Proposals for a children’s bike track in a park in Nelson have attracted criticism from some outraged residents, after a petition which attracted over 200 signatures claimed the track would lead to anti-social behaviour, parking issues, and the “disturbance of a tranquil area” due to the potential for an increased number of children riding bikes through the woodland.
In 2022, Pendle Borough Council and the Nelson Town Deal Board first proposed the creation of a BMX track, which would be built through the woodland within Marsden Park in the Lancashire town, which is undergoing a series of improvements including the building of a new playground, refurbished tennis courts, and a new multi-use games area.
However, plans for the BMX track were soon scrapped and replaced by a proposed junior pump track, after the board concluded that the potential for “BMX or other bikes crossing footpaths within the park” posed a serious health and safety risk.
The planned location for the track has also changed twice over the past two years, after proposals for it to be built on the site of a former outdoor pool area were kiboshed by residents, who argued that it would be “too close” to nearby houses and a narrow road, and that “the area would be better served as a picnic site or orchard or growing space”.
> Councillor claims planned Surrey Bike Park could attract child molesters
According to Pendle Borough Council, officers then proposed that the track should be built on the site of an informal football area in the centre of the park woodland, due to its “contained” location “away from houses”.
However, that change of location still failed to satisfy local residents who, during the council’s consultation process, lodged a petition against the pump track scheme, which attracted over 200 signatures.
The petition argued that the pump track would lead to “parking issues, anti-social behaviour, the disturbance of a tranquil area, an increased number of children riding cycles through the park, and a lack of access for emergency vehicles”.
Finally, the petition concluded that “pump tracks should not be in a park”.
However, a counter-petition, supported by local cycling campaigners and attracting 133 signatures, argued that the track would instead “provide alternative activities to reduce anti-social behaviour”.
The petition also pointed out that the infrastructure, aimed at children, would promote physical exercise, well-being, and skill creation among young people, while also providing a feeder group to the large cycle hub at nearby Barrowford.
Meanwhile, the residents opposing the scheme called for several other sites to be considered, all of which were deemed unsuitable by council officers. Nevertheless, a third location was identified within Marsden Park, on the corner of Marsden Hall Road and Hallam Road – the council said earlier this month that it has informed the lead petitioner of the new plans and is yet to receive a response.
And in a meeting of Pendle Borough Council last week, the local authority’s deputy leader, Liberal Democrat councillor David Whipp, dismissed the initial opposition as a “storm in an open-air swimming pool”.
“I don’t want to belittle the legitimate concerns of residents. But I also can’t help feeling this is a storm in an open-air swimming pool,” he said.
“[Town Board chair] Stephen Barnes and I were both involved in closing it, which alienated people at the time. But time moves on. I think it was appropriate to consider a pump track. It’s also important to listen to what local people feel.”
However, Whipp also noted that the need to maintain the pump track must be taken into account before any plans are finalised.
“Pendle Council has no money for maintenance of the track or Marsden Park generally. So would maintenance costs be picked up by Nelson Town Council?” he asked the meeting.
“It’s all very well to spend millions on facilities but if there’s no money for maintenance, it’s a waste of public money.
“We, the council, might have to slash £1 million from budgets next year. If the town deal is not supplying maintenance money, we should do something different that won’t have these consequences.”
> Surrey Bike Park row: campaigner opposed to bike park takeover explains “what is really happening”
However, Phil Riley, a park manager at the council, pointed out that the track’s proposed tarmac surface, with the exception of some moss treatment, would not require much maintenance.
“It will be tarmac because it will have bikes and electric scooters going on it, being realistic. But the Pendle Panthers BMX club has offered help,” he said.
“Regarding anti-social behaviour, Marsden Park is challenging, as many parks are in Nelson. I wonder what engagement is like with young people and with other organisations?
“I think we have a good model about engaging with neighbourhoods. This issue is about maintenance but also how we support young people, and potential and perceived anti-social behaviour.”
Of course, local fears about the perceived potential for anti-social behaviour on pump or BMX tracks are not just confined to Pendle.
In June, we reported that a bid by a school in Folkestone, Kent, to build a BMX track for its students was met with opposition from nearby residents, who claimed the “noisy bikers” would disturb the peaceful atmosphere of the neighbourhood and make it like “living next to a motorway”.
And back in 2021, a councillor in Surrey claimed that a planned bike park near Dorking “could attract child molesters” – though she later claimed her comments were misinterpreted.























38 thoughts on “Planned bike track will lead to noise, traffic, parking issues, anti-social behaviour, and “more children cycling through park”, say angry residents”
FWIW, I’ve been in
FWIW, I’ve been in Peterborough 14 years and there’s a BMX track in the middle of a housing area. It probably had the similar NIMBY’s when it was built.
https://maps.app.goo.gl/dLQKh7dtrkbjEJeo6
Our local council built one
Our local council built one in Kenton Rec about 4 years ago. Been a great success and has even had classes from nearby Harrow and John Lyon schools using it for GCSE PE lessons.
There’s a very good reason
There’s a very good reason why pump tracks are often built in deprived areas – because, as the article mentions, they are excellent at reducing anti-social behaviour by providing an outlet for physical activity and skill creation, which has been shown time and time again. Why are the nimbys allowed to have such a say when their opposition is based on absolutely no evidence?
NIMBY retirees and boomers
NIMBY retirees and boomers will be the death of us all.
C3a wrote:
As a boomer (excuse me for my date of birth) I resent the generalisation as much as I resent “bloody cyclists!”
Generalisations are valid in
Generalisations are valid in this case; there are enough boomers with negative attitudes to young people to be able to block good things like this.
Regards, Fellow Boomer
rogerwb wrote:
Are there guidelines for when generalisations are valid?
There’s the guideline that
There’s the guideline that you don’t apply a generalisation to individuals. That didn’t happen here.
belugabob wrote:
NIMBY retirees and boomers will be the death of us all.
— belugabob As a boomer (excuse me for my date of birth) I resent the generalisation as much as I resent “bloody cyclists!”— C3a
I think you need to apply the adjective to both nouns, so the commentator is not referring to all boomers but only “NIMBY boomers”.
belugabob wrote:
Wouldn’t generalisations about generations be, I don’t know, “generationalisations”?
Hear, hear: not just a boomer
Hear, hear: not just a boomer here but a retiree also. C3a, you are bang out of order.
Yes, of course parking
Yes, of course parking problems. Should’ve known. Bound to bring in loads of drivers apparently – not like the kids using it could, I don’t know, just spit balling here, cycle there? Ah wait no, they don’t want that either.
To be fair to the nimbys though they have correctly identified that drivists & motornomativity are a problem. Kudos. If only there were a solution……
Don’t forget angry residents’
Don’t forget angry residents’ fear that more children will start riding through the park, sowing chaos and fear or something.
You see – there’s going to be parking chaos due to people driving there, or cycling chaos if people ride there: the angry residents are afraid of there being any change at all…
brooksby wrote:
I’m so tired of people being
I’m so tired of people being stupid about bicycles.
sigirides wrote:
I’m just tired of people being stupid.
don simon fbpe wrote:
Well, it is humanity’s defining characteristic: better get used to it.
The X in BMX stands for Satan
The X in BMX stands for Satan. I know that after our council built a pump track there was an increase in the sighting of cloven hoofed demons with leathery wings. Also traffic congestion during school runs got worse.
Did house prices not rise as
Did house prices not rise as quicky?…
The houses of the righteous
The houses of the righteous rose in value. The others were cast into the abyss. The others; being Millenials.
I thought the X was for the
I thought the X was for the Elon – which doesn’t make things any better…
Right. These kids are going
Right. These kids are going to grow up with the costs of global warming (including political instability) and increased energy cost anyway. Why should we invest money in them if they don’t have the perspective that we had? And what a waste of tarmac and concrete – widen the motorway instead so we can travel further without need. And ban anyone not driving cars or mobility aids from parks. We’ve worked hard for it, we paid a LOT of money for energy and fuel during the oil crisis, and we have built up the road network with our road tax! <irony off>
Btw: Does anyone remember the reason for the oncle being arrested in Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451?
anke2 wrote:
Huh – just last night I discovered that I didn’t have a copy of the 1966 Truffaut film and then had difficulty finding a copy as I spelled it with only one “h”. The film’s only readable text (apart from numbers) is the opening logo.
anke2 wrote:
Wasn’t it something to do with demonstrating deviant behaviour by enjoying walking? I’m assuming you mean Clarisse’s uncle BTW. Remember that from school.
Oops, sorry HP, I see you beat me to it. Never mind, I’m sure anke2’s question was rhetorical anyway.
What the hell is wrong with
What the hell is wrong with people who don’t want children having fun in parks!?
Seriously, this country has some issues.. particularly with teenage children. They basically want them to cease existing, bar them from doing anything or going anywhere and then get pissy when they’re roaming the streets making trouble because there’s literally nothing they’re allowed to do
Case in point – a new bowling alley opening in town, 10 mins walk from my house.
Fantastic, I thought – my kids will get tte chance to go bowling regularly and maybe get good – which I never had the chance to because the nearest bowling was 30 mins drive away
A month later – and they’ve introduced a policy of no under 18s after 8pm. They open at 7pm. So basically there’s only one slot in the day that actual teenage kids are allowed to go to a *)!*”ing bowling alley.
Sorry for slight ragey tangent, but it’s the same idiotic mindset with this comment about not wanting to encourage kids on bikes in the park. What a world.
Better to have fun at
Better to have fun at McDonald’s ?
Velo-drone wrote:
If they are miserable curmudgeons, everyone else has to be miserable too. When Reform gets in, fun will be illegal.
That’s not strictly true –
That’s not strictly true – Reform will legalise immigrant baiting, trans bashing and tar and feathering of anyone woke. Loads of fun for all the family.
eburtthebike wrote:
Harsh, but fair.
Makes me think about
Makes me think about objections to one near me..
Loads of rants about how dangerous it was and how ambulances wouldn’t be able to get there etc;
At least until the rep for the ambulance service pointed out they were actively campaigning for the skate park because the alternative to a professionally designed skate park is the kids building far more dangerous homemade jumps in the woods…
– Kids these days, they never
– Kids these days, they never go out; just stay indoors, playing on their Playstations and XBoxes. Never getting any exercise.
-Ok, we’ll build a BMX track so that they can get out in the fresh air and get exercise
-No not that, it’ll just attract kids.
There were similar calls to
There were similar calls to stop a BMX pump track near where I live. “It’ll bring crime,” were the claims. Actually, it’s done the opposite. The area was notorious for drug crime and muggings but the increased numbers of families there to ride the track mean the drug dealers have moved soemwhere else.
I hate the thought of young
I hate the thought of young hooligans exercising and having fun. Especially if the activity is non-productive. It distracts me while I am washing my SUV or reading the Ian Duncan Smith column in the Daily Telegraph. Grrr. If youngsters want exercise, they should sign up for national service and do lots of marching or paint coal white.
Mr Blackbird wrote:
Goodness, I remember you, “If it doesn’t move, paint it. If it does move, salute it.”
Weren’t you one of the Permanent Staff when I went through Army Apprentices College; Way back when Pontious was still an Air Trooper?
All children should be locked
All children should be locked in their rooms with a playstation to avoid causing a nuisance to the NIMBYs, curmudgeons and gammons. When they get old enough to go out and get into trouble because they have no social skills, become drug addicts and rob the NIMBYs, curmudgeons and gammons, then they’ll wish they hadn’t opposed the track.
200 people out of a close by
200 people out of a close by population of how many? Just build it and stop being a wuss
“It’s all very well to spend
“It’s all very well to spend millions on facilities but if there’s no money for maintenance, it’s a waste of public money.”
No more road building, then…?
belugabob wrote:
Bullseye!