Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Jail for burglar who led police on 115mph chase after bike shop raid

Harry Curran had been seen acting suspiciously at other bike in Lake District shops before Keswick break-in

A burglar who led police on a 115mph chase after a £30,000 raid on a bike shop in the Lake District after apparently casing other shops in the area earlier the same day has been jailed for 27 months.

Harry Curran, aged 34 and from Tower Hamlets in London, had admitted burglary and dangerous driving when he appeared via video link at Carlisle Crown Court last month.

> Burglar behind £30,000 raid on bike shop caught after 115mph chase

Curran and accomplice James Easterbrook, aged 41, who received a 14-month suspended sentence, broke into E-Venture Bikes in Keswick on the evening of 5 October this year after driving to the premises in a hired van.

Prosecuting at Carlisle Crown Court, Gerard Rogerson said that Curran had attracted suspicion at a bike shop earlier in the day, reports Cumbria Crack.

“He did not look like the usual customer in the Lakes to buy a mountain bike,” he explained. “That was due to the way he was dressed and also the inappropriate bike he was choosing for his build.”

Police stopped Curran in Ambleside and he and Easterbrook were subsequently seen outside another bike shop in Penrith.

In the evening, they broke into E-Venture Bikes in Keswick at around 10pm and stole several bikes, “The van door was slammed shut and it sped off with some wheel spin leaving Keswick in a hurry,” Mr Rogerson said.

The van was later spotted by police on the M6 at speeds of up to 115mph and exited the motorway at Junction 33.

The vehicle was subsequently stopped by police deploying a stinger, with Curran and Easterbrook both arrested, while a third occupant of the van is said to have fled.

Besides the stolen bikes, police also discovered balaclavas and an angle grinder in the van.

Curran pleaded guilty to burglary and dangerous driving, and will be banned from driving for 20 months once he has been released from jail, while Easterbrook pleaded guilty to burglary.

The shop owner said in a victim impact statement that superficial damage to the five stolen bikes meant that despite their recovery, he had been forced to sell them at a discount, causing him a loss of £7,362.

He also said that he was anxious at the prospect of potential future break-ins at the shop.

He said: “It makes me wonder why I bother. I feel like the criminals just don’t understand the impact their crime has on me, my business and the local community in Keswick.”

Simon joined as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment


Gus T | 1 year ago
1 like

Whilst I'm happy that this person has been caught and jailed, it does add to the belief that theft is dealt more harshly with by the Judicial system than killing a cyclist  2

RoubaixCube | 1 year ago

If people are stealing from you - I dont think what happens as result of their actions is very high up on their list to give a toss about.

I understand the need to appeal to a thieves sense of morals or moral compass to get them to stop doing what they do but at the end of the day, Its a money making operation, just like your business is to sell bikes and accessories to legitimate customers.

If people need money and they have the intention of stealing. They will steal because its money in their pocket.

LeadenSkies replied to RoubaixCube | 1 year ago

A victim impact statement isn't only to the perpetrator, it is read to the whole court and can be taken into account in sentencing. If it were my business I would want the judge / magistrate to understand that although I got my property back, I was still significantly out of pocket and it had had a psychological effect too.

Steve K replied to LeadenSkies | 1 year ago
1 like

I don't think it's 'to the perpetrator' at all - it's to the court and impacts on sentencing once a verdict has been reached.  I think RC is mixing it up with restorative justice.

Latest Comments