The Welsh Conservative party seems to have performed a miracle: They have posted something so absurd and asinine that Twitter, the graveyard of coalition and reason, has united in shaming and lampooning their remark that “Labour and their lycra clad lobbyists are slowing Wales down with their blanket 20mph speed limit”.
The Welsh Government, which is in the process of electing Vaughan Gething as its new First Minister after the surprise resignation of Mark Drakeford, introduced a 20mph speed limit not to a rapture of applause, but raised eyebrows, controversies and conspiracy theories (the last one seems the natural public reaction to most things now) last year.
Despite the directive just calling for roads and streets with a 30mph speed limit to be reduced to 20mph, with local councils still ultimately holding the power to have the final say on it, Conservatives have taken up the issue as if people are being forced to drive down the M4 or the A470 at 20mph speeds.
> "Far more pleasant for walkers and cyclists": 20mph speed limit analysis hailed "astonishing", with drivers' journeys just 45 seconds longer
And while the Westminster Tory Government continues to pledge its allegiance to drivers to halt the so-called ongoing “war on motorists” and continue its “angry rhetoric” on traffic calming measures like low traffic neighbourhoods, 20mph speed limits, and even public transport schemes, the Welsh wing of the party has taken it upon themselves to mount an assault on the 20mph warriors — you know, road safety campaigners, transport experts, and mums and dads who want safety for their children.
And the next step in its assault has come in the form of a Twitter post yesterday, with the most shoddy use of Photoshop I’ve seen in a while, and that’s bearing in mind the Princess of Wales’ latest endeavours with it.
The Welsh Conservatives wrote: “We will SCRAP Labour and Plaid's blanket 20mph speed limit and get Wales moving,” with a cyclist wearing a jersey and a helmet, made to seem as if they’re holding a speed gun pointing at a car.
And cyclists, not just the lycra clad ones, mind you, have blasted the post.
“Ahhh, so basically, you don't care about children being able to walk around their neighbourhoods or to school safely,” wrote James Stafford, while Nick Hawksworth wrote: “This is why nobody likes Tories anymore; Name calling nasty party.”
One person replied saying: “Playground comments about clothes are disgusting and fuel road crime. Shame on you,” while another commented: “Way to alienate people and the proof that you are finished as a government nationally, certainly becoming more and more irrelevant in Wales.”
Folks, do you think they may have read too much into its one-off win in the Uxbridge by-elections, opposing London’s ultra-low emission zones?
> Whose ULEZ is it anyway? Political chicanery as clean air zone set to expand to outer London
Here are some more replies on the tweet…
Despite me cynically looking for them, not a single anti-cycling or pro-Tory comment in the replies! Have the Tories managed to unite Twitter?
The irony deepens when you consider that just three years ago, senior members of the Welsh Tories were calling on the Welsh Government to bring in a 20mph limit calling it a “common sense” plan.
And funnily, some of the lycra clad cyclists they accuse of lobbying the government into making the nationwide changes are the same ones who are going to be somewhat negatively affected by the blanket speed limit, in losing many routes previously used for time trials.
In November last year, Cycling Time Trials (CTT) introduced a ban on events taking place on roads with 20mph speed limits, with existing courses in such areas going to have to be scrapped or modified to avoid the zones. Many cyclists feared that this would spell the end of safe time trial courses and could be the tip of the iceberg for British racing.
> All cyclists must adhere to 20mph speed limits during time trials in Britain – as governing body cites safety concerns and risk of causing “public outrage”
I think they’re giving us too much credit. If the lycra lobby were indeed so powerful, maybe they’d fix up all the potholes first…
Add new comment
77 comments
Collective responsibility.
I'm a cyclist myself.
What other group would be written about in this way ?
https://www.standard.co.uk/comment/cycling-london-cycle-lanes-drivers-b1...
Ped Millichamp sounds like a right wanker.
He writes like a tw*t
"Ped Millichamp is head of design at the Evening Standard"
Not head of thinking or head of logic or even head of sense. What kind of head could he possibly be?
Re the Ferrari driver crash...
Can Norfolk Constabulary now claim to be the MOST "pro-motorist and anti-road safety force" in the country with their "no further action" decision on this incident with such clear CCTV?
Surely a NFA incident would be ok in a driving test...
If you think that's a bad nfa https://www.becclesandbungayjournal.co.uk/news/24197925.no-action-a143-f...
I have no words.
I wonder if the driver had to say anything other than 'I didn't see the cyclists' to persuade the police to rerun the usual 'NFA' dodge?
The right handshake?
If it were one cyclist, it is conceivable that they moved onto the road giving the driver no chance but 2 cyclists seems very unlikely.
Let's see if the families make a complaint.
Sze-Ming Cheung
https://www.edp24.co.uk/news/crime/20754151.family-devastated-no-one-bro...
https://www.edp24.co.uk/news/crime/20647792.family-cyclist-killed-crash-...
Huntingdon cyclist killer to appeal manslaughter conviction
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-cambridgeshire-68606255
Last appeal failed https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-cambridgeshire-65645364
Not sure I follow the subteties of this appeal.
The first appeal was against the sentence only, not the conviction. In the appeal against conviction her lawyers are, it seems, going to argue that Grey had no intention of harming Mrs Ward or causing her to fear harm, presumably leaning heavily on her disabilities to claim a justified act of self protection due to fear of harm to herself defence. Not quite sure how that is going to be tied in with the fact that Grey stood in the middle of the pavement gesticulating and swearing at Mrs Ward whilst she was still a considerable way away, rather than moving out of her way, though.
It looks like a narrow grounds for Appeal - "the jury did not consider an unlawful actl.
It seems clear that pushing a cyclist in front of a moving motor vehicle is an unlawful act.
Maybe she's going to say that the cyclist shouldn't have been on the footway (unlawful act) and so deserved what she got? Thus setting a precedent to legalise genuine vigilantism...
Christ but I hope not
re the Ferrari - no charges but who pays for the damage to the road furniture and cycle racks? I presume insurance will be invalid as he shouldn't have been out in the car (curfew)
From a legal standpoint it's going to get ugly. But unless he is forced to pay up by the court, I doubt it will come from anywhere other than the local authority's purse.
He was out before curfew. The time on the CCTV shows 1600 something.
Property damage by an uninsured driver should come from the Motor Insurance Bureau industry levy fund.
Nice of them to photoshop a picture of the A12 on to a Paris-Roubaix comment; good quality though, it would get the Royal Seal of approval!
I don't know about the actual Comic Relief show, but Mollie King's ride got plenty of coverage and support during the week. It was constant on Radio 1 and the BBC had a live text with updates on their home page. It was all good.
Pure luck the cyclist wasn't wiped out
https://youtu.be/tdSpWOyu5u8?t=126
Meanwhile the ES goes with vigilante cycle cammers
https://www.standard.co.uk/lifestyle/jeremy-vine-cycling-mikey-road-safe...
BTL
"The car-dependent, car-brained media is trying to change the meaning of ordinary words to shill for the motoring industry. "
I watched one of those dashcam compilations for the first time the other day...we're in a terrible state if the contributors think that they aren't in any way adding to the risks the way that they themselves drive. Absolutely shocking reactions to things you can see a mile off happening.
Fortunately when you read the comments, they mostly echo what you put !
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/uk-england-cambridgeshire-68600639
See if you can spot the problem with the sentencing they handed out for it.
I can only assume prior convictions !
If disqualification didn't work the first time why do they think it will work this time?
The cover of that copy of the Standard.
It's almost as if they don't understand that one of those things is illegal and dangerous and the other isn't…
OK, so it's a cartoon ...
However - in general you're worried about cameras now? The UK apparently (2019) had more CCTV cameras per person than anywhere bar China, and London is in the lead in the UK. No idea how exactly how many drivers have dashcams but there are a lot and apparently more than cyclists with cameras. Probably more than cyclists full stop.
Anyway - aside from "vigilante" - people out to "nail dangerous drivers"? Where can we get some more (any) of that?
Small mercies, but at least the sub-heading at the bottom acknowledge the drivers are dangerous.
Pages