A London cyclist, confronted by four blacked-out bike thieves armed with an angle grinder who attempted to steal his Brompton outside a cafe in broad daylight, has told of how “depressing” the brazen attack was, advising others who are targeted to “make lots of noise and take loads of pictures”.
Ben Derbyshire, an architect who is the former president of the Royal Institute for British Architects (RIBA), told the Evening Standard he had been left “shaken” by the incident, which happened on Friday morning as he ate with his son and daughter at El Ganso cafe in Hackney.
I find myself in an altercation with angle-grinder wielding rustlers after my #Brompton. Fended off with the help of son & daughter and the proprietor of El Ganzo!
Lesson 1: In extremis make lots of noise & take loads of pictures.
Lesson 2: Swap Brompton for my tatty old Giant? pic.twitter.com/vm6tIUREp2— Ben Derbyshire PPRIBA FRSA HonAIA (@ben_derbyshire) May 12, 2023
Mr Derbyshire reported hearing “commotion down the street” as the two moped riders, each with a passenger on the back, came along “making a racket, revving and basically being as intimidating as possible”.
They were all dressed in black and used an angle grinder to begin cutting through the D-lock on his daughter’s bike in an attempt to get at his £2,500 Brompton, also locked to the rack outside the cafe.
Having run out to confront the gang, Mr Derbyshire quickly felt “in danger”, ending up “rather pinned into position with a lot of bikes in front of me and people behind”, meaning he “wasn’t in a position to run away” if necessary.
Holding on to his bike, one of the thieves threatened him with the angle grinder, raising it towards his face, before the cafe’s owner and Mr Derbyshire’s son ran out to help as passers by filmed the incident.
“I think what happened was, from their point of view, it all got a bit too complicated so they chickened out,” he said. “The proprietor of the restaurant came out immediately and was very supportive and very concerned and took our bikes in afterwards so we could finish our meals.
“I just think that’s depressing and that they should be so aggressive about it. I mean, trying to intimidate me by, by pushing an angle, grinder into my face. That is not on.”
Metropolitan Police attended the scene quickly, the cyclist reported, confirming that he was uninjured and able to cycle home. The police said there have not been any arrests, with witnesses who are yet to give information asked to call 101, ref 2586/12may.
Thieves wielding angle grinders and cutting through locks is far from a new problem, with footage of similar incidents sadly becoming all too common in UK cities. Last June, Labour MP Helen Hayes’ bike was saved by a local councillor and staff working at a nearby restaurant after they spotted a thief cutting through the lock.
Just months earlier, a masked gang appeared unfazed by large crowds watching outside Surrey Quays shopping centre as they stole a Trek e-bike.
> Thieves use angle grinder to steal Trek bike locked outside busy shopping centre
In February, thieves stole a cargo bike parked next to a bikehangar in East Dulwich, a member of the council replying to a social media post about the issue to report he had suffered two electric cargo bikes stolen within the last year.
-1024x680.jpg "“Clear anti-cyclist bias”: Lawsuit filed against Toronto police after cop doored cyclist… before ticketing rider over incident")
62 thoughts on “Cyclist fights off moped gang bike thieves armed with angle grinder”
These scumbags are nearly
These scumbags are nearly always dressed in the obligatory “roadman” uniform of black tracksuits, black trainers, black hoodies, black bandannas / balaclavas and their backsides hanging out.
They are visible a mile off to anyone who has had the misfortune to have an interaction with them.
The only group of people that doesn’t seem to notice them is the police.
I suppose the thieves having
I suppose the thieves having angle grinders was the most likely meaning of the headline. But I was so disapointed that the cyclist wasn’t armed with an angle grinder while he fought off the thieves.
Mick Dundee style – “that’s
Mick Dundee style – “that’s not an angle grinder, this is an angle grinder”. Pulling out a nine inch badboy.
I’m seeing a Rambo image – a
I’m seeing a Rambo image – a big orange Stihl petrol grinder in one hand, starting cord in the other – quote as above……
A petrol one definitely works
A petrol one definitely works better than the one I had in mind.
nniff wrote:
Even better if the Brompton-owner had a Stihl chainsaw – bound to make a nasty mark or two on the assailants helmets – AND their headgear ?
nniff wrote:
Or Ash Williams from the Evil Dead franchise. Groovy
NotNigel wrote:
yes, while they are going about the lock, you disable their moped.
wycombewheeler wrote:
Hmm… so escalate the situation with a gang of four crims AND make it harder for them to scarper when you and they face off?
I’d deffo be wanting at least an equal level of tried and trusted pals, plus narwhal tusks to keep a useful range in that contest.
Or vast upper body strength and a 32 inch angle grinder. Come to think of it, where’s that ChuckSneed gone since the last ban came in?
He’d was banned before for a
He’d was banned before for a week.
I assume libellous statements lead to a ban being permanent.
“I just think that’s
“I just think that’s depressing and that they should be so aggressive about it. I mean, trying to intimidate me by, by pushing an angle, grinder into my face. That is not on.”
How very British. If only they’d asked nicely.. 😉
But seriously, glad there was a happy ending.
The number plate of one is
The number plate of one is visible, so that ought to help enquiries, while the other has a food delivery box on the back. Were they both stolen too?
Both the bikes and plates are
Both the bikes and plates are undoubtedly stolen, which is why they are so brazen; if they were unlucky enough to be pursued by police, the police couldn’t identify them and as a last resort, they’d dump the bikes and leg it..
I’m not sure what I’d do in
I’m not sure what I’d do in that situation but bravo to those that have stood up to these types of thieves. I know they’re only material items but it’s the morality of someone thinking they can just come along and take something that’s not theirs so brazenly that makes it warming hearing about people standing up to them.
As a keen cycler myself I
As a keen cycler myself I read this story with interest. What I would like to know though is why the cyclers thought it was ok to lock up an expensive Brompton with only a D-lock and then toddle off for a meal. That was a terrible decision by the cyclers and really just encouraged those poor professional thieves to target the bike. What’s worse is that the cyclers don’t even seem to be wearing helmets or hi-vis whereas the thieves at least are wearing full black helmets which will protect them from strong sunlight as well as collisions with lawless red-light-running pavement hogging cyclers. I really hope that those cyclers behave properly in future to prevent such crimes occurring. Thank goodness the thieves had an angle grinder handy for protection. Best, Nigel.
A loving homage to Nigel, or
A loving homage to Nigel, or as I knew him, Fireman John.
“Cyclers”
“Cyclers”
You’ve got to feel for the
You’ve got to feel for the other diners having to put up with people turning up to such an event as lunch. On bikes. The stench of sweat must have been terrible.
NotNigel wrote:
Not to mention having to look at the helmet hair and general explosion in the Decathlon aisle appearance of these people. One doesn’t spend £500 a month on hair and nails to have to look at these troglodytes whilst enjoying luncheon.
The final insult to everyone
The final insult to everyone else would’ve been clipless pedals and them god awful shoes you have to wear with them. Why, just why?!!
NotNigel wrote:
They’re not Louboutins, that’s for sure.
Rendel Harris wrote:
After many years as a cyclist I have solved the issue of helmet hair. I bought a skull shaver.
Head gets cold outside in winter though. (and the spring and autumn)
Shove it troll.,
Shove it troll.,
I feel I ought to reassure
I feel I ought to reassure some that cocovelo is on our side and is a martin, nigel, fireman etc. parody account!
Sure, but while we are
Sure, but while we are temporarily free of the real thing (I think; or is there already another incarnation?) do we have to impersonate it?
I wonder if we could get the
I wonder if we could get the opinion of a leading bicycle security expert
This is so not the point (and
This is so not the point (and chapeau for taking the thieves on) but surely if you have Brompton you fold it and take it with you rather than lock it up?
Getting out my phone to video
Getting out my phone to video it is the first thing I always think of whenever I see a 70 year old being threatened by thieves. I mean videoing it for likes is so much easier than actually making a positive impact on society.
Without the video, there
Without the video, there would not be any concrete evidence.
How would you safely defend anyone against an angle grinder? You’d need 3 or 4 people armed with pikes to do anything.
Makes me wonder how we
Makes me wonder how we managed before phones came along. If I had seen this from the phone users position I’m not going to stop and think about my own safety but just pile in. It helps that I’m 6.5 and 17 stone but I imagine most people would do the same and whatever happens, happens. If the 70 year old can stand up to them I’d be ashamed if I didn’t. Bullies like that aren’t brave, they just rely on most people shrugging their shoulders and passing on by.
Sigh.
Sigh.
Before phones came along, we
Before phones came along, we didn’t have portable angle grinders.
How do you know anything about the cammer ? They could be 1.6m and 55kg for all you know
I think you are just generalising from your physical ability and most people would be hesitant.
Would you try and take on someone with a knife ?
Hirsute wrote:
Exactly, and they don’t have to be small either; I’m 6 foot tall, built like the proverbial and not, I hope, lacking in physical courage, but I’m not going to take on four guys, who have at least an angle grinder and probably more weapons about their persons, in defence of personal property (defending a person from attack would be a very different matter). At least in taking a video some useful evidence might be obtained.
4 guys attacking a 70 year
Deleted my reply as I didn’t read far enough down your post to see you’d intervene if it was a person rather than property.
Hirsute wrote:
If they were attacking someone with it yes of course. How could you stand by and watch a 70 year old get attacked and not intervene?
You’ve just changed the goal
You’ve just changed the goal posts.
Hirsute wrote:
You changed the goal posts when you asked about a hypothetical ‘someone with a knife’ as we were discussing the situation with the 70 year old before that but I still answered honestly and in good faith.
If you’re happy to agree to disagree that’s fine, or even discuss it further but please don’t try to twist things around to imply some sort of ‘gotcha’ moment.
The question about a knife
The question about a knife was a direct swap for an angle grinder – pretty sure people think twice about knives as they are aware of how much damage they can do.
You seemed ( or how I read it, rightly or wrongly) to be changing from stealing a bike to attacking a 70 year which is a category change.
Obviously you have a huge advantage in these situations due to your build but not everyone is built like that.
Hirsute wrote:
Yep. I’m built like a shit brickhouse so while I’d love to be the heroic type I’m much more likely to be the hospitalised type.
quiff wrote:
An interesting exercise I’ve seen in a martial arts class was to arm a couple of fighters with marker pens and get them to pretend that they’re knives. Let them spar for a couple of minutes and see how many fatal wounds they’ve got.
Doesn’t matter how big or experienced you are, some idiot with a knife has a good chance of putting you in hospital.
My “received wisdom” was that
My “received wisdom” was that most knife fights are over very quickly. And that they’re best avoided, being at best chancy affairs.
I would agree that a confident (not confrontational) approach seems to act as a deterrent to some kinds of trouble. However that doesn’t change your odds if someone *does* decide to “teach you a lesson”.
UPDATE: a spade would seem to be the way to go, says military history.
Hirsute wrote:
My apologies, I thought that was what we were talking about all along. Given that he wasn’t hurt and the bike wasn’t taken I understand your position.
I was going on the assumption that if I saw it happening from the beginning I would have rushed in to avoid any violence aimed at the old man bravely trying to stop the thieves. It would be a fair point to say that I could have been hurt badly or my actions may have made the situation turn more violent than it was but standing by and watching would not have been an option for me.
My build is an advantage but my lack of fighting skills isn’t. I assume bullies usually run scared when confronted by someone bigger and if not then the consequences are my own fault. It wouldn’t be the first time I took a beating defending someone innocent.
I hear narwhal tusks are the
I hear narwhal tusks are the thing …
No arrests from a violent
No arrests from a violent gang style robbery in public, visible plates and box on at least one of the mopeds, with multiple witnesses, and having “attended the scene quickly”?
The victim is basically defending himself, the police have done nothing.
I guess the Met is very busy dancing in Tik Tok videos, waving rainbow flags and visiting people for posting things on Facebook. Also, the victim doesn’t have any flags on his Twitter, so how can anyone take him seriously?
The sad thing, here is that his only real option for justice is to use the D lock as its secondary use, to smash those cretins in any vulnerable spot.
You (and the no to eu thing)
You (and the no to eu thing) should get down to the Hate Mail. It’s probably more your level.
You sound nice.
You sound nice.
Funnily enough the new Chief
Funnily enough the new Chief Constable of Greater Manchester has referenced the distractions described in Roulereo’s reply – pretty much saying that the force had been failing to serve the public because its officers and resources were being wasted on social-media friendly causes instead of real crime that blights the lives of victims.
Since the GMP force went back to “old fashioned” policing the detection rate for crime has improved markedly.
Hmm… problem is of course
Hmm… problem is of course that lots of our lives now involve social media, like it or not. That means that’s where you can engage with people (if you think that’s worthwhile) and also evidence is there.
Since the Manchester force was in special measures when he arrived in 2021 I’m not sure it’s just him telling them to get off Twitter what fixed it. His statements also sound more like a plea for the simplicities of the “old days”. FWIW here is some of what he said (back in 2022 to the Times):
“Using social media, in these very contested times, requires a particular skill. And it’s a skill that we do not have. So for the most part, regardless of our intentions, we tend to use social media badly.
And actually, reaching out to communities is all too often perceived as virtue signalling. And, candidly, in some cases it is virtue signalling.”
chrisonatrike wrote:
This website is the only social media on which I engage.
Sounds like you’re safe if
Sounds like you’re safe if you’re in Manchester then!
open_roads wrote:
IIRC, unfortunately, “old fashioned” policing involved a lot of brown paper envelopes full of used notes and beating a confession out of the nearest Black or Irish person…
brooksby wrote:
Whilst modern policing is sharing mysognistic ‘banter’ and pictures of victims on WhatsApp.
Steve K wrote:
Ah: “progress”, eh? 😉
BIRMINGHAMisaDUMP wrote:
I don’t know if the Daily Mail approve of physically defending a 70 year old being attacked but I definately do. If that makes me sink lower in your estimation than I already was I think I can live with that.
If you think standing by and watching a 70 year old get attacked is Ok then I’d better not give my opinion on you. Partly because I may be wrong and you’re just taking the chance to have a little dig and not saying that it would be OK and if I’m right because it wouldn’t be very polite.
This is next topic on Jeremy
This is next topic on Jeremy Vine, channel 5 for panel & phone guests to debate. Mr Derbyshire to be interviewed.
As an aside, the lock on my
As an aside, the lock on my wife’s bike jammed at the weekend. We all had a shot at shifting it but none of us could. In the end she borrowed an angle grinder from a neighbour and cut the old lock off. Nobody bothered to stop her and ask what she was doing, despite this being right outside a popular South London cinema aound midday.
My son used to D-lock his
My son used to D-lock his bike to railings outside a railway station. Came the day when the key snapped in the lock. A builder friend cut the lock with a petrol angle grinder. Both foot and car traffic stopped cos no-one wanted to run the gauntlet of the huge shower of sparks (blade was old and blunt). And no-one even questioned him …
What a sad state of affairs
What a sad state of affairs that we allow this kind of thing to go on unopposed by the majority, where getting your phone out to film it is, more appropriate than actually standing up to these scumbags.
I’m not advocating throwing punches or anything, but a few stand-byers actually standing beside Mr Derbyshire would have made the 4 wannabe thieves to reassess the situation and realise that this time there were no easy pickings to be had.
Smartphones are great at times, but they’ve totally eroded our sense of community and doing the right thing for our fellow citizens, when it matters.
This isn’t the only one where
This isn’t the only one where they threaten the would be interveners
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/london-bike-thieves-stolen-video-hackney-brompton-a9345881.html
We can all imagine intervening, but the reality is a bit different.
Speak for yourself, 99/100 I
Speak for yourself, 99/100 I’d always intervene.
Act first, worry about the consequences later.
It’s got me into a fair number of scrapes over the years, but at least I’ve been true to myself.
I’m a firm believer that what goes around, comes around.
I intervened a few years ago,
I intervened a few years ago, got surrounded, stabbed twice and hospitalized with a punctured lung. I was lucky to survive.
be very very careful out there.
Langsam wrote:
Yes, I’m reminded of a friend who was killed trying to break up a fight – RIP James.