Considering the sheer scale of Jeremy Vine’s online database of cycling commuter clips and dodgy driving, which he publishes on social media on an almost daily basis, it’s understandable that a sense of déjà vu will creep in from time to time.
And that was certainly the case this week, when the pedalling broadcaster posted another snazzily edited video showing a bin lorry blocking a cycle lane in Camden – just over two months after Vine shared a clip of a driver working for the same company heading the wrong way down a cycle lane in, you guessed it, Camden.
> “Two wrongs?”: Jeremy Vine accused of jumping red light as he films bin lorry driver heading wrong way down cycle lane
While the waste collection company in question, Veolia, thanked the presenter last month for reminding their drivers of the importance of keeping bike lanes “clear at all times”, Vine claimed this week that they appear to be “quietly” resuming the “illegal and dangerous” practice.
“Bin operators do a hard job with great dedication and I respect them… But don’t park in cycle lanes!” the Strictly alumnus wrote in the video.
During the clip itself, captured by the ‘drone’ flying over Vine’s head at all times, as he says (because why not, it keeps the internet on their toes), the broadcaster – upon noticing the lorry blocking the lane – mutters to himself, “And now I have to go out into oncoming traffic here”, before telling the operators: “Guys, you can’t park in a cycle lane, I’m really sorry. People have to pull round you and they could get hit here.”
Meanwhile, recognising the cyclist (I suppose the so-called ‘drone’ helmet camera is a giveaway), one of the workers joked, “Where’s your bike? Didn’t it get mangled?” – a reference to an incident from last month which left Vine desperately banging on the back of a van as the driver reversed over his bike having turned onto a stretch of cycling infrastructure.
> Jeremy Vine's lucky escape as bike run over by reversing driver who turned onto cycle lane
“Listen I love you guys, but really come on, it’s not safe,” Vine said, before departing.
While his post elicited the usual complaints on social media – with some noting that the operators would only be stopped for a “short period” and that stopping in the road and wheeling the bins across the lane would still prove an “inconvenience” – Veolia yesterday apologised and promised to review its procedures while collecting bins near bike lanes.
“We continue to work closely with Camden Council and their highways team to determine best practice that keeps all road users and our frontline teams safe when collecting along busy roads with cycle lanes,” a spokesperson said.
"Health and safety is paramount to the work we do and we want to ensure the crew have limited contact with both cyclists and vehicles. We apologise for any inconvenience caused as we develop the safest course of action.”
Meanwhile, a spokesperson for Camden Council added: “We are clear that cycle lanes must not be used or obstructed by vehicles and we are working with Veolia to ensure that our waste and recycling vehicles follow their set routes at all times and that drivers understand the importance of keeping cycle lanes clear.
“Where cycle lanes are repeatedly being obstructed by lorries, vans, and other vehicles we will seek to add additional road safety measures that keep our cycle lanes clear and all road users safe.”
Anyway… Same time, same place in December?
Add new comment
61 comments
Perhaps but its not really a practical alternative in this location, perhaps on a smaller side street (I would be all for it there) but its not really a reasonable balance in this location, especially with things just retrofitted, not designed properly like the Dutch, etc would do.
Why is it not practical that motorists have to wait a few minutes while essential work is being done, it's not as if they empty the bins every day or even week? You wouldn't expect the lorry to mount the pavement to allow impatient motorists to pass. The convenience of drivers shouldn't come at the expense of the safety of cyclists.
In the right place it is and a very good solution but I don't think that the right place. Ideally the place would have been designed to ensure that was the right solution but this is only a retrofit solution and folk sometimes have to weigh up the bigger picture IMO.
Genuinely - where is this "right place"? Been hearing this for years now - "of course we're in favour of more active travel / road safety / more pleasant streets, but..."
And it turns out that it is *never* the right place, wherever it is!
Further - although I'm sure any retrofit design will have issues I've looked at quite a lot and would say that while better or worse some are good enough. And yet it turns out I'm completely wrong! Every single one is fatally flawed according to some folks. Having analysed this it seems the key problem in each is it makes things marginally less convenient for drivers, even if that is simply learning a new layout.
Be honest - complete redesigns are going to be very rare.
If you've been hearing that for years it should tell you something. The right place for me is 90% of places and I'd rather concentrate/focus on getting them perfect (or at least the best it can be and be safe for all) than trying to retrofit 100% of places. I think thats a reasonable balance to encourage the mode shift we need to save the planet. Other folk will say the balance needs to be more orientated to movement but I'd rather concentrate on the sence of Place as I don't think their approach is enough to even start to address the 'Climate Emergency' that practically everyone has recognised.
I think it tells me that motornormativity is a thing and people don't like change - but we specifically see any change which *might* reduce driving convenience as a threat.
So far so normal - "if you're privileged modes towards equality feel like oppression".
Question for you - If you feel like 90% of places are "right" why do *you* think that lots of people think 0% of places are right? (Or more specifically - 100% of places that they may drive through / park in occasionally are the wrong place for changes other than more roads / more parking?)
It is a serious challenge to move from where we are - there are lots of forces keeping the status quo in place. So for any change we'll require multiple things working together, not just one "fix".
Specifically for cycling (and also reducing motor traffic - these are linked) there are places where this *has* happened. And what was required was not "perfect" but "enough everywhere - of *sufficient* quality". This has been the case in NL, parts of Scandinavia, Seville... it's not likely to be different here.
https://www.aviewfromthecyclepath.com/2008/09/grid.html
It also takes managing and reducing the motor traffic.m (and because driving is private transport we will need in part a private alternative eg. cycling).
Talkng of "place" this is something that can work in favour of this kind of change.
https://robertweetman.wordpress.com/2019/03/19/i-want-my-street-to-be-li...
Of course in the UK we are used to even "nice places" being dominated by parked cars. And we will fight to ensure we have the ability to drive through *everyone else's places* to get to our destinations. Or even get there just 10 seconds quicker...
You'll need to ask them why! FWIW, To get change its all about reasonable balance, I don't think 0% is any sort of balance!
This would totally block car traffic (there is a central island) for a couple of minutes or maybe more, as the cars would have absolutely no other choice, but to stay still and immobilized. Cyclists, Vine including, could either wait without any emissions (a internal combustion car staying still, will pollute if it doesn't have a start/stop system) or could simply dismount and walk and lose like 10 seconds. I know dismounting is uncomfortable, but still an option.
So please mr Vine (and supporters) give me all the alternatives in this exact case.
I will try to have a few:
1) Lorry parks in cycle lane as in video, cyclists may wait, dismount walk, causiously overtake, or just pretend it is 2005 and no cycle lanes exist.
2) Lorry parks in car lane as ChasP proposes. Car gets stuck for minutes, total manhours lost in travel time increase compared to previous scenario, angry drivers mob cyclists increases even more, air quality worsens, cyclists get lung cancer and everybody wanders how they got it if they were never smoking and athletic.
3) Lorry parks in car lane as ChasP proposes, but now the Veolia HR department has hired olympic weightlifters from peaceful okinawa so that they are both super fast and having to be stressed from blocking car traffic. Instead of minutes they finish in seconds, everybody happy, but the tax goes +10% to hire these exceptional athletes.
4) 40000 drones of the video keep the lorry on the air, everybody happy, but now the tax goes +15% to keep all these drones running.
5) Any other solutions?
Maybe they do the action which is not illegal?
Playing 'Devil's Advocate' is it illegal though (there's double yellows but its impossible to read a timeplate) and whilst its not preffered it might not actually be illegal. See chapter 8 (p24) of the TfL's guide on protected cycle lanes and parking https://content.tfl.gov.uk/guidance-for-the-use-of-traffic-wand-with-cyc...
My interpretation of that is that it's illegal as that's a mandatory cycle lane which does not allow for vehicles to drive in them. Parking/loading could presumably be allowed in marked bays, but that does not appear to be the case from the picture above (apologies - I don't use Twitter so won't watch the video).
Section 8.2.4: Formal provision of parking/loading bays within a cycle lane requires breaking of the mandatory cycle lane marking.
I cant guarantee its definitely illegal or legal, for instance if you read the earlier paragraph:
8.2.2 Parking/loading can take place formally, in designated bays, or could be permitted informally by the presence of parking and loading restrictions.
Can you see any of those restrictions (which would be unusual for a mandatory cycle lane) that would allow the bin lorry there?
Thats what I said previously, its impossible to see the details of the parking an loading restrictions so hence playing Devil's Advocat it is impossible to say from the vid definitively if its illegal or not
Mmmm Devil's Advocaat
Lol, typo
Is that where the expression "snowball's chance in hell" comes from?
...and also the action that produces a slight delay to traffic rather than introducing a danger to some traffic (and potentially a much greater delay if someone is injured)
Quickly followed by a Vine video, a vineo? Of the bins being chucked back across the cycle lane towards the kerb from behind the truck unsighted
That's clearly dangerous behaviour whether or not there's a cycle lane. Certainly the recycling/bin people around my area don't throw the bins around.
I don't think that the law maker was thinking a refuse truck, on a single lane road next to a cycle route when the law was written. There are many stupid laws, and that is why laws change. Some are of such minor importance or so easily broken because there are no realistic other alternatives (as in this example) that no one bother to change them.
And to people worrying extremely about safety, and don't want to do Vine's swerve that can compare only with base jumping from Big Ben in levels of danger, they can just wait like the car drivers they dream of waiting in their unicorn world. But on top of that they have the super safe option of just dismounting and walking.
ftfy
Wel, there's an issue, I can see that.
But in a more general view - how on earth did we cope before when e.g. a refuse truck was collecting on a one-way street (I presume this is what this one is)?
Pretty sure people have been travelling in London and also delivering / collecting stuff for thousands of years. And for all of that time there have been "narrow streets". How come people haven't deserted this terrible impractical city for the country, or massacred the bin men / gong farmers / carters?
I mean - I know it's London so presumably everyone's 5 minutes is worth most of my year's salary, and that people being delayed by any time at all probably means the mayor or maybe the prime minister is summoned to answer questions...
If the cyclist just stop then the bin lorry cannot proceed to drive the wrong way on the cycle lane and therefore gets nowhere.
There are numerous streets in London, particularly in the City, that are too narrow or winding for bin lorries, so the residents/business owners take their bins to an agreed point on a wider street where they are collected. You might say that sort of effort isn't justified here, but it is a perfectly good alternative that is used in numerous locations across the capital. In this specific case Vine is on Tavistock Place near the junction with Marchmont Street; the latter has no cycle lanes and no parking and would allow the refuse collectors to empty the bins with minimal disruption to traffic, motor vehicle or bicycle.
Which is exactly what they do on the 98.5% of their round that doesn't have cycle lanes on it, so it's not exactly something new or unxpected.
Comprehensive cycle infra is rarer outside of London than you think - in the rest of the country, drivers have to wait for bin lorries to do their thing in the main carriageway every day.
'During the clip itself, captured by a drone flying over Vine’s head (because why not)'
Please tell me you're in on the gag here and furthering it, rather than falling for it?
Vine still gets the occasional perfectly serious genius on Twitter quoting the law about flying drones within certain distances of pedestrians or buildings and asking why he should be taken seriously for criticising other people for breaking the law when he's clearly doing it himself.
Ha! I never even imagined anyone would think it wasn’t a joke! Inverted commas now added to make that very clear… Can’t be too subtle these days, I suppose.
OMG, Jeremy: please please PLEASE stop adding all these "wacky" animations. A basic video with - maybe - some text to highlight your point is sufficient...
(maybe I'm just getting old...).
Pages