A teenager has been arrested after a cyclist from Surrey was violently attacked by masked thugs on motorbikes while using a segregated cycling route near Box Hill, the rider suffering broken bones and a punctured lung when he was aggressively kicked from his bike last Wednesday evening.
After releasing a still image of the attackers, along with video footage of the attack, captured on the cyclist’s rear facing camera, in a bid to identify those responsible for the “vicious” and “unprovoked” assault, Surrey Police confirmed on Friday that a 15-year-old boy has been arrested in connection with the incident.
“A 15-year-old boy from Leatherhead has been arrested in connection with our investigation. He has since been released on bail,” the force told road.cc on Friday.
Whether the incident was an attempted bikejacking remains unclear, however, numerous similar incidents of masked motorbike riders targeting cyclists to rob them of bikes having been reported across London, Kent and Surrey in recent times.
At around 7.30pm on 29 May, Matt Farr was cycling back to his home in nearby Leatherhead having completed a lap of the popular Box Hill climb made famous by its inclusion in the 2012 Olympic Games road races and which sits just a mile south of where the violent attack happened as he rode along the shared-use infrastructure that runs parallel to the busy A24.

Riding towards Givons Grove roundabout, Matt heard the sound of a motorbike approaching but assumed they were on the dual-carriageway.
He was then “suddenly and violently pushed down onto the ground” (with the footage released by Surrey Police later revealing that he was kicked by the motorbike’s passenger) and has little memory of anything before being helped by several cyclists and walkers who were passing by and reported seeing four people on two motorbikes without number plates, none of the suspects wearing helmets and with their faces instead covered by bandanas or balaclavas.
According to Surrey Police, the dirt bike riders then continued on towards the roundabout, where they took the first exit onto Leatherhead Road.
Coincidentally, the author of this story was cycling up Box Hill at 7.15pm on Wednesday and was shouted at by four people matching the description speeding down the climb on motorbikes towards where the incident occurred just minutes later.

On Monday 3 June, Surrey Police launched a witness appeal and said they were seeking information about “the riders of a dirt bike”. The force initially uploaded a still image from the cyclist’s rear-facing camera footage (which he still has not received back or viewed himself) but this was quickly deleted, the force telling us this was because it is believed both suspects are under 18.
Following contact from road.cc on Tuesday 4 June, Surrey Police reinstated the photo of the suspects to its appeal, the force stating it came following authorisation from a senior officer due to the serious nature of the injuries sustained.
A spokesperson told us: “We can make an exception for issuing images of under-18s in more serious cases if we have the authorisation of a senior officer. In this instance a senior officer has now authorised the subsequent release of the image due to injury levels, and we have now updated our appeals to reflect that.
“However, not releasing an image with our appeals does not mean that we treat offences less seriously if committed by a suspect who is thought to be under 18. Media appeals are just one investigative avenue available to us, and our officers make sure to exhaust all lines of enquiry as part of a thorough investigation.”
And on Wednesday 5 June, the force released a 14-second clip of the footage captured by Matt’s camera, as part of the force’s appeal for information.
The footage (which has since been removed from this story due to the age of the boy arrested) shows the motorbike rider and a passenger riding at speed past two pedestrians, before the passenger kicks Matt and sends him clattering to the ground.
While two bikes were reported using the cycle path by witnesses, Surrey Police says it is concerned with the actions of the first dirt bike rider and passenger.
The force said: “The driver has been described as a White male, of medium build, wearing a dark grey hoodie, navy trousers, and a balaclava. The passenger has also been described as a White male of large build with dark hair, wearing a dark jacket, grey trousers, and black trainers.”
“This is a serious assault which has left a man with significant injuries. We’ve released this footage, which was captured at the time, to show the shocking nature of this unprovoked attack,” Inspector James Green, Borough Commander for Mole Valley, added on Wednesday, before confirming the arrest two days later.
Recalling the incident, which saw him spend four days being treated at East Surrey Hospital, Matt told us: “I don’t remember much after [being pushed]. Shortly before, I had heard a motorbike behind me but assumed it was on the road rather than the cycle path. I suffered four broken ribs, a punctured lung, broken shoulder blade, concussion and numerous cuts, scrapes and bruises and have only got out of hospital today [Saturday].
“I had a rear-facing camera on my bicycle and the police attending the scene took the memory card, so I haven’t seen the footage yet. I’m still waiting to hear back from the police but I’m not hopeful of the culprits being caught. I’m yet to assess the damage to my bicycle but can see at least the levers have taken a lot of damage. My cycling kit was cut off me in A&E and my helmet took several heavy hits so this is definitely going to cost me a minimum of multiple hundreds of pounds just for equipment, plus many months to get my fitness back again. It’s really truly horrible.
“I couldn’t believe how violently I’d been shoved, I just remember feeling that I was rotating to the left incredibly quickly, there was literally nothing I could do and it was a fraction of a second before I hit the ground. It was bizarre and obviously they’d kicked or pushed or done something on the way past, it wasn’t like a glancing blow or like I was hit from behind. It was a sideways shove basically, so it must have been deliberate.”
The police told Matt it is unlikely the four people could be traced due to the lack of number plates and the fact they had hidden their faces, raising concerns about repeat incidents in the future.
“My immediate thought, because they weren’t wearing helmets, was that they must have been local rather than coming out from London, they must have not come very far,” the cyclist continued.
“Maybe it was just for fun, who knows? I was quite beaten up from it and was lying by the side of the road for about two and a half hours before the ambulance. Lots of people stopped and helped and there was a couple who were walking who got there first that don’t live that far away, so they were nice and brought my bicycle back home.”
Matt admitted being unsure about what it would be like when he is able to return to riding outside and will be “setting up Zwift” in the meantime once he is sufficiently recovered.
“I might be completely fine or I might have some kind of post-traumatic and be unable to get on the bike again outside, I really don’t know, hopefully it’s the first,” he explained.
“I was on my own and I think when the roads are really busy it’s probably less of a worry but if you’re out on your own on an evening, which quite a few people do over the summer, I think it’s good to be a little bit forewarned. If I’d known about it, I don’t know, maybe I would have looked behind and got out the way or stopped, I don’t know. It’s just so unnecessary […] people riding motorbikes down the cycle lane not wearing a helmet with bandanas over their faces… they’re not people who care about consequences.
“At the end of the day the chance that happens to you is obviously still going to be very small, I was probably very unlucky, but you’d like to think the chance would be zero.”
There have been numerous incidents involving motorbike-riding masked attackers targeting cyclists, often in bikejacking incidents, across the countryside surrounding south London in the past few years. The motive in this case remains unclear, the cyclist’s bike and property having not been taken.
In 2022, British Cycling stepped in to say it was “deeply concerned” by a spate of violent bikejackings across south London. In the most high-profile incident, in autumn 2021, professional cyclist Alexandar Richardson was knocked off his bike, dragged for 100 metres by muggers on motorbikes, and threatened with a machete during a shocking bikejacking in Richmond Park.
In April of last year, a teenager, aged 15 when Richardson was attacked, was jailed for 12 months for the bikejacking.
Another professional cyclist, former Scottish champion Jennifer George said she no longer rides alone after she was similarly attacked by two people on a motorbike during a long ride from her home in south east London out to Surrey.

“I’ve never felt so vulnerable in my life. I’ve never felt so terrified in my life,” she said.
A chase ensued, with the attackers trying to veer into the 39-year-old. When George asked them to leave her alone, one of the attackers said “no, why should we?” She managed to make it to a busy pub nearby, and collapsed having a panic attack.
Seven weeks later George was targeted by two more would-be attackers on mopeds, and she was forced to wait in a driveway for half an hour until they had gone. She reported both incidents to the police, with Surrey Police filing details of the first incident due to limited lines of enquiry, and Kent Police failing to respond at all.
A member of Penge Cycling Club narrowly escaped a robbery attempt near West Wickham, around five miles west of Orpington, during which the rider was told he would be stabbed if he did not give up his 2022 Specialized S-Works Tarmac SL7.
While another incident saw a Trek Domane SL6 and Wilier GTR forcefully taken by a group, described as “youths on mopeds” by one victim and “four males on mopeds” by the other.
Duncan Dollimore, head of campaigns at Cycling UK, said he believes criminals are attracted towards stealing high-end bikes because the potential money to be made from selling them on far outweighs the chances of getting caught.
“It is possibly perceived as a low-risk crime if the numbers of people being caught are so low,” he explained. “It may be seen as a high-reward, low-risk crime.
“There have been increasing concerns about people cycling out of London to the Kent and Surrey hills who have been victims of muggings or robbery. There are a limited number of routes where people would cycle out of London.
“Somebody has posted on Strava what they are doing on their ride. The criminals will know it is someone on a £3,000 to £4,000 carbon fibre bike who has unwittingly signposted the fact that they are likely to be heading out to Kent or the Surrey Hills. It is on the police’s radar.”




















85 thoughts on “15-year-old boy arrested after violent attack on cyclist near Box Hill which left victim seriously injured with punctured lung when masked thugs on motorbike kicked him off popular cycle path”
should be zero tolerance on
should be zero tolerance on these toe rags. Nicked the second they are seen and their motorbikes seized and crushed.
Only thier motorbikes?
Only thier motorbikes?
Come to think of it the motorbikes probably aren’t ‘their’s’ anyway.
I’d say a very, very, very
I’d say a very, very, very hard labour for the next 10 years is a good way to prevent people from doing things like this.
No need to jail / prison them, just force them to work for – almost – free for quite a lot of time without hope of releasing. There’s plenty of hard labour to be done in this country and it seems these people are great candidates to improve roads (manually), walking paths (manually), and other things (manually).
leipreachan wrote:
You’re going to win anyway: no need to be smutty, Sir Keir.
If the victim’s reading this,
If the victim’s reading this, so sorry this happened and sure everyone here is wishing you a swift and full recovery. Convinced these thugs and bullies are getting worse and worse because they feel empowered and emboldened by certain quarters of the press and politics and their hateful pronouncements.
Paging Matthew Briggs, Rishi
Paging Matthew Briggs, Rishi Sunak, Iain Duncan Smith, Mark Harper, et al.
Would you all care to comment please. Your words and actions contribute to incidents like this. I hope you all are proud.
Speedy recovery to the victim
Speedy recovery to the victim.
I’m gonna bet the answer to your question is “no”.
Wild speculation but I’d guess the first would probably see little difference (thugs in this case and the case of his wife). The third (IDS) would probably say this is already addressed by existing law; he was just fixing an unfair “loophole”. Mark Harper and his boss have probably got bigger things to think about…
Much as they all need challenging (on several grounds) I’m not sure there’s much of a connection here other than failing to be cycle-positive and for some also “backing the motorist over everyone else”*. The top two do have to answer for deficient road policing however.
Certainly there are a few “but but cyclists” types in parliament / the Lords who are directly unhelpful and or are prepared to feed the media’s love of anti-cyclist tropes.
* EDIT – Of course “follow the money” – it’s possible that some folks have been … distracted by benefits from the motor / transport industry / seeking approval of loud voices? Otherwise – because thugs on mopeds, not “hard-working drivers” – and apparently this was on a (rare) bit of separate (cycle) infra anyway, not the road.
Unpopular opinion – the sort
Unpopular opinion – the sort of scrote that pushes someone off a bike for fun isn’t listening to these people on the Today programme, isn’t reading their comments reported in the local rag etc, and might guess that IDS is that tummy issue their auntie has. As misguided as they are, I don’t think there is any direct correlation – scrotes like have always existed regardless of political and culture winds.
Totally agree
Totally agree
quiff wrote:
But they will quite possibly have seen cycle-hating articles in the Daily Mail, picked up on comments by Clarkson and the like on Twitter, watched the anti-cycling segments on GB news and so on and picked up on the general vibe around the right wing that cyclists are selfish vermin who deserve to be crushed. Of course scrotes who go out kicking the crap out of others for fun have always existed but they often pick their targets according to the zeitgeist, back in the day they might have gone queer bashing or P**i bashing, when there’s so much hatred against cyclists in the media and on social media the fact that they chose to go cyclist bashing can’t be entirely divorced from those who create the atmosphere of hate, I think.
Point taken, they’re not
Point taken, they’re not totally divorced from one another and there will be an understanding of who is vulnerable and they can take liberties with. But I suspect that Clarkson, the Daily Mail and GB News are for more visible to the demographic of this site than to the (presumably young) scrotes doing this sort of thing. I would wager their social feeds are instead full of football, viral challenges, and dangerous driving vids. I remember idiot sixth formers in my day leaning out of a car window and grabbing kids by the backpack for fun, but don’t think they were getting the idea from the Daily Mail.
come off it theyre barely out
come off it theyre barely out of school, they dont read the Daily Mail or listen to old farmer Clarkson to get their kicks, and no one watches GB news.
and they werent inspired by playing video games like Grand Theft Auto either, theyre just adolescent bullies who are playing up because they can get away with it
and it trivialises the actual impact of anti cycling rhetoric if we just label any incident with a cyclist as being the result of that rhetoric, and places us not too far away from the kind of sweeping generalisations the idiots making those statements in the first place make.
So when anti-Islamic rhetoric
So when anti-Islamic rhetoric ramps up, attacks on Muslims increase. When anti-immigrant rhetoric ramps up, racist attacks increase. When anti-semitic rhetoric ramps up, attacks on Jews increase. But when anti-cyclist rhetoric ramps up it has no connection with violent attacks on cyclists (contrary to the lived experience of many on here as frequently discussed). OK.
Impressed that without any details provided you know their age, reading habits, who they listen to and what they watch, whether or not they’ve been influenced by anti-cyclist rhetoric and what their motivations are though, you should get a job with the police, I’m sure such insights would be highly valuable.
Rendel Harris wrote:
TBF Rendel, you have also made assumptions about what they may have been reading or watching and that they have been influenced by anti-cycling rhetoric – you just said possibly instead of definitely.
quiff wrote:
Which is a pretty massive difference, no?
Just not convinced it
Just not convinced it justified the sarcasm.
quiff wrote:
Response to effectively being called an idiot: “[what you’re saying] places us not too far away from the kind of sweeping generalisations the idiots making those statements in the first place make.” An ironic statement given that stonojr’s statement about whom the perpetrators will be was in itself a sweeping generalisation.
Rendel Harris wrote:
There’s a picture of the suspects. They look very much like young/adolescent men to me, and their build and clothing are of types more commonly associated with more-deprived socio-economic groups. They are fairly unlikely to be avid Daily Mail readers or GB News watchers, and may well be from a group actively demonised by those outlets.
They might of course be outliers, or Tarquins cosplaying poor people, or indeed two completely innocent dirt-bike riders who have been misidentified. But it doesn’t seem impossible that this particular incident might be more about violent young men being violent young men than it is about anti-cyclist shit-stirring from the media. That absolutely does exist, and does contribute to a lot of the abuse we get, but it doesn’t follow that all the abuse is caused by it. Some people are horrible dickheads independently.
Brauchsel wrote:
Cripes, it’s getting more and more like 221b Baker Street round here than anything. You can tell their socioeconomic group from their build? Can you also tell that they are Freemasons, occasionally use snuff and have travelled extensively in the east?
I believe the Court of Public
I believe the Court of Public Opinion delivers verdicts “on the balance of probability”. Or “looks like it to me”.
What I want to know is how these folks from deprived socioeconomic groups can afford motorbikes? Aren’t they supposed to be going barefoot in the streets, faintly hoping to come by a couple of crusts for the day or possibly a couple of pennies to get “as happy as a sandboy”?
chrisonabike wrote:
As do the civil courts in this country. If the rider who was seriously assaulted here wants to sue his attackers for damages, that’s the standard he’ll have to meet. Two gentlemen who can be shown to have been very close to the location of the assault at the same time riding (illegally) the same kind of fairly-uncommon vehicle might find it difficult to convince a judge that it’s more likely than not that their presence was simply coincidence.
I assume ‘how can they afford
I assume ‘how can they afford motorbikes’ was sarcasm, when the aforementioned scrotes would be far more likely to steal motorbikes and if they did actually buy the motorbikes, the funds used would have been misappropriated undoubtedly..
Rendel Harris wrote:
No, which is why I didn’t say that you could. But obesity, particularly in younger people, is much more prevalent in worse-off groups. They are fat young white men, wearing clothing which is the near-ubiquitous uniform of badly-off young white men around me, riding a dirt bike on public roads. The combination of these indicators suggests (but doesn’t of course prove) that these guys are not middle-aged stockbroker types who have been drinking too much of Farage’s poison.
Are you telling me that when you see someone you don’t notice anything about them that might indicate their background, or that you do notice such things but are not right any more than random chance? We are closer to the classless society than I’d thought if so.
Brauchsel wrote:
Just for interest it’s not nearly as much more more prevalent as you might think. The “obesity gap” between the poorest and the richest males in 2017 was less than 6% (21.9% of highest socioeconomic level obese, 27.4% of lowest SEL obese).
Being poor doesn’t make you
Being poor doesn’t make you want to be a bully there are plenty of rich bullys around. Being able to get away with attacking someone is a direct link to this behaviour. It is a fact that there is a lot of anti cyclist rhetoric at present so it is definitely no surprise to hear of this kind of attack. This is irrespective of someone’s social background.
Teen thugs doing drive-by
Teen thugs doing drive-by pushes when driving past a cyclist has been done for a long time in various countries around the world; I knew of it happening decades ago in Australia, long before anti-cycling rhetoric in the media.
grOg wrote:
There has been anti-cycling rhetoric in the media for decades, it’s ramped up over recent years as cycling’s popularity has exploded but it’s always been there.
quiff wrote:
However prevailing culture does give a permission structure for particular types of violence.
For an example, consider for how long maritial rape was acceptable.
Yep, have a like. I guess my
Yep, have a like. I guess my point was really just that, IMO, the current political anti-cyclist nonsense might have a direct effect on people who read / watch certain traditional media, I have my doubts that it’s directly reaching the sort of people who have always enjoyed bullying / injuring people for fun. However, IMO the current political discourse may well increase the risk to cyclists from people who might otherwise consider themselves to be right-minded (don’t we all) law-abiding types.
It’s true though, ensuring
It’s true though, ensuring cyclists are insured, ‘taxed’ and have number plates, plus threat of Dangerous Cycling charge, would make the roads safer from the 0.001% of RTIs caused by cyclists leading to a KSI.
As this incident proves, ministerial and policing resources are applied intelligently by a society promoting Active Travel to improve our healthcare and pollution tax burdens, mental health, and reduction in car dependency.
At this rate, the UK will top the global list of most backwards thinking countries in the world.
I hope the poor lad makes a
I hope the poor lad makes a full recovery and don’t let the fkers grind you down.
Quote:
Don’t know if the cyclist is aware, but they might be able to make a claim against the Motor Insurance Bureau. If they have legal insurance (included that provided through Cycling UK or British Cycling membership) I would get in touch with them, or else various solicitors do “no win no fee” arrangements. Should be pretty clear cut in this case. Or you can claim directly without a solicitor, but I would imagine given the injuries, advice on the best approach might be advised.
Obviously this was a horrible incident and a bit of money isn’t going to change that, but might at least mitigate the financial impact.
Worth looking into but I fear
Worth looking into but I fear (not certain by any means) one might have trouble getting the MIB to pay out on that one as it’s a clear case of assault but I suspect they would say it’s assault by the person rather than using the motor vehicle as a weapon and so not covered. However, if Matt is reading, the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority may be able to help: with those injuries you should get several thousand pounds at least.
Commiserations to the victim,
Commiserations to the victim, it seems particularly grim that it appears to have just been for entertainment rather than even theft.
Are the police saying that you can get away with any crime as long as you cover your face and don’t wave an identifying document around, or just crimes where a cyclist is the victim?
“Somebody has posted on Strava what they are doing on their ride. The criminals will know it is someone on a £3,000 to £4,000 carbon fibre bike who has unwittingly signposted the fact that they are likely to be heading out to Kent or the Surrey Hills. It is on the police’s radar.”
Then the police’s radar isn’t going to catch anyone. You don’t post your ride to Strava before you’ve ridden it, and the idea that criminals are trawling through Strava looking for someone who rides the same route at the same time every week and then going looking for him/her is ludicrous. Very many people going up Box Hill (or round Richmond, or Regents) are doing so on very expensive (more than £3-4k) bikes: criminals know that, and know that if it says S-Works or Colnago it’s worth assaulting someone for. I’ve been followed and assessed for the risk/return of being pushed off, and I doubt they’d been monitoring my knackered old bike’s social media presence.
Stick a copper on a Pinarello and send them out for a ride in the affected areas, if they actually want to catch the culprits.
Brauchsel wrote:
What…. the Police be proactive…. that’ll never happen. Now if it was an officer out for a ride in their own time and this had happened to, you would not be able to move in the area for coppers looking for revenge for one of their own.
Police Scotland… a driver
Police Scotland… a driver only has to state that they can’t remember and that trumps HD video of the offence, and driving the only vehicle on the road for several minutes.
I couldn’t say for certain
I couldn’t say for certain but there is a possibility that theft was initialy a motive but there was too many witnesses at 7.20pm so the scrotes scarpered.
Do the police actually
Do the police actually prosecute any criminals?
A pedant writes: no, that’s
A pedant writes: no, that’s the job of the Crown Prosecution Service. And they prosecute people who have been charged with a crime, who may or may not be criminals: that’s the court’s job to determine.
Pedantry aside, and getting
Pedantry aside, and getting to the spirit of your question;
No, the police are too underfunded, understaffed, and tied up in red tape and politics to actually do the job they’re supposed to do. That’s all before any questions of willingness to aid one demographic of victim over another.
The police have an all time
The police have an all time record number of officers but are still invisible.
Policing has failed largely because the police have unilaterally redefined their role to focus on other things. They also refuse to accept or follow the crime reduction strategies deployed successfully in other countries.
The College of Policing has played a significant role in developing useless Police Leaders that are incapable of setting an effective strategy for policing and then managing against it.
open_roads wrote:
Pedantry: this can be true but surely the first metric that matters is the number per head of population – which (strange to say) declined under Conservative governments, though has more recently gone back up. I don’t think it’s as high as “all time record” which in recent years was 2010 I think?
You’re quite right however that where they put their efforts is key.
As to what the police are doing by themselves – asdistinct from how they’re tasked by government – I am ignorant.
It is an all time high:
It is an all time high:
https://www.statista.com/statistics/303973/police-officer-figures-england-and-wales/#:~:text=Number%20of%20police%20officers%20in%20England%20and%20Wales%201979%2D2023&text=There%20were%20150%2C697%20police%20officers,during%20this%20provied%20time%20period.
Zjtm231 wrote:
Whilst it’s true that the government have finally managed to return police numbers to a whopping 2.5% more than they were before their unnecessary, foolish and shortsighted cuts, in the same period the population has increased 9.5%, so in real terms of officers per head of population numbers are still well down on their pre-2010 levels. There is also the question of other funding cuts to the police services since 2010, e.g. £850 million from the Metropolitan Police, forcing the closure of 75% of local police stations. Officer numbers are not the only important metric in this area.
Thanks for your agreement
Thanks for your agreement
Do the police actually
Do the police actually prosecute any criminals?
Setting aside the pedantry, as the CPS don’t have to consider any alleged offences if the police bin all the evidence first, the answer is No, if it’s moving traffic offences by motorists against cyclists
https://upride.cc/incident/rx17mxlpn66kna_2lorriestogether_closepass/
or if it’s moving traffic offences by motorists against the law and cyclists
https://upride.cc/incident/b5hol_tanker_closepassdwlcross/
or if it’s moving traffic offences by motorists only against the law
https://upride.cc/incident/k7ddy_audia4_redlightpass/
So, once you have established that the police are too busy to deal with any of those, or with ‘technical only’ offences by motorists where the vehicle is stationary (this is a Wigan taxi with no MOT for 7 months, parked in Garstang High Street- ‘it could have been moved there and taken away again by Martians, against the owner’s will!’) you’re not left with much.
Result!
The police can prosecute some
The police can prosecute some crimes without involving the CPS. We have Theresa May to thank for that. Not sure it’s really resulted in 91,000 more prosecutions as they claimed it would…
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/greater-police-prosecution-powers-to-cut-costs-and-deliver-swifter-justice–2
Maybe it would be a good
Maybe it would be a good practice for someone who would like to beat someone almost to death, after he has rendered him unconsious, to dress him in cycling outfit.
That will improve his chances of not getting caught.
Surrey Police have posted an
Surrey Police have posted an appeal online – with a screenshot from the rear facing video: https://www.facebook.com/100064544418553/posts/pfbid02Pxdxfi2A2zMALohpbRippo1UiTavRRpNn4ryWov9HaoniWsNUuXooVYwR1Ln5U3kl/?app=fbl
Only now they’ve updated it
Only now they’ve updated it and removed the screenshot – no idea why…
https://www.facebook.com/100064544418553/posts/pfbid035uCiihTYcLaQcUj7J75CAtRW5xu1CM6HL6NUAs88bd7nSStDBhoj2bgsT9n5Huq5l/?app=fbl
If that’s the direction I
If that’s the direction I read it as, that turning onto Leatherhead Road will have taken the riders past the main local Traveller site. A lot of the young men there get about on similar types of dirt bike, so maybe they can advise if one of theirs has been stolen recently.
Brauchsel wrote:
Oh it almost certainly would have been. “When was this incident, officer?” “Ah, right, there you go – that dirt bike was stolen just an hour before that…”
I live pretty close to here.
I live pretty close to here. The Police are non-existant. I get some form of verbal or physical abuse most rides, and only a fortnight ago was run off the road when commuting home by white man van – deliberately, and he wound the window down and swore at me as he did it. I reported it. Got no response other than an automated email with a crime number. Generally, the level of speeding and reckless and drug driving is incredible. It’s basically the wild west now. Consequently I, like most at my club now, don’t ride solo on the road at all anymore.
The police can find them in
The police can find them in the local gypsy camp. But they don’t want to, so they won’t
Thug teens hurting people for
Thug teens hurting people for laughs, not a theft motive here;
a shocking case from the US where a cyclist was deliberately run into at speed, by teens driving a stolen car, killing the cyclist..
https://abc7.com/las-vegas-andreas-probst-police-body-camera-video-bicyclist/14365122/
How the fuck can the police
How the fuck can the police determine from that grainy picture of masked thugs, they are are under 18? They literally have no chance of anyone being able to identify them if they leave out the only evidence they have of what they look like and this will be another attack on cyclists that goes unsolved. Can we ask Briggs, Harper, Sunak, IDS, and Murdoch for their opinion on what might be motivating this type of behaviour? I know what’s motivating theirs.
One suspects the police
One suspects the police already have a good idea who they are based on knowledge of the local toerag community. Proving that & making a case stick is probably another matter.
As well as a lack of comment from the usual suspects propogating anti cyclist BS for clicks and the gammon vote, there was abolutely sod all recognition of the recent PACT release pointing out the grim 500,000 deaths on our roads milestone. Quelle surprise.
I’m not sure if it was this
I’m not sure if it was this site or another, but there was something else that happened in this area recently and it was mentioned it coincided with the Epsom Derby and the extra people that descend on the area for the weeks around it.
They were lambasted for it, but I’ve seen fights happen in Dorking with travellers* around Derby time that wouldn’t have happened if they weren’t there and starting trouble.
(*how did I know they were travellers, they said so)
The fact it happened on Derby weekend does offer hope it was a one off and not the start of violence/robbery against cyclists in the area. I use that cycle path regularly, but my bike’s nowhere near the ‘list’ of stealable ones!
Are you referring to the
Are you referring to the cyclists which was found dead in the road?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cz96dr5en9po.amp
I’ve ridden on that cycle
I’ve ridden on that cycle path countless times down to Box Hill, Dorking and the Surrey Hills. So this is truly shocking. Not sure how much the first person had to do with it – were there any other reports of incidents that didn’t end so badly? – or was it a spur of the moment thing from the second person. Whatever, they need to be caught to find out.
Same here. I’ve never
Same here. I’ve never experienced anything like that TF.
“After initially deleting a
“After initially deleting a still image of the attackers, due to the belief that both suspects are under 18″… I’m sorry, does that mean that if the suspects are minors, the police can’t publish images to trace them?!
The passenger looks to be
The passenger looks to be holding a phone, which is probably recording video as the flashlight is on.
I wonder if this got posted anywhere before the story hit the news?
£5 says those two are
£5 says those two are travellers.
Just ahead of Derby weekend
Just ahead of Derby weekend down the road in Epsom? Surely not.
and could this be the top the
and could this be the top the rider was wearing…
I am shocked at the
I am shocked at the prevalence of racist comments on this article. I am hugely disappointed that road.cc do not moderate such discriminatory comments. Shame on road.cc
Gbjbanjs wrote:
Agreed, people would rightly be appalled if there were comments like “bet you £5 they’re black” or “the police just need to look in the nearest black community but they won’t”. Not sure about “shame on road.cc”: comments on these forums are generally not monitored. If you draw the offending comments to their attention with an email (info@road.cc) they’re usually good at addressing such matters.
What else do you expect in
What else do you expect in tory/farage little England?
If you are not wholly English then you are lowlife scum who are responsible for all that is wrong.
The people in the photo are
The people in the photo are very likely to be British so what’s Farage got to do with it?
?
Did you bother reading the comments below, hence my post.
If the criminals had gone
If the criminals had gone full mask off the way this comments section has they would have been a lot easier to catch…
Are you easily offended? I
Are you easily offended? I counted three out of 77. I wouldn’t call that prevelant.
They look obese. Without
They look obese. Without their little motorbike they would helpless.
Great news – the police have
Great news – the police have arrested someone they suspect to be the person on the back! Let’s hope the publicity and the arrest has some kind of a deterrent effect.
The reason is simple: the
The reason is simple: the TikTok generation, in which parents are powerless, hence no morals are transferred from the previous generation and everything is to be captured for monetized attention. Thank social media for the idiotisation of a generation.
Blackthorne wrote:
Exactly what previous generations said about television, rock ‘n’ roll music, the wireless…there were probably cavemen back in the Stone Age complaining that these here modern cave paintings were ruining the upcoming generation. Each generation is different and makes its own mistakes and advances, I find the current generation of young people to be thoughtful, generous of spirit and having a heartening concern for humanity and the planet. Of course there are a minority of brain-dead thugs and stupid narcissists as there have been in every generation, I don’t think we should write off or denigrate millions of youngsters as “idiotized” because of them.
Rendel Harris wrote:
If only the same could be said by non-cyclists….
Just spotted another crime to
Just spotted another crime to add to the list:
That’s two crimes, Crocs is
That’s two crimes, Crocs is one and Crocs with socks is another. Or are they combined into aggravated Crocage?
Glad somebody explained that!
Glad somebody explained that! I thought it was just white socks.
Doesn’t matter – it’ll get
Doesn’t matter – it’ll get downgraded to careless footwear if it ever gets to a prosecution.
mdavidford wrote:
Yep, probably just be ordered to undergo a programme of retrainering.
Great news, good Police work.
Great news, good Police work.
Hopefully the judiciary will follow through with a draconian sentence for this nasty and unprovoked attack, make an example of the worthless little git.
Sadly this isn’t anything new
Sadly this isn’t anything new. Years ago, now, probably 2014/2015, I was riding up Box Hill in the evening, as part of a long ride out from Farnborough. At the top of the second “lift”, just before the hairpin, three mopeds/scooters, each with two loud and lairy teenagers aboard, came past me, and the second and third pillions both had a crack at kicking me off my bike (and down the hill). I didn’t report it back then, mainly due to “lack of evidence” and the fact that the bawbags didn’t manage to land a hit. They turned around at the top, too, and swerved their scooters toward me on the way back down, while shouting something unintelligible at me. It won’t be the same scrotes, obviously, but disturbingly similar behaviour.
I think the media and politics have a case to answer, emboldening the scumbags off the back of the ridiculous levels of hatred toward cycling and cyclists we’ve been reading recently. I find scooter riders intensely irritating when I’m driving my car – imagine the police’s reaction if scooter/moped riders were regularly being deliberately knocked off their contraptions by car drivers. I know Surrey Police appear to be taking this incident seriously, but generally there’s a lack of interest/effort going into similar events unless/until there are serious injuries. More effort required a) to trace, seize, and destroy mopeds/scooters/electric motorcycles that are used illegally on public highways, and b)explain to the Muppets campaigning for bicycle numberplate laws that they won’t help, because those who display them will be the law abiding majority, and those who routinely break the law won’t bother registering for or display them…