- News

“The man who never misses has officially missed”: Adrian Chiles claims expensive cargo bikes are a “new kind of class politics”; Foul-mouthed rant at cyclist not using cycle lane… but public sticks up for rider + more on the live blog
SUMMARY

Foul-mouthed rant at cyclist not using cycle lane... but public sticks up for ride
WARNING: Contains strong language…
A man is cycling north towards the North Circular in Walthamstow, completely ignores the cycle lane.
The driver awards him “bell end of the year award.” pic.twitter.com/xMKYuAJHfW
— David Atherton (@DaveAtherton20) March 13, 2023
To be honest, we weren’t going to share this until we spotted a glimmer of hope in the replies…(granted, we chose to ignore asking what constitutes a ‘serious cyclist’?)…
It’s a contentious issue but I understand why serious cyclists do this.
Cycle lanes are generally sporadic, constantly giving way to driveways and side roads so they have to stop and start the whole way and, considering they’re powering themselves, that’s pretty demoralising.— Stuart Clarke (@Stucashx) March 13, 2023
And at the last moment when the driver conveniently puts his phone down, we see that as with so many of them, the cycle disappears into a mess of unclear markings and shrapnel on the path pic.twitter.com/0mjVAVHEwL
— J M (@mulronie) March 13, 2023
To be fair. The cycling lanes are so badly made/maintained that they’re almost impossible to cycle on with a proper road bike. Cycle lanes are completely pointless.
— Dead Ferrets (@Deadferrets) March 13, 2023
Just a thought on this he’s cycling quite quickly and (not here) dog walkers kids etc are in the cycle lane a lot it’s safer to be on the road sometimes
— rosco. (@marktaylor584) March 13, 2023
Yes, admittedly the other 95 per cent of replies were people with football clubs in their name or picture tagging Jeremy Vine…
Anyone got any local knowledge on this one?
"I've got one chance left to win it": Peter Sagan's San Remo swansong
Look, if you had one shot or one opportunity to seize everything you ever wanted in one moment. Would you capture it, or just let it slip?
Will the real Peter Sagan please stand up? (On the San Remo top step of the podium)… Eminem references out the way, it’s Sagan’s final Milan-San Remo on Saturday, the Monument he always seemed best suited to winning but never has…


[Gian Mattia D’Alberto — LaPresse]
Two second places, one behind Gerald Ciolek’s stunning underdog victory (above), another from an escape trio including eventual winner Michał Kwiatkowski and Julian Alaphilippe (below). Five fourth places, one sixth place and a tenth. Is Saturday finally the day? Stranger things have happened but the three-time World Champion will need to improve on his underwhelming start to his final WorldTour season.


[LaPresse — D’Alberto-Ferrari]
Speaking to Cyclingnews, Sagan acknowledges “I’ve got one chance left to win it”…
“Milan-San Remo has always been a race that suits me but has always been a difficult race for me to win,” he said. “I haven’t managed to win Milan-San Remo for a lot of different reasons and because every year is a different race. Losing in 2017 hurt a lot, I admit it. I felt really strong that day, but they told me information from the team car that was wrong, so I made a bad tactical decision. But as I said, Milan-San Remo is decided even in a split second and you don’t get a second chance to win.
“Milan-San Remo is also special in that sense, there so much you can’t control. If you’re the absolute strongest at the Tour of Flanders, you can win quite easily. Milan-San Remo is more of a lottery and everything is decided in the last five kilometres, so there’s no real time to correct any errors you make or to turn things around if you have a mechanical or a problem. Milan-San Remo is all or nothing.”
One of the UK's best days in the saddle
Alright, Jake, you big show off… possibly the most beautiful three hours plus for most people? Get your favourite three-hour routes in the comments…
"I am extremely disappointed in the UCI's decision": Kristen Faulkner comments on Strade Bianche disqualification
On Tuesday we reported that Jayco-AlUla, the team of Kristen Faulkner, had accepted her disqualification from Strade Bianche for wearing a glucose monitor. Well, Faulkner herself has released a statement too, saying she supports a fair environment for all athletes, but has been left “extremely disappointed” by the UCI’s decision.
“I have never used glucose data in competition,” she said. “I was under the impression that I could race with my device if it did not record any data, because there was no performance advantage whatsoever. The UCI holds the position that wearing a non-connected patch itself — even if there is no transmission of data and no performance advantage — is enough to disqualify me.
“My intent was not to violate any rules or gain an unfair advantage. I am proud of how I raced Strade Bianche and I am extremely disappointed in the UCI’s decision. I also hope that one day glucose monitors are allowed in racing. I believe they are a valuable tool for athletes — especially women — to take care of physical health, though that is a conversation for another time.
“I look forward to the rest of the season and I hope that Strade Bianche is one of many WorldTour podiums to come.”
They last 2 weeks and are very expensive to replace
— Kristen Faulkner (@FaulknerKristen) March 15, 2023
With her disqualification, Cecilie Uttrup Ludwig has been bumped up to third.
Supersapiens: "This isn't about going faster. This is about health"
Supersapiens Statement Regarding Kristen Faulkner Disqualification From Strade Bianche: pic.twitter.com/hyPoXJDQvu
— Supersapiens (@supersapiensinc) March 16, 2023
Women's Tour launches crowdfunding campaign to cover sponsorship shortfall


> Women’s Tour launches crowdfunding campaign to cover sponsorship shortfall
Introducing your special guest...
Have you invited Adrian Chiles?
— Bob From Accounts 🚲 (@BobFromAccounts) March 16, 2023
"That is going to be smelly": Stan Dewulf's soft landing at GP Denain
Hopefully the manure offers a soft landing #GPDenain pic.twitter.com/AXYI6n8eCp
— the Inner Ring (@inrng) March 16, 2023
Juan Sebastián Molano got the win in the end, but this was our take-home story from the race…


> “That’s not normal”: Arkéa-Samsic pro breaks TWO sets of Bianchi handlebars during cobbled race
Matej Mohorič dusts off the dropper post ahead of Milan-San Remo
Just as we reported at Strade Bianche, Matej Mohorič has got the dropper post out again…
Look what Matej Mohorič is using again 👀
The Slovenian has confirmed he will once again use a dropper seatpost at Milano-Sanremo on Saturday, after it helped him to victory in last year’s race 🔥
___
🇮🇹 #MilanoSanremo pic.twitter.com/5cYVeayfRZ— Velon CC (@VelonCC) March 16, 2023
"The man who never misses has officially missed": Adrian Chiles claims expensive cargo bikes are a "new kind of class politics"
The run had to come to an end someday… a harsh Thursday morning reminder that all of life’s joys are fleeting…
Adrian Chiles, for context, is the writer and broadcaster behind such Pulitzer-worthy Guardian opinion pieces as ‘I have a urinal in my flat and it has changed my life’ and ‘Cheddar and stout?! Salted caramel?! This messing with hot cross buns has to stop’. As worthy musings as those are, I’m not sure today’s column is going to go down quite as well. In fact, scrap the speculation, it hasn’t…
The man who never misses has officially missed
Massive L https://t.co/lnipBELNuR
— Harry Gray (@HarryHamishGray) March 16, 2023
A local group of Spokes, the Lothian-based campaign for better conditions for every day cyclists was quick to point out to Chiles the £3,999 price tag he was turning his nose up at might not seem quite as steep if he were to pop down to his local dealership for a new motor. That’s without mentioning “the growing number of community schemes lending out cargo bikes for free,” they added.
West Midlands Walking & Cycling Commissioner Adam Tranter called Chiles’ take “strange”. “When I bought my first cargo bike for £4,000 it was so useful it enabled me to get rid of my car, saving me around £6,000 a year in finance repayments and running costs,” he explained. “A few years later, I upgraded to a bigger cargo bike and sold the old one for £2,800.”
Weird article. Man sees expensive bike. Shock. Makes some odd comment comparing deliveroo riders with parents. Doesn’t explain why. End of article.
— Richard Sharp (@rich7sharp) March 16, 2023
I’ve had a cargo bike for 3 years. It’s used daily to transport kids, shopping and occasionally rubbish to the tip. It cost £3500. Expensive to buy, cheap to run and you reclaim so much time you would otherwise be sat in traffic. More are needed!
— Andy Waterman (@andywaterman) March 16, 2023
Wait until you hear about how much cars cost Adrian
— Jack N (@jack__n) March 16, 2023
The article seems to end prematurely – he doesn’t explore why a bike like that might cost £4k (maybe it was electric?) or why we should consider normalising them (nobody double takes when someone takes on £20k of car finance debt) in favour of yet more motor vehicles.
— Matt Andrews (@mattpointblank) March 16, 2023
Stick to spoons, urinals and hot cross buns, Adrian…
So how cheap is your car, Adrian? Ah... right... okay...
For reference, as per a Sunday Times 2018 interview, Chiles’ current motor, since 2016, is a BMW 520d…


Better still…


All under the four grand mark, I assume…
Things that cost more than a cargo bike
Since Adrian Chiles’ column about £3,999 cargo bikes is getting a lot of attention we thought we’d take a look at some other less practical purchases, just for comparison with the potentially lifelong, and in some cases car-replacing, investment that is a cargo bike…
- You could buy seven and a half of the cargo bikes Chiles took issue with for the price of… his motor, the BMW 520d…
- Or one ‘mini’ Dior bag


- 2,000 copies of the Guardian featuring Chiles’ column
- A couple of steaks seasoned by a questionable social media influencer


- Half a day represented by Mr Loophole (according to the Express)
- Seven of the 360-degree cameras Jeremy Vine never leaves the house without
16 March 2023, 09:11
16 March 2023, 09:11
Help us to bring you the best cycling content
If you’ve enjoyed this article, then please consider subscribing to road.cc from as little as £1.99. Our mission is to bring you all the news that’s relevant to you as a cyclist, independent reviews, impartial buying advice and more. Your subscription will help us to do more.

81 Comments
Read more...
Read more...
Read more...
Latest Comments
Same here. I have a helmet with built in front and rear lights and have a red light clipped onto my bag plus lights attached to my bike front and rear but still have drivers putting me in danger. My commute is about two miles and I normally have around four incidents a week where I have to brake hard or take other evasive action to avoid being hit by distracted drivers. A big percentage of these are drivers coming on to roundabouts when I am already on them.
Glasgow's South City Way sounds great, does it not? As a user from before and after I wholeheartedly welcome the construction of the segregated route, but so much of the detailed construction is poor, if not unsafe. I provide a link to a presentation I made when construction was half complete (a personal view) and the construction errors remain outstanding to this day: crossed by high speed flared road junctions, poor colour differentiation, car door zone risks and so on. And yet cyclists come because they feel safe. It's a complex subject but IMHO the feeling of safety (or lack of) is a critical component. https://drive.proton.me/urls/B67AK44G90#CFueBGjscoWr
I can only conclude that you haven't been into a city in the last few years. Food delivery riders in particular are riding overpowered "eBikes" that are basically mopeds ... powered only via the throttle without pedalling at significantly more than 15mph. Problem is they look like normal bikes/ebikes and not like mopeds so that is what people describe them as. My reading of the article is that it is those vehicles that are being talked about here.
I have the Trace and Tracer, which have essentially the same design, albeit smaller and less powerful. The controls are a little complicated but only because there are loads of options. In reality, once you've chosen your level of brightness, you'll only cycle through 1 or 2 options and it's dead simple. The lights are rock solid, bright, with good runtimes. The only thing I find annoying is charging them - if your fingers are slightly wet or greasy, getting the rubber out of the way of the charging port is a pain in the arse.
Dance and padel is all very well, but when is Strava going to let me record my gardening?
You can use it to check whether it's raining.
If it's dusk, i.e. post-sunset, then the cyclists should have lights on and thus the colour of their top is irrelevant. If you want to complain about cyclists not having lights when it's mandatory then by all means do but their top has nothing to do with it.
All of my Exposure lights with a button allow cycling through the modes with a short press. I have five of those; it would be odd if Exposure didn’t allow this functionality with the Boost 3. I also have two Exposure Burners if I remember correctly: they are rear lights for joysticks that clip on and are powered through the joystick charging port. They don’t have a button. None of my Exposure lights have failed. I looked at the Boost 3 review photos but none showed the button, so far as I could tell. I also have Moon lights. Good experience generally. One did fail, possibly because it was so thin it used to fall through the holes in my helmet onto the ground. Also, the UI and charge indicators vary for my Moon lights. Perhaps the latest ones are more consistent. My worst lights ever were from See.Sense.
Steve really doesnt like exposure products does he? Boost and Strada marked down for being too complicated. While the Zenith and Six Pack reviewed by his colleagues give them rave reviews (as most exposure products have on road.cc), the Zenith even touted as 'even more intuitive to use' with the same controls.
They are more interested in dog shit. https://www.lancasterguardian.co.uk/news/people/lancaster-police-launch-search-for-person-who-sprayed-dog-faeces-with-pink-paint-5605519




















81 thoughts on ““The man who never misses has officially missed”: Adrian Chiles claims expensive cargo bikes are a “new kind of class politics”; Foul-mouthed rant at cyclist not using cycle lane… but public sticks up for rider + more on the live blog”
Adrian Chiles, for further
Adrian Chiles, for further context, is married to the editor of the Guardian.
Indeed he is. That completely
Indeed he is. That completely explains why his confused meanderings get a regular slot in the Graun because otherwise it is quite puzzling.
I’ve always thought he also
I’ve always thought he also looks an awful lot like “Pig Cop” from the early Duke Nukem games.
Is it just me that feels we
Is it just me that feels we sometimes take anything that isn’t glowingly positive about bikes as an attack on them…
I would love an electric cargo bike but £3k+ is far too expensive. Most people don’t have the choice between car and cargo bike, they need both. We certainly do. You might be able to replace your car on 60% of journeys but you will still need it for the other 40% and you will still be paying everything but fuel to keep that car for that 40%.
I think its entirely fair to say £3k+ for a limited use vehicle that plenty of people won’t get masses of use out of is a luxury item most can’t afford.
Like most things, some people can afford it, others can’t and plenty simply won’t see the value in it at the price offered. Its not a “right or wrong” answer.
Have you considered joining a
Have you considered joining a car club for the remaining 40%?
I would but I don’t know how
I would but I don’t know how keen they would be with me using it to take crap to the tip, sticking dirty bikes in it or driving to Europe in it.
I looked at this, but in my
I looked at this, but in my case concluded a car club would be significantly more expensive than keeping my car. But then I run a 15 year old Golf.
I suspect that it is common
I suspect that it is common to express surprise and even ridicule at the way other people spend their money in ways that we do not understand. £4k on a bicycle of any kind, a pair of trainers, jewellery, a pokemon card, football tickets, overpriced fizzy wine in a lap dancing bar etc seems crazy if you are not into those things.
But surely on your 60/40
But surely on your 60/40 split it’s the car which is more akin to the (very) expensive limited-use vehicle?
Given the availability of Uber etc., taxis, public transport, hire cars and (as below) car clubs, many people in urban areas would be able to re-organise their lives in such a way that they could do without a car and save themselves all that expense of car ownership. The trade-off may or may-not be in convenience.
The reason we all own cars is
The reason we all own cars is because they are fantastically convenient. Public transport is crap in this country. Uber isn’t available in loads of areas and you need to know when you can leave and when you want to come home for taxis etc or be happy to wait for hours at times. I travel to Europe a few times a year by car. I drive to family who live all over the place. I go to the tip, I take my mountain bike in the car regularly, I go to pick up items from facebook marketplace.
I have a car and I can do all these things at the drop of a hat without any planning, without worrying about damaging the car or getting it dirty, without worrying about when I come home etc. Its fantastically convenient and I paid about £5k for the car 5 years ago. It costs me nothing in VED, MOT is £50 and insurance for me and my partner is about £400. There has been almost zero maintenance cost as I change the oil and filters myself.
I, like many, love the idea of ditching the car but my lifestyle and the way the transport system is built in this country make a car the best tool for a huge number of journeys.
Some people could ditch the car but it feels a little like a “london centric” view when people think that even a sizeable chunk of the population could abandon their cars.
mctrials23 wrote:
I think it’s more to do with being an aspiration to get as many people as possible to abandon their cars due to better/cheaper alternatives. As you say, public transport sucks in most of the UK, so that will need to be improved if we want people to choose it over a personal car – one easy way to do that is to hugely subsidise public transport, maybe even provide it completely free to people. Once we get more people onto public transport, it should massively reduce congestion and enable quicker and easier trips for people who need/want to be travelling in personal vehicles.
Ultimately, personal cars waste too much space on the roads which means that they’re not practical for moving large numbers of people around once the population gets over a certain density. It’s a problem of geometry and building more roads ends up with needing yet more roads to be built as the number of car journeys increase. At some point, we need to evaluate the benefit of spending public money on building roads so that people can sit in metal boxes in queues of traffic – the only people that benefits is the motor/oil companies.
Some good points here. TL/DR
Some good points here. TL/DR – we should avoid getting stuck in a binary of “cars everywhere / no cars at all” as that’s unhelpful (and never going to happen that way). “What is the current situation” / “do we need change? If so, what would we like to have?” and “how could we start that change?” are the questions.
Basically – but I’d go a little further:
– Cars are a good Swiss-army knife for transport. They cover most common use-cases and do so pretty well – at a large (and normally hidden) cost (use of vast amount of space, direct casualties on roads, health impacts, supression of independent mobility for some, cost to taxpayer…).
The deeper view is that most adults only consider what exists. So once many people have cars our entire view of “what we can do” (or even “what we need to do“) is filtered through the potential and characteristics of cars. To the person with a hammer every problem looks like a nail.
– The organisation of our entire transport system, built environment, location of amenities and housing, many jobs etc. are (after 3 generations or so) predicated on mass motoring. This is a driveogenic environment. For most choices we make everything says “use a motor vehicle”.
– Cars don’t just mark just richer / poorer (or “class”) social status – though they certainly are used to convey that. They’re also considered a general marker of adulthood and being a competent / independent / “productive” member of society. Don’t own a car? You’ll be explaining why not to many people you interact with.
This is the “driveogenic” part. Once you have a car lots of things become possible or just more convenient. Within a few trips this becomes your life and “I need a car”. You could actually achieve many if not all of those goals without a car. Would you do it in exactly the same way? No. Would they be as convenient? Probably not – but point is your current patterns would change – a lot. So if you have a car and then don’t, that’s a major life change. People see this as an extreme loss / unacceptable disruption. (On the flip side – I’ve seen people adapt pretty quickly to not having a car…)
Agree. For the cost of quite a bit of money, some admin etc. you get “last minute” convenience (or what seems to be that). I think though people complain about insurance, tax and MOT these are just seen as “stuff I can’t avoid” (except in Lancashire) so people then tend to look at the cost of fuel per journey – which is often less than public transport. Even including the other expenses the “marginal cost” of a car be remarkably low compared to anything other than cycling. And people don’t tend to worry about the car getting stolen (unlike bikes).
Hmm… how does that measure up against the fact that the majority of trips driven are actually within cycling range (and many in walking distance)? The majority of the UK population is urban. There is a massive potential for change there. As the Dutch and other different thinking countries show we don’t need magic. The Dutch are (2019) car owners and users in similar numbers to the UK. In addition – unfortunately for them they also have some of the longest commutes in Europe. Many of them do so by car. The point is – they show how we can have many more short trips made other than by car (and also use multi-modal transport to facilitate longer trips). The NL shows some of the environmental, health and social benefits available from taming the motor vehicle. It shows that this is possible without “returning to the stone age” and it’s nonsense to claim that “old people will be trapped in their homes” / “the ambulances won’t get through”. (That’s down to *how* you change – the UK shows local authorities can make that happen without any cycle infra at all!) It shows that this kind of change is possible even while people still own lots of cars!
Is it politically possible though? That’s the three-pipe problem!
I think its entirely fair to
I think its entirely fair to say £3k+ for a limited use vehicle that plenty of people won’t get masses of use out of is a luxury item most can’t afford
There is, of course, the intermediate and much cheaper stage: the trailer- for that great majority of trips where I have to take the car because I’m getting loads of shopping (plus ‘don’t want to mess up my hair, get all sweaty etc. etc.) Of course, you need a bike for that as well
But then there is a choice
But then there is a choice when replacing the family’s second (or third) car.
And then one of them is working from home, so the car is not always being used for the commute…
And no congestion or ULEZ charges, no diverts because of LTNs, free parking in town…
And of course the cargo bike is the answer to how you can transport that bag of cement that you can’t on a bicycle.
If it takes you from needing
If it takes you from needing 2 cars to one, it will be nearly paid for in a year just on the savings.
Unreadable tosh from Chiles.
Unreadable tosh from Chiles. “In these boxes sat a small child or two being transported to or from nursery or primary or prep school.” The extra “or” in place of a comma is completely unacceptable. I refuse to read the article any further.
I’d suggest you take this up
I’d suggest you take this up with the Guardian’s editor-in-chief, but it seems her husband’s copy is too important to let the last remaining subeditor near.
Presumably distinguishing
Presumably distinguishing between “nursery”, on the one hand, and “primary or prep school” on the other. Though I accept that some would append the word ‘school’ to nursery too.
True. I also think that
True. I also think that “nursery, primary or prep school” would be perfectly acceptable.
I did think that it was a bit
I did think that it was a bit of an odd piece by Adrian Chiles (more so than normal) when I read it. It doesn’t really seem to go anywhere or offer any real point.
But, he probably does have a point about the perceived gentrification of the humble bicycle. 4 grand for a bike must seem like lottery winner money to most non cyclists whose heads seem to explode if you state that you regularly ride distances of more than 100 feet & your bike costs more than a couple of hundred quid.
It’s not like the same doesn’t apply to cars though. All those Insta lifestyle 4x4s you see in towns & cities serve what purpose & cost HOW MUCH?
NB – Other forms of bike are available. And cars.
I went into a Rutland Cycling
I went into a Rutland Cycling store in Nottingham last week looking for a saddle for my partners new second hand bike. You had to look rather hard at the back to find bikes in the £500 to £600 pound range, or find a decent bicycle saddle for much less than the price we had paid for a very serviceable second hand bike. Its no surprise people get a rather distorted view of the cycling community when they walk past such shops or casually enter them. They do seem rather more akin to Park Lane car dealerships than the bikeshops of old.
True that.
True that.
Fortunately my arse has always been comfortable on a Charge Spoon (which never cost me more than about £25 til they were discontinued,) & I have several still in use & going strong. I may have to sell one of my kidneys when I need to acquire a new saddle….
Still seem to be able to buy
Still seem to be able to buy them – for £19.99.
Tredz have them at £20.99
Tredz have them at £20.99 with a further 10% off if you’re inclined to increase your stockpile.
Oh that I am!
Oh that I am!
Was pretty sure that a while back Charge dropped their saddles & the personnel morphed into the Fabric brand (with the Spoon seeming to vanish). Oh well, my kidney (and my arse it seems) are saved. Happy times.
I bought my now over 20 year
I bought my now over 20 year old entry level Golf new with a few security extras for 16000€. Look what that costs now.
I had a win/win situation
I had a win/win situation once on a local facebook group. Someone was commenting how cyclists ignored the cycle lane along a dual carriageway and used the pavement, which is shared use in places but not 100%. Rather than condescend I explained how bad the cycle lane was, it being narrow and full of mud and debris from pine trees the council decided to plant along the route. I had reported it and nothing had been done. He was quite shocked when I shared a video I had of cycling the cycle lane and changed his attitude.
The next day the guy messaged me with a photo of a roadsweeper going along the route he saw while walking the route. So maybe someone on the council was on FB and woke up.
I’m a bit conflicted on cargo
I’m a bit conflicted on cargo bikes. I really want one for the ability to do extra stuff by bike that I might now do by car, but I’m a bit concerned that *in my case* it is just a case of N+1 and would be the bike equivalent of buying an SUV – excessive for most trips. It’s unlikely we would sell our car, so I recognise myself in the Chiles piece (even if it doesn’t really seem to have a point).
Why not a trailer, most of
Why not a trailer, most of the capacity for under £100?
Good question. In my case: (1
Good question. In my case: (1) although I would use a cargo bike to take a fridge to the tip just because I could, my usual ‘cargo’ is a child. I’m instinctively uneasy about having them low down behind me, and they are also already officially too heavy for e.g. Burley trailers (rated to 18kg per child). (2) I think cargo bikes are really cool. Although I’m self aware, I still I have a weakness for buying what I want rather than what I strictly need…
quiff wrote:
It sounds to me like you should just get yourself the cargo bike. Is approval from a stranger on the internet sufficient to push you over the edge on that decision? If it is, you have it.
It’s where I source approval
It’s where I source approval for most of my buying decisions. I am weighing up treating myself to one as a semi-sensible present to self for a significant birthday. Either that or a Fairlight Strael because it’s purple.
I am building a new gravel/
I am building a new gravel/ commuter using a Ragley Trig frame. I can give all sorts of reasons why I chose it (steel, full carbon fork, clearance, mudguard mounts etc.) but really the main reason was that it was purple (and I couldn’t afford a Strael).
As I already have a Mason
As I already have a Mason Definition which is in many ways very similar and which I don’t really want to part with, it’s quite hard to make a case for a Strael too. But did I mention it’s purple?
Same. The roads here are
Same. The roads here are lacking in cycle routes and being quite rural in places are such that something the size of a cargo bike would be stuck in traffic as much as a car. Public transport is poor to the point a car is still necessary for many journeys. I get more use out of a combination of my gravel bike with a pannier and brrompton. Both of which has allowed me to reduce the number of car journeys.
It’s never going to be a one size fits all though, I think a lot of people forget there is big difference in cycling in somewhere like London and other big towns/cities, to towns and villages further out.
quiff wrote:
I’m probably in the same position as you. But we’re hitting the point where our children need ferrying in different directions, so I’m kind of in the place that if we thought we might consider a second car, I’d go for a cargo bike instead.
As someone who’s been riding
As someone who’s been riding a cargo bike on an (almost) daily basis for almost ten years, I’d say go for it. I’d wanted one for a while, but found it hard to justify the cost. I was unfortunate enough to get hit by a car on a roundabout and got a broken ankle out of it, but the insurance payout from that gave me the opportunity to buy my Bullitt. If I’d known before what I now know about how useful it is, I’d have found a way to get one. It depends on what model you get, but certainly the Bullitt rides very similarly to a normal bike. I bought it expecting that I’d only use it when I needed the extra capacity and would ride another bike most of the time, but I quickly found myself using it as my daily ride. I’m normally carrying something when I ride, even if it’s just my bag for work, and I really appreciate never needing to worry about what I need to carry. Plus they’re really fun bikes to ride.
Thanks. A Bullitt is what my
Thanks. A Bullitt is what my heart wants, but wonder if it might not be the friendliest for my wife to ride. I might spin this out into a thread on the forum…
quiff wrote:
Sounds to me like you actually might need two cargo bikes…
If it’s just the one child
If it’s just the one child can I recommend a kiddyback tandem? Something like a Helios is fine from 3.5 years if my experience is anything to go by. Significantly faster and less hassle than a cargo bike (again, based on my own experience).
The thing cargo bikes are really good for is taking small kids out on longer rides on their own bike. I used to ride my big basket type one out as far as my 5-7 year old’s legs would carry him, then pop him and bike in the basket and ride back. Harder with a tandem but for ease of doing school run and for having a bike which feels more like a bike than a boat, it’s fantastic.
Chiles deserves a modicum of
Chiles deserves a modicum of sympathy.
He was Bobbited in a bicycle accident at the age of 11.
Still made it to the footy match, though.
https://www.express.co.uk/celebrity-news/1473657/adrian-chiles-penis-surgery-reattached-accident-BBC-Olympics-Radio-5-video-news-latest
Uninformed man who hasn’t
Uninformed man who hasn’t bought bike in years finds that bikes for transport are not toys. Coming next, an article that expresses shock at £35k starting price for an electric car.
holtyboy wrote:
I think that’s the thing: many people who don’t ride a bike, or who own a Halfords BSO which does circles at Centre Parcs once a year, have no idea how much a decent bike costs. Or even a not decent bike.
Or the joy in how a good bike
Or the joy in how a good bike can ride.
How good brakes can really be. And gears. The acceleration and speed.
The way that when you and your trusty bicycle are truly one, that you can almost control it with thought…
On the economics of cargo
On the economics of cargo bikes – there’s a nice segment in this video on cargo bikes from “Notjustbikes”. They’re expensive… except when compared to running a vehicle, when they become cheap as chips!
(Of course “but I have to have a car!” which is a separate debate).
On the numbers, buying and
On the numbers, buying and running a cargo bike does not seem to cost any more than running an average dog.
That’s why I have a second
That’s why I have a second hand car, a second hand road bike and cats.
Are the cats second hand too?
Are the cats second hand too?
SimoninSpalding wrote:
Oooo – Oxford Comma Wars!
SimoninSpalding wrote:
Can someone own a cat in the first place?
Not IME
Not IME
SimoninSpalding wrote:
If they’re road cats, they probably aren’t new – if they’re feral and have never had a previous owner, I suppose they aren’t second hand.
SimoninSpalding wrote:
Probably third or fourth hand – the little buggers will live in however many houses they can find, where somebody feeds them
If retailers could stop
If retailers could stop fecking around with hot cross buns, that’ll be great.
As for the rest … well, couldn’t be bothered to read it. Some bloke spouting off his personal opinion like it *matters*
If you don’t want variants in
If you don’t want variants in your hot cross bun, the answer is simple: don’t buy them. I like em.
ShutTheFrontDawes wrote:
BURN THE HERETIC!!!
brooksby wrote:
BURN THE HERETIC!!!
On a hot cross…
I make my own.
I make my own.
Paul Hollywood’s recipe.
Strong bread flour, and proper hearty for it.
We tend to get a half privilege day at work, Maundy Thursday, so I take the morning as holiday and spend the day making them. You can’t eat too many because of the aforementioned heartiness, so they last the whole weekend.
Why is it that hot cross buns can be had for seemingly the whole year, but chocolate eggs are only available between Xmas and just after Easter?
I’d like a Surly Big Fat Dummy, but more as my zombie apocalypse bike.
But then the first survivor I encounter would kill me for it…
Good for you. I’m a keen
Good for you. I’m a keen baker too. Though I don’t buy into fancy flours. I just use Shipton Mill No4 for everything. Everything turns out awesome.
I cant believe this article
I cant believe this article he wrote only on Wednesday hasnt come up today…it would only take 4 days to have enough for a cargo bike
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/mar/15/i-have-a-naked-lookalike-and-he-is-making-a-fortune-on-onlyfans-adrian-chiles
Eugh, there’s a picture the
Eugh, there’s a picture the mind’s eye will have to be scrubbed with bleach to remove…
Rendel Harris wrote:
I agree. That’s one hell of a tough w*nk.
Why is a glucose monitor
Why is a glucose monitor illegal under UCI rules?
It could make the racing less
It could make the racing less exciting. Basically if all the riders just ride at their maximum exersion so they don’t run out of glucose you don’t have the attacks and cat and mouse of someone pushing too hard and dramatically getting caught at the end, you just have the fittest riders slowly riding away from everyone else.
The same arguments could, and should, be made for power meters and team radios in my opinion. The riders finding their effort harder to gauge and harder to meter out consistently makes for better racing, more surprises and more upsets.
OK, thanks
OK, thanks
Almost like one could go on a
Almost like one could go on a lone breakaway and pace themselves nearly perfectly to the end…
Complaining you didnt remove it because it cost alot of money to replace, late call up so unplanned ok fine get your team to pay it, but I think supersapiens & Kristen doth protest too much.
As I said yesterday had she sought permission theyd probably not have stopped her having it, but she didnt, neither did the team that’s their drop off it’s not about health or menstrual cycles, these devices are banned in mens races too.
Mr Chiles could buy 200 of
Mr Chiles could buy 200 of these Leeds based band t-shirts (or the less family audience friendly version that’s also from Yorkshire, you can find on google) for 4k to share with his family and friends, theyve even got a song, the vinyl is also £20
If you’ve got some time to
If you’ve got some time to kill, pop on Autotrader and see what kind of car £4K gets you. Almost all of them are over 10 years old, and / or with astronomical mileage.
Adrian Chiles showing he’s as
Adrian Chiles showing he’s as out of touch with reality as David Cameron was regarding the price of a pint of milk.
I’ve been riding cargo bikes for 15 years now, initially a human powered Bullitt, then an electic one, before buying the all singing, all dancing Urban Arrow XL which with a few neccessary options is considerably more than £3,999.
I wonder how much his swanky flat in London costs in relative terms to a 2 up, 2 down in Brum? I bet there’s a huge difference.
I get the point of the article, that many poorly paid individuals are servicing the needs of the affluent, but at least they ply their trade using vehicles that emit little in the way of noxious gases, take up a quarter of the space of even the smallest of vans, while giving the rider a healthy dose of exercise that will benefit them far more than sitting on their arse in a four wheeled vehicle.
I’m not sure why he feels the need to sneer.
Owd Big ‘Ead wrote:
There seems to be a theme of e-bikes/cargo-bikes being dismissed by mainstream media and Fox News even made up some rubbish about them (https://electrek.co/2023/03/13/why-fox-news-wants-you-to-be-afraid-of-electric-bikes/). I think it’s a sign that motor companies see them as a threat to their business model and it would be especially galling for wealthy people to be sat in their metal box in a queue whilst people just zoom past them on various bikes. I think we’re going to see more e-bike scare stories from the likes of the BBC etc.
hawkinspeter wrote:
Absolutely right, the ace in the hole for the pro-car/anti-cycling lobby has always been how are you going to carry that bag of cement/cello/weekly shop/kid on a pushbike, if they see something that challenges that narrative they will of course jump on it as quickly as possible. The documentary Who Killed the Electric Car is a great example of the way governments and automobile manufacturers have no shame in colluding to try to quash anything that threatens their profitable hegemony.
Rendel Harris wrote:
I hadn’t heard of that documentary – found a full version available here: https://archive.org/details/vimeo-210171457
I still think that electric cars aren’t made to save the planet, but to save the car industry.
(Those cars must have been hella heavy with those lead-acid batteries)
Edit: Lighter than I thought – 1400kg for their lead-acid model and 1,319kg for the NiMH model (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Motors_EV1)
Pah! Those folks were really
Pah! Those folks were really late to the party. My local works were cranking them out in 1898. (Full disclosure – bust by 1900…)
I can’t find the weight or endurance though.
Finally managed to finish
Finally managed to finish fitting mudguards to my Ultimate Commuter. SKS Bluemels 75, longs. Took me about a year and a half. Originally purchased to see if I can get on with real mudguards before I splash serious money on some custom wooden ones from the US. No-one really makes standard guards for 27.5+ tyres, alongside a hoped for option of switching to 29s at 2.5. the Bluemels are a little narrow, but my 3inch Surly Dirt Wizards come up narrow. My Maxxis Chrinicals 3inch come up true, but summer can be dryer and sometimes less muddy.
I first made an attempt at fitting Xmas 21, (I knew it wasn’t going to be easy) no holes in the rear, and SKS in their wisdom give a strut for the front that would be to short for a 26 inch wheel for guards that are meant to fit 27.5 or 29. Others have complained of this in reviews.
So the proper strut was found, and a few other small parts I thought I might need (falsely) from SJS. And then left it until last Xmas.
When I found I needed more small parts, different ones, not the ones I already got. Some not available in this country. And bolts, they give you spacers to fit the strut around the front, but not the bolts. Borrowed a drill and some bits, (always rented, no need to drill holes) bits were a bit blunt, nice drill though. Fitted the rear on Monday, nice, no muddy splatter on the back of the bag. Plucked up enough courage to cut the front strut this evening, lot of measuring and test fitting last night. (WFH today, train strike)
The front is tighter on the tyre than I would like, but the fork is not that accomodating and the guards look a bit to weak to make any major adjustments.
They do look good, it allows the frame to be more pure, the Cruds I have always used and do work OK, take away some of the purity.
And the rear is a lot more solid when installed than I thought it would be.
We will see how it goes.
I know mudguards can be a
I know mudguards can be a fiddle to fit and it generally takes longer than expected … but I think 18 months to fit a set could be a record. Congrats. Anyway, pictures please or they’re not fitted. 😉
I’ve had some Specialized
I’ve had some Specialized plug + play, which they’re anything but, v1 mudguards for at least 5 years & still not got round to fitting them.
I paid to have a LBS fit some
I paid to have a LBS fit some Bluemels because I knew I wouldn’t get round to it. 2 years later I still haven’t rectified the dodgy unsightly curvature round the rear wheel, or the overlong stays which ejected the end caps on the first ride and scarred my calf
quiff wrote:
I think one change in attitude which made bike fettling far less stressful for me was when I changed from “It must be by-the-book perfect” to “That’ll do”
brooksby wrote:
One of my favourite sayings is “don’t let perfect be the enemy of good”.
Hmm, after reading that, a
Hmm, after reading that, a wet arse and weil’s disease seems like an easier option!
Is this one of these projects
Is this one of these projects that is so awesome that it can’t ever be finished? Or if finished, it could never be taken out of the house?