. Maybe there should be another class of driving licence restricted to asthmatic cars incapable of exciting the passions of petrolheads. Of course there remains the enforcement problem. But at the very least people repeatedly proven to be a menace behind the wheel ought not be simply given back the keys to their V8 after whatever period.
When a driver has caused the death of another person, then surely public safety must be more important than whether the driver can do their chosen job. There are plenty of jobs that do not involve driving and if you've deprived someone of their career and life, then I think you have no right to insist on keeping your chosen career.
But, but, Driving...
not disagreeing with you - I am not a 'legal expert'. Those arguments are advanced, and hold sway.
But we already have category restrictions on licences, so not hard to do. If in practice certain people can be restricted to, say, insurance group 1 cars where previously it was seen that a total ban was not tenable, and it works for safety, then why not? In the end, like you say, it's about public safety. Not retribution.
So in this example the guy, having previous, would have been already consigned to driving a Fiat Panda or the like. It's a different vibe to the cockpit of a performance car and I'm assuming just does not press the same buttons in some people's heads. And no, I'm not trying to excuse them, more just to separate the addict from their drug.
A quick search shows 10000 drivers with points over 12.
I don't know how you change the wind unless of course a cyclist kills someone.
But 1700 odd deaths a year is the collateral damage.
The BBC story has this little tit-bit missing from the road.cc version
"Raffermati was also banned from driving for five years on his release from prison"
WHAT? If this incident, plus this scumbag's history of road rage etc, doesn't warrant a life time ban, what does?
A truly dreadful case but what is its purpose being posted on Road.CC other than as clickbait? It contains nothing related to cycling.
Erm - "a six-year-old boy cycling home from football training"
I think that road.cc likes to cover general road danger issues as well as Lance Armstrong's latest shenanigans.
More infrastructure. Better infrastructure. Lifetime bans for things like 'a road rage offence from 2015 when he threatened another driver with a hammer'.
I see far more of this now that the roads are quieter. There's a nice, wide, straight residential road near me, on which I'm often tailgated when driving along it at high 20s mph. Since lockdown, the average speed has gone up, and it's not uncommon for people to drive along it at 50+ mph.
My experience is the same as yours. When I drive in my local resisdential streets there are few stretches where 30mph is safe and I am regularly tail-gated by drivers who I think aren't in a particular hurry but are just completely unaware of the idea of adjusting ones speed to the driving environment. I think many drivers see speed limits as an indication of the speed at which the traffic should move. Then again there are others who see speed limits as some sort of in fringement of their right to drive at whatever speed they consider appropriate.
A sad story for all concerned, and one to bring to the attention of all those people who say speed doesn't kill. It must have been heart-breaking for the father to see his son slaughtered in front of him by a callous driver and be powerless to do anything.
"Defending, Neil Jarvis said: "He wishes he could put himself in the place of the child. He accepts his speeds was excessive. He can't clearly say what happened. He wishes he could go back and do something completely different." Given his record, I very much doubt any of that.
An unbelievably light sentence for what was effectively murder, even if he did plead guilty, especially since he had children in the car with him.
You know what? I think we all wish that.
Oh, but he can put himself there. The boy was on a bike - he can put himself in the same position and suffer the same risks from idiots such as himself, let him take his chances. He should be taken at his word, along with a life ban from driving in case his word is worthless.
And if he is truely remorseful, perhaps he will never try and get his licence back or seek ever drive again. He could also campaign for lowered speed limits and enforcement and spend the rest of his life trying to persuade others who treat the roads as he did to slow down and never, ever do this to other human beings.
Taking account of this dangerous maniac's history and evidence against him, a conviction of manslaughter would have been more appropriate and 15 year term in prision, with a life driving ban.
Too many dangerous maniac drivers are saved from fitting deterents by callous, cowardice law enforcers.
Yep, you have to ask whether lifetime driving bans would be suitable in extreme cases like this where the driver has a history of previous serious offences. Some people aren't fit to drive.
As a parent, I have a lot of sympathy for the victim's family.
As a fellow parent, I struggle to contain my emotions when reading stories like this, I find the unnecessary and brutal, violent death of anyone - but especially a child - deeply distressing.
I can't imagine the additional pain the family must go through and little chance of closure when they find out that this kind of crime is treated so casually and the punishment so inadequate.
All of that buddy, all of that. You put it well.