Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Not-so-Near Miss of the Day 391:Cyclist knocked off bike - but police unable to idenify hit-and-run driver

Our regular series featuring close passes from around the country - today it's London...

Today's video in our Near Miss of the Day series is one of those in which the motorist does make contact with the cyclist, in this case knocking him off his bike into a hedge. The Metropolitan Police, however, were unable to take the incident, which happened in Chislehurst in the borough of Bromley, further because they were unable to identify the driver involved.

The incident is similar to many we have featured in recent weeks, with the driver overtaking the cyclist when it is unsafe to do so because of oncoming traffic, meaning they have to pull back in, putting the bike rider in danger.

Often, that results in a close pass by a matter of inches but here, the result was that the cyclist, road.cc reader Tim, was knocked off the road. Moreover, he's since been subjected to a close pass involving the same vehicle.

He told us: "I work as a manager in the NHS and use my bike to travel for work.

"On 4th December was cycling through Chislehurst on the way back from a meeting when I was knocked off my bike by a hit and run driver.

"I was not injured thankfully and carried on.

"I reported the matter to the Metropolitan Police, but they have now written to say they are unable to trace the driver so no further action will be taken.

"I do understand that priorities have now changed due to Coronavirus but I don’t understand why in the previous 3 months they were unable to trace the driver."

He added: "I was close passed by the same car in February and noticed that it has a number of dents on it. I am concerned the driver may have an eyesight problem."

> Near Miss of the Day turns 100 - Why do we do the feature and what have we learnt from it?

Over the years road.cc has reported on literally hundreds of close passes and near misses involving badly driven vehicles from every corner of the country – so many, in fact, that we’ve decided to turn the phenomenon into a regular feature on the site. One day hopefully we will run out of close passes and near misses to report on, but until that happy day arrives, Near Miss of the Day will keep rolling on.

If you’ve caught on camera a close encounter of the uncomfortable kind with another road user that you’d like to share with the wider cycling community please send it to us at info [at] road.cc or send us a message via the road.cc Facebook page.

If the video is on YouTube, please send us a link, if not we can add any footage you supply to our YouTube channel as an unlisted video (so it won't show up on searches).

Please also let us know whether you contacted the police and if so what their reaction was, as well as the reaction of the vehicle operator if it was a bus, lorry or van with company markings etc.

> What to do if you capture a near miss or close pass (or worse) on camera while cycling

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

16 comments

Avatar
zero_trooper | 4 years ago
1 like

The police have access to a motor insurance database, that's how they know when to seize uninsured motor vehicles. The database will have the name and address of the insured keeper. When I was in the police (some time ago), it was often more reliable/up to date than the PNC DVLA database.

There could be some other reasons why they can't trace the driver, but at least make the effort to explain to the OP.

Avatar
Hirsute replied to zero_trooper | 4 years ago
1 like

I did think: driver sold car, moved away, no forwarding address so hard to find.

But I don't see how that could have happened that quickly and for 2 serious offences why not act quickly back in December?

Avatar
leqin | 4 years ago
1 like

Take this further - demand to know why it is that the police cannot take this further - it took the internet mere minutes to give us all a picture of the number plate, so how much more investigation will it take to discover who was behind the wheel.

Right now at this moment this country is in desperate need of your knowledge and services and there would be hell to play if you refused to do your job. So why the hell are the supposed police refusing to do theirs

Avatar
Greeneyelevin | 4 years ago
0 likes

Come on plod - you can do better

Avatar
Mungecrundle | 4 years ago
2 likes

The MIB has a trace service. For £4.50?? you can get the registered insurer and contact them to put in a claim for any damages.

Obviously not as good as the Police attempting to do some policing in the cause of road safety, but will flag the insured driver as a risk come renewal time.

Avatar
miekwidnes | 4 years ago
4 likes

I fidn it strange that they cannot identify the driver. They have the reg number

 

Now if you get snapped by a speed camera they ask you who was driving - and of you refuse to identify who it was then you get done for refusing

So why is this different??

Seems weird

Avatar
iandusud replied to miekwidnes | 4 years ago
3 likes

It's not different other than it's a cyclist's life that has been put in danger rather than a speed limit that has been broken. Obviously the Police officer concerned considers one of those offences to be insignificant. I'm not one for criticising the police, as I think they have difficult job to do and I wouldn't like to do it, but there is something perverted about the thinking of whoever dealt with this.

Avatar
Hirsute | 4 years ago
5 likes

If the outcome is anything less than 6 points and a fine for the registered keeper at the time, then there is something fundamentally wrong with the legal system.

Avatar
eburtthebike | 4 years ago
4 likes

So glad you weren't injured Tim, we need you.  The police's job is to protect the public, and it is absolutely clear that this driver puts the public at risk, and I understand that there are priorities, but surely they could have traced them.

Avatar
ktache | 4 years ago
3 likes

Hmmm...

 

Avatar
George Hill replied to ktache | 4 years ago
1 like

Looks like the car was sold on Feb 27, might explain why it's difficult to trace the driver. 

Avatar
Dr_Lex replied to George Hill | 4 years ago
5 likes

I’d be completing a V888 (https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/v888-request-by-an-individual...) and popping over to ask the new owner about the previous one.

Avatar
alchemilla replied to Dr_Lex | 4 years ago
3 likes

I’d be completing a V888 (https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/v888-request-by-an-individual...) and popping over to ask the new owner about the previous one.

Why can't the police do this, then prosecute the registered owner of the vehicle at that time?  I don't understand this "cannot find the driver" nonsense.  The name is on the document. If the  owner had lent their car to someone, that's the risk they took, but probably won't take again.

Avatar
Legin | 4 years ago
3 likes

Y901LVW is a bit of a clue!

Avatar
postmandick replied to Legin | 4 years ago
0 likes

Sue the driver Via the small claims court ..... as you have evidence from your video 

It boils down to your word Vs there's and let the judge deceide. if they turn up 

Avatar
Hirsute replied to postmandick | 4 years ago
0 likes

Well it's not your word v theirs, as there is the video evidence.
Which person will you sue, when you need to show that the driver and keeper are the same?
What damages or loss are you suing for?

Latest Comments