Dominic Cummings’ wife accused of hypocrisy over anti-LTN ‘war on cars’ Spectator column; Parents of man killed in hit-and-run call for change; Every pub on June 21; ‘Road tax’ whinging; Bike theft victim’s happy ending + more on the live blog
SUMMARY
Police surprise boy with new bike after his was stolen
#GOODNEWS | A 15-year-old boy has received a new bike thanks to the generosity of a police officer and a local bike shop owner after his previous one was stolen.
💙 #CommunitySpirit
🚲 #HelpingThoseInNeedFull story ➡️ https://t.co/oXB4imrwJP pic.twitter.com/iN8EI9As50
— Dudley Police (@DudleyPolice) March 3, 2021
Top work by Dudley Police and a local bike shop to gift a 15-year-old with a replacement bike after his previous one was stolen. PC Andy Peters went out of his way to find a bike being kept at Brierley Hill police station that had been recovered, donated or seized, and got it fixed up ready for Daniel to use. Cycles4U owner Steve Jones carried out all the work for free and they surprised Daniel with the gift at the bike shop last week.
The 15-year-old took up cycling last year, during the pandemic, to keep fit and had the idea of cycling to local football stadiums. However, he had his bike stolen by a man who approached him in Buffery Park which made him anxious about going out. Officers say the negative impact the incident had on the teenager made them keen to help him out.
PC Peters said: “From what I have seen, Daniel is a caring and hard-working boy who has had his confidence knocked by what happened to him. I was determined to help in some way and show them that despite the negative situation, something positive can come out of it. Dudley is an amazing town with some truly wonderful people and I cannot thank Steve enough for rallying to help. We also used money raised by officers and staff to purchase Daniel new lights and a bike lock to keep him safe when he’s back out touring the stadiums.”
Well, that’s a nice story to start Thursday with…
Tour of Poland scraps dangerous finish where Fabio Jakobsen crashed
The Tour of Poland organisers have scrapped the finish in Katowice where Fabio Jakobsen crashed last year. Riders and fans criticised the race organisers and the UCI for allowing the fast downhill sprint, where speeds often exceed 80km/h. Feltet.dk reports that the organisers have listened to the criticism and won’t return to that particular finish again. In the crash on the opening stage of last year’s race, Jakobsen was nudged into the barriers by fellow Dutch sprinter Dylan Groenewegen. The Deceuninck-Quick-Step rider was left in a medically-induced coma with extensive injuries and has not raced since.
The incident also led to questions being asked about the standard of barriers at the event, with the UCI bringing forward plans during the off-season to standardise race barriers.
Traffic cops confirming riding two abreast is legal and safe leads to 'road tax' whinging
Cycling 2 abreast is perfectly legal, and safer for everyone involved. See why here: https://t.co/0nzJAot044#DalkeithRP have charged a driver with dangerous driving after a cyclist was injured in a collision in #EastLothian at the weekend.#Rule66#SaferRoadsForAll pic.twitter.com/xLHQyoO9By
— Road Policing Scotland (@polscotrpu) March 3, 2021
Road Policing Scotland took to Twitter to explain to motorists that cycling two abreast is both legal and safer for everyone involved. They linked a video featuring Chris Boardman which explains how riding single file can often make it harder for drivers to pass. Single file means a longer line of cyclists for a driver to overtake. If you’re on this site you probably don’t need me to explain that…
However, not everyone saw the point of the educational video and instead took the opportunity to give the tired road tax comments another outing…
if they get to hog all the road maybe they should pay road tax. They certainly seem to think they own the roads, as well as shared cycle and pedestrian footpaths for that matter.
— Woody (@PrestwickMainSt) March 3, 2021
Charge them ROAD TAX THEN !!
— Wullie Mckenzie (@wullie_mckenzie) March 3, 2021
At least there was a small peloton of people waiting to respond…
— Callum Alvey (@_CallumEdward) March 3, 2021
And their vehicle excise duty based on their current level of emission would be what then, Einstein?
— Andrew Buss (@ambuss) March 3, 2021
Let us know your e-bike stories
We’ve got a new series on our sister site e-bike tips taking a closer look at the people and businesses that have made the switch to using electric vehicles. First up is Farr Out Deliveries in Edinburgh who offer a worker-owned e-cargo bike service, and set up their business during the first lockdown last spring aiming to provide a genuine, sustainable alternative to deliveries made by van. Check it out and let us know your own tales…Has your business switched to electric vehicles? Has your e-bike cut out your need for a car? Have you used N+1 to add an e-bike to your own two-wheeled collection?
Body Rocket now available to pre-order
Want wind tunnel accurate data without the wind tunnel? Body Rocket’s system offers cyclists real-time drag measurements via a three-part sensor that hopes to bring aerodynamic measurement to the masses. It’s now available to pre-order, for more details check out our in-depth look at why it could be the next big technology game-changer to hit the world of cycling…
Parents of a man killed when hit by a driver who fled the scene call for a change to the definition of 'death by dangerous driving'
A Hit & Run driver left my son Ryan dead in the road.He hid for 36hrs & only got charged with failing to stop & report, receiving suspended sentence. #RyansLaw with mean, STOP, DIAL 999, RENDER AID until help arrives or face 10yr min sentence.Pls sign & RT pic.twitter.com/x1dmPz63IH pic.twitter.com/1nWj78DOiE
— Helen Saltern (@SalternHelen) March 3, 2021
A couple from Cornwall told Cornwall Live of their hope that the law for hit-and-run offenders can be changed to mean an automatic custodial sentence which cannot be suspended. Helen and Mark Saltern’s son Ryan was killed while making his way to a party after being hit by Wayne Shilling on the B3267, who then fled the scene. The BBC reports that in court Shilling claimed he had not realised he had hit anyone, despite the collision puncturing his car’s radiator. The court also heard that the driver had been drinking.
Shilling pleaded guilty to failing to report an accident and received a four-month jail sentence, suspended for a year. He was also disqualified from driving for 12 months, given an evening curfew for four months and ordered to pay a victim surcharge of £207 and prosecution costs. Helen and Mark said they were devastated by the outcome but it was expected due to the options available to the magistrates. They are campaigning to change the law to give hit-and-run offenders custodial sentences which cannot be suspended.
“Our justice system is failing in many ways. At present if you hit, and kill someone and are found to be over the limit you could face 14 years in prison. However, if you hit and kill someone but carry on, wait long enough to be free of drink or drugs then the maximum you face is 6 months. How does this deter people from behaving in such a cowardly, selfish manner? The sentence given today is a mockery of justice and has to be changed,” the couple said in a statement.
The Ryan’s Law petition has 7,000 signatures and can be viewed here…
Every pub on June 21st...
If you are having a rough day, this video of Rigoberto Uran singing and dancing might cheer you up. pic.twitter.com/u4zqmBS0wP
— Cycling out of context (@OutOfCycling) March 2, 2021
Miguel Ángel López considered walking away from the sport due to the pressure and sacrifices required to be a team leader
Movistar’s new signing Miguel Ángel López says considered his future in cycling because of the stress and pressure that comes with being a leader of a team at the highest level of the sport. López is yet to make his debut for his new team and hasn’t raced since his crash during the opening time trial of the Giro d’Italia last year. He said he had sympathy for a rider like Tom Dumoulin, who has taken an indefinite break from competition.
López told El Tiempo he could empathise with Dumoulin’s situation. “Cycling is complicated and you start to think like Tom Dumoulin,” he said. “To be honest, I have thought about leaving it and taking a step aside, because there are complex situations. The pressure, the sacrifice, the fatigue, the injuries are complicated. When you are a leader you are responsible for an entire team, but there are moments of despair and sometimes you think with hot blood. It is important to be well surrounded. Your family puts you back on the ground.”
The Colombian is expected to return to the startline at Itzulia Basque County next month, before a mountainous path back to the Tour de France, where he won a memorable stage last year (pictured above). The 27-year-old will race the Tour of the Alps and Tour de Romandie before the Tour and will likely take in a second Grand Tour of the year at the Vuelta in August.
Some Thursday weirdness...
Y así 🤷♂️ “Ma-i-a hi, Ma-i-a hu…” 🎶🎶🎶🎶. ¿Is this clip an @OutOfCycling video? #DragosteaDinTei #Cycling pic.twitter.com/9pibxY3x7w
— iker gallastegi (@ikguallas) March 4, 2021
Tokyo Olympics can still be a success without fans, says Sir Chris Hoy
.jpg)
Sir Chris Hoy believes the Toky Olympics can still be a success even without the huge crowds that normally flock to events. The six-time gold medallist told Sky Sports that athletes will want to make the most of the opportunity, regardless of how many fans are there.
“There’s no question it’s going to be the same experience without crowds but ultimately in the heat of the moment, they’ll just be focused on their own performance and just the opportunity to compete at the Olympic Games. Having spoken to a few of the cyclists, they’re just committing 100 per cent as if it was going ahead and it was business as usual and that’s all you can do.
“You can’t have even the slightest thought that it might not take place or that training might be for nothing or it’s a wasted effort. They won’t be thinking that.”
In January, Team GB’s preparations were criticised after British Cycling hosted a 90-rider track meet at Manchester Velodrome.
Dominic Cummings' wife accused of hypocrisy over Spectator column slamming 'war on cars' and LTNs
It appears just enough time has elapsed for Mary Wakefield to talk about “essential” car journeys again.
(Mary Wakefield is, if you didn’t know, married to Dominic Cummings). This piece is clearly a pop at the PM with cycling as collateral damage. pic.twitter.com/Qk4j3DrYhs
— Adam Tranter (@adamtranter) March 4, 2021
You may remember not so long ago Dominic Cummings was fielding questions about why, in the middle of a pandemic and national lockdown, he’d driven to the other end of the country with his wife, Mary Wakefield. Bicycle Mayor of Coventry, Adam Tranter has suggested that just enough time has elapsed for The Spectator journalist and wife of the PM’s former Chief Adviser, to talk about essential car journeys again…
Mary Wakefield’s column this morning slams “the war on cars”, saying LTNs aren’t fair and disadvantage the less well off, while also being “terrific if you want to get on with selling cocaine.” Jon Burke was quick to point out that Wakefield lives in an LTN that has been in place since 1974.
The column comes just two days after research into recently installed low traffic neighbourhoods in London showed the schemes aren’t implemented primarily in wealthier areas. In fact, according to the Census and other data, people living in the most deprived areas of Greater London were found to be nearly three times more likely to live in a new LTN than residents of the capital’s least deprived areas.
From The Spectator:
‘The war on cars is backfiring’
Includes several interesting viewpoints including:
“…London simply isn’t suited to cycling.”https://t.co/mzoqwaWymE
— APPGCW (@allpartycycling) March 4, 2021
4 March 2021, 09:00
4 March 2021, 09:00
4 March 2021, 09:00
Help us to bring you the best cycling content
If you’ve enjoyed this article, then please consider subscribing to road.cc from as little as £1.99. Our mission is to bring you all the news that’s relevant to you as a cyclist, independent reviews, impartial buying advice and more. Your subscription will help us to do more.
23 Comments
Read more...
Read more...
Read more...
Latest Comments
When ice is liquid, don't we usually call it 'water'?
Yes let's focus on the negatives shall we rather then celebrate what a magnificent career he had and became a great ambassador for the sport.
You forgot to include giving yourself a dose of heatstroke by riding all day in mid-40s temperatures.
@eburtthebike Sorry to hear that. I had a very worried wife who saw me being a goldfish. I kept going round the same loop of 4 statements. My shoulder really hurts, what happened? My watch is broken, I suppose the bike is fu***d? Apparently I did that for about 2 hours. I eventually came back to near normality about 5-6 hours later. I was on the phone to my wife and I suddenly realised I had cold feet. I looked at them and they were bare as were my legs, I said Bear this is a bit embarrassing I haven't got any trousers on, er nor a shirt what the hell is going on? She said you have been in an accident and you are at hospital. The bike had fingernail marks in the bar tape, a scuff to the back of the front mudguard, and a broken quill pedal. now all repaired. Somehow I managed to stop the bike but not me. The Helmet was cracked right through. I had a broken tooth a bust rib and a lot of bruising. Someone came out of a house and put me in the recovery position in the road until I came round. For me not remembering what happened is really quite frustrating. I have bought a go-pro clone to go on the bike but I haven't actually fitted it yet. It would be sensible to just to have a bit of evidence if the same should ever happen again. After all there aren't always Londis shops with CCTV in just the right position are there?
@timscottellis given the "anarchic by design" organising principle what Critical mass is "for" will vary (even between participants). I believe part of the original idea was to be "critical" - direct activism against motorists by reclaiming space. Whether it's a good idea to annoy people who mostly will have no clue why you're doing that is a question of course. It certainly serves a community building and awareness raising function. And for some (perhaps like yourself?) showing them that they *can* ride on the streets. Albeit some would never do so outside of such an event.
Money's *always* tight - or rather it's always tight for active travel because in the UK that is very low on the priority list *. The vast majority of money goes on apparently unrelated stuff - health and adult social care. But I think active travel could make a minor but positive contribution here. And a large amount of that money compared to active travel spend goes on things that overall have a negative impact there (indeed are a net cost) - providing for the level of motoring we have. Including repeatedly pouring money into (pot-) holes in the ground. Could we reallocate some of that? * For some parties - maybe even governments - it's actually something they're against. If only because they're more keen on motoring which will effectively work against it.
I don't understand why the police can't crack down on those bloody idiots forcing the riders to inhale the smoke from powder flares, not as if it's a sort of guerrilla action, interfering with the riders then disappearing back into the crowd, they couldn't be any easier to spot as they stand there holding them but I don't think I've ever seen police, authorities or other fans intervening to stop them in a road race. Seen the police doing a good job stopping them at cyclocross, obviously on a long road stage it's not as easy to have an officer on the spot at the right time but yesterday's flareup (sorry) was on the finishing circuit, there must have been a few coppers in the vicinity who could have dealt with it.
Bit confused now Tom, you said that "AFAIK nobody said he’s going to ride to win the GC", I gave you an example of Seixas himself talking about going for GC, now you're saying there you are, there is evidence that he's talking about the GC? I know that, it was me who shared the quote.
Couldn't have a much more perfect example for a certain poster of how cycling continues to feel the full force of climate change...
@Rendel Harris Oh, and by the way. "But I will not take risks for something other than the GC." - this could just as well be read as "I won't take any risks unless it's really, really worth it." They're not even talking about snatching the maillot jaune for a day, but about the GC. Who wouldn't, if they had a opportune shot at that?
23 thoughts on “Dominic Cummings’ wife accused of hypocrisy over anti-LTN ‘war on cars’ Spectator column; Parents of man killed in hit-and-run call for change; Every pub on June 21; ‘Road tax’ whinging; Bike theft victim’s happy ending + more on the live blog”
Quote:
… so it’s all downhill from here (and not in a good way).
I’m not a Twitterer, but I do
I’m not a Twitterer, but I do like this reply to the bozo triggered by cyclists two abreast. The picture is ace:
https://twitter.com/Gar10B/status/1367196757940125703?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1367196757940125703%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fpublish.twitter.com%2F%3Fquery%3Dhttps3A2F2Ftwitter.com2FGar10B2Fstatus2F1367196757940125703widget%3DTweet
I’ve never entirely
I’ve never entirely understood how someone sitting on their own in an SUV, with a phone and a wallet and no luggage, feels that they have a leg to stand on in complaining about “cyclists taking up the road”…
It’s quite good, but to be
It’s quite good, but to be honest, my main takeaway is the question of why this person’s sitting on the steering wheel.
Man pushed over Portway
Man pushed over Portway railings onto river bank in apparent cycle rage attack
https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/bristol-news/man-pushed-over-portway-railings-5070248
I’m sure Mary Wakefield is
I’m sure Mary Wakefield is absolutely the best person to lecture us all on the benefits of a motor-centric society.
She runs through all the
She runs through all the reasons cycling is so shite and downright risky in London, which [i]by her own account[/i] all stem from too many cars, and concludes that the solution is more cars!
Add in the old tropes about how people can only patronise local shops and restaurants if they travel by car, not by bicycle (because, what?), and that the poor, disabled and elderly are disenfranchised by cycling. Oh yes, and guess what, she’s a cyclist too y’know.
I miss crippledbiker
I miss crippledbiker
I guess it’s more difficult
I guess it’s more difficult to cycle all the way to Barnard Castle to test one’s eyesight…
brooksby wrote:
Well, not so much from Durham it isn’t.
Sriracha wrote:
I guess it’s more difficult to cycle all the way to Barnard Castle to test one’s eyesight…
— Sriracha Well, not so much from Durham it isn’t.— brooksby
True.
But I meant Cummings and Wakefield travelling up to their family estates in the North by tandem or some such…
Quote:
It’s OK folks, Mary has the solution to this one too. More cars. That ought to sort out the lack of secure bike facilities.
“What do bankers care about a
“What do bankers care about a £15 a day congestion charge? But for a small business struggling to survive after lockdown, for the disabled and for the car-dependent elderly, it’s a bitter blow.“
She’s aware that blue badge holders are exempt from the congestion charge, right?
If I’ve understood her plea
I guess not!
And if I’ve understood her plea on behalf of “small businesses struggling to survive after lockdown”, she believes the congestion charge is to reduce numbers of people rather than of cars – unless her plea is for owners of struggling car-wash businesses? Or maybe she believes people only carry their wallet when they travel by car?
Sriracha wrote:
The size of my wallet is why I need a 4×4….
Only drivers would
Only drivers would spontaneously break their journey and enter a shop on a whim, because parking outside High Street shops is so easy.
wycombewheeler wrote:
Which means they probably weren’t concentrating on the road
OnYerBike wrote:
Of course she is. She’s just a lying hack who only mentions poor elderly and disabled when it suits her agenda.
Re Ryans Law. I’ve just
Re Ryans Law. I’ve just signed the petition.
Ditto – it’s absurd that
Ditto – it’s absurd that drivers could face lesser charges for not stopping and giving assistance.
hawkinspeter wrote:
Me too, and I posted it on fb; please consider doing the same everyone.
Once you’ve hit someone,
Once you’ve hit someone, saying you thought they were just a bin bag, sack of potatoes, or whatever, or claiming you never even noticed at all, should be an aggravating factor that brings down a harsher sentence. It’s saying, in effect, that right up to the point of impact you had no idea of what you were doing. And yet, much like politicians using the “I don’t remember” defence, it works as a universal cop out.
Agreed. Many years ago I had
Agreed. Many years ago I had the unpleasant experience to hit a cat at 60 on a dual carraigeway. The sound and feel still haunts me. How anyone can mistake a person for a bag is beyond me. Its just an excuse and should be treated as one.